I live very close to Kitchener and I'm sure some of you have heard or seen this already. Terrible hit.
OHL Hit
#1
Posted 02 November 2009 - 08:00 PM
I live very close to Kitchener and I'm sure some of you have heard or seen this already. Terrible hit.

O.o
#2
Posted 02 November 2009 - 08:09 PM
© mikah
#3
Posted 02 November 2009 - 08:11 PM
I mean it absolutely sucks that the kid got hurt and no one wish that on anyone, but it looked pretty clean to me.
Injuries happen in contact sports. It's a drawback sometimes.
Hope the kid is ok.
Edited by BuckeyeWingsfan80, 02 November 2009 - 08:14 PM.
Get a clue already.
#4
Posted 02 November 2009 - 08:11 PM
It's not even "hard hitting". Try charging from the blue line, screening yourself with the goalie and hitting with your elbows up.

O.o
#5
Posted 02 November 2009 - 08:12 PM
No way you can react when you are inches away from the guy.
- Original-Six likes this

#6
Posted 02 November 2009 - 08:15 PM
yes. this is exactly what Perry, Kunitz, Clutterbuch, and a bunch of others are doing... and people tend to call it "hard hitting".
© mikah
#7
Posted 02 November 2009 - 08:16 PM
No way you can react when you are inches away from the guy.
Yes, because it's easy to see around your goalie when the guy is flying in from the far right >.>
Regardless of which way he was hit, it was boarding, charging and an elbow to the head.

O.o
#8
Posted 02 November 2009 - 08:17 PM
And where is your proof?

O.o
#9
Posted 02 November 2009 - 08:22 PM
He looked twice and saw him coming before he even got to the puck. So yes he knew the guy was coming.
He was right next to the boards, it wasn't a charge (arguably), and his elbow was tucked in.

#10
Posted 02 November 2009 - 08:27 PM
Should of probably been a charging though, that's it.
I agree with Doc.
#11
Posted 02 November 2009 - 08:27 PM

I don't really see that as tucked in..

O.o
#12
Posted 02 November 2009 - 08:28 PM

I don't really see that as tucked in..
That was a follow through. His elbow seemed to be tucked in when he made contact.
#13
Posted 02 November 2009 - 08:29 PM

I don't really see that as tucked in..
Of course not, because you chose to show a still of where his elbow was located AFTER contact was made.
That is useless. You could argue he crosschecked him in the head based on that same logic.

#14
Posted 02 November 2009 - 08:32 PM
#15
Posted 02 November 2009 - 08:33 PM
That is useless. You could argue he crosschecked him in the head based on that same logic.
So he fully untucked his elbow before the kids helmet made a full rotation in mid air? Don't be afraid to compile.
Edited by Broken 16, 02 November 2009 - 08:33 PM.
- Frozen-Man likes this
#16
Posted 02 November 2009 - 08:34 PM
Second of all, dude saw the train coming...twice! You can't spin like that to turn your back on somebody and not expect to get hit. He wasn't looking where he should have been. The guys elbows were tucked and he had his guy lined up for a check. That's the name of the game here, folks.
It sucks the kid went down like that, but I don't see anything deserving of a penalty.
#17
Posted 02 November 2009 - 08:34 PM
Should of probably been a charging though, that's it.
I agree with Doc.
The guy broke his stride when he lined him up, so I would say charging would even be iffy. The kid saw him coming before he went behind the net to get the puck. He had the sense to protect and reverse the puck, he just didn't have the sense to protect himself. In fact, he did just the opposite by turning his back.
smooth as Tennessee whiskey
#18
Posted 02 November 2009 - 08:35 PM
#19
Posted 02 November 2009 - 08:35 PM
That is useless. You could argue he crosschecked him in the head based on that same logic.

No elbow?

O.o
#20
Posted 02 November 2009 - 08:36 PM
Oh I agree, I probably wouldn't have called charging either. But in a Junior league I wouldn't be surprised if it was called after the outcome.
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NHL penalties/suspensions for hits getting out of hand.
|
General Discussion | jollymania |
|
|
|
Next two off-seasons (it's going to be a two-year process) |
General Discussion | blueadams |
|
|
|
Ryan Sproul: OHL D-Man of the Year |
General Discussion | Crymson |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














