Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

NHL playoffs TV ratings up 21 percent


  • Please log in to reply
27 replies to this topic

#1 auxlepli

auxlepli

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,762 posts

Posted 21 April 2010 - 04:03 AM

http://sports.yahoo....layoffs-ratings

The first five nights of coverage on Versus have the highest cable ratings for the beginning of the postseason since 2002. The average of 543,000 viewers is up 21 percent from last year.


I've always thought the NHL should stay with Versus. Looks like I'm right.

#2 SiLkK19

SiLkK19

    1st Line Sniper

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 930 posts
  • Location:Bay Area CA

Posted 21 April 2010 - 04:33 AM

Just need a Vs2 for more games.

Just need a Vs2 for more games.

#3 F.Michael

F.Michael

    Old School Dynamic Duo

  • HoF Booster
  • 7,567 posts
  • Location:Wisconsin

Posted 21 April 2010 - 09:38 AM

Just need a Vs2 for more games.

Just need a Vs2 for more games.

:lol: wishful thinking...There's only so much pro bull riding, and MMA that I can tolerate.

I will say though that ESPN/ESPN2 did a great job back in the 1990's with broadcasting playoff games; 1 game on the flagship, and 2 games on the deuce each night...Every year I caught the "Battle of Ontario" on the deuce between the Leafs, and Sens, and I gotta say the overall coverage back then was solid.

Too bad ESPN had a change of heart just after the Red Wings won the Cup in 2002.

'Evolution' created by Offsides

#4 Hossa4Life

Hossa4Life

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,139 posts
  • Location:HockeyTown Michigan

Posted 21 April 2010 - 10:22 AM

i'm sure all of these close series and underdog wins is helping too.

But I must be off, I have some jerking off to do. Oh btw I like to consider myself extremely attractive and am proud of myself for being your intellectual superior as I am going to UofM next year, and I am a better hockey player than Crosby.

Posted Image


#5 FireCaptain

FireCaptain

    This space for rent.

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,908 posts
  • Location:Atoka, TN

Posted 21 April 2010 - 11:07 AM

This.

Even if it's not a 24/7/365 channel. Just something to open up more air and avoid the 'joined in progress' or not aired games.

Just need a Vs2 for more games.

Just need a Vs2 for more games.


Most nights, my posts are brought to you by Heineken and sarcasm.
Success has a thousand fathers, failure is an orphan.
We not score, is hard to win. - Pavel Datsyuk #13

#6 Howard He Do It?!

Howard He Do It?!

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,417 posts
  • Location:Hockeytown

Posted 21 April 2010 - 11:20 AM

I'd be willing to bet those numbers would be even higher if the NHL was on ESPN.

Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image


Round 1: Red Wings (4) vs. Coyotes (0)
Round 2: Red Wings (0) vs. Sharks (0)


#7 stevkrause

stevkrause

    Legend

  • Bronze Booster
  • 5,236 posts
  • Location:Detroit, MI

Posted 21 April 2010 - 12:36 PM

I'd be willing to bet those numbers would be even higher if the NHL was on ESPN.

I bet it be even higher than that if the games were all broadcast on NBC, ABC, CBS and Fox, simultaneously, thus taking over all major over the air networks at once...

All I have to say about Holland and our off-season:

Here in this thread

Here in this one as well

Here in this one too

and finally

Here


Holland is a damn good GM. period.


#8 Bring Back The Bruise Bros

Bring Back The Bruise Bros

    RIP Probie

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,691 posts

Posted 21 April 2010 - 12:55 PM

i'm sure all of these close series and underdog wins is helping too.

The fact that 4 of the original 6 teams(Detroit,Boston,Montreal,Chicago) are in doesn't hurt either.
"Ice hockey is a form of disorderly conduct in which the score is kept."

RIP Bob Probert
RIP Wade Belak
RIP Derek Boogaard
RIP Rick Rypien

#9 Drake_Marcus

Drake_Marcus

    Pariah

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,336 posts
  • Location:Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada

Posted 21 April 2010 - 01:11 PM

Nice! Great to hear that TV viewership is up in the US.

Although I bet this is solely because LA is in the playoffs. The LA market is HUGE.
Dedicated to lulz once lost:
Posted Image
Thanks TeeMan!

"We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas
of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage" --H.P. Lovecraft

#10 GMRwings1983

GMRwings1983

    The Killer is Me

  • Silver Booster
  • 20,742 posts
  • Location:Jerkwater, USA

Posted 21 April 2010 - 01:50 PM

Anything is more exciting than the boring NBA playoffs, where the higher seed wins every damn series.
According to my profile, my reputation is excellent. LOL.

#11 Bring Back The Bruise Bros

Bring Back The Bruise Bros

    RIP Probie

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,691 posts

Posted 21 April 2010 - 01:53 PM

Anything is more exciting than the boring NBA playoffs, where the higher seed wins every damn series.

I can't watch the NBA anymore.I used to be able to sit down for a playoff game or two,but its just so ridiculous now.Its ALL about money in the NBA.its sad.
"Ice hockey is a form of disorderly conduct in which the score is kept."

RIP Bob Probert
RIP Wade Belak
RIP Derek Boogaard
RIP Rick Rypien

#12 titanium2

titanium2

    Asha... I want I want!!!

  • Bronze Booster
  • 10,495 posts

Posted 21 April 2010 - 02:06 PM

I can't watch the NBA anymore.I used to be able to sit down for a playoff game or two,but its just so ridiculous now.Its ALL about money in the NBA.its sad.


Yup. And the NHL is starting to show symptoms of a similar progression.

#13 Opie

Opie

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 7,419 posts
  • Location:The only Henniker on Earth!

Posted 21 April 2010 - 02:33 PM

NBA I only watch Celtics games now, I used to watch every playoff series, I do in almost all sports (even Cricket if I can find it televised which is tough any more), but in the NBA I can not follow the game any more. Whomever has the best 2 players wins. When the C's beat the lakers Paul and KG were better than Kobe (who was better than any one single player) and whomever else you want to add. The Duncan/Parker years.

I miss the 130-120 games, I hate the fact that the NCAA does a 300% better job officiating the game. It is the game with the absolute most bias when it comes to officiating. I am not even talking about names, I mean guard and Center collide, foul on the center almost guaranteed.

This is why I feel the NHL really needs to crack down on the inconsistency of officials, the gambling thing didn't help the NBA, but the officials beyond the Donahey (SP) scandal are still the biggest problem in the game, it gets no flow.

The inconsistencies of officiating in the NHL is really starting to become a concern, I wouldn't be surprised to hear Franzen suspended over his hit last game, but certain players hit like that all year and got away with it, does Franzen deserve penalty under the new head rule, probably but I don't think so ( I am bias).

Officiating is a big problem in every sport because as the players get younger, faster, stronger, bigger, and smarter the officials keep getting older and older and slower and slower. That my internet friends is a bad combination!

"The more I know about people - the better I like my dog." - Mark Twain

"A wise man once told me, ‘Don’t argue with fools. Cause people from a distance can’t tell who is who'." Jay Z, Takeover

"When I was looking for a captain, I wanted a guy with the Red Wings crest tattooed on his chest," said former Detroit coach Jacques Demers, who named Yzerman captain in 1986. "Steve Yzerman was that guy."

“Told him if he wasn't ultra-competitive he couldn't come here. If he didn't bring it every day he couldn't come here, because he was going to hate it if he didn't, dislike the coach and dislike playing here.
“It's real straightforward. If you don't do it right, you're not happy here." Babcock

#14 VM1138

VM1138

    Legend

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,518 posts
  • Location:Michigan

Posted 21 April 2010 - 02:37 PM

I'd be willing to bet those numbers would be even higher if the NHL was on ESPN.


I don't know. ESPN has spent so much time bashing the Nhl over the years their audience is probably automatically going to dismiss the NHL and not try watching it. Which would be justification for ESPN to limit NHL coverage (they would probably start out with small coverage thus making all the NHL progress over the past few years moot).

Keep it on VS. The only issue is reaching an audience which seems to be happening.
Check out my short e-book on the Red Wings' 1937 Stanley Cup championship entitled: "Nothing Could Keep 'Em Down." Please download it from my profile at Smashwords: https://www.smashwor...ile/view/victor

New e-book: The Spanish-American War: A Brief History. Relatively short, introductory read for casual history buffs and people who want to learn more about a forgotten war that changed America. Available at BN.com, Smashwords, Kobo, and Diesel E-Books right now. Same link as above.

#15 F.Michael

F.Michael

    Old School Dynamic Duo

  • HoF Booster
  • 7,567 posts
  • Location:Wisconsin

Posted 21 April 2010 - 02:59 PM

I'd be willing to bet those numbers would be even higher if the NHL was on ESPN.

Hard to say.

The last few years prior to the lock-out ESPN's ratings for NHL games were sinking lower, and lower...With more channels available one could conclude that the ratings for ESPN/ESPN2 would be higher - that is if they didn't show MLB, or NBA games instead.

I don't know. ESPN has spent so much time bashing the Nhl over the years their audience is probably automatically going to dismiss the NHL and not try watching it. Which would be justification for ESPN to limit NHL coverage (they would probably start out with small coverage thus making all the NHL progress over the past few years moot).

Keep it on VS. The only issue is reaching an audience which seems to be happening.

The 1st round will be an issue for VS, but once we get to the 2nd round there shouldn't be as many scheduling woes.

The best bet for the NHL is to strike up a deal that would involve all 3 parties (VS, NBC, ESPN); that way there'll be plenty of games available for us hard-core fans as well as for the casual fan.

'Evolution' created by Offsides

#16 Lidstrom for life

Lidstrom for life

    3rd Line Checker

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 439 posts
  • Location:St Johns/EL MI

Posted 21 April 2010 - 07:56 PM

I don't know. ESPN has spent so much time bashing the Nhl over the years their audience is probably automatically going to dismiss the NHL and not try watching it. Which would be justification for ESPN to limit NHL coverage (they would probably start out with small coverage thus making all the NHL progress over the past few years moot).

Keep it on VS. The only issue is reaching an audience which seems to be happening.


I think the reason that ESPN ignores/bashes hockey is because its the only major sport that they don't broadcast, so what good would it do them to promote it? If hockey was actually broadcasted on ESPN they would work much harder to promote it because it would make them money.

Edited by Lidstrom for life, 21 April 2010 - 07:57 PM.

credits to hobbit-face for my icon.

#17 Carman

Carman

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 5,114 posts
  • Location:Riverview, MI

Posted 21 April 2010 - 08:08 PM

ESPN doesn't show as much hockey because they don't make money off it. They don't have anything against the sport itself.

Anyways this is great news, finally the NHL seems to be on the right track.

#18 VM1138

VM1138

    Legend

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,518 posts
  • Location:Michigan

Posted 21 April 2010 - 08:30 PM

ESPN doesn't show as much hockey because they don't make money off it. They don't have anything against the sport itself.

Anyways this is great news, finally the NHL seems to be on the right track.


They bash the NHL every chance they get. They always try to diminish it. It's not a matter of not covering it because they don't broadcast games, they literally tear it apart when they do discuss it.
Check out my short e-book on the Red Wings' 1937 Stanley Cup championship entitled: "Nothing Could Keep 'Em Down." Please download it from my profile at Smashwords: https://www.smashwor...ile/view/victor

New e-book: The Spanish-American War: A Brief History. Relatively short, introductory read for casual history buffs and people who want to learn more about a forgotten war that changed America. Available at BN.com, Smashwords, Kobo, and Diesel E-Books right now. Same link as above.

#19 NBCnothingbutcrosby

NBCnothingbutcrosby

    Rookie

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 149 posts
  • Location:19 & Hayes

Posted 21 April 2010 - 09:16 PM

I'm sure having teams with bigger TV markets (LA, Denver...) which weren't in the playoffs last year helped.
Not now chief, I'm in the zone.


#20 dropkickshanahans

dropkickshanahans

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,576 posts

Posted 21 April 2010 - 09:52 PM

They bash the NHL every chance they get. They always try to diminish it. It's not a matter of not covering it because they don't broadcast games, they literally tear it apart when they do discuss it.


They do? This is news to me.





Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users