Do you have anything to contribute other than "Larkin is a 2C" and "Zadina Sucks"? You're like a broken record.
Anyway, some articles I found that seem to contradict you. From actual experts.
https://thehockeywriters.com/red-wings-larkin-2020-21-production/
Article highlights Larkin's challenges as a 1C and that he will put up the points as the team gets better.
https://www.nhl.com/news/nhl-fantasy-hockey-best-centers-top-50-rankings-2020-21/c-299921028
https://www.fantasypros.com/nhl/rankings/c.php
Both articles put him at 31. Not flattering, but still a 1C.
If you're spoiled and comparing Larkin to the likes of Yzerman, Federov, Datsyuk, and Zetterberg, you're being unfair. He's never going to measure up. That said, Larkin doesn't have to be a HOF to justify being a 1C. Even after a poor season from him, he's still a low end 1C. His performance 2 years ago shows that he has the ability to be a top 15 NHL center in the mold of a Jonathan Toews. As the team improves, so will Larkin's numbers. He'll never be a top 10 or elite NHL center. That doesn't make him a 2C.