NeverForgetMac25

Mom?

To me, whether he's injured on the play or not is irrelevant. It was a dirty, dirty hit that shouldn't be celebrated from the moment it took place. Just like when Lemuiex destroyed Draper and the fan base started calling him the "Draperizer". Pathetic.
....And make no mistake, I love Kronwall, but some of his hits are borderline. I've never seen someone push the envelope as much as he does and yet 99.9% of his hits are clean.

Seriously...what a d*uche. Kronwall's M.O. is lining people up coming out of their own zone. This was running someone from behind into the boards. Completely different.....what a jackass.

Poor family.
And i seriously dislike these "psychics."
Nothing like profiting off the pain of the mourning.

My greatest contribution to the internet:

A thread bump regarding a player that left vs. one that was added and hasn't lit it up *yet* coinciding with a Red Wing loss.
Who'd of thought?

A thread bump regarding a player that left vs. one that was added and hasn't lit it up *yet* coinciding with a Red Wing loss.
Who'd of thought?

Anytime that there is even a debate whether someone's number should be retired I feel like they shouldn't be up.

I know you weren't asking me this, but how is that different than any other stat if he was on a poor team? His point scoring along with most other stats will go down playing on garbage clubs.
It's no more a "horrible stat" than anything other....its relative.

Dats is seriously hysterical. It brought back memories of his James Brown ringtone.

Dats is seriously hysterical. It brought back memories of his James Brown ringtone.

^ You might want to check your Cleary numbers. Looks like he got one hell of a raise.

^ You might want to check your Cleary numbers. Looks like he got one hell of a raise.

I miss the fact that play doesn't continue after someone lays another player out with huge, clean hit. It pisses me off that players go after Kronwall (or any other player for that matter) after a huge hit. To me, this should be called as delay of game if it immediately follows a legal hit.

My beef is when its done immediately after the hit takes place. I have no problem if you ask the player that laid your guy out to "go" the next shift, but when someone jumps the player that just blasted a guy on their team (specifically when its not an illegal hit and no call is coming), it should be delay of game. You never saw this type of stuff until after the 2005 lockout. It's BS.

I miss the fact that play doesn't continue after someone lays another player out with huge, clean hit. It pisses me off that players go after Kronwall (or any other player for that matter) after a huge hit. To me, this should be called as delay of game if it immediately follows a legal hit.

I miss the fact that play doesn't continue after someone lays another player out with huge, clean hit. It pisses me off that players go after Kronwall (or any other player for that matter) after a huge hit. To me, this should be called as delay of game if it immediately follows a legal hit.

I miss the fact that play doesn't continue after someone lays another player out with huge, clean hit. It pisses me off that players go after Kronwall (or any other player for that matter) after a huge hit. To me, this should be called as delay of game if it immediately follows a legal hit.

Exactly what I'm talking about. Seriously, what happened to this award? Why has the criteria completely changed the past 2-3 seasons?
It's kind of like how the Heisman has become an offensive award in college football. Ridiculous.....and this is coming from a guy that played Center his whole career and pinched way too often for my teams' own good.

Jesus....didn't the Norris trophy used to have nominees that were actually incredible defensive players?
This list seems so ridiculous compared to what we saw just a few years ago.

Jesus....didn't the Norris trophy used to have nominees that were actually incredible defensive players?
This list seems so ridiculous compared to what we saw just a few years ago.

I typically run the game and I was just about to make a post asking if someone else could handle it this year. I'm about to start up my own business on June 1st and I simply don't have the time my game requires this year. Hopefully, next year I'll be back up and running.

This is what you wrote:
Samuelsson. Trade him if you can. Buy him out if you can't.
Quincey. Trade him if you can. Buy him out if you can't.
Colaiacovo. Trade him if you can. Bu..
Bertuzzi. Trade him if you can. Bu..
Eaves. Trade him if you can. Bu..
Gustavsson. Trade him if you can. Bu..
To the avid English-speaking poster, this implies you want these players to be bought out if they can't be traded. That number is 6, not 2.
The twenty year run is not over until they miss the playoffs. Blowing up the roster is simply stupid when you can subtract pieces and continue to build with the solid players you have along with the youth that's making its way up.
Is this team what it once was, no...but that doesn't mean they can't be with the correct additions/subtractions. Your OP comes off like something an impulsive child would say.

This is what you wrote:
Samuelsson. Trade him if you can. Buy him out if you can't.
Quincey. Trade him if you can. Buy him out if you can't.
Colaiacovo. Trade him if you can. Bu..
Bertuzzi. Trade him if you can. Bu..
Eaves. Trade him if you can. Bu..
Gustavsson. Trade him if you can. Bu..
To the avid English-speaking poster, this implies you want these players to be bought out if they can't be traded. That number is 6, not 2.
The twenty year run is not over until they miss the playoffs. Blowing up the roster is simply stupid when you can subtract pieces and continue to build with the solid players you have along with the youth that's making its way up.
Is this team what it once was, no...but that doesn't mean they can't be with the correct additions/subtractions. Your OP comes off like something an impulsive child would say.

put down the xbox controller