With All These Injuries; Here Comes Howard!
#1
Posted 29 December 2009 - 07:01 PM
What else could it be? I mean the guy is our MVP and Rookie Of The Year.

#2
Posted 29 December 2009 - 07:05 PM
#3
Posted 29 December 2009 - 07:09 PM
#4
Posted 29 December 2009 - 07:46 PM
I admit I didn't like what I seen and heard about Howard in the AHL. He has proven me wrong so far and thank god.
Edited by dragonballgtz, 29 December 2009 - 07:48 PM.
#5
Posted 29 December 2009 - 11:58 PM
That's a decent record, considering the abysmal play of the team in front of him. He hasn't been letting in many goals. I mean, he only let in one or two goals in most games, and we still lost those games.
#6
Posted 30 December 2009 - 12:27 AM
He still gives up too many juicy rebounds, the bad goal now and then, and the real test
will come post season provided he gets the nod.
#7
Posted 30 December 2009 - 12:36 AM
Just cause you look like the gimp don't mean you play like the gimp!
#8
Posted 30 December 2009 - 12:43 AM




#9
Posted 30 December 2009 - 01:14 AM
- uk_redwing
HockeyArchive Twitter
#10
Posted 30 December 2009 - 01:28 AM
#11
Posted 30 December 2009 - 01:29 AM
#12
Posted 30 December 2009 - 09:45 AM
on a side note 19-14-6 isn't too bad with the team we have in front of him right now, but the real numbers I'm focused on are .926 SV% and 2.26 GAA - keep that up and you'll win way more than you lose...
All I have to say about Holland and our off-season:
and finally
Holland is a damn good GM. period.
#13
Posted 30 December 2009 - 11:10 AM
Not for nothin', but the real test will be once he begins to consistently face quality NHL Teams, rather than the non-stop spate of bottom dwellers he's been racking up those impressive stats against.
The only real Team he's even faced this Season has been Chicago. Then again, he was also pretty good in the Win against Phoenix mid-December. Other than that? He's played every bottom feeder on the schedule thus far this year.
I know I'm going to be blasted for pointing it out, (especially considering I am a huge Osgood fan!), and perhaps rightfully so, but let's not get too crazy here. With the exception of Chicago, (on THEIR second night of back-to-backs after facing the Sharks the night before), the only Teams he's really even been allowed to face are the Teams that the Wings are capable of beating.
#14
Posted 30 December 2009 - 11:26 AM
The only real Team he's even faced this Season has been Chicago. Then again, he was also pretty good in the Win against Phoenix mid-December. Other than that? He's played every bottom feeder on the schedule thus far this year.
I know I'm going to be blasted for pointing it out, (especially considering I am a huge Osgood fan!), and perhaps rightfully so, but let's not get too crazy here. With the exception of Chicago, (on THEIR second night of back-to-backs after facing the Sharks the night before), the only Teams he's really even been allowed to face are the Teams that the Wings are capable of beating.
Has he had his growing pains, for sure, but to say he has only faced one real team this year is a joke... he has faced several and done quite well against them as well, not to mention playing well against teams he should as well...
Date Team Opp GP W L T Min GA SA SO GAA Sv%
03-Oct-09 Det StL 1 0 1 0 58.36 5 32 0 5.14 .844
13-Oct-09 Det Buf 1 0 0 0 27.23 1 15 0 4.21 .872
24-Oct-09 Det Col 1 0 1 0 59.35 2 22 0 3.31 .884
27-Oct-09 Det Van 1 1 0 0 52.83 2 22 0 3.03 .890
29-Oct-09 Det Edm 1 0 0 0 65 5 33 0 3.42 .879
11-Nov-09 Det CBJ 1 1 0 0 60 1 26 0 2.97 .893
12-Nov-09 Det Van 1 1 0 0 60 1 32 0 2.66 .907
14-Nov-09 Det Ana 1 1 0 0 59.93 4 23 0 2.85 .898
18-Nov-09 Det Dal 1 0 1 0 58.75 3 32 0 2.87 .899
21-Nov-09 Det Mtl 1 1 0 0 64.95 2 18 0 2.75 .898
25-Nov-09 Det Atl 1 0 1 0 58.43 2 25 0 2.69 .900
28-Nov-09 Det StL 1 1 0 0 64.58 3 35 0 2.70 .902
30-Nov-09 Det Dal 1 1 0 0 60 1 30 0 2.56 .907
03-Dec-09 Det Edm 1 0 1 0 60 4 36 0 2.67 .906
06-Dec-09 Det NYR 1 1 0 0 60 1 29 0 2.55 .910
09-Dec-09 Det StL 1 0 1 0 59.48 1 26 0 2.45 .913
11-Dec-09 Det Ana 1 1 0 0 60.6 2 27 0 2.43 .914
14-Dec-09 Det Phx 1 1 0 0 59.91 2 32 0 2.40 .915
17-Dec-09 Det TB 1 1 0 0 60 0 30 1 2.27 .920
19-Dec-09 Det Dal 1 0 1 0 59.55 4 21 0 2.36 .916
23-Dec-09 Det Chi 1 0 1 0 59.96 3 31 0 2.39 .915
26-Dec-09 Det CBJ 1 1 0 0 59.9 1 29 0 2.33 .917
28-Dec-09 Det CBJ 1 0 0 0 63.2 1 40 0 2.26 .921
Edited by stevkrause, 30 December 2009 - 11:27 AM.
All I have to say about Holland and our off-season:
and finally
Holland is a damn good GM. period.
#15
Posted 30 December 2009 - 11:39 AM
Date Team Opp GP W L T Min GA SA SO GAA Sv%
03-Oct-09 Det StL 1 0 1 0 58.36 5 32 0 5.14 .844
13-Oct-09 Det Buf 1 0 0 0 27.23 1 15 0 4.21 .872
24-Oct-09 Det Col 1 0 1 0 59.35 2 22 0 3.31 .884
27-Oct-09 Det Van 1 1 0 0 52.83 2 22 0 3.03 .890
29-Oct-09 Det Edm 1 0 0 0 65 5 33 0 3.42 .879
11-Nov-09 Det CBJ 1 1 0 0 60 1 26 0 2.97 .893
12-Nov-09 Det Van 1 1 0 0 60 1 32 0 2.66 .907
14-Nov-09 Det Ana 1 1 0 0 59.93 4 23 0 2.85 .898
18-Nov-09 Det Dal 1 0 1 0 58.75 3 32 0 2.87 .899
21-Nov-09 Det Mtl 1 1 0 0 64.95 2 18 0 2.75 .898
25-Nov-09 Det Atl 1 0 1 0 58.43 2 25 0 2.69 .900
28-Nov-09 Det StL 1 1 0 0 64.58 3 35 0 2.70 .902
30-Nov-09 Det Dal 1 1 0 0 60 1 30 0 2.56 .907
03-Dec-09 Det Edm 1 0 1 0 60 4 36 0 2.67 .906
06-Dec-09 Det NYR 1 1 0 0 60 1 29 0 2.55 .910
09-Dec-09 Det StL 1 0 1 0 59.48 1 26 0 2.45 .913
11-Dec-09 Det Ana 1 1 0 0 60.6 2 27 0 2.43 .914
14-Dec-09 Det Phx 1 1 0 0 59.91 2 32 0 2.40 .915
17-Dec-09 Det TB 1 1 0 0 60 0 30 1 2.27 .920
19-Dec-09 Det Dal 1 0 1 0 59.55 4 21 0 2.36 .916
23-Dec-09 Det Chi 1 0 1 0 59.96 3 31 0 2.39 .915
26-Dec-09 Det CBJ 1 1 0 0 59.9 1 29 0 2.33 .917
28-Dec-09 Det CBJ 1 0 0 0 63.2 1 40 0 2.26 .921
Context, please. Context.
When he faced Vancouver, the 'Nucks were below the Wings in the Standings.
Dallas? Against Turco? Come on. Had it not been Turco in net, at JLA......? But, (regardless), Dallas was below the Wings in the Standings when he faced them, too.
When he faced the Rangers, they also were below the Wings in the Standings. As a matter of fact, they still have fewer points, in a weaker Conference, than the Wings.
I already stated that he was good against Phoenix on the 14th of December. And he was. That was a good, quality Win against a tough opponent.
Chicago? He played alright in that Game. He also lost. Facing a Team, (as stated previously), on the second night of back-to-backs, and with a fresh Team in front of him.
Take another glance over your list. And tell me how many REAL QUALITY Teams he's faced out of the 23 Games he's played.
#16
Posted 30 December 2009 - 11:46 AM
Date Team Opp GP W L T Min GA SA SO GAA Sv%
03-Oct-09 Det StL 1 0 1 0 58.36 5 32 0 5.14 .844
13-Oct-09 Det Buf 1 0 0 0 27.23 1 15 0 4.21 .872
24-Oct-09 Det Col 1 0 1 0 59.35 2 22 0 3.31 .884
27-Oct-09 Det Van 1 1 0 0 52.83 2 22 0 3.03 .890
29-Oct-09 Det Edm 1 0 0 0 65 5 33 0 3.42 .879
11-Nov-09 Det CBJ 1 1 0 0 60 1 26 0 2.97 .893
12-Nov-09 Det Van 1 1 0 0 60 1 32 0 2.66 .907
14-Nov-09 Det Ana 1 1 0 0 59.93 4 23 0 2.85 .898
18-Nov-09 Det Dal 1 0 1 0 58.75 3 32 0 2.87 .899
21-Nov-09 Det Mtl 1 1 0 0 64.95 2 18 0 2.75 .898
25-Nov-09 Det Atl 1 0 1 0 58.43 2 25 0 2.69 .900
28-Nov-09 Det StL 1 1 0 0 64.58 3 35 0 2.70 .902
30-Nov-09 Det Dal 1 1 0 0 60 1 30 0 2.56 .907
03-Dec-09 Det Edm 1 0 1 0 60 4 36 0 2.67 .906
06-Dec-09 Det NYR 1 1 0 0 60 1 29 0 2.55 .910
09-Dec-09 Det StL 1 0 1 0 59.48 1 26 0 2.45 .913
11-Dec-09 Det Ana 1 1 0 0 60.6 2 27 0 2.43 .914
14-Dec-09 Det Phx 1 1 0 0 59.91 2 32 0 2.40 .915
17-Dec-09 Det TB 1 1 0 0 60 0 30 1 2.27 .920
19-Dec-09 Det Dal 1 0 1 0 59.55 4 21 0 2.36 .916
23-Dec-09 Det Chi 1 0 1 0 59.96 3 31 0 2.39 .915
26-Dec-09 Det CBJ 1 1 0 0 59.9 1 29 0 2.33 .917
28-Dec-09 Det CBJ 1 0 0 0 63.2 1 40 0 2.26 .921
I would say Detroit is more than capable of beating NYR, VAN, DAL, and ATL.

#17
Posted 30 December 2009 - 12:01 PM
Hey there, Doc.....I know you've noticed the same pattern.
Yes, Howard is playing well. BUT.....
I don't think there's a person here who wouldn't concede that Howard's Games are being closely managed, micro-managed even, in order to give him the most favorable match-ups, with the best possible outcomes, and with the least amount of adversity possible.
There's ONE Team he's faced, all Season long, where there was not a better than even chance of Victory. Chicago.
As previously stated, that was a Loss. Not his fault, really. You can't Win if your Team doesn't score, but a Loss, nonetheless.
Also, take a look at the OVERALL schedule, people. And compare it to Howards slate of Starts. Then compare the Starts that Osgood has gotten. Without exception, Osgood has gotten the TOUGHER opponents, under the least favorable conditions, every single time.
#18
Posted 30 December 2009 - 12:08 PM
Edited by Carman, 30 December 2009 - 12:10 PM.
#19
Posted 30 December 2009 - 12:12 PM
Yes. That IS all you can ask, Carman. He HAS done well with what he's been given. Did you expect him NOT to, considering the Teams he's been facing?
But that doesn't take into consideration all those who are ready to hand Howard the Calder AND the Starting job, (even into the Post Season - knock on wood), based on a record built up almost exclusively against the worst Teams in the NHL.
A little perspective here.
#20
Posted 30 December 2009 - 12:18 PM
But that doesn't take into consideration all those who are ready to hand Howard the Calder AND the Starting job, (even into the Post Season - knock on wood), based on a record built up almost exclusively against the worst Teams in the NHL.
A little perspective here.
The only perspective I need is at the moment he is giving the team a chance to win games. I'm happy with that. NHL competition is NHL competition, the NHL is close enough in terms of standings that the best teams aren't that far away from the worst teams. He's winning games at the NHL level, it doesn't matter who they are against we need every single win we can get, because right now we are fighting for a playoff spot.
Osgood deserves his chance, he's earned it, but Howard is the future and we all need to be happy that he is finally playing at level which puts him in categories with other legitimate NHL goaltenders that are versing the same competition as him.
Howard is playing well behind a team playing without 6 of it's top 8 players, enjoy it is all I'm asking.
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Members photos
Post 'em here? |
Water Cooler | Kattermole |
|
|
|
Where are The Black Aces? |
General Discussion | unsaddleddonald |
|
|
|
"You-Got-Kron-Walled!"
|
General Discussion | Red Wings Addict |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













