ur Crazy. All I'm sayin is no logo is all that imaginative. The only thing that really makes a logo cool is the tradition behind it. What the hell else are they gonna put on there? A Buffalo and two freakin Sabres. How is the shoulder patch better? YOU couldn't come up with a B and a Sabre sword? I mean its not a Dali painting. Its not gonna be that imaginative. Teams should just stick to their logo let it become tradition. you wanna talk about cookie-cutter logos. everyone wants to go for this sharp-angled futuristc thing. Compare the Buffaslug, Patriots new logo, Carolina Panthers logo, Rams. That s*** is so yr. 2000. I'd rather be traditional the new wave.
What is a cool and "imaginative" logo in your book?
The Blues' logo. It's simple, elegant, and, yes, imaginative. The same holds true for the Winged Wheel. And I also really like the Wild's logo, as well as the Capitals' shoulder patch.
Funny you mention the Carolina Panthers - that's also excellent logo design, the shape of the panther is supposed to resemble the Carolinas.
The only thing that really makes a logo cool is the tradition behind it.
Basically what you're telling me is, no new logo can be good until it's been around for 30 or 40 years, and at some point it changes from "futuristic" (i.e., bad) to "traditional" (i.e., good.)
Also the old leaf is a good, simple design. None of the old logos are bad looking.
I would like the leaf a lot
better if they took out the ugly TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS wording in the middle of it.
Why has no one asked what a Thrasher is yet?
Cause most of us already know it's a bird?
(They do have some of the absolute worst uniforms, though. Good God, how many different colors does a team need?)