Guest L3T5G0W1NG5 Report post Posted June 3, 2009 hal gill always stands players up as their trying to race for the puck. time after time he stands there and holds hte player as their trying to get past him. IN TER FER ENCE Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thedisappearer 291 Report post Posted June 3, 2009 Yeah, he's really just an aggressive pylon. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
P. Marlowe 748 Report post Posted June 3, 2009 Yep and I hate to see Franzen get a penalty 30 seconds after Gill's gotten away with that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CenterIce 83 Report post Posted June 3, 2009 Yep and I hate to see Franzen get a penalty 30 seconds after Gill's gotten away with that. Eddie Olczyk only says the Wings interfere. What are you talking about? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RedWingsFan13 0 Report post Posted June 3, 2009 hal gill always stands players up as their trying to race for the puck. time after time he stands there and holds hte player as their trying to get past him. IN TER FER ENCE Well, when your dressed in white, its OK to stand players up and push them back, Interfering with their "FORWARD PROGRESS" But.... if your in red. you get a nice 2 min break from playing hockey Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
P. Marlowe 748 Report post Posted June 3, 2009 (edited) Eddie Olczyk = BewareThePinkqueens. Edited June 3, 2009 by P. Marlowe Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest L3T5G0W1NG5 Report post Posted June 3, 2009 wow ericsson gets a penalty for that same s*** Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Selke13 0 Report post Posted June 3, 2009 i said the same thing Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stolsanov 0 Report post Posted June 3, 2009 I said the exact same thing to my dad about that penalty. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thedisappearer 291 Report post Posted June 3, 2009 wow ericsson gets a penalty for that same s*** Yep. Exactly. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmubronco420 25 Report post Posted June 3, 2009 (edited) everybodys doing it(wings included) as long as the offensive player plays the puck first...in ericssons case the penguin player never touched the puck which is why it was called Edited June 3, 2009 by wmubronco420 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmubronco420 25 Report post Posted June 3, 2009 (edited) sorry double post Edited June 3, 2009 by wmubronco420 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Z Winged Dangler 2,082 Report post Posted June 3, 2009 i noticed it in game 1...i noticed it in game 2...and again tonight. ericsson does it once and he's in the box. how did the wings end the game with less penalties than the penguins. unbelievable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Snazzy 0 Report post Posted June 3, 2009 I'm not impressed with Penguins Defensemen at all. Chicago had more of threat than these guys. This was a MUST WIN game for Penguins and they still barely squeaked by a win. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Statts 4 Report post Posted June 3, 2009 wow ericsson gets a penalty for that same s*** I dont think the pens player touched the puck before Ericcson checked him into the boards. Thats an easy interference call... people need to stop whining. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Inultus 12 Report post Posted June 3, 2009 Yeah, Ericcson was just being lazy, I'm not too sure what was up with that he is usually very good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zata20 4 Report post Posted June 3, 2009 I dont think the pens player touched the puck before Ericcson checked him into the boards. Thats an easy interference call... people need to stop whining. +1 Many people on here were bashing Pens fans for whining about penalties. You guys are doing the same exact thing. Goes to show that every losing team's fans will whine about something after a loss. The Ericcson interference penalty was an obvious call to make. Did the Pens get away with penalties? Yes, but so did the Wings. It happens. Get over it. Here's to hopin Pavel is back in game 4. Let's come back with a strong effort, win, and go back to the Joe with a chance to win the Cup at home. This time with a differernt result. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HankZetty 0 Report post Posted June 3, 2009 +1 Many people on here were bashing Pens fans for whining about penalties. You guys are doing the same exact thing. Goes to show that every losing team's fans will whine about something after a loss. The Ericcson interference penalty was an obvious call to make. Did the Pens get away with penalties? Yes, but so did the Wings. It happens. Get over it. Here's to hopin Pavel is back in game 4. Let's come back with a strong effort, win, and go back to the Joe with a chance to win the Cup at home. This time with a differernt result. But yet have you ever seen any team have 6 players in the play for 30 seconds and that NOT being called? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Statts 4 Report post Posted June 3, 2009 (edited) But yet have you ever seen any team have 6 players in the play for 30 seconds and that NOT being called? Nobody on the Wings bench saw it either. If they did they would be screaming at the refs. The game is not won on one call or non call. Edited June 3, 2009 by Statts Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jollymania 162 Report post Posted June 3, 2009 i wouldnt care if ericsson was called but that type of interference was let go all game, then like a minute later cooke randomly attempts to take someone's head off away form the puck and nothign is called jsut to shove it in our faces. That call simply did not make sense in the context of this gmae especially at a crucial time like that Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MTU_Huskies963 398 Report post Posted June 3, 2009 +1 Many people on here were bashing Pens fans for whining about penalties. You guys are doing the same exact thing. Goes to show that every losing team's fans will whine about something after a loss. The Ericcson interference penalty was an obvious call to make. Did the Pens get away with penalties? Yes, but so did the Wings. It happens. Get over it. Here's to hopin Pavel is back in game 4. Let's come back with a strong effort, win, and go back to the Joe with a chance to win the Cup at home. This time with a differernt result. I am not going to cry about that Int. call but the pens having 6 skaters on the ice for 20 secs is laughable. If I was a ref and I missed that i would be embarrassed. What the heck is the point of having 4 officials on the ice if none going to make an easy call like that. What was even more laughable was the pens player bolted towards the bench AND A PLAYER DID NOT REPLACE HIM. That would be setting an alarm off in my head. What if the pens would have scored on that!?!? The league will just stand by their refs like they always do, but when a player gets an instigator they go against the refs. The NHL is really good at be consistently inconsistent. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Detroit # 1 Fan 2,204 Report post Posted June 3, 2009 I've had enough of it. Hal Gill gets away slowing down the forechecker, holds onto to forechecker, wraps the free hand around and the refs just watch it and say good hockey. (BABS JUST CALLED HIM OUT FOR IT 4 TIMES, not by name but we all know who) Nothing we can do, avoid him, we're fast enough as a team to get around Gill without iniating with him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sixer 37 Report post Posted June 3, 2009 Hall Gill should hopefully get a penalty for this at some point in time Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weGotTheCup89 41 Report post Posted June 3, 2009 Well, when your dressed in white, its OK to stand players up and push them back, Interfering with their "FORWARD PROGRESS" But.... if your in red. you get a nice 2 min break from playing hockey Actually, we were the team wearing white tonight. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hossa8181 0 Report post Posted June 3, 2009 TO EVERYONE SAYING STOP CRYING ABOUT ERICSSON'S PENALTY...... They haven't been calling that the whole series so why call it in the third period of a crucial game. If they're calling it the whole series, or game for that matter, fine go ahead and call it but that is certainly not the case here. CONSISTENCY is the issue here, not whether or not it was a penalty. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
