ttbrunke 0 Report post Posted May 16, 2007 I would say C+ He has been out for a long time and needs to get the rhythm back, he also took some bad penalties. On the plus side he was more of a presence that Calder or Hudler. He used his size a bit and seemed to make a few nice moves on the rush. Its a C+ right now but I see a chance for serious improvement as we move forward. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zeta Power 40 1 Report post Posted May 16, 2007 I would say C+ He has been out for a long time and needs to get the rhythm back, he also took some bad penalties. On the plus side he was more of a presence that Calder or Hudler. He used his size a bit and seemed to make a few nice moves on the rush. Its a C+ right now but I see a chance for serious improvement as we move forward. I agree. Those 2 penalties in the 1st got me pretty pissed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Izzy24 44 Report post Posted May 16, 2007 I agree, C+. If the grade is "weighted" for not having played in almost 6 months, B-. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Elshupacabra 0 Report post Posted May 16, 2007 I would say C+ He has been out for a long time and needs to get the rhythm back, he also took some bad penalties. On the plus side he was more of a presence that Calder or Hudler. He used his size a bit and seemed to make a few nice moves on the rush. Its a C+ right now but I see a chance for serious improvement as we move forward. I agree! I think the penaltys were a result of some nerves maybe, and like you said he needs his rhythm back too. C+ here as well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
My GF Wishes I Was Hank 0 Report post Posted May 16, 2007 I would say C+ He has been out for a long time and needs to get the rhythm back, he also took some bad penalties. On the plus side he was more of a presence that Calder or Hudler. He used his size a bit and seemed to make a few nice moves on the rush. Its a C+ right now but I see a chance for serious improvement as we move forward. C+ is being generous. He didnt do anything for me at all, those two bonehead penalties in the first were dumb and i didnt even notice him the rest of the night. I know hes better than he played.....but i like Calder over this guy...i wish they would give calder more playing time when hes in the game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cicada 4 Report post Posted May 16, 2007 was unlucky with the 2nd penalty - i thought it hit the glass.. can't really grade him on 7 mins though... he showed more jump than Calder has though last night Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rick zombo 3,739 Report post Posted May 16, 2007 was unlucky with the 2nd penalty - i thought it hit the glass.. can't really grade him on 7 mins though... he showed more jump than Calder has though last night The fact that he played 7 minutes, compared to Calders 3.5 minute playoff average or whatever, is saying something on it's own. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
puertoricanWingsfan 5 Report post Posted May 16, 2007 I'll wait to give him my grade until after game 4... see if he can go 3 shifts without stupid penalties Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drwscc 212 Report post Posted May 16, 2007 His first penalty was one of those bogus "hooking" that doesn't hinder the other player, nor does it affect play calls. I give him the benefit of the doubt on that one. I really liked the spark he showed, and he was finishing checks all over the place. I think if he gets another game or two, those miscued passes and fanning on shots will fade away, and he'll do well for us. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gordie Howe hat trick 110 Report post Posted May 16, 2007 Yes he did take some penalties, but he has been out...and he was much more of a presence than Calder...B Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Copenhagen848 58 Report post Posted May 16, 2007 Meh...taking 2 penalties in the first period after being gone for months is no way to re-introduce yourself C- Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yemack 1 Report post Posted May 16, 2007 Can't say he played big role in our victory but you could just tell he was going to be a valuable asset to our club in future a playoff game now under his belt, hopefully he will not repeat same mistakes next game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
esteef 2,679 Report post Posted May 16, 2007 The fact that he played 7 minutes, compared to Calders 3.5 minute playoff average or whatever, is saying something on it's own. True, but Calder never had the luxury of the team being up by 5 goals either. Kopecky banged bodies and chipped in here and there. All Babs really wanted him to do. The two penalties are the only negatives. I'll agree with C+ for now. esteef Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wing Nut 0 Report post Posted May 16, 2007 I liked the way he was hitting solid C Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
StoleYourYsebaert 0 Report post Posted May 16, 2007 He skated faster than most others on the ice, which is to be expected considering how much of a break he's had. He looked good down low, but I thought he ruined a dandy chance with him and Draper skating down the left side early in the game. That's all timing. Other than that, didn't see much. Wasn't able to critique his puck handling or shot selection, since he didn't have the chance to do any of that. With 10 or so minutes on Thursday, we'll get a good glimpse of what he's all about. The coaching staff obviously loves him - they were more confident with him in the lineup early in the season than Filppula or Hudler. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest jaytan Report post Posted May 16, 2007 He didn't really add anything, but he did pad our PIM stats. I think Calder would have been given some extra minutes too if he'd been playing and we had a comfortable lead and players to rest or recover. D Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BringHomeTheCup! 0 Report post Posted May 16, 2007 I don't think he can really be blamed on either penalty, the first one was pretty lame, no question. And on the second one, not only is about to get hit while he is flipping the puck, remember, he's been out for 6+ months, he is going ot be rusty. I think the simple fact that he didn't hurt us in our own zone should give him a C-, I'd go with a C+ becuase he had a strong phscial game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
