• Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
GONGSHOW HOCKEY

How many players from Team USA would have made Team Canada?

Rate this topic

64 posts in this topic

No flame.

Miller obviously would have been there over Fleury.

Parise probably would have been given a good shot at the team by Yzerman and co.

That's about all imo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Parise for sure. I also think Suter would have been given some thought over Seabrook. As good as Seabrook is I don't necessarily think he brought a different component to the team that wasn't already there. The fact you could dress all 13 forwards and all 7 defensemen every game made me think a guy like Mike Green would have made more sense over Seabrook even if he was used almost strictly on the PP. I also think Dustin Brown and Patrick Kane would have been given some thought but would have come up just short.

There are just too many good Canadians who were already left off like Jeff Carter and Steven Stamkos.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Parise for sure. I also think Suter would have been given some thought over Seabrook. As good as Seabrook is I don't necessarily think he brought a different component to the team that wasn't already there. The fact you could dress all 13 forwards and all 7 defensemen every game made me think a guy like Mike Green would have made more sense over Seabrook even if he was used almost strictly on the PP. I also think Dustin Brown and Patrick Kane would have been given some thought but would have come up just short.

There are just too many good Canadians who were already left off like Jeff Carter and Steven Stamkos.

Ya actually Brown could have probably played on the 4th line- would have had to get rid of Morrow though.

I couldn't see Kane making it though, he wouldn't be a top 9 forward on this team imo and a guy like him on the 4th line is just plain worthless to a team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

None, as they're all US born.

Isn't there enough glow in Canada to bask in? Nevermind that the teams went 1-1 in the tournament and the second game was close enough that either team could have taken it at any second, let's talk about how inferior the US team was.

Christ.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah I would see Brown as being a younger vesion of Morrow with more offense. Yeah Kane wouldn't fit in the top 9 but in my eyes he'd fall in the same category as Stamkos and Carter. They've got great offensive upside and are worth considering. Since they are so young it would be great to get them that experience but right now there are guys that are producing the same (or better) that have more winning experience so they'd fall short.

It's tough for guys like Carter and Stamkos to compete with captains and stanley cup winners.

Personally, despite how they may have performed, I could have done without the likes of Marleau and Bergeron but that's just my opinion. Even Thornton isn't a big game performer in my eyes but hey, it worked out so what do I have to complain about?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ya actually Brown could have probably played on the 4th line- would have had to get rid of Morrow though.

I couldn't see Kane making it though, he wouldn't be a top 9 forward on this team imo and a guy like him on the 4th line is just plain worthless to a team.

Kane is outplaying Richards, Heatley, and Marleau this year. I would think they would have had to give some serious thought to pairing him up with Toews and breaking up the Sharks. Unfortunately, Canada has a lot of "must-hires".

Edited by kook_10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if we were talking about the reverse, I doubt Pronger and Neidermayer would be there... the Americans were going for a younger, quicker team

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kane is outplaying Richards, Heatley, and Marleau this year. I would think they would have had to give some serious thought to pairing him up with Toews and breaking up the Sharks. Unfortunately, Canada has a lot of "must-hires".

Richards brings an element to the game that Kane can not. His defencive ability is amazing along with his PKing. Marleau and Heatley are both going to be 40 plus goal scorers and are kinda hard to leave off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kane is outplaying Richards, Heatley, and Marleau this year. I would think they would have had to give some serious thought to pairing him up with Toews and breaking up the Sharks. Unfortunately, Canada has a lot of "must-hires".

Kane, Heatley and Marleau are all having similar years. Kane has 74 points, Heatley has 69 and Marleau has 38 goals to go with 68 points.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kane, Heatley and Marleau are all having similar years. Kane has 74 points, Heatley has 69 and Marleau has 38 goals to go with 68 points.

Marleau and Heatley are also constantly derided by Canadians for being the biggest chokers you have - especially paired up with big Joe. They are all in the same ballpark, but I think you guys are still putting an American asterisk in your calculation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Marleau and Heatley are also constantly derided by Canadians for being the biggest chokers you have - especially paired up with big Joe. They are all in the same ballpark, but I think you guys are still putting an American asterisk in your calculation.

Heatley isn't a choker, he never has been known as a choker at any point in his career. Marleau and Joe on the other hand...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Heatley isn't a choker, he never has been known as a choker at any point in his career. Marleau and Joe on the other hand...

Not a choker but definitely a cancer. But perhaps the are not together long enough to worry about that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For the record I'm Canadian but somewhat agree with some of the Americans in this thread.

Marleau and Heatley are also constantly derided by Canadians for being the biggest chokers you have - especially paired up with big Joe. They are all in the same ballpark, but I think you guys are still putting an American asterisk in your calculation.

Heatley is not a choker what so ever...at least not yet in his career.

Heatley isn't a choker, he never has been known as a choker at any point in his career. Marleau and Joe on the other hand...

Cancer...sure, that's fair in some ppl's opinion. BUt not a choker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tim Thomas could have made it over Thorton :/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For the record I'm Canadian but somewhat agree with some of the Americans in this thread.

Heatley is not a choker what so ever...at least not yet in his career.

Cancer...sure, that's fair in some ppl's opinion. BUt not a choker

No I agree and have never said Heatley was a chocker but it is pretty well concensus that he has been a cancer on locker rooms in the past and I was merely stating that Kane might have been chosen over him for that reason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

None, as they're all US born.

Isn't there enough glow in Canada to bask in? Nevermind that the teams went 1-1 in the tournament and the second game was close enough that either team could have taken it at any second, let's talk about how inferior the US team was.

Christ.

Cry me a river.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Malone? You're kidding right.

I think he was referring to Karl Malone making Team Canada's basketball team.

That's the only thing I can surmise from that post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're right, who would want a gritty foward who can score?

He can't skate, though.

Canada had gritty scoring forwards who could also skate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0