Am I the only one who finds this ridiculous ?
#1
Posted 20 March 2010 - 05:29 PM
Why is Mike Babcock not playing Chris Osgood on the second game of a back-to-back ?
This is flatout humiliating for a goaltender of Ozzie's caliber. What is he thinking ?
Babcock is showing once more that he's mediocre at best when it comes to the 'human' side of coaching.
Why would consciously render you second goaltender useless by sitting him thisf****** long ?????
This will backfire someday..
Besides that, I think.. KNOW that Chris Osgood has some wins in him.
Don't treat him like there's sitting some snot nosed college goaltender on the bench.
- EZBAKETHAGANGSTA, GoWings1905 and Zeowingsfan like this
I went to buy some camouflage pants the other day but I couldn't find any.
#2
Posted 20 March 2010 - 05:33 PM
- Doggy, Green Wing, SiLkK19 and 1 other like this
#4
Posted 20 March 2010 - 05:35 PM
- SiLkK19 likes this




#6
Posted 20 March 2010 - 05:36 PM
Because babcock doesn't trust Osgood, simple as that. I wouldn't trust Osgood either if the rumours floating around are true....
What rumors are you referring to?
#7
Posted 20 March 2010 - 05:39 PM
Alcoholic and whatnot....What rumors are you referring to?
#8
Posted 20 March 2010 - 05:43 PM
#9
Posted 20 March 2010 - 05:44 PM
Because babcock doesn't trust Osgood, simple as that. I wouldn't trust Osgood either if the rumours floating around are true....
What rumours dish, DISH... I love a good rumour and I'm out of the loop on this!!
#10
Posted 20 March 2010 - 05:44 PM
Alcoholic and whatnot....
Chris Osgood an alcoholic ?
Oh sir... you really have a vivid imagination..
"and whatnot" ??
So he's probably smoking a crackpipe as well ?
And he's wanted in 8 states ?
He owns money to the Russian mob ?
I went to buy some camouflage pants the other day but I couldn't find any.
#11
Posted 20 March 2010 - 05:49 PM
If that was the case he wouldn't be on the Wings or any team for that matter.
When Babs said in the interview after the game last night that Howie was starting, I was baffled. What a slap in the face. Wasn't it two weeks ago he had a meeting with Oz and told him he'd be playing him real soon and that he should 'run with it.' Ridiculous. If the Wings make the playoffs and for some reason Howard falters, is Ozzie just suppose to go in and save the day from not playing for two months or so? Common freaking sense. It doesn't work that way.
#12
Posted 20 March 2010 - 05:49 PM
#13
Posted 20 March 2010 - 05:53 PM
If Howard plays every game the rest of the way and we make the playoffs, what then? Are we going to play a tired Howard in the playoffs, or give Ozzie a playoff start after not having played for 2 months?
Babcock should have played Ozzie last night and Howard tonight. Instead, he keeps piling on starts on his tired rookie goaltender.
Also, you have to wonder what effect this is having on the rest of the team. They're not robots, so this has to be getting to their heads too.
Edited by GMRwings1983, 20 March 2010 - 05:54 PM.
- Zeowingsfan likes this
#14
Posted 20 March 2010 - 05:58 PM
Babcock just hasn't done a good job of coaching this season, most glaringly with this goaltending fiasco.
If Howard plays every game the rest of the way and we make the playoffs, what then? Are we going to play a tired Howard in the playoffs, or give Ozzie a playoff start after not having played for 2 months?
Babcock should have played Ozzie last night and Howard tonight. Instead, he keeps piling on starts on his tired rookie goaltender.
Also, you have to wonder what effect this is having on the rest of the team. They're not robots, so this has to be getting to their heads too.
But there's also the argument that you have to play who's hot. It's all we can do to pull out eighth, we can't afford to play a goaltender that's been inconsistent.
#15
Posted 20 March 2010 - 05:59 PM
Babcock just hasn't done a good job of coaching this season, most glaringly with this goaltending fiasco.
If Howard plays every game the rest of the way and we make the playoffs, what then? Are we going to play a tired Howard in the playoffs, or give Ozzie a playoff start after not having played for 2 months?
Babcock should have played Ozzie last night and Howard tonight. Instead, he keeps piling on starts on his tired rookie goaltender.
Also, you have to wonder what effect this is having on the rest of the team. They're not robots, so this has to be getting to their heads too.
Exactly what I was saying earlier today to a friend. I understand that he wanted to get Howard to play a bunch and finally get him going in the NHL but this is too much. He's playing him as much as freaking Brodeur plays, if not more. All this on a ROOKIE. He's going to tire out sooner or later and it won't be pretty. It's going to all come down to Ozzie and he hasn't played in months. Then of course EVERYONE will expect him to be amazing cause he's a veteran but that has nothing to do with it. In order to be good you gotta play. Doesn't matter who you are. Sitting on the bench and charting faceoffs doesn't do a goalie any good. Especially one of Osgood's caliber.
#16
Posted 20 March 2010 - 06:01 PM
But there's also the argument that you have to play who's hot. It's all we can do to pull out eighth, we can't afford to play a goaltender that's been inconsistent.
Yeah, but it's not like Howard has won 8 games in a row and is standing on his head while we're getting outshot 4 to 1 in all these games.
I realize we have to make the playoffs before worrying about the playoffs, but Howard has looked tired since the All Star break, and if he plays every game to the end, that has to affect him in those late games.
#17
Posted 20 March 2010 - 06:06 PM
- Dano33 likes this

Thanks TeeMan!
#18
Posted 20 March 2010 - 06:08 PM
But there's also the argument that you have to play who's hot. It's all we can do to pull out eighth, we can't afford to play a goaltender that's been inconsistent.
How can he can be inconsistent when he hasn't played? And earlier this season when he strung together some wins, Babs still went with Jimmy.
#19
Posted 20 March 2010 - 06:10 PM
Exactly what I was saying earlier today to a friend. I understand that he wanted to get Howard to play a bunch and finally get him going in the NHL but this is too much. He's playing him as much as freaking Brodeur plays, if not more. All this on a ROOKIE. He's going to tire out sooner or later and it won't be pretty. It's going to all come down to Ozzie and he hasn't played in months. Then of course EVERYONE will expect him to be amazing cause he's a veteran but that has nothing to do with it. In order to be good you gotta play. Doesn't matter who you are. Sitting on the bench and charting faceoffs doesn't do a goalie any good. Especially one of Osgood's caliber.
I agree with your first statement and do think Ozzie should have had a couple more but Broduer is an old fart. If he can play 70+, I think Jimmy could handle it. Putting this load on him I think can only be positive. I can't think of another time, outside of playing for Maine, where Jimmy's confidence has been so high.

Thanks TeeMan!
#20
Posted 20 March 2010 - 06:13 PM
he'll be dead tired by the playoffs. damn it babcock
- zettie85, Wings_Fan_In_Exile, Doggy and 2 others like this

Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
97.1 The Ticket: Hocketown "Dead"? |
General Discussion | StormJH1 |
|
|
|
Another reason why Red Wings fans are awesome. |
General Discussion | RedLightGoesOn |
|
|
|
Babcock tells players they are soft. Pushes them to play better. |
General Discussion | drumnj |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users















