Bleh, its gonna get called back. At least its a PP.
508 replies to this topic
#321
RedLightGoesOn
-
- Member
-
- 785 posts
Playoff Ice...if you know what I mean
Posted 24 April 2010 - 07:47 PM
40 for life.
#322
acidroach420
-
- Member
-
- 168 posts
You know I've got a soft spot for hot dogs
- Location:Bowling Green, Ohio
Posted 24 April 2010 - 07:47 PM
Yeah, it seems like Orpik caused it to come off with out a doubt. I hope its a good goal.I do not think the net is matter. It is not the Sens moved the net but Orpik pushed the Sens to move the net.
#323
Nightfall
-
- Gold Booster
-
- 3,534 posts
My goal is to deny yours!
- Location:Grand Rapids
Posted 24 April 2010 - 07:47 PM
I can replay it on my DVR and clearly see the net is off.Just saw a good replay, looks the net has shifted out but the peg is still stuck in the hole.
Christopher Brian Dudek
My Domain
My Domain
#324
Heroes of Hockeytown
-
- Bronze Booster
-
- 13,729 posts
Big Goal Bob
Posted 24 April 2010 - 07:48 PM
Kind of annoying because whether or not the net is jarred an inch off the frame has zero impact on the play that was happening in the middle of the goalmouth.How can that not be a goal? The Penguins guy pushed the Ottawa guy into the net. What does it matter if it comes off?
"We've been in the same spot all year long. We won 50 games for the fourth year in a row. People think we're just hum-drum and boring.
No, you know what we are, we're good. You can't do what we do every single day and not be good." - Mike Babcock
No, you know what we are, we're good. You can't do what we do every single day and not be good." - Mike Babcock
#325
HockeytownRules19
-
- Member
-
- 1,073 posts
1st Line All-Star
- Location:Troy, Michigan
Posted 24 April 2010 - 07:48 PM
Should be a no goal
#326
heed316
-
- Member
-
- 791 posts
Greenman strikes down the Wings foes
- Location:Brooklyn, MI
Posted 24 April 2010 - 07:48 PM
Puck is going in the middle, it shouldn't matter that the post was an inch or two off!
#327
Heroes of Hockeytown
-
- Bronze Booster
-
- 13,729 posts
Big Goal Bob
Posted 24 April 2010 - 07:48 PM
Good call, they just showed a pretty definitive look.I can replay it on my DVR and clearly see the net is off.
"We've been in the same spot all year long. We won 50 games for the fourth year in a row. People think we're just hum-drum and boring.
No, you know what we are, we're good. You can't do what we do every single day and not be good." - Mike Babcock
No, you know what we are, we're good. You can't do what we do every single day and not be good." - Mike Babcock
#328
Zenith
-
- Member
-
- 232 posts
Legend
Posted 24 April 2010 - 07:49 PM
No goal
The ZENITH of real hockey, The Detroit Red Wings
#329
Hockeymom1960
-
- Member
-
- 4,531 posts
Hall-of-Famer
Posted 24 April 2010 - 07:49 PM
BULLs*** BULLs*** BULLs***
#330
Nero
-
- Member
-
- 1,523 posts
1st Line All-Star
Posted 24 April 2010 - 07:49 PM
So now where is the penalty shot?
#331
kook_10
-
- Gold Booster
-
- 2,180 posts
hot and ready
- Location:South Orange, NJ
Posted 24 April 2010 - 07:49 PM
it's nice and all that they got the call right, but they gotta come up with a rule that if they can't come to a consensus within 2 minutes then there isn't enough conclusive evidence to overturn the call on the ice.
works every time
#332
Xitium
-
- Member
-
- 2,426 posts
Super Lurker
- Location:Vegas. Baby.
Posted 24 April 2010 - 07:49 PM
I thought the ref can still call a goal if the puck goes through where the net would have been?
If you start a new thread within two hours after a Wings game, specifically a loss, YOU ARE WRONG.
#334
acidroach420
-
- Member
-
- 168 posts
You know I've got a soft spot for hot dogs
- Location:Bowling Green, Ohio
Posted 24 April 2010 - 07:49 PM
No goal. Seems like the right call, just unfortunate it helps out the pens.
#335
edicius
-
- HoF Booster
-
- 25,207 posts
Professional drinker.
- Location:Budd Lake, NJ
Posted 24 April 2010 - 07:49 PM
Puck is going in the middle, it shouldn't matter that the post was an inch or two off!
Wasn't there a goal recently that counted even though the net was up off the ice? NHL not knowing its own rules yet again.
- Xitium likes this
Can't listen live? Check out MoreLikeRadio.com/downloads for show archives!
#336
HockeytownRules19
-
- Member
-
- 1,073 posts
1st Line All-Star
- Location:Troy, Michigan
Posted 24 April 2010 - 07:50 PM
as much as I hate to say it... Excellent Call right there
- acidroach420 likes this
#337
Crymson
-
- Gold Booster
-
- 9,724 posts
Caustic
- Location:Boulder, CO, USA
Posted 24 April 2010 - 07:50 PM
That no-goal call was the result of a terrible NHL rule. Of course, they'll probably never change it.
#338
Nightfall
-
- Gold Booster
-
- 3,534 posts
My goal is to deny yours!
- Location:Grand Rapids
Posted 24 April 2010 - 07:50 PM
That works so long as your team doesn't get burned.it's nice and all that they got the call right, but they gotta come up with a rule that if they can't come to a consensus within 2 minutes then there isn't enough conclusive evidence to overturn the call on the ice.
Christopher Brian Dudek
My Domain
My Domain
#339
edicius
-
- HoF Booster
-
- 25,207 posts
Professional drinker.
- Location:Budd Lake, NJ
Posted 24 April 2010 - 07:51 PM
it's nice and all that they got the call right, but they gotta come up with a rule that if they can't come to a consensus within 2 minutes then there isn't enough conclusive evidence to overturn the call on the ice.
You realize that Toronto would then take more than 2 minutes any time it related to a Wings disputed goal.
Can't listen live? Check out MoreLikeRadio.com/downloads for show archives!
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013 Playoff Beards! |
General Discussion | marcaractac |
|
|
|
Pinned Money on the Board - playoff style!
|
General Discussion | vladdy16 |
|
|
|
Should we bring Tootoo in for game 4? |
General Discussion | raidedredwing2 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
