WCSF Game 1 GDT: Red Wings 3 at Sharks 4
#881
Posted 29 April 2010 - 10:54 PM
Thanks TeeMan!
#882
Posted 29 April 2010 - 10:54 PM
#883
Posted 29 April 2010 - 10:54 PM
#884
Posted 29 April 2010 - 10:54 PM
#885
Posted 29 April 2010 - 10:55 PM
"You guys were 0-10 on the powerplay during the regular season, what changed in tonights game?"
Let me see..........Oh, the 5 on 3 and a 4 on 3. That'll do it.
Rediculous
#887
Posted 29 April 2010 - 10:55 PM
#888
Posted 29 April 2010 - 10:55 PM
#890
Posted 29 April 2010 - 10:56 PM
I honestly have never felt this good after a wings loss.
that's what I'm thinking... I mean yeah we did lose because of some HORRENDOUS giveaways, but that's it. Throughout the rest of the game I thought we played pretty good.
not worried. game 1. you're goin down sharks
- Vladifan likes this
#891
Posted 29 April 2010 - 10:56 PM
They'll be alright.
#892
Posted 29 April 2010 - 10:57 PM
marleau was out if that matters to anyone
#893
Posted 29 April 2010 - 10:57 PM
It's crazy to think the wings are now 0-95 when going down 3 goals in the playoffs. That's gotta change one day right?
Only when we acquire Crosby.
Although we came close last year against the Hawks in that game where Kronwall was kicked out and we scored 3 quick goals.
#894
Posted 29 April 2010 - 10:57 PM
#895
Posted 29 April 2010 - 10:58 PM
#896
Posted 29 April 2010 - 10:58 PM
Somewhere in Sweden.
Edited by GMRwings1983, 29 April 2010 - 10:59 PM.
#897
Posted 29 April 2010 - 10:59 PM
#898
Posted 29 April 2010 - 10:59 PM
Pretty good game actually for the Wings. I thought they carried the play for a lot of the game. Outside of that 3 minute stretch, they exceeded my expectations.
They'll be alright.
Exactly, Sharks had a good start (Wings had a bad start, whatever way you wanna call it) but after that it was controlled by the wings. Only problems lie with special teams and I'm confident they will be fixed.
I still say wings in 5
Thanks TeeMan!
#899
Posted 29 April 2010 - 10:59 PM
Second, the Wings played decent tonight consider the amount of energy lost in game 7 against the Yotes. The one thing the Wings need to do is capitalizing some pp. Ref surely was sucked in a word but if we could capitalize some pp chances, we could take this game.
Last, the most important thing; the Wings need to manage the Sharks' big bodies and speed. Seems the Wings played better than the Sharks after falling behind 3-0, it was obvious that our skill players could not take their big players. We may need some line changes, not wholly but giving many different shifts.
I still have faith and hopefully we do better on Sunday
The ZENITH of real hockey, The Detroit Red Wings
#900
Posted 29 April 2010 - 10:59 PM
64.1 Diving / Embellishment – Any player or goalkeeper who blatantly dives, embellishes a fall or a reaction, or who feigns an injury shall be penalized with a minor penalty under this rule.
A goalkeeper who deliberately initiates contact with an attacking player other than to establish position in the crease, or who otherwise acts to create the appearance of other than incidental contact with an attacking player, is subject to the assessment of a minor penalty for diving / embellishment.
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WCSF Game 2 GDT : Red WIngs at Chicago Blackhawks, 1:00 EST
|
General Discussion | Hockeytown0001 |
|
|
|
Red Wings don't belong in the same rink as the Hawks? |
General Discussion | MidMichSteve |
|
|
|
The person below me game...
|
Water Cooler | SouthernWingsFan |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












