Keith Jones is a %&*($@^(
#1
Posted 13 May 2009 - 07:16 PM
There is a difference between in-game physicality, making a statement, or even trying to get moment with what the Ducks did. They had already won the game, they were not provoked, they were picking on smaller players and injured players, and they weren't fighting by any code of hockey honor I've ever seen.
Fighting has it's place in hockey but 1) It takes place within the game 2) It takes place between two willing players or at least two players who were asking for it 3) No Cheap Shots 4) You want to fight, drop the gloves/stick and lose the helmet.
Anaheim broke almost every cardinal rule of hockey fighting. AND Keith Jones is talking like it up like the Ryan Getzlaf and Niedermayer were sucking him off under the table.
To not do anything about it is one thing. To commend the goons is another level entirely.
I hated Colorado but at least I could respect some of them. I hate Anaheim but I can't respect them. I can't accept a loss to those ass clowns.
I want a game 7 massacre. I want the Wings to win by 10. If the hockey gods exist, Datsyuk, Zets, and company will make it happen.
#3
Posted 13 May 2009 - 07:17 PM
#4
Posted 13 May 2009 - 07:19 PM
#5
Posted 13 May 2009 - 07:19 PM
The ducks are doing what they have to, to win.
Whats the problem?
Its time for the wings to play 60 min a send them home. Thats the best statement ever. Personally I think the Wings needed that wakeup call. And if they hit snooze they will be playing golf by Saturday.
#6
Posted 13 May 2009 - 07:20 PM

#7
Posted 13 May 2009 - 07:20 PM
#8
Posted 13 May 2009 - 07:21 PM
You point is moot because the Red Wings wouldn't do that. Especially if they had just won.
#9
Posted 13 May 2009 - 07:23 PM
Any hockey announcer that comments this type of behavior is also embarassing. It shows exactly how much he knows about hockey and about class and sportsmanship also.
#10
Posted 13 May 2009 - 07:23 PM

Thanks TeeMan
#11
Posted 13 May 2009 - 07:28 PM
Him and Eddie O can f*** each other for all I care.
#12
Posted 13 May 2009 - 07:30 PM

#13
Posted 13 May 2009 - 07:34 PM
GO WINGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#14
Posted 13 May 2009 - 07:39 PM
Exactly what message was sent? Its always hilarious to me when teams "send a message". Do they and or you think the Red Wings got back the the dressing room and said "Oh no, they started a bunch of fights, they must really want to win. We should just forfeit the next game so they don't beat us up again" Its comical.
#15
Posted 13 May 2009 - 07:41 PM
Well, I peed in the corner. I'z scurred of the Ducks, I is, I is.
#16
Posted 13 May 2009 - 07:49 PM
Sounds like they sent you a message too.
I mean, maybe they should've sent a message at the beginning of the series. Or they could've even attacked Datsyuk and Hossa in the parking lot before game 1. If only the Red Wings had known that the Ducks could beat them up, we could've saved everyone alot of time.
#17
Posted 13 May 2009 - 08:22 PM
I mean, maybe they should've sent a message at the beginning of the series. Or they could've even attacked Datsyuk and Hossa in the parking lot before game 1. If only the Red Wings had known that the Ducks could beat them up, we could've saved everyone alot of time.
Screw the "soccer on ice" (as Micah once put it) that leads to goals and saves, there should be a six-on-six brawl at the beginning of every game. The team that loses that is deducted two "man points". The rest of the game should be decided with who can cheap-shot the other team dirtier, with the dirtier, more manly team getting man points. Elbows to the head are allowed and encouraged.
Christ, Brian Burke might have 12 Stanley Cup rings by now.
#18
Posted 13 May 2009 - 08:25 PM
Why have our star players slowly been disapearing from the game? Why is Datsyuk being looked at differently because he isn't scoring? Why are we not infront of the net battling? why are there no open ice hits of meaning? There are a few people on this team who are carrying the physical weight of this team. the rest are scared of Anahiem. No doubt in my mind the past 2 game ending scrums/brawls have gotten into the wings head.
There is a reason why our team came out flat. because we're flat our scared. We maybe out hitting them, but we're not out playing them physically.
#19
Posted 13 May 2009 - 08:28 PM
I couldn't turn the lights off, I was afraid that a Duck player would show up by my bed. All these people that are saying we should be scared are stupid. You ain't going to go far into the playoffs just fighting, you can't be like the Chiefs in the movie Slap Shot.
#20
Posted 13 May 2009 - 09:15 PM
Because people are morons and think that since he's not putting any number up, he's not playing well. Yeah, it'd be nice if the puck went in for him, but he's been fine.
I'd say you're definition of meaningful open ice hits is pretty subjective, and I also didn't know that the alleged lack of them were the sole indicator of whether a team is intimidated or scared. You're right we need to get to the net more, like we did in game 4 and game 5 after Anaheim sent their 1st message after game 3.
There's been 2 incidents after games in this series. After game 3 and after game 6. Hard to say the last one is in anyone's head since they haven't played since then, but we played a pretty good game in game 4. I guess we were just slightly less scared after that one.
Exactly what happened in game 5 that intimidated the Red Wings into playing so flat in game 6?
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jamie Benn Cross Checks Ryan Jones - Hearing Scheduled |
General Discussion | rrasco |
|
|
|
Keith Yandle to be Traded? |
Trade Rumors & Free Agent Talk | DesertWing |
|
|
|
Avs sign David Jones |
General Discussion | Diluvian04 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














