Jump to content


Photo
* * * * - 2 votes

The most at risk sports teams (per msn.com)


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#1 miller76

miller76

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Gold Booster
  • 2,719 posts
  • Location:Riverside, CA

Posted 19 July 2009 - 01:29 AM

Just read this on msn.com Take a look.

http://articles.mone....aspx?GT1=33002
lighten up people, it's the internet!

#2 Zack is Great

Zack is Great

    Bigger Goal Bob, Mike owes me money.

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 198 posts
  • Location:Honolulu

Posted 19 July 2009 - 05:56 AM

Tigers won't leave Detroit.

#3 Zion

Zion

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Bronze Booster
  • 2,933 posts
  • Location:Vicenza, Italy

Posted 19 July 2009 - 06:05 AM

QUOTE
In the meantime, the Islanders will try to drag their sorry butts out of last place in the NHL’s Atlantic Division, where they won 26 games, lost 47, and tied 9 last season.


Thanks. Good read. wink.gif
Hockeytown - No Limits

#4 Drake_Marcus

Drake_Marcus

    Pariah

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,336 posts
  • Location:Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada

Posted 19 July 2009 - 06:49 AM

Interesting read, but there was some very poor sports research put into this thing. One example would be the fact that the author assumed that the OT loss column in the Islander's stats meant "ties". Easy mistake, but smacks of someone who doesn't even understand what he's writing about at a fundamental level.

Plus his comments about the questionable profitability of the Buffalo Bills games played in Toronto is retarded. They sold out within minutes and were spectacles that drew in s***-tons of cash.
Dedicated to lulz once lost:
Posted Image
Thanks TeeMan!

"We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas
of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage" --H.P. Lovecraft

#5 uk_redwing

uk_redwing

    #25 Jamie Tardif

  • Gold Booster
  • 3,852 posts
  • Location:Liverpool, UK

Posted 19 July 2009 - 08:10 AM

Me thinks they should leave sports journalism to sports journalists.

Posted Image
Turtling is for the weak
Grand Rapids Griffins Fights


#6 Jericho613

Jericho613

    Give Nothing, Take Everything

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 513 posts
  • Location:Detroit, MI

Posted 19 July 2009 - 08:46 AM

Detroit Tigers are not going anywhere, what a stupid article.

#7 StevieY9802

StevieY9802

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,529 posts

Posted 19 July 2009 - 09:27 AM

That wasn't a very good read. The Tigers still bring in around 35K to a game and are selling out games. 3 years ago went to the WS and are #1 in the division. 6+ years ago I say they would have an argument, while a bad a one, but not today. Attendance down while still in the 30's is not gonna move any team.

Sadly the Isles could move before the Coyotes if Bettman has his way.

#8 HadThomasVokounOnFortSt

HadThomasVokounOnFortSt

    Hi

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,133 posts
  • Location:Cloudy Town, Minnesota. 762.20 miles from the Joe Louis Arena

Posted 19 July 2009 - 11:00 AM

This was a good read, I agree with a couple and didn't with some. I agree that the Coyotes could be in trouble but seeing the Tigers up there was very shocking. I thought Nascar was doing good for having the economy being so bad?

Follow me on Twitter: @W2G4U


#9 dallas27

dallas27

    It worked with Hossa, now it's Ilya's turn

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,051 posts
  • Location:Up Sh*t's Creek

Posted 19 July 2009 - 01:20 PM

Considering Mr. Illitch owns both the Tigers and the Wings I reckon they should have included the Wings in that list.

Nascar. We're in a gas/oil crisis and they are only perpetuating it.


It's a Festivus miracle!!!

"For the next 20 minutes, you will sit in silence while I tell you why the Detroit Red Wings are the greatest franchise in the history of professional sports." -Dr. Perry Cox

#10 HadThomasVokounOnFortSt

HadThomasVokounOnFortSt

    Hi

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,133 posts
  • Location:Cloudy Town, Minnesota. 762.20 miles from the Joe Louis Arena

Posted 19 July 2009 - 03:31 PM

QUOTE (dallas27 @ July 19, 2009 - 01:20PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Nascar. We're in a gas/oil crisis and they are only perpetuating it.


I forgot about that, isn't Nascar getting fairly popular now? I know that since no one got money right now that less and less are going to the races but every sport has seen less people show up.

Follow me on Twitter: @W2G4U


#11 Doc Holiday

Doc Holiday

    Huckleberry?

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,654 posts

Posted 19 July 2009 - 03:38 PM

QUOTE (dallas27 @ July 19, 2009 - 02:20PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Considering Mr. Illitch owns both the Tigers and the Wings I reckon they should have included the Wings in that list.

Nascar. We're in a gas/oil crisis and they are only perpetuating it.


We aren't in a crisis, they just choose not to produce much oil.

Consider where we were in gas last year and where we are today. Two full dollars cheaper.

#12 Glubki

Glubki

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 569 posts
  • Location:Sarasota, FL

Posted 19 July 2009 - 03:39 PM

QUOTE (HadThomasVokounOnFortSt @ July 19, 2009 - 04:31PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I forgot about that, isn't Nascar getting fairly popular now? I know that since no one got money right now that less and less are going to the races but every sport has seen less people show up.


They are losing a lot of money in sponsorships and marketing as well as the lower attendence. A lot of these teams are laying people off or eliminating spots altogether. The engineering and technology provided by the automakers is dwindling rapidly. That is why a lot of the smaller tier teams just aren't as competive as they once were.
If you have an online nemesis you are spending too much time online....

#13 Cern

Cern

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,677 posts
  • Location:Vancouver

Posted 19 July 2009 - 04:41 PM

QUOTE (Drake_Marcus @ July 19, 2009 - 03:49AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Plus his comments about the questionable profitability of the Buffalo Bills games played in Toronto is retarded. They sold out within minutes and were spectacles that drew in s***-tons of cash.

Very true, but the fact that so few games are in TO is inevitably going to heighten demand. It's an uncommon, special event, people are going to flock to it because there's a sense that it's a there-and-gone affair. Just earlier in that same article the same phenomenon occurred with the Jaguars - relatively small-market team that drew in sellout crowds to begin with, now they have to shut down segments of the stadium to avoid blackouts. You can't judge overall profitability on the measure of a single game or hell, even a single season. Talk like that is the reason teams like the Coyotes are continuing to vacuum the league's money instead of being allowed to die.

Edited by Cern, 19 July 2009 - 04:43 PM.

1 2 3 4|1 2 3 4 5 6 7|1 2 3 4 5|1 2 3 4 5 6 7

#14 Detroitboogie

Detroitboogie

    Stretcher Fetcher

  • Member
  • 21 posts
  • Location:Eastside

Posted 19 July 2009 - 05:17 PM

I have seen a consistant amount of fans at Tigers games since the 2006 season. Before that season I could buy a $5 ticket and sit anywhere in the park because less than 20k were showing up. So to write something like that now is bad timing by about 4 years. If the Tigers make the playoffs Comerica will be sold out every night. We watched 15 years of horrible baseball in Detroit, now that the Tigers are looking like a contender again we get that trash. Who remembers when the Twins were going to be dissolved a few years back? That didn't seem to happen, blink.gif now they are building a new stadium in MN.
Another TeeMan Sig creation

#15 TheDetroitRedWings

TheDetroitRedWings

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,202 posts
  • Location:Michigan

Posted 19 July 2009 - 07:49 PM

The Tigers are one of the most historic teams in baseball. I don't care how bad the economy gets. The Tigers will never leave Detroit. Period.

12041887825_d4b1d5c02f_o.jpg


#16 MacK_Attack

MacK_Attack

    Old School

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,678 posts
  • Location:Ontario

Posted 20 July 2009 - 09:27 PM

QUOTE (Drake_Marcus @ July 19, 2009 - 07:49AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Plus his comments about the questionable profitability of the Buffalo Bills games played in Toronto is retarded. They sold out within minutes and were spectacles that drew in s***-tons of cash.



QUOTE (Cern @ July 19, 2009 - 05:41PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Very true, but the fact that so few games are in TO is inevitably going to heighten demand. It's an uncommon, special event, people are going to flock to it because there's a sense that it's a there-and-gone affair.


I don't know where you got that from, but they had a hard time giving tickets away for that game in Toronto.

Scalpers were charging half-price in some cases and Rogers ended up giving pairs of tickets to people who switched to Rogers cable in the month or so leading up to the game.

They priced themselves out with $100 tickets for upper-deck seats.

#17 Rikadyn

Rikadyn

    1st Line All-Star

  • Bronze Booster
  • 1,105 posts
  • Location:Kalamazoo MI

Posted 20 July 2009 - 10:10 PM

QUOTE (HadThomasVokounOnFortSt @ July 19, 2009 - 04:31PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I forgot about that, isn't Nascar getting fairly popular now? I know that since no one got money right now that less and less are going to the races but every sport has seen less people show up.



QUOTE (Glubki @ July 19, 2009 - 04:39PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
They are losing a lot of money in sponsorships and marketing as well as the lower attendence. A lot of these teams are laying people off or eliminating spots altogether. The engineering and technology provided by the automakers is dwindling rapidly. That is why a lot of the smaller tier teams just aren't as competive as they once were.


More than likely Nascar won't be able to continue in it's current bloated form. Personally think that they will need to limit the number of cars per team further (Really? Only allowing 4 cars? why so few? rolleyes.gif) to say 2 per team, that or expect less teams over all to be available to run the series, and therefore having to shrink the field down.

Really the economy has hurt the American LeMans Series more, teams can't afford to race in the US and Europe, so this years field for everything but maybe Sebring/Petite/Laguna will be around 22 cars, and that is only cause they bumped up some teams from the Porsche Cup support race to run the new ALMS-C class.

#18 mackel

mackel

    Bring Back Vernie

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 498 posts

Posted 20 July 2009 - 10:31 PM

QUOTE (Rikadyn @ July 20, 2009 - 10:10PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
More than likely Nascar won't be able to continue in it's current bloated form. Personally think that they will need to limit the number of cars per team further (Really? Only allowing 4 cars? why so few? rolleyes.gif) to say 2 per team, that or expect less teams over all to be available to run the series, and therefore having to shrink the field down.

Really the economy has hurt the American LeMans Series more, teams can't afford to race in the US and Europe, so this years field for everything but maybe Sebring/Petite/Laguna will be around 22 cars, and that is only cause they bumped up some teams from the Porsche Cup support race to run the new ALMS-C class.




NASCAR is for "Red Necks" not "Red Wings"... Silly...

#19 Rikadyn

Rikadyn

    1st Line All-Star

  • Bronze Booster
  • 1,105 posts
  • Location:Kalamazoo MI

Posted 20 July 2009 - 10:56 PM

QUOTE (mackel @ July 20, 2009 - 11:31PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
NASCAR is for "Red Necks" not "Red Wings"... Silly...






Anyway, I don't follow NASCAR more than perfunctorily, but follow Sportscar Endurance racing and Formula One regularly, and the economy has hurt all of them hard.

Also Nascar's fame has been waining in the last 5yrs or so, since it's become even more than normal advertising first racing second.

#20 Pskov Wings Fan

Pskov Wings Fan

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,027 posts
  • Location:Minneapoilis, MN

Posted 20 July 2009 - 11:04 PM

I could understand argument that auto racing somehow contribute to the gas prices. I suspect that amount of gas all racing cars use is rather minuscule compared to all the cars people use every day.

I just hope that NASCAR goes away from TV. There has to be a better way to fill TV schedule over weekend.







Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users