Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

4/1 GDT: Blue Jackets 2 at Red Wings 3


  • Please log in to reply
262 replies to this topic

#241 Four

Four

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,143 posts
  • Location:Ontario, Canada

Posted 01 April 2010 - 10:32 PM

Just saw Datsyuk's goal.

Wicked.

O.o

#242 Trapt1307

Trapt1307

    Tootoo + Hem = Win

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,043 posts
  • Location:Livonia, MI

Posted 01 April 2010 - 10:32 PM

Flip and Farnzen left the game?


They both played afterwords...I'm assuming they're fine.
"Scotty hated the world and treated everybody the same, from me to Steve Yzerman,'' Legace said. ''Scotty would rip anybody, and had the personality of ant."

#243 Z and D for the C

Z and D for the C

    This is the TBL forum, right?

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,025 posts
  • Location:D, Michigan

Posted 01 April 2010 - 10:48 PM

Flip led all forwards in ice time again. Hopefully he can start getting some points again.

Edited by Z and D for the C, 01 April 2010 - 10:48 PM.

Just cause you look like the gimp don't mean you play like the gimp!


#244 Zetts

Zetts

    1st Line Sniper

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 963 posts
  • Location:Edmonton

Posted 01 April 2010 - 11:08 PM

http://www.mlive.com...jackets_3-.html

Said Columbus captain Steve Nash: "You can't blame the refs. You have to talk to Toronto, that's their call. I'm at a loss for words. I thought it was quite evident, but apparently not. If that call goes the other way, we're going to overtime.''


Apparently the issues go beyond just ESPN.

Edited by Zetts, 01 April 2010 - 11:23 PM.


#245 Kira

Kira

    "I hope you're not from KGB"

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,556 posts
  • Location:Oh yeah, like you really care where I am.

Posted 01 April 2010 - 11:16 PM

This makes Saturday so damned important. We better win and win big. I wish I could go to that game but I hear it's sold out.
Posted Image

#246 DirtyD

DirtyD

    One fast move or I'm gone

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 104 posts
  • Location:London, ON

Posted 01 April 2010 - 11:19 PM

http://www.mlive.com...jackets_3-.html



Apparently the issues go beyond just ESPN.


Is it just me, or are the Wings a lot less bitchy about the countless goals which Homer (or, Brad May on one specific occasion) gets legitimate goals called back? I know Babs will occasionally make little jabs at the league or officiating, but the Wings' players tend to keep their mouths' shut, do they not? I've already seen quotes from Commadore, Mason, Nash, and their nobody coach all pissing and moaning. Hell, with the way that they're complaining, you'd think they actually had a shot at making the playoffs.

On top of that, I really thought that the contact with Bertuzzi's foot looked incidental. He was being bodied up, so I thought that his movement was very limited. I have, however, only seen it once or twice. What was the concensus around here? Did we get lucky?

Posted Image


#247 hokike

hokike

    Rookie

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 195 posts

Posted 01 April 2010 - 11:35 PM

Why Red Wings conspiratory theorists do not show up when Red Wings gets questionable calls?

Usually silly posts "I hate bettman" are common but why not "I love bettman" when Red Wings is favoured? :lol:

OK, lemme start.

I love bettman.

Edited by hokike, 01 April 2010 - 11:36 PM.

Crosby’s frustration level seemed to reach a boiling point in the final seconds, leading to him cross-checking Zetterberg in the back in front of Detroit goaltender Jimmy Howard(notes).

“I knew it was him without turning around,” Zetterberg said.

#248 SaCkaveli20

SaCkaveli20

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,085 posts
  • Location:Woodstock, Ontario

Posted 02 April 2010 - 12:58 AM

I'm going to the game on Saturday!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I can't wait...HUGE game..i'm f***in pumped

#249 mjtm77

mjtm77

    mjtm77

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 962 posts

Posted 02 April 2010 - 04:05 AM

Jackets score, cutting the lead to 2-3 Wings.


this pisses me off. Its 3-2 wings, not 2-3 wings.
Posted Image

#250 Guest_screwdahawks (Guest)

Guest_screwdahawks (Guest)
  • Guests

Posted 02 April 2010 - 06:49 AM

Game will be rebroadcast today at 2:00 pm on NHL Network for those interested..........

#251 55fan

55fan

    All mine 'til 2-0-1-9

  • HoF Booster
  • 12,872 posts
  • Location:Fargo, ND

Posted 02 April 2010 - 06:54 AM

this pisses me off. Its 3-2 wings, not 2-3 wings.

He has good luck reporting it this way. It's good mojo. Confusing to us mere mortals (yeah, I have to read it 2-3 times- or maybe 3-2 times) but it works for the Wings, and that's what counts.

#252 softshoes

softshoes

    3rd Line Checker

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 474 posts
  • Location:Farmington Hills, Mi.

Posted 02 April 2010 - 07:39 AM

Is it just me, or are the Wings a lot less bitchy about the countless goals which Homer (or, Brad May on one specific occasion) gets legitimate goals called back? I know Babs will occasionally make little jabs at the league or officiating, but the Wings' players tend to keep their mouths' shut, do they not? I've already seen quotes from Commadore, Mason, Nash, and their nobody coach all pissing and moaning. Hell, with the way that they're complaining, you'd think they actually had a shot at making the playoffs.

On top of that, I really thought that the contact with Bertuzzi's foot looked incidental. He was being bodied up, so I thought that his movement was very limited. I have, however, only seen it once or twice. What was the concensus around here? Did we get lucky?


His skate pushed/kicked it in, still seemed more a ricochet. I never thought they would overturn that. After the game they asked Bert about kicking it in and he said he didn't even know it hit his skate.

As for the pissing and moaning that's for the losers. Winners play over it and prevail.
"Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f***in beatin's. The world ends when you're dead. Until then you got more punishment in store.Stand it like a man, and give some back."

- Al Swearengen


#253 Hockeytown0001

Hockeytown0001

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 22,599 posts
  • Location:A2, Michigan

Posted 02 April 2010 - 07:46 AM

http://www.mlive.com/redwings/index.ssf/2010/04/red_wings_edge_blue_jackets_3-.html



Apparently the issues go beyond just ESPN.


Right, because that 1 point could make or breat the Jackets playoff hopes. :rolleyes:

"All done? Five bucks." - Pavel Datsyuk after an interview
"Very few cities in the NHL have the history or the following of the Detroit Red Wings." - Steve Yzerman

 

 


#254 hokike

hokike

    Rookie

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 195 posts

Posted 02 April 2010 - 08:14 AM

His skate pushed/kicked it in, still seemed more a ricochet. I never thought they would overturn that. After the game they asked Bert about kicking it in and he said he didn't even know it hit his skate.

As for the pissing and moaning that's for the losers. Winners play over it and prevail.


this forum has more than enough pisssed and moaned over not counted goals or "dirty" goals by opponents.

do not try to fool me.
Crosby’s frustration level seemed to reach a boiling point in the final seconds, leading to him cross-checking Zetterberg in the back in front of Detroit goaltender Jimmy Howard(notes).

“I knew it was him without turning around,” Zetterberg said.

#255 HOCKEY MATTERS

HOCKEY MATTERS

    Nearly invisible now........you smell that?

  • HoF Booster
  • 2,401 posts
  • Location:Mount Clemens, MI

Posted 02 April 2010 - 08:25 AM

Doesn't the rule book say "forward kicking motion"? Bert's motion was to the rear. Just sayin.
half the world is nuts...and the other half is crazy
"You can't chew yesterdays' breakfast." Jim Leyland
Drawing on my fine command of language, I said nothing.

Alternative to Google tracking you.... http://duckduckgo.com/

#256 Inultus

Inultus

    Slush ****

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 885 posts
  • Location:Lansing, MI

Posted 02 April 2010 - 09:38 AM

I believe the book just says "kicking motion".

I'm really surprised that they counted it, for numerous reasons:

He was well into the crease, it could have easily been interference.
It could easily have been called a kicking motion.
It's pretty rare that they turn over the call on the ice.

I actually wish they hadn't counted the goal, because it makes me afraid that we will get a "make-up call" going against us when it really matter, i.e. playoff time.
"It's been six years since we won the Cup. That's too long." -Nick Lidstrom

"my message is simple: The next time anyone runs any of our guys in a way that shouldn't be done, then a message will be sent. I'm not going to go out and run your skill guys, your superstars. I'm going to go right to the guy (who did it), and fair justice is fair justice." -Downey

#257 scottj

scottj

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 644 posts
  • Location:Southgate

Posted 02 April 2010 - 09:45 AM

I love bettman.


Posted Image

Edited by scottj, 02 April 2010 - 09:45 AM.


#258 55fan

55fan

    All mine 'til 2-0-1-9

  • HoF Booster
  • 12,872 posts
  • Location:Fargo, ND

Posted 02 April 2010 - 09:52 AM

Doesn't the rule book say "forward kicking motion"? Bert's motion was to the rear. Just sayin.

My rule book is a year old, but I don't think this has changed. If I'm wrong, I'll certainly welcome correction. The phrases in all caps are as printed in the book.

Rule 39.4 The following situations are subject to review by the Video Goal Judge:

(blah, blah, stuff that doesn't apply)

(iv) Puck directed or batted into the net by a hand or foot or deliberately batted with any part of the attacking player's body. With the use of a foot/skate, was a distinct kicking motion evident? If so, the apparent goal must be disallowed. A DISTINCT KICKING MOTION is one which, with a pendulum motion, the player propels the puck with his skate into the net. If the Video Goal Judge determines that it was put into the net by an attacking player using a distinct kicking motion, it must be ruled NO GOAL. This would also be true even if the puck, after being kicked, deflects off any ofther player of either team and then into the net. This is still a NO GOAL. See also 49.2.

49.2
Kicking the puck shall be permitted in all zones. A goal cannot be scored by an attacking player who uses a distinct kicking motion to propel the puck into the net. A goal cannot be scored by an attacking player who kicks a puck that deflects into the net off any player, goalkeeper, or official.

A puck that deflects into the net off an attacking player's skate who does not use a distinct kicking motion is a legitimate goal. A puck that is directed into the net by an attacking player's skate shall be a legitimate goal as long as no distinct kicking motion is evident. The following should clarify deflections following a kicked puck that enters the goal:
(i) A kicked puck that deflects off the body of any player of either team (including the goalkeeper) shall be ruled a no goal.
(ii) A kicked puck that deflects off the stick of any player (excluding the goalkeeper's stick) shall be ruled a good goal. Any time the puck has been kicked, makes contact with any stick, and then deflects off any player (excluding the goalkeeper) into the net, it will be ruled a good goal.
(iii) A goal will be allowed when an attacking player kicks the puck and the puck deflects off his own stick and into the net.

A goal cannot be scored by an attacking player who kicks any equipment (stick, glove, helmet, etc.) at the puck, including kicking the blade of his own stick, causing the puck to cross the goal line.



Nothing about forward kicking motion in these sections. Only whether or not it is distinct.

#259 Datsyuk Fan

Datsyuk Fan

    Prospect

  • Member
  • 44 posts

Posted 02 April 2010 - 10:24 AM

I actually wish they hadn't counted the goal, because it makes me afraid that we will get a "make-up call" going against us when it really matter, i.e. playoff time.


Maybe that was our make-up call.

#260 softshoes

softshoes

    3rd Line Checker

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 474 posts
  • Location:Farmington Hills, Mi.

Posted 02 April 2010 - 10:52 AM

this forum has more than enough pisssed and moaned over not counted goals or "dirty" goals by opponents.

do not try to fool me.

No fooling.

I was referring to the Jackets(losers) pissing and moaning. Winners play on(Wings/Babcock).

The poster I was replying to wondered about our players acting that way. When it comes to the press they usually keep their mouth shut about bad calls.
"Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f***in beatin's. The world ends when you're dead. Until then you got more punishment in store.Stand it like a man, and give some back."

- Al Swearengen






Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users