Bootland
#1
Posted 07 November 2005 - 11:18 AM
#2
Posted 07 November 2005 - 11:24 AM
I wouldn't mind Boots on the 4th but I can't see him kicking any of Franzen, Cleary, or Samuelsson off the active roster.
peace

#3
Posted 07 November 2005 - 11:32 AM
#4
Posted 07 November 2005 - 11:34 AM
| QUOTE (Barnes52 @ November 7, 2005 - 01:32PM) |
| No, but I'd love for him to be a fill in for any of those guys if they go down to injury |
And if he keeps playing well in GR, he proabably will.
#5
Posted 07 November 2005 - 12:09 PM
"It's called the American Dream Because you've got to be asleep to believe it." - George Carlin
There is no theory of evolution. Just a list of creatures Derek Boogaard has allowed to live. - Johnny B
#6
Posted 07 November 2005 - 01:13 PM
I am in total agreement with you on the Lebda/Rivers idea though. Lebda has impressed me way more than Rivers so far.
Who knows; maybe you would realize that enforcers in hockey are critical to a teams chemistry and overall success?
#7
Posted 07 November 2005 - 01:16 PM
I'm sorta wondering how the combo Drapes, Maltby, and Bootland would be. They'd definitely be the grindline again.
#8
Posted 07 November 2005 - 01:44 PM
| QUOTE (daniel1 @ November 7, 2005 - 02:13PM) |
| Why does it not surprise me that this particular player impresses you?, lol, In all honesty though, I would rather have Bootland up here than Mowers. I just cant' see him getting into a ton of games barring an injury. There's no way I would dress him ahead of Cleary/Franzen/Samuelson. His grit would be good IF he was willing to play the body without taking dumb penalties. As far as fighting majors go... I think we're doing ok in the "team toughness" catagory. It was nice to see Fisch take care of business right there, rather than having to wait for a goon to come on the ice later in the game. I am in total agreement with you on the Lebda/Rivers idea though. Lebda has impressed me way more than Rivers so far. |
Wings don't have much team toughness. From what I gather they're constantly out hit. Fischer standing up to Barnaby doesn't impress much. I expect him to do that vs someone like Barnaby. Will he do it vs tougher opponents? Either way it's a waste to have Fischer policing the game for us.
"Empty-net goals are for homos" -Al Iafrate
#9
Posted 07 November 2005 - 01:45 PM
| QUOTE (daniel1 @ November 7, 2005 - 02:13PM) |
| Why does it not surprise me that this particular player impresses you?, lol, In all honesty though, I would rather have Bootland up here than Mowers. I just cant' see him getting into a ton of games barring an injury. There's no way I would dress him ahead of Cleary/Franzen/Samuelson. His grit would be good IF he was willing to play the body without taking dumb penalties. As far as fighting majors go... I think we're doing ok in the "team toughness" catagory. It was nice to see Fisch take care of business right there, rather than having to wait for a goon to come on the ice later in the game. I am in total agreement with you on the Lebda/Rivers idea though. Lebda has impressed me way more than Rivers so far. |
Edited by Barnes52, 07 November 2005 - 01:46 PM.
#10
Posted 07 November 2005 - 01:54 PM
"For most of a decade, the Wings were the most popular team not just because they won, but also because they won with flair, with speedy Russians and legendary leaders and the occasional willing fighter"
#11
Posted 07 November 2005 - 02:23 PM
| QUOTE (Barnes52 @ November 7, 2005 - 02:45PM) | ||
|
Who knows; maybe you would realize that enforcers in hockey are critical to a teams chemistry and overall success?
#12
Posted 07 November 2005 - 02:31 PM
| QUOTE (RyanBarnes! @ November 7, 2005 - 02:44PM) | ||
Wings don't have much team toughness. From what I gather they're constantly out hit. Fischer standing up to Barnaby doesn't impress much. I expect him to do that vs someone like Barnaby. Will he do it vs tougher opponents? Either way it's a waste to have Fischer policing the game for us. |
I agree with the waste part of your thread, I would absolutely blow a gasket if Fisch broke his hand or something else stupid whilst pummeling a Barnaby type guy. But, is it more of a waste tie up a roster spot with a guy whose only going to get 2-3 minutes of ice time? Bootland, however would be one guy that I would like to give a shot to.
IF he can take a semi-regular shift and not be a defensive liability, then maybe he can learn some other skills to make him of value to the team too, besides the knuckle- chucking.
I would offer up Chris Neil as a prime example of a guy who saw the writing on the wall, so to speak. I think he knew he had to offer something besides fighting to stick with the Sens, so he becomes a "Holmstrom" type guy on the PP, and he's doin a great job of it too. I'm not all that familiar with Booter to say whether or not there's potential for him to develop like that. There's PK duty too if he can anticipate plays and skate well enough.
Who knows; maybe you would realize that enforcers in hockey are critical to a teams chemistry and overall success?
#13
Posted 07 November 2005 - 02:50 PM
#14
Posted 07 November 2005 - 02:57 PM
| QUOTE (norrisnick @ November 7, 2005 - 12:24PM) |
| Mowers is in the pressbox and so will Rivers once Woolley heals up, which ought to be any game now. Though Lebda will likely come back once Manny is cleared to play and Jimmy is sent back to GR. I wouldn't mind Boots on the 4th but I can't see him kicking any of Franzen, Cleary, or Samuelsson off the active roster. peace |
Here's to hoping these threads stay at this 'urgency-level' all season.

Mixing up a fwd or 2 on the fourth line, and who gets the 6th or 7th Dman spot down the line. Awfully nice 'problems' to discuss here.
That said, Rivers is grossly overpaid (league minimum). Lebda is no great risk there.
And looks to me like Boots has to await an 'i-word' and for Mowers to be moved to have a shot this year?
aloha
#15
Posted 07 November 2005 - 03:22 PM
#16
Posted 07 November 2005 - 03:30 PM
| QUOTE (WickedColdClown @ November 7, 2005 - 02:22PM) |
| Yes... we need him Hudler and Lebda. |
Need? In place of whom?
peace

#17
Posted 07 November 2005 - 03:38 PM
| QUOTE (norrisnick @ November 7, 2005 - 04:30PM) |
| Need? In place of whom? peace |
Zetterberg...he sucks, right?
#18
Posted 07 November 2005 - 03:43 PM
I'm fine with replacing Mowers with Bootland. Hell, I'd even give him Cleary's spot for a couple of games. What's Cleary done that's so great? He skates fast, can't finish and gets knocked off the puck easily. Give Boots a shot.
I'd also switch out Lebda for Rivers but I'm still not ready to give up on Rivers entirely though. He's still got a little roughness to him that I like. For example, he's one of the few Wings I've seen consistently clear people away from the goal tender after the whistle. (That extra contact drives me crazy!)
wurd,
esteef
Edited by esteef, 07 November 2005 - 03:44 PM.
#19
Posted 07 November 2005 - 03:56 PM
#20
Posted 07 November 2005 - 06:01 PM
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Impressed with our young core..
|
General Discussion | blueadams |
|
|
|
Wings top 2 FWD lines starting the season |
General Discussion | Adidarw |
|
|
|
January 19 Starting Date? |
General Discussion | MidMichSteve |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














