PS 2009 West Final Photoshop War: Chicago Blackhawks

[Rocket Queen 30 1]

And now a word from our legal department: The photo on the right is not an actual photo of Chris Chelios. It is an approximation of his age at the time in question and is used for comparative purposes only. Do not send it to him to be autographed. Age is approximate based on full-term pregnancy, and may vary from actual length of gestation.

flipping hilarious!

[Electrophile 3,554]

Actually, Cheli was a couple months old when Chicago won the last time. He was born in January of 1961 and the Hawks won in either March or April - the season was much shorter back then with only 6 teams. So he wasn't in utero, although he was a wee one.

[55fan 5,133]

Actually, Cheli was a couple months old when Chicago won the last time. He was born in January of 1961 and the Hawks won in either March or April - the season was much shorter back then with only 6 teams. So he wasn't in utero, although he was a wee one.

Well, we're both a little bit right. He was born in 1962, which is what I had used to figure his age, but you are correct that the 1961 series was played in April (6th -16th to be exact).

Nuts. I guess that wasn't as cool as I thought it was. He wasn't even in existence yet. Can we just keep it as a joke?

[Jocke 53]

Well, we're both a little bit right. He was born in 1962, which is what I had used to figure his age, but you are correct that the 1961 series was played in April (6th -16th to be exact).

Nuts. I guess that wasn't as cool as I thought it was. He wasn't even in existence yet. Can we just keep it as a joke?

It still makes a very good point!

[55fan 5,133]

It still makes a very good point!

Thanks. It was really for a visual aid anyway.

[MidMichSteve 1,115]

Actually, Cheli was a couple months old when Chicago won the last time. He was born in January of 1961 and the Hawks won in either March or April - the season was much shorter back then with only 6 teams. So he wasn't in utero, although he was a wee one.

Why let the facts ruin a good story?

[crotty99 302]

[Third Man In 2,091]

[Doc Holiday 0]

[tommingthepuck96 1]

[crotty99 302]

Haha i laughed when i saw that too.

[drfnr14 0]

hahahahaha

[Casey 145]

What am I missing here?

[Heroes of Hockeytown 694]

What am I missing here?

Kane and Toews have done f***all in this series.

[maltbymaniac 13]

dynamic duds

[Detroit # 1 Fan 2,204]

Someone should put together all of Kane's ISO cam video and play it. I bet you see 3-4 shots, and nothing positive.

[EuroTwin 240]

Sure, ill have it for you in a sec.

You want just the pic? Or the Motivational too?

Eh, here you go.

Thanks! It's now my wallpaper as well! I love the looks on the crowd's faces.

[hokeychik22 17]

hudler smash. Huet looks like a giant compared to Jiri.

Edited May 24, 2009 by hokeychik22

[Detroit # 1 Fan 2,204]

Because it was my favorite game and he was joke. (Still is)

[Louisville 112]

hudler smash. Huet looks like a giant compared to Jiri.

That's Corey Crawford actually

[Yzermania19 1]

Thanks! It's now my wallpaper as well! I love the looks on the crowd's faces.

Excellent work!! Did you see the look on the Blackhawk player's face on the extreme far left? I think it's Buttfuglyen (or however you spell his name). Priceless!!

Just a note on Kronwall's hit - amazing how, two days later, the only people who are saying it was a dirty hit are the Blackhawks and their media slappies. The announcers, the majority of Blackhawks fans, Detroit's media and nearly all of Detroit's fans (except for one woman yesterday on the radio who says Kronner is a dirty player and who compelled me to call and defend my gender) say it was a clean hit and mostly Havlat's fault since he didn't have his head up.

[sjradio 0]

Game 2

OR

Game 4

[Cali_Wings_Gal 0]

It's sad how unappetizing a good hunk of brie is now after this...

[hokeychik22 17]

That's Corey Crawford actually

oh. i didnt see the game (had to work), just looked at pictures, i knew Huet started, just figured it was him. The guy is a giant still.

Edited May 25, 2009 by hokeychik22

[Rocket Queen 30 1]

What am I missing here?

Same here... I'm not getting what this is supposed to mean.