• Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

Sign in to follow this  
Hank

NHL GM's Declare War on Goalies

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Guest CaliWingsNut
So you're saying that a puck would hurt worse than a bullet only because it's bigger? I've spoken to cops that have taken a shot while wearing a bullet proof vest. They said it's like getting hit with a mack truck.

You can absolutely make the same comparison. The idea is that there are materials available that allow cops to protect themselves against a freakin' bullet (that can crack an engine block) while still wearing a T-shirt.

If that's possible then so is shrinking the goalie equipment so it's of reasonable size.

Look at Lidstrom's skates. They're made of the same material as the composite sticks. I've heard Lidstrom say a dozen times that he can take a 100MPH slapshot off the toe of his skate and he barely feels it.

If you can mold this material to a SKATE, how come it can't be done for something like chest and arm protectors???

Please people, stop defending goalies. It's already been shown that technology has helped streamline every single thing in life while goalies continue to grow. It's not for physical safety, but rather job security. Take up more net, see less goals. It's that simple.

True, goalies are far more conditioned and agile than from previous era's, but it I don't think they've gotten that good to the point where a 2.50 GAA is considered horrible. Especially when you think how Grant Fuhr won the Vezina with a 3.70 GAA and .877 save % only 20 years ago.

Goalies take up 30% more of the net than from years past. And while some goalies are much bigger, Ken Dryden would still be a monster in today's age and he was half the size of Giggy or Luongo. And he played in an era where he had to stop blasts from players such as Bobby Hull.

Seriously, whoever thinks the goalies need to be this big needs serious psychological help.

You misunderstood my point, mostly because I'm guessing I was too vague. I was basically making the point that comparing a bullet to a puck is a useless arguement. I agree that hockey pads need to be decreased.

However, since you went that route... try a slapshot on a bullet... see how much it hurts compared to a puck. Sounds funny when you put it that way, doesn't it? It would be the same result as shooting a puck at the same speed as a bullet (without taking wind resistance slowing the puck into account).

While you may be able to steal some of the technology from bulletproof gear, most of it is useless since they have two different goals. The number one goal of bulletproof gear is to prevent penetration. People getting up after a gunshot is something from the movies, most people shot break bones from the impact. Now take this into hockey... do you want a goalie wearing something that's going to stop the puck from entering his body? or something designed so he doesn't get phased by the pain of the shot in part of a second and respond to the next?

That's a bit drastic of an example, and I'm mostly trying to agree with you. I'm just saying that bullets and bulletproof gear are not something to be compared with goalie equipment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The nhl does not need more goals. It may need alot of things but more goals isnt one of them. Stop trying to change the game. Goalie pads are fine the way they are and the same with the nets. Unless there is 40 shot shutouts going on everynight then it doesnt need to be fixed. Really there is no logic in changing the pads at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The nhl does not need more goals. It may need alot of things but more goals isnt one of them. Stop trying to change the game. Goalie pads are fine the way they are and the same with the nets. Unless there is 40 shot shutouts going on everynight then it doesnt need to be fixed. Really there is no logic in changing the pads at all.

Heretic! :scared:

Luongo made 49 saves tonight; but his big ass gear must of made like 48 of them.

Edited by Jocu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm all for smaller goalie gear. I remember watching the Devils play one night and seeing how drastically different Brodeur looked compared to the goalie across the ice from him (I forget who it was) in regards to equipment size. His pads come to the top of his knees, while others come up to their waist almost. That's stupid. You can obviously do just fine, and be safe in your goal with gear that actually fits you.

The only reason for bigger gear is to stop more shots without actually having the skill. It has NOTHING to do with safety.

Whenever I see a picture of Giguere, or watch him play, I can't help but laugh..hard. He looks ridiculous. They should make him tone down his equipment just for the fact he's making a joke out of the game and the position he plays by coming out geared up like that.

Edited by Osgood=WIN!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

can i just say... im probably not an expert on the matter.. in fact not even close.... but didnt goalies used to play without masks if i remember rightly? ok that was dangerous and all but a mask was developed and it was crap... geez i'd love to see some of the goalies now try to wear something like that!

A second point.... what about other skaters, not just goalies, who block shots... i dont see many D-men complaining when they get hit with a puck or worse hit by a 200+ pound man skating at them. Just because a goalie's decisions can maybe change a game they want the biggest advantage possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You misunderstood my point, mostly because I'm guessing I was too vague. I was basically making the point that comparing a bullet to a puck is a useless arguement. I agree that hockey pads need to be decreased.

However, since you went that route... try a slapshot on a bullet... see how much it hurts compared to a puck. Sounds funny when you put it that way, doesn't it? It would be the same result as shooting a puck at the same speed as a bullet (without taking wind resistance slowing the puck into account).

While you may be able to steal some of the technology from bulletproof gear, most of it is useless since they have two different goals. The number one goal of bulletproof gear is to prevent penetration. People getting up after a gunshot is something from the movies, most people shot break bones from the impact. Now take this into hockey... do you want a goalie wearing something that's going to stop the puck from entering his body? or something designed so he doesn't get phased by the pain of the shot in part of a second and respond to the next?

That's a bit drastic of an example, and I'm mostly trying to agree with you. I'm just saying that bullets and bulletproof gear are not something to be compared with goalie equipment.

First, I don't understand your reasoning behind a puck vs a bullet. You're still not making much sense.

Secondly, when did goalies turn into giant p*ssies? "I don't want to feel any pain?" WAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!

That's what goalies did for years and years. Suddenly this new crop of goalies wants every game to be sunshine and lolipops.

The equipment is there to prevent breaking bones or lacerations. Goalies SHOULD feel pucks hitting them. It's not like we're telling them to wear a T-shirt out there, but if this is every goalies argument then you're all a bunch of cry babies.

I've played hockey and had my share of bones broken, cuts, bruises etc. And so have many skaters out there. But you don't see them wearing 8 foot wide shoulder pads. Or wearing helmets that would dwarf the sun.

I remember seeing Grant Fuhr after games and he'd have welts and bruises all over his body - hardly anything life threatening. But I've seen players such as Ryan Miller (who's a super skinny SOB) and Dipietro after games and it looks like they've spent the year playing tennis.

Suck it up and wear smaller gear. The technology is there to make it smaller and just as safe - even more so.

Edited by Hank

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm all for smaller goalie gear. I remember watching the Devils play one night and seeing how drastically different Brodeur looked compared to the goalie across the ice from him (I forget who it was) in regards to equipment size. His pads come to the top of his knees, while others come up to their waist almost. That's stupid. You can obviously do just fine, and be safe in your goal with gear that actually fits you.

The only reason for bigger gear is to stop more shots without actually having the skill. It has NOTHING to do with safety.

Whenever I see a picture of Giguere, or watch him play, I can't help but laugh..hard. He looks ridiculous. They should make him tone down his equipment just for the fact he's making a joke out of the game and the position he plays by coming out geared up like that.

Excellent points.

Watch some replays of the 2003 final when Brodeur and Giggy shook hands. Brodeur is 1" taller and 20lbs heavier and yet Giggy looked twice his size. Brodeur seems to think his smaller gear is safe enough. If it wasn't he would be using bigger stuff. Is Giggy a giant panzy or is he just smart enough to know that he has no talent and he needs HUGE equipment to keep a job in the NHL?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Who needs bigger pads when you have eyes in the back of your head?

It's saves like that which highlight the reason Brodeur is possibly the best ever. The reason is even referenced in the clip. Because he has taken the positive traits of the standard butterfly style and incorporated them into a hybrid style which gives him better reaction speed on high shots coming at him, because he's rarely down in a full butterfly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope. I am biased though. As a goalie I am tired of seeing all the leagues changes be to make things worse for goaltenders. I would be angry but accept smaller equipment, but if the league ever makes nets bigger I will be so fed up with what a freak show Bettman wants the league to be.

There is nothing wrong with a 1-0 win in overtime...it is quite fun to watch actually. I love to see great goaltending and magnificent saves. And all Bettman wants is ridiculously high scores.

Lower scoring has nothing to do with equipment or s*** like that, that is why I believe its come down again since equipment got smaller toi begin with. It is that the training for goaltenders is so intense now that the goalies in the league are ridiculously talented.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nope. I am biased though. As a goalie I am tired of seeing all the leagues changes be to make things worse for goaltenders. I would be angry but accept smaller equipment, but if the league ever makes nets bigger I will be so fed up with what a freak show Bettman wants the league to be.

There is nothing wrong with a 1-0 win in overtime...it is quite fun to watch actually. I love to see great goaltending and magnificent saves. And all Bettman wants is ridiculously high scores.

Lower scoring has nothing to do with equipment or s*** like that, that is why I believe its come down again since equipment got smaller toi begin with. It is that the training for goaltenders is so intense now that the goalies in the league are ridiculously talented.

So do I. That's why I want the equipment reduced. I'm sick of seeing 30 belly saves a night. Smaller gear will mean the return of more acrobatic, exciting goaltending.

And yes Bettman wants more goals - so does 95% of the paying public, including me.

9 times out of 10, a 1-0 game is dog-ass boring. And while some high-scoring games can be sloppy, a majority of the time a high scoring game is almost always far more entertaining than a low scoring game.

It's this kind of thinking that always makes me laugh. I've heard so many fans say "I love 1-0" games and then in the next breath complain that the NHL isn't on ESPN or has a better national TV deal. You get better TV deals when casual fans tune in. And casual fans do not want to see boring defensive systems and overblown goalies. Heck, most diehard NHL fans don't want to see that.

Edited by Hank

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But a goalie just standing there and letting pucks hit his giant shoulder pads or the matresses strapped to his legs without moving isn't a great save. It's just the fact that the goalie blocks a large portion of the net.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So do I. That's why I want the equipment reduced. I'm sick of seeing 30 belly saves a night. Smaller gear will mean the return of more acrobatic, exciting goaltending.

And yes Bettman wants more goals - so does 95% of the paying public, including me.

9 times out of 10, a 1-0 game is dog-ass boring. And while some high-scoring games can be sloppy, a majority of the time a high scoring game is almost always far more entertaining than a low scoring game.

It's this kind of thinking that always makes me laugh. I've heard so many fans say "I love 1-0" games and then in the next breath complain that the NHL isn't on ESPN or has a better national TV deal. You get better TV deals when casual fans tune in. And casual fans do not want to see boring defensive systems and overblown goalies. Heck, most diehard NHL fans don't want to see that.

I see your arguement, thats why I put my bias up top. I've almost broken fingers with equipment I have and making it smaller isn't helping my cause any...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with EJ Hrdek and Melrose ( I can not believe I just typed those words) the pads are not designed for protection otherwise they would be rounded as most human bodies are round. They are square and protrude well beyond the legs, arms, and body of the goalie. No one is saying make the padding thinner and less protective. People are asking for narrower pads, which is similar to smaller pads. But smaller is more of a general term that could describe the thickness or the height of the pads.

Plus the Chest protectors that are 3 inches above the shoulders and 3 inches wider than the ribcage are ridiculous. I am not saying that Goalies rely on their padding to make the saves, I think they use bigger pads to make the net harder to shoot at. And seriously if it is legal why not do it, it is not like they are breaking the rules of the game or cheating, well unless the stories of guys putting cardboard under them to make the flaps stand up higher are true.

Plus this rule will not impact all goaltenders, sure guys like Luongo and Jiggy will be impacted, but this changes nothing about Broduer's game, and I would venture Vokoun's pads wouldn't be changed much either.

This is a typical discussion board debate, one extreme to the other.

If they were to take 4 inches of the max pad width it would go from 38 to 34 inches which I believe Broduer wears currently. And you know what if the best goalie in the world wears smaller pads and is still that much better (and we are talking about one of the most durable goalies in the league) why would anyone else need bigger pads.

When was the last time Broduer was hurt after getting hit with a shot, he has smaller pads than Jiggy, Luongo, Snow, etc. but he still plays 50+ games a year and has gawdy stats.

Anyone who argues that smaller pads will be an injury issue needs look no further than Broduer to say that is untrue!

Edited by Opie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I see your arguement, thats why I put my bias up top. I've almost broken fingers with equipment I have and making it smaller isn't helping my cause any...

I have no problem with equpiment being better for smaller parts such as hands and feet. I can only imagine breaking digits.

I just don't see the need for shoulder pads to protrude 12" from the shoulders. When equipment extends beyond body parts, then it's not for physical protection but rather covering more net.

And like Opie said, those analysts make great points. The equipment today is not streamlined - it's gotten bulkier and more square. Kind of like the same shape as a hockey net.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have no problem with equpiment being better for smaller parts such as hands and feet. I can only imagine breaking digits.

I just don't see the need for shoulder pads to protrude 12" from the shoulders. When equipment extends beyond body parts, then it's not for physical protection but rather covering more net.

And like Opie said, those analysts make great points. The equipment today is not streamlined - it's gotten bulkier and more square. Kind of like the same shape as a hockey net.

I do agree with that. I just don't think it should be taken to the extreme where goaltenders are put at risk for injury just to increase scoring.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I do agree with that. I just don't think it should be taken to the extreme where goaltenders are put at risk for injury just to increase scoring.

The technology is the same, the padding will be the same, The helmet will still be the same size, chest protectors will still cover the whole chest, that will not change therefore the risk of goalie injury is not in question here. What is in question is the amount (think sq footage) of space that the pads will cover.

The goalies have used "Safety" or "Injury" issues as a reason (I wanted to say excuse but that made me sound like an asshat) before, I think it backfired on them when the trapezoid came in to play. I have no proof, but if the goalies were arguing against it the league could have said well this prevents you from going into danger areas.

But either way I still think safety is a moot point in this discussion, the equipment will still be the same materials and some goalies are currently playing with equipment the size they are talking about shrinking them to, and they do not get hurt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I do agree with that. I just don't think it should be taken to the extreme where goaltenders are put at risk for injury just to increase scoring.

I'm wondering how streamlining the goalies equipment would put the goalies at risk of injury. They wouldn't be taking any padding that is protecting a part of the goalie body only taking away the padding that is used to protect the space around the goalies body.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I see your arguement, thats why I put my bias up top. I've almost broken fingers with equipment I have and making it smaller isn't helping my cause any...

Are your hands bigger than your trapper? I'm not sure how shaving a couple inches off the size of the trapper, which probably extends a good 10 inches beyond the finger tips is really going to put a goalie at risk. The only thing the outer areas of the trapper are potetecting is the air that surrounds it......or the mesh in the net behind it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are your hands bigger than your trapper? I'm not sure how shaving a couple inches off the size of the trapper, which probably extends a good 10 inches beyond the finger tips is really going to put a goalie at risk. The only thing the outer areas of the trapper are potetecting is the air that surrounds it......or the mesh in the net behind it.

No they are not, it hurts to save a puck in the trapper if it hits in the wrong spot, which is why there is more padding in those spots. I have no concern about size, I just feel that if they keep it up goalies will not have sufficient protection. Trimming size down is no issue to me as long as the paddingh remains sufficient.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nope. I am biased though. As a goalie I am tired of seeing all the leagues changes be to make things worse for goaltenders. I would be angry but accept smaller equipment, but if the league ever makes nets bigger I will be so fed up with what a freak show Bettman wants the league to be.

There is nothing wrong with a 1-0 win in overtime...it is quite fun to watch actually. I love to see great goaltending and magnificent saves. And all Bettman wants is ridiculously high scores.

Lower scoring has nothing to do with equipment or s*** like that, that is why I believe its come down again since equipment got smaller toi begin with. It is that the training for goaltenders is so intense now that the goalies in the league are ridiculously talented.

I'm all for 1-0 games when it is the goalie making the saves and not his oversized shoulder pads, trapper, and leg pads. When you see a 90+ mph come in and hit a goalie squarely and he doesn't know it hit him, the pads are too big.

Its kind of like when you drive down the road in one of those big boats of American cars from the mid 70's. You don't get any kind of road sensation, because they went too far with the power steering. Right now the goalies have gone too far with their pads because they can.

Its like Patrick Roy said the day he retired, "You can make pads smaller now."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its clear not many of you are goalies. Im a goalie so I kno. NHL does not need more goals and the goalies do not need smaller pads. Some of u are making it seem like goalies wear pads that takes up the whole net. I wear NHL regulation size pads and its not like that at all. i want to see some of you who say goalies need smaller pads to to try playing goalie one time and see how it works out for you. You should beable to stop every shot right? I mean cause the pads are SO BIG.

And if the NHL makes the nets bigger these pro's will be hitting the corners left an right for goals. That would make it boring. The position of the goalie is the most exiting to watch dont mess it up by changing the pads or nets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Its clear not many of you are goalies. Im a goalie so I kno. NHL does not need more goals and the goalies do not need smaller pads. Some of u are making it seem like goalies wear pads that takes up the whole net. I wear NHL regulation size pads and its not like that at all. i want to see some of you who say goalies need smaller pads to to try playing goalie one time and see how it works out for you. You should beable to stop every shot right? I mean cause the pads are SO BIG.

And if the NHL makes the nets bigger these pro's will be hitting the corners left an right for goals. That would make it boring. The position of the goalie is the most exiting to watch dont mess it up by changing the pads or nets.

That is definitely your opinion, and seeing as you are a goalie I would consider it a biased opinion. But to tell you the truth this decision has nothing to do with your opinion or mine. The league is trying to expand its' audience, and most Americans want to see scoring, not great defensive plays, yeah the occasional brilliant save will make highlight reels, and people will ohh and ahh for a little bit. But the overall goal from the lockout has been developing a brand of hockey that will appeal to a broader audience and a game that is faster paced and more offensive than the current product. Hence all of the changes.

Also it is not that the pads are SO BIG that they block out the sun, but a lot of goalies use pads that are way to big for them and hockey pants that would fit Andre the Giant let a lone a skinny pencil necked 6'2" 185 netminder.

I was at a Manchester Monarchs game and the goalie's pants were so big (How big were they, lol) that their was at least 8 inches of spare room around the waste of the pants. Goalies have purposely gone out and got the biggest pads and pants they can fit under the rules, it is not about getting equipment that fits them or is safer, it is about covering as much space as possible.

And as a goalie I hope you understand the principal of angles, and that if a goalie is in his crease and covers, lets say for the sake of argument, 70% of the net. If that goalie takes one step off of his line in a direct angle towards the puck he covers more of the net. Goalie pads extend far past the edge of the leg, ribs, arms, and shoulders. Some goalies have found ways to stuff their pads so that the flaps of their pads stay up to create even more blocking surface

How big are you, 6' 180 pounds (I guess based on an average human size) why on earth would you wear 38" pads other than to cover more space? Why do the pads need to be square, when the Human body is not? Why do the pads need to extend beyond the body?

Why does JS Giguere who is smaller than Marty Broduer (I would say it is pretty widely accepted that he is one of the best goalies of this era) need to wear bigger pads than Broduer?

I'll answer this one, because he is not as good and bigger pads make him that good, not only is that not fair to the game it is not fair to Broduer.

I want the instigator rule gone, I want 10 minutes of 4-4 OT, I want lots of rules changed, but they are not needs or wants of the NHL!

Edited by Opie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this