NOTICE: If you are not on the active roster for the LGW.com Red Wings, please do not take part in this vote. Thanks in advance for your cooperation
10 replies to this topic
#1
NeverForgetMac25
-
- Gold Booster Mod
-
- 18,156 posts
Kate: Jr. Wing Nut
- Location:Green Bay, WI
Posted 12 October 2006 - 12:58 PM
It's amazing how much clarity comes when you care more about the Red Wings than any individual player.
"They are the best team in the world. They are a team that can just take over when they want to," Chicago's Patrick Kane said (of the Detroit Red Wings).
#2
wingsgirl001
-
- Gold Booster
-
- 6,721 posts
Hey Hey, Hockeytown!
- Location:Lansing, MI
Posted 12 October 2006 - 02:01 PM
Hmmm...that's a tough one. I can understand why penalties would be negative, since it puts us short handed and gives the opponent a chance to score with the extra man. However, depending on the circumstances, enforcers are sometimes needed when the other team takes a cheap shot at one of our members. A roughing penalty is sometimes warranted.
Generally though, I consider penalties as a negative, so I'll have to go with that consensus.
Generally though, I consider penalties as a negative, so I'll have to go with that consensus.
Thanks for the memories
#3
MSUDoubleJ19
-
- HoF Booster
-
- 669 posts
Mmm, pancakes.
- Location:Grand Rapids, Michigan
Posted 12 October 2006 - 02:20 PM
Ha, I made that comment half joking! I didn't realize I'd create a whole new poll and debate!
Really I don't care. As a defenseman, I think it's important to make hits, even if you might get the occassional penalty. I'm there to kick some ass if I need to!
Really I don't care. As a defenseman, I think it's important to make hits, even if you might get the occassional penalty. I'm there to kick some ass if I need to!
And I wonder
If everything could ever feel this real forever
If anything could ever be this good again
If everything could ever feel this real forever
If anything could ever be this good again
#4
NeverForgetMac25
-
- Gold Booster Mod
-
- 18,156 posts
Kate: Jr. Wing Nut
- Location:Green Bay, WI
Posted 12 October 2006 - 02:36 PM
QUOTE(MSUDoubleJ19 @ October 12, 2006 - 02:20PM) 
Really I don't care. As a defenseman, I think it's important to make hits, even if you might get the occassional penalty.
No doubt that's imporant and there are times of the game where a penalty is needed, but the majority of them don't help the team, and that's what I was getting at.
It's amazing how much clarity comes when you care more about the Red Wings than any individual player.
"They are the best team in the world. They are a team that can just take over when they want to," Chicago's Patrick Kane said (of the Detroit Red Wings).
#5
vladdy16
-
- HoF Booster Mod
-
- 5,449 posts
Not on my watch.
Posted 12 October 2006 - 07:56 PM
Once again, I am a contradiction. I am a firm believer in, shall we say, "physicality", but I voted against PIMs being a favorable stat considering we don't have anyone on the team capable of making it count.
Can't wait to read the "Phoenix: I still think it's a hockey market" chapter of Gary Bettman's autobiography. I'm guessing it's going to be chapter 11.
- mjlegend 3/9/2011
- mjlegend 3/9/2011
#6
rage
-
- Silver Booster
-
- 3,879 posts
Nicklas ~The World's Best~ Lidstrom
- Location:Dallas, Texas!
Posted 12 October 2006 - 09:59 PM
I say no way.
#7
HockeyCrazy3033
-
- Silver Booster
-
- 17,357 posts
Hall of Famer
- Location:Sterling Heights, MI
Posted 12 October 2006 - 10:36 PM
Usually I'd vote no, but I say yes it should favor them because she helped me a lot with my English paper. 
Edited by hockeycrazy3033, 12 October 2006 - 10:42 PM.
"I'm a winner. That's all I do". - Chris Osgood -
#8
German Red Wing
-
- Member
-
- 184 posts
Night Owl
- Location:Leuterod, Germany
Posted 13 October 2006 - 05:31 AM
QUOTE(vladdy16 @ October 13, 2006 - 02:56AM)
Once again, I am a contradiction. I am a firm believer in, shall we say, "physicality", but I voted against PIMs being a favorable stat considering we don't have anyone on the team capable of making it count.
I'll second that.
[insert signature here]
#9
NeverForgetMac25
-
- Gold Booster Mod
-
- 18,156 posts
Kate: Jr. Wing Nut
- Location:Green Bay, WI
Posted 13 October 2006 - 09:39 AM
QUOTE(vladdy16 @ October 12, 2006 - 07:56PM)
Once again, I am a contradiction. I am a firm believer in, shall we say, "physicality", but I voted against PIMs being a favorable stat considering we don't have anyone on the team capable of making it count.
It's amazing how much clarity comes when you care more about the Red Wings than any individual player.
"They are the best team in the world. They are a team that can just take over when they want to," Chicago's Patrick Kane said (of the Detroit Red Wings).
#10
Offsides
-
- Gold Booster
-
- 3,906 posts
Hall-of-Famer
- Location:Hockeytown to Texas
Posted 13 October 2006 - 06:57 PM
Ha ha, I voted for favorable..but I guess they aren't. They just always are in fantasy 
#11
DaKineMaui
-
- Gold Booster
-
- 2,620 posts
Alii Nui
- Location:not maui
Posted 14 October 2006 - 03:17 PM
The old days? Yup......PMs should be sign of hard skating.
In this NNHL? Had to vote no. Stay outta da box and odds are heavy that you get the 'W'.
aloha
In this NNHL? Had to vote no. Stay outta da box and odds are heavy that you get the 'W'.
aloha
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDT
WCSF Game 4 GDT- Blackhawks 0 @ Red Wings 2 - (DET leads series 3-1)
|
General Discussion | FlashyG |
|
|
|
Red Wings don't belong in the same rink as the Hawks?
|
General Discussion | MidMichSteve |
|
|
|
4/7 GDT : Blues 1 at Red Wings 0 gdt
|
General Discussion | Hockeytown0001 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
