Seems Canucks fans feel that their goal was disallowed by Toronto not because of intent to kick but because Mike Murphy played for and coached the Kings.
Fans more paranoid than ours
#1
Posted 20 April 2010 - 06:21 AM
Seems Canucks fans feel that their goal was disallowed by Toronto not because of intent to kick but because Mike Murphy played for and coached the Kings.
- Howard He Do It?! likes this
#2
Posted 20 April 2010 - 06:35 AM

Crosby's Bettman Real Doll is going to get quite a workout tonight.
#3
Posted 20 April 2010 - 07:20 AM
#4
Posted 20 April 2010 - 07:25 AM
#5
Posted 20 April 2010 - 07:55 AM
"I think a tough team, a team that sticks together, is a lot better than leaving the onus on one guy to take care of business." - Brendan Shanahan
It still would be nice to have that one guy. (Jordin Tootoo, wish granted)
#6
Posted 20 April 2010 - 08:06 AM
That was not a kicking motion.
- EZBAKETHAGANGSTA and Wings_Fan_In_Exile like this
"Mess up tomorrow, don't mess up now".
- Harry James Benson, CBE.
#7
Posted 20 April 2010 - 08:08 AM
- Wings_Fan_In_Exile likes this
#8
Posted 20 April 2010 - 08:09 AM
I'd be one step closer to believing in a conspiracy too if I were a Nucks fan.
Especially after that whole Auger nonsense earlier this season.

Can't listen live? Check out MoreLikeRadio.com/downloads for show archives!
#9
Posted 20 April 2010 - 08:17 AM
That was not a kicking motion.
I'm a high school drop out, and I find that clip highly offensive.
- 55fan and Green Wing like this
Two minutes, by yourself, you know and you feel shame, you know.
And then you get free.
#10
Posted 20 April 2010 - 08:32 AM
#11
Posted 20 April 2010 - 08:36 AM
New e-book: The Spanish-American War: A Brief History. Relatively short, introductory read for casual history buffs and people who want to learn more about a forgotten war that changed America. Available at BN.com, Smashwords, Kobo, and Diesel E-Books right now. Same link as above.
#12
Posted 20 April 2010 - 08:37 AM
I'm surprised there was no goal here.He didn't go out of his way to direct the puck into the net with a distinct kicking motion.In no way/shape/form did he kick it in.He was driving to the net.Not sure if everyone saw the play, but pretty amazing that they called that back. The call on the ice was a goal, so in order to call it back, you needed conclusive evidence. If you look at the video, I find it impossible to call that back, but someone did. I would even suggest that if the call on the ice was no goal, you'd change it to a goal because it was pretty clear that there was no kicking motion.
RIP Bob Probert
RIP Wade Belak
RIP Derek Boogaard
RIP Rick Rypien
#13
Posted 20 April 2010 - 08:37 AM
Was just reading Bob McKenzie and a few other's tweets.
Seems Canucks fans feel that their goal was disallowed by Toronto not because of intent to kick but because Mike Murphy played for and coached the Kings.
If you start a new thread within two hours after a Wings game, specifically a loss, YOU ARE WRONG.

#14
Posted 20 April 2010 - 08:46 AM
#15
Posted 20 April 2010 - 08:57 AM
And on top of them being wrong 50% of the time, replays are now taking like 5 minutes each. That one last night went on foreverrrrrrrrrr
#16
Posted 20 April 2010 - 09:02 AM
#17
Posted 20 April 2010 - 09:36 AM

Can't listen live? Check out MoreLikeRadio.com/downloads for show archives!
#18
Posted 20 April 2010 - 09:44 AM
So basically, Mike Murphy just said they decided to change the rules for that particular instance.
He also said the league wanted more goals, which is why they originally expanded the rule about pucks off skates. Yet while wanting more goals off skates, this one doesn't count because he "twisted his toe" and the puck came back off his skate too fast. It really is a crock of s***.

Crosby's Bettman Real Doll is going to get quite a workout tonight.
#19
Posted 20 April 2010 - 09:47 AM
- EZBAKETHAGANGSTA likes this

Can't listen live? Check out MoreLikeRadio.com/downloads for show archives!
#20
Posted 20 April 2010 - 09:53 AM
Evidence that the wrong call was made. "Not a distinct kicking motion but a kicking motion"
When I was watching it, I got the feeling that they were going to call it back. The reason why though is not involved in any of the videos shown on the replay now. There was a view where it looked like he went out of his way to "stop" right where the puck would go. If that was why they called it back, it's a pretty bad call, and if it was what was said in the video? Pretty bad still. Of course, as Wings fans we should have already known the results of a team that didn't play the full 60 mins, right?
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Another reason why Red Wings fans are awesome. |
General Discussion | RedLightGoesOn |
|
|
|
Hey Hawks fans.... |
General Discussion | Louisville |
|
|
|
Andreas Athanasiou |
Prospects Watch | egroen |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














