Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Ideal Playoff Matchups


  • Please log in to reply
37 replies to this topic

#21 Wings_Dynasty

Wings_Dynasty

    The Greatest Ever

  • HoF Booster
  • 3,773 posts
  • Location:Michigan

Posted 29 March 2010 - 04:32 AM

Teams I do not want to play:
Vancouver
Phoenix

Teams I want to play:
Pittsburgh

"I think a tough team, a team that sticks together, is a lot better than leaving the onus on one guy to take care of business." - Brendan Shanahan

 

It still would be nice to have that one guy. (Jordin Tootoo, wish granted)


#22 titanium2

titanium2

    Asha... I want I want!!!

  • Bronze Booster
  • 10,495 posts

Posted 29 March 2010 - 05:15 AM

Teams I want to play:
Pittsburgh


Really? Why?

I would certainly enjoy another cup win but beating them doesn't make it any more special because we've seen that dynamic twice and it was annoying to watch both times. On the ice, Pittsburgh only has one way of beating the Wings and that is to agitate and knock them off their game. C-Word and Malkin provide most of the offense while the Cookes, Kunitzes, Talbots and Orpiks simply try to get under the Wings skin for 7 games. Rules will be broken, the Pens will dish out their cheap shots and LGW will have too many angry threads labeling the Pens as 'classless'. It's all too predictable and I truly feel like there's nothing left to prove in that situation.

I can understand that you just want to see them lose but what makes it funnier and more entertaining is seeing them lose in the first round or something like that.

#23 Wings4Life19

Wings4Life19

    3rd Line Checker

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 436 posts
  • Location:Casper, Wyoming

Posted 29 March 2010 - 06:34 AM

who i want the wings to play: i dont care, after the season the wings have had just making the playoffs is a victory in it self. plus that whole "be careful what you wish for" thing comes into play.

#24 Wings_Dynasty

Wings_Dynasty

    The Greatest Ever

  • HoF Booster
  • 3,773 posts
  • Location:Michigan

Posted 29 March 2010 - 07:04 AM

Really? Why?

I would certainly enjoy another cup win but beating them doesn't make it any more special because we've seen that dynamic twice and it was annoying to watch both times. On the ice, Pittsburgh only has one way of beating the Wings and that is to agitate and knock them off their game. C-Word and Malkin provide most of the offense while the Cookes, Kunitzes, Talbots and Orpiks simply try to get under the Wings skin for 7 games. Rules will be broken, the Pens will dish out their cheap shots and LGW will have too many angry threads labeling the Pens as 'classless'. It's all too predictable and I truly feel like there's nothing left to prove in that situation.

I can understand that you just want to see them lose but what makes it funnier and more entertaining is seeing them lose in the first round or something like that.

I want a sweep. I want there to be ZERO doubt who the better team is. I want total dominance in all possible ways down to blocked shots and beers sold. 2 wins, 1 loss.

"I think a tough team, a team that sticks together, is a lot better than leaving the onus on one guy to take care of business." - Brendan Shanahan

 

It still would be nice to have that one guy. (Jordin Tootoo, wish granted)


#25 stevkrause

stevkrause

    Legend

  • Bronze Booster
  • 5,236 posts
  • Location:Detroit, MI

Posted 29 March 2010 - 07:14 AM

never pick your poison.

with the parity in the league and the tight race in the West, any team is as scary as the next and the Wings will need to play their game to win... with that said, I only pull for one thing - the least travel possible... the less West Coast trips we have to make, the better.

All I have to say about Holland and our off-season:

Here in this thread

Here in this one as well

Here in this one too

and finally

Here


Holland is a damn good GM. period.


#26 Drake_Marcus

Drake_Marcus

    Pariah

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,335 posts
  • Location:Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada

Posted 29 March 2010 - 07:31 AM

I want a sweep. I want there to be ZERO doubt who the better team is. I want total dominance in all possible ways down to blocked shots and beers sold. 2 wins, 1 loss.


This.

Although it's worth noting that we've beaten them 7 times in the finals and they've only beaten us 6 times. ;)
Dedicated to lulz once lost:
Posted Image
Thanks TeeMan!

"We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas
of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage" --H.P. Lovecraft

#27 mmamolo

mmamolo

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,809 posts

Posted 29 March 2010 - 12:10 PM

Personally I dont want Vancouver in the first round. I think the Sedins are playing really well I'd rather see if they can make it or break it against someone else....same thing for Samuelsson. Luongo hasn't looked that great since the Olympics but he *can* be a game changer.

The thing with Phoenix is although they have been playing really well since the Olympic break they have won a chunk of their games in shootouts. That's not to take anything away from them but it is worth noting. Also, in all fairness they do have players that are playing well above their heads. Since the deadline Lee Stempniak has 12 goals in 12 games. There is zero chance that he keeps up that pace. To me, the Coyotes just reak of a team that will be happy to get into the playoffs and some of their overachieving players will fizzle out. The only thing they legitimately have going for them is Bryzgalov and as good as he is I think the Wings could beat him.

I dont want to pick my poison but I'd rather not seeing a Wings/Canucks first round match up.
Posted Imagewww.unsportsmanlike.ca

#28 RedWings

RedWings

    4th Line Grinder

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 211 posts
  • Location:Paris, France

Posted 29 March 2010 - 04:42 PM

I'm afraid of Vancouver.
They really made the Wings look bad this year. Probably the most dangerous playoff team in the West.
Chicago and SJ will choke. Phoenix is a regular season success story which will end up playing golf soon.

#29 Lidstromboli

Lidstromboli

    buncha geezers

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,454 posts
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 29 March 2010 - 05:17 PM

Why are people more afraid of Luongo than Nabokov?

Luongo: 14th in Sv%, 12th in GAA

Nabokov: 6th in Sv%, 8th in GAA

Nabby has better numbers on an equally good defensive team. Neither is as scary as Bryzgalov but Luongo is definitely the the less impressive of the three. He's easily taken off his game and has been pulled about 82 times this year.

Luongo has the potential to be terrifying but he's really not been impressive this year.


Why regular season stats?

Posted Image

I don't think Luongo has had as long to prove himself as Nabokov has. Their stats in the playoffs aren't too dissimilar I think.

Posted Image


#30 dicksmack

dicksmack

    lol LGW "writer" login first...

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,584 posts
  • Location:Windsor

Posted 29 March 2010 - 05:49 PM

<br />I'm afraid of Vancouver.<br />They really made the Wings look bad this year. Probably the most dangerous playoff team in the West.<br />Chicago and SJ will choke. Phoenix is a regular season success story which will end up playing golf soon.<br />

<br /><br /><br />

Vancouver is also the team I'm most concerned about in the first round. I'm not so sure the Nucks made us look that bad as we took the season series handily. However, their offense is top notch, their D is good and they have do have Luongo after all... Zetterberg can definitely score at will on Luongo; Hank has Lu's # big time so if Z should falter, we are in big trouble. Another concern is how we lost the second last game vs them at the Joe. They were chucking pucks at the net for deflections (one of their trademarks) and Howard really struggled with this in the 6-3 loss. We need to remember that Luongo's achilles heel is that he doesn't like those passing plays that get him moving side to side and he esp. doesn't like #40 coming down on him!
Finally someone that can post with actually integrity, nice to see. :thumbup: --Carman

#31 BlakKy

BlakKy

    3rd Line Checker

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 461 posts
  • Location:Toronto On.

Posted 29 March 2010 - 07:13 PM

<br /><br /><br />

Vancouver is also the team I'm most concerned about in the first round. I'm not so sure the Nucks made us look that bad as we took the season series handily. However, their offense is top notch, their D is good and they have do have Luongo after all... Zetterberg can definitely score at will on Luongo; Hank has Lu's # big time so if Z should falter, we are in big trouble. Another concern is how we lost the second last game vs them at the Joe. They were chucking pucks at the net for deflections (one of their trademarks) and Howard really struggled with this in the 6-3 loss. We need to remember that Luongo's achilles heel is that he doesn't like those passing plays that get him moving side to side and he esp. doesn't like #40 coming down on him!


7uongo's weakness is that he comes off the inside post too easily. You can't beat his pads or blocker but if you shoot from tough angles or lob shots in from the blue (a la Datsyuk) line you've got a chance.

#32 mjtm77

mjtm77

    mjtm77

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 962 posts

Posted 29 March 2010 - 10:32 PM

no one els would like to see hossa loose in another cup final
Posted Image

#33 wingsaroundtheworld

wingsaroundtheworld

    Draftee

  • Member
  • 10 posts

Posted 29 March 2010 - 10:36 PM

I too think the top 4 are close, and all strong, but I just feel Phoenix would be our best matchup. We lost to them this season but we somewhat dominated that game with injuries and they got 2 late ones to tie it up. Also, I know we've had trouble in the past with teams under the radar in the first round but that was with what i think was a very different team (pre 2007).

I'm stoked for jimmy howard, and i think our goaltending and team defence is better this year than last (even though our offence may be not as good).

Also, I don't really get the argument about bad travel. Unfortunately we are an Eastern time zone team playing in the Western conference, pretty much all teams we play against are gonna require considerable travel. Also, both teams have to travel. I dont know, just seems like a poor excuse to me.

Oh, I also think Nashville will upset whoever they play in the first round, getting good goaltending, with great D (Weber, Suter, Hamhuis). Not too high on the avs or kings.

#34 Icesurfer

Icesurfer

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 560 posts
  • Location:Honolulu, HI

Posted 29 March 2010 - 10:42 PM

NO ONE is afraid of Luongo.....

IT IS THE POSSIBLE THREE FRIGGIN' FLIGHTS OUT TO VANCOUVER THAT IS THE KILLER! And if the Wings have to fly out to Vancouver three times (for games 1 & 2, 5 and 7)to beat Vancouver they will be cooked in the next round.

When Wings won the cup two year ago they had a VERY easy flight schedule!
Defense and goaltending win championships!!!

#35 Icesurfer

Icesurfer

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 560 posts
  • Location:Honolulu, HI

Posted 30 March 2010 - 01:19 AM

I think Colorado and LA are sandbagging... LOL. LA has lost the last 4 games to teams who are below them in standings. Colorado has lost 5 of the last 6 but I attribute that to the fact that I think Duchene is running out of gas. Colorado and LA do not want to play Vancouver or Phoenix.

The last time Colorado lost 5 out of 6 was December 3rd. The last time LA lost four in a row was December 30th.
Defense and goaltending win championships!!!

#36 webwing91

webwing91

    Rookie

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 196 posts
  • Location:Glendale, Arizona

Posted 30 March 2010 - 02:28 AM

Also, I'm not a conspiracy theorist but I do think they might find the refs being a little lenient to Bettman's current prized organization. I could see a few calls going their way so that they can bring in more playoff revenue.


Please, seems incredibly unlikely that this could happen. I've been watching them all season long, they get no more calls go there way then any other team does. Just like I don't buy that the league "fixed" the cup finals against us last year.

The thing I love about hockey the most is that you have to EARN everything, and if I didn't see that in the NHL, then I wouldn't watch.

#37 skyphoenix

skyphoenix

    JIMMEH

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,734 posts
  • Location:Commerce, MI

Posted 30 March 2010 - 02:42 AM

I would like San Jose or Chicago first round. San Jose because they are notorious for choking in the playoffs and because we haven't had any trouble with them all season even with a depleted lineup. Chicago would be good to get out of the way early, because I think we have a solid chance of beating them. I don't want to face Vancouver in any case. Nashville/LA/Colorado/Phoenix don't scare me much although out of that group, Phoenix seems the most dangerous.

Posted Image


#38 Guest_screwdahawks (Guest)

Guest_screwdahawks (Guest)
  • Guests

Posted 30 March 2010 - 04:45 AM

I'd want us to play Chicago, because they have the worst goaltending out of those other teams. I don't think they want to play us in the first round.

Phoenix is not going to be as scared of the Wings as the other top 3 teams, because they just don't know any better, and they don't have as much pressure on them as Chicago or San Jose per se. They're the kind of team we always struggle against. A no name team with a hot goalie and a tight defensive system of hockey.

Everyone is expecting San Jose to choke, so this may be their year under the radar where they finally succeed.

Vancouver is a bad travel matchup, and Luongo and Sammy would kill us.

So yeah, I'd have to go with Chicago.


:thumbup: Plus I like the travel in that matchup..........





Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users