Is the way Lidstrom handled his captaincy really that much different then the way Stevie did?
No but it's more about the era. He is still a member of the old guard. Same with Iginla.
Posted 05 April 2010 - 03:19 PM
Is the way Lidstrom handled his captaincy really that much different then the way Stevie did?

Posted 05 April 2010 - 03:24 PM
Honestly, I don't think there are any captains now like we had in the previous era, with Yzerman, Messier, Stevens, Bourque, Sakic and Francis.
Since those guys have retired, it's left the door open for lots of young captains in the NHL.

Posted 05 April 2010 - 03:28 PM
Is the way Lidstrom handled his captaincy really that much different then the way Stevie did?
Posted 05 April 2010 - 03:33 PM
HEY! I just realised that Sidney Crosby = SC and Stanley Cup = SC.Where's the guy who's initials are SC?
![]()
Posted 05 April 2010 - 03:36 PM
HEY! I just realised that Sidney Crosby = SC and Stanley Cup = SC.
Coincidence?
Edited by GMRwings1983, 05 April 2010 - 03:37 PM.
Posted 05 April 2010 - 04:39 PM
Posted 05 April 2010 - 04:41 PM
Yzerman has more longevity as captain than him, as does every other player I listed.
Of course that's because they played on the same team, but still, Lidstrom will not go down as one of the greatest leaders in hockey history.
Posted 05 April 2010 - 04:46 PM
I just copy and paste'd the OP's list, minus the nicknamesCome on, man...
Posted 05 April 2010 - 04:55 PM
I bet Stevie would disagree.
Posted 05 April 2010 - 04:58 PM
Because he's too humble.
Do you think Lidstrom is in the same class of leadership as any of the guys I listed?

Posted 05 April 2010 - 05:56 PM
Figures don't lie, but liars sure figure. - Mark Twain
Posted 05 April 2010 - 06:15 PM
Because he's too humble.
Do you think Lidstrom is in the same class of leadership as any of the guys I listed?
Posted 05 April 2010 - 06:26 PM
Posted 05 April 2010 - 07:45 PM
Yzerman, Messier, Stevens, Bourque, Sakic and Francis.
I really don't see why not. Enlighten me on your impression of a great leader.
Posted 05 April 2010 - 08:56 PM
More than Messier.
Posted 05 April 2010 - 09:15 PM

Posted 05 April 2010 - 09:47 PM
Posted 05 April 2010 - 09:53 PM

Posted 05 April 2010 - 09:54 PM
Well, longevity is important when it comes to how people look at all time great leaders.
Lidstrom when he retires will likely be a captain for 5 total years in his career. That's not much compared to those other players. Maybe if Lidstrom became captain at a younger age and stayed there, he would be considered in that class. I'm not saying he's not a great leader, I'm just saying that when discussions arise amongst all-time great captains, who will mention Lidstrom? I don't think anyone will.
The personality isn't really important like some people think. Sakic and Francis were quiet guys, who were well respected as captains. But the longevity is important if you want to mention him amongst those other names.
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pinned Calder Cup Finals Game 6 GDT - Grand Rapids Griffins @ Syracuse Crunch
|
General Discussion | FlashyG |
|
|
|
Best Songs That Pump You Up at the Rink |
General Discussion | The Axe |
|
|
|
The Hottest Red Wing
|
Between Periods | Guest_lidstrom#5 (Guest) |
|
|
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users