redwings1914 18 Report post Posted January 14, 2006 Komisarek=UofM= Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YoungGuns1340 1 Report post Posted January 15, 2006 I would love Modin. Hes a warrior and skilled too. He would look GREAT in a wings uniform. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimeBinder 28 Report post Posted January 15, 2006 Would love to see Modin in the winged wheel; but I'm banking on the possibility of Kenny looking at the off season free agents and not tying his hands before then. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
norrisnick 1 Report post Posted January 15, 2006 Would love to see Modin in the winged wheel; but I'm banking on the possibility of Kenny looking at the off season free agents and not tying his hands before then. I doubt he can find a more cost-efficient FA that fits our needs up front more than Modin. If he can land him with minimal cost, he should. He's huge and does his best work down low and at $2.2M is by no means costly. peace Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barnes52 0 Report post Posted January 15, 2006 Rumor from SLAM has the Canadiens creating a market for Komisarek, and that Detroit may indeed be interested. Nice catch Gobias Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
norrisnick 1 Report post Posted January 15, 2006 Rumor from SLAM has the Canadiens creating a market for Komisarek, and that Detroit may indeed be interested. Nice catch Gobias Big strong and young body to replace the one we lost. I'd sign off on Komo. And with his salary I don't think we have to create an cap space so a pick or something might land him. I doubt they have any interest in our prospects as their strength (skill fowards and goalies) match ours. peace Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hatcher#2 13 Report post Posted January 15, 2006 Komisarek would be good but i would rather Holland went out and got Jim Vandermeer. I think Vandermeer would provide more to the Wings and he is $400,000 cheaper. Vandermeer can play in all situations and he would be the enforcer that has been missing since McCarty left. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
norrisnick 1 Report post Posted January 15, 2006 Komisarek would be good but i would rather Holland went out and got Jim Vandermeer. I think Vandermeer would provide more to the Wings and he is $400,000 cheaper. Vandermeer can play in all situations and he would be the enforcer that has been missing since McCarty left. That cheap we could afford both, I believe. It would go a long way to retool our top 4 for the eventual departure of our vets. Plus our best defensive prospects are mostly of the skill variety besides Quincey and the longshot, but mean as hell and I hope he makes it, Kolosov (he changed the spelling when he came over). peace Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Heaton 1 Report post Posted January 15, 2006 Vandermeer would cost more since he's in the same division IMO. The Hawks would probably want to move him out of the divison. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barnes52 0 Report post Posted January 15, 2006 That cheap we could afford both, I believe. It would go a long way to retool our top 4 for the eventual departure of our vets. Plus our best defensive prospects are mostly of the skill variety besides Quincey and the longshot, but mean as hell and I hope he makes it, Kolosov (he changed the spelling when he came over). peace Kolosov is a great prospect, but still very, very raw....I doubt he's around next year. I like your idea for both, but Holland won't get rid of Rivers or Woolley, so we'll be lucky if he gets one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hatcher#2 13 Report post Posted January 15, 2006 That cheap we could afford both, I believe. It would go a long way to retool our top 4 for the eventual departure of our vets. Plus our best defensive prospects are mostly of the skill variety besides Quincey and the longshot, but mean as hell and I hope he makes it, Kolosov (he changed the spelling when he came over). peace Both would be great but i don't see Holland doing it. If it is Komisarek that Holland wants i wouldn't mind if he tried to get Garth Murray in that trade aswell. That way we have improved our grit in both positions without giving up too much either. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hatcher#2 13 Report post Posted January 15, 2006 Vandermeer would cost more since he's in the same division IMO. The Hawks would probably want to move him out of the divison. Yeah i was thinking that myself but it would be worth a try IMO. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
norrisnick 1 Report post Posted January 15, 2006 Kolosov is a great prospect, but still very, very raw....I doubt he's around next year. I like your idea for both, but Holland won't get rid of Rivers or Woolley, so we'll be lucky if he gets one. Oh I know he won't be on the Wings. Or do you mean even in the system since he has to be re-signed this offseason? I don't think Holland is as enamoured with Rivers and Woolley as you think. Rivers was a decent depth guy last year but the new game passed him by, hard to forcast. Woolley was brought in solely as a puckmover because Kronwall went down and they weren't ready to trust Lebda. With Kronwall coming back and Fischer down he has a different hole in his defense. I think he'll address it. peace Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barnes52 0 Report post Posted January 15, 2006 Oh I know he won't be on the Wings. Or do you mean even in the system since he has to be re-signed this offseason? I don't think Holland is as enamoured with Rivers and Woolley as you think. Rivers was a decent depth guy last year but the new game passed him by, hard to forcast. Woolley was brought in solely as a puckmover because Kronwall went down and they weren't ready to trust Lebda. With Kronwall coming back and Fischer down he has a different hole in his defense. I think he'll address it. peace I like your thinking, but I have my doubts...we'll see Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gobias 0 Report post Posted January 15, 2006 What do you guys think about Jan Bulis? He's not the true powerforward we need but he's a decent size and doesn't shy away from the physical stuff. He's also fairly cheap and he's a guy we could stick with Lang, while allowing Zetterberg to play center. Holmstrom - Datsyuk - Shanahan Samuelsson - Zetterberg - Williams Bulis - Lang - Yzerman Maltby - Draper - Franzen Lidstrom - Kronwall Schneider - Komisarek Chelios - Lilja We'd have to send about 1.5m. Mowers/Rivers/Lebda? Surely Montreal would accept that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lou_Siffer 1 Report post Posted January 26, 2006 Souray would be the guy i'd want the most out of those names, but his pricetag would probably be too high. Craig Rivet would be a nice addition though, doesnt scrap a whole lot but when he does he's actually pretty darn tough. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Seth 0 Report post Posted January 26, 2006 Big strong and young body to replace the one we lost. I'd sign off on Komo. And with his salary I don't think we have to create an cap space so a pick or something might land him. I doubt they have any interest in our prospects as their strength (skill fowards and goalies) match ours. peace If I we're the Wings GM I would strongly consider trading away my 2nd heck even 1st round pick for this kid. One hell of a player who under Babs could easily flourish and bloom from being a hell of a player into a soild NHLer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
J-Swift 0 Report post Posted January 27, 2006 What do you guys think about Jan Bulis? He's not the true powerforward we need but he's a decent size and doesn't shy away from the physical stuff. He's also fairly cheap and he's a guy we could stick with Lang, while allowing Zetterberg to play center. That could work. There's been a lot of talk about this guy getting moved lately, though I can't say I know why exactly. Bulis has got a pretty solid point total this season, and isn't particularly expensive. The guy is big, strong, and would give them second line scoring depth. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Manny>Ozzie(by a long shot) 55 Report post Posted January 27, 2006 Lose Lang, land Doug weight... oh, and andy delmore too! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimeBinder 28 Report post Posted January 27, 2006 Lose Lang, land Doug weight... oh, and andy delmore too! Yes!!!!!!!!!!! C'mon Kenny get Delmore back - he's tearing up the AHL! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YoungGuns1340 1 Report post Posted January 29, 2006 Shanahan-Datsyuk-Williams Modin-Zetterberg-Samuelsson Maltby-Draper-Franzen Holmstrom-Yzerman-Cleary Kronwall-Lidstrom Schneider-Komisarek Lilja-Chelios Lebda Woolley, Lang, Rivers, Mowers. A few trades and a waiver. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Seth 0 Report post Posted January 29, 2006 Shanahan-Datsyuk-Williams Modin-Zetterberg-Samuelsson Maltby-Draper-Franzen Holmstrom-Yzerman-Cleary Kronwall-Lidstrom Schneider-Komisarek Lilja-Chelios Lebda Woolley, Lang, Rivers, Mowers. A few trades and a waiver. Eh I can roll with the D, but I dunno if Im totally soild on the Modin part. I always like his game but man this season has not bowed well for him at all. But who knows we do have Babs behind the bench and Lewis is long gone from the locker room. Alright Im sold. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barnes52 0 Report post Posted January 30, 2006 I like Souray, Rivet, Witt, Vandermeer, Jackman and Matt Walker as guys who could improve the D and give it some backbone. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fatcat6 0 Report post Posted February 23, 2006 I'd take Rivet, Vandermeer, Jackman, and Walker, but wouldn't take Souray or Witt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
