If not, he is a pretty good bargaining chip, IMO.
Jiri Hudler, the answer to all of our prayers
#1
Posted 04 May 2010 - 10:23 PM
If not, he is a pretty good bargaining chip, IMO.
- Finnish Wing and VAL FILPPULA like this
JERSEY SALE!!!!! PM IF INTERESTED!(I have international and red wings jerseys)
#2
Posted 04 May 2010 - 10:25 PM
EZBAKETHAGANGSTA, on 26 April 2010 - 10:47 AM, said:
#3
Posted 04 May 2010 - 10:26 PM
- WingsallTheway likes this
"Getting my leftover soup from yesterday back in my bowl is my lunchtime acquisition"
Samuelson should be arrested for loitering on our roster.
#4
Posted 04 May 2010 - 10:26 PM
He should help a little with the goal scoring, though once we got healthy this year scoring didn't seem to be a big problem. But the depth he provides will help immensely.
I still feel we need a guaranteed goal scorer, though. Someone like....Pavelski? Haha.
New e-book: The Spanish-American War: A Brief History. Relatively short, introductory read for casual history buffs and people who want to learn more about a forgotten war that changed America. Available at BN.com, Smashwords, Kobo, and Diesel E-Books right now. Same link as above.
#5
Posted 04 May 2010 - 10:27 PM
but huds> bert
wonder how hell handle 2nd line ice time
Edited by brett, 04 May 2010 - 10:28 PM.
#6
Posted 04 May 2010 - 10:28 PM
As long as williams is off the team we stand a chance
Maybe the Shark said "Jason, if you throw the game, there will be a spot for you here in San Jose"
Btw, you're avatar is awesome. Frank in the music shop when they created a band....one of my all time favorite episodes.
- Hossa4Life and VAL FILPPULA like this
JERSEY SALE!!!!! PM IF INTERESTED!(I have international and red wings jerseys)
#7
Posted 04 May 2010 - 10:28 PM
exactly we had 17 guys playing forward in that last minute of ot. that got us farwe need defense not offense

#8
Posted 04 May 2010 - 10:29 PM
Just cause you look like the gimp don't mean you play like the gimp!
#9
Posted 04 May 2010 - 10:30 PM
Hudler isn't THE answer, but he's certainly a key puzzle piece. I expect him to be pretty rusty, and it'll take him a while to warm up, so I just want him to score some goals.
He should help a little with the goal scoring, though once we got healthy this year scoring didn't seem to be a big problem. But the depth he provides will help immensely.
I still feel we need a guaranteed goal scorer, though. Someone like....Pavelski? Haha.
Marleau will be a free agent and if Lidstrom retires, we will certainly have the cap space....
(NICK, NOOOOOOOOOO)
- VAL FILPPULA likes this
JERSEY SALE!!!!! PM IF INTERESTED!(I have international and red wings jerseys)
#10
Posted 04 May 2010 - 10:33 PM
Marleau will be a free agent and if Lidstrom retires, we will certainly have the cap space....
(NICK, NOOOOOOOOOO)
lids retires i will be very scared for next season with the defense we have now
#11
Posted 04 May 2010 - 11:18 PM
Edited by ShanahanMan, 04 May 2010 - 11:19 PM.
- micah and ManLuv4Clears like this

#12
Posted 04 May 2010 - 11:21 PM
Agreed.As long as williams is off the team we stand a chance
I used to be 29 on my team... Switched when wlliama came to the wings

#13
Posted 04 May 2010 - 11:22 PM
you guys DO realize Huds will be making 3.5 mil a year right? Thats a lot of mullah for an already cap tight team. Is he really worth it? I personally dont see him making any difference. I'd honestly rather trade his rights away, and use that 3.5 mil for some better assets.
Yea just trade him and a pick for hossa.
EZBAKETHAGANGSTA, on 26 April 2010 - 10:47 AM, said:
#14
Posted 04 May 2010 - 11:27 PM
I'd love to see Flip and Huds re-unite.
Ken Holland: He’s (Mursak) a young guy, provides energy, can skate, he’s a puck hound.
#15
Posted 04 May 2010 - 11:27 PM
Yea just trade him and a pick for hossa.
If Holland did do something similar to that last season, we'd still have Hossa in our lineup.

#16
Posted 04 May 2010 - 11:28 PM
Umm, Huds is at $2.875.you guys DO realize Huds will be making 3.5 mil a year right? Thats a lot of mullah for an already cap tight team. Is he really worth it? I personally dont see him making any difference. I'd honestly rather trade his rights away, and use that 3.5 mil for some better assets.
Hudler's salary >> Cleary's.
Ken Holland: He’s (Mursak) a young guy, provides energy, can skate, he’s a puck hound.
#17
Posted 04 May 2010 - 11:38 PM
you guys DO realize Huds will be making 3.5 mil a year right? Thats a lot of mullah for an already cap tight team. Is he really worth it? I personally dont see him making any difference. I'd honestly rather trade his rights away, and use that 3.5 mil for some better assets.
Since when did he get a raise from the 2-year, $2.875m deal he was given in arbitration that he will be coming back to? And how did he manage it, for that matter?
And BTW...there are no better players than Hudler making his cap hit who are available on the free agent market. Before you say "Yeah, but what about the money we're getting back if Lidstrom takes a pay cut or retires?" I will respond with "Hudler is replacing Jason Williams, who costs $1.5m" so that's only a $1.375m increase and it's likely that Holmstrom will take a pay cut if he returns, further reducing that. If Bertuzzi negotiates a deal, he'll likely ask for around $2.5m-$3m so I don't know if he'll be back.
But regardless, who do you suggest we sign for $2.875m that is a UFA instead of having young, soon-to-be-prime top-line caliber scoring forward Hudler who can also play above-average defense? I can't wait to hear the response to this. It might be someone as good as RJ Umberger or Matt Cullen!
- Reds4Life likes this
"I once devoured a monk's soul. It tasted like chocolate."
#18
Posted 04 May 2010 - 11:47 PM
Umm, Huds is at $2.875.
Hudler's salary >> Cleary's.
Was off about 500,000. He will be making exactly 3 mil when he comes back. Still, is he worth that?
I'm going off the 10/11 salary numbers listed on nhlnumbers. Am i missing something?
Edited by ShanahanMan, 04 May 2010 - 11:48 PM.

#19
Posted 04 May 2010 - 11:51 PM
It might be someone as good as RJ Umberger or Matt Cullen!
I'd rather have Umberger or Cullen than Hudler. Cullen is basically a 50 pt guy who has some size and was a major force vs Pitts for Ottawa. Umberger has good size and could be useful as a 2nd line goal scorer, plus he picks up his game in the playoffs.I'm not too comfortable having so many guys under 6 feet tall on the top two lines.
#20
Posted 04 May 2010 - 11:55 PM
Completely ignoring the fact that Hudler has shown he IS a playoffs performer and we've won the Cup and lost in the SCF with him.
I can't wait for Hudler to be back in the line-up.
Ken Holland: He’s (Mursak) a young guy, provides energy, can skate, he’s a puck hound.
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Babcock tells players they are soft. Pushes them to play better. |
General Discussion | drumnj |
|
|
|
Any tips on ways to tolerate the NBC media? |
General Discussion | Red Wings Addict |
|
|
|
Pinned Money on the Board - playoff style!
|
General Discussion | vladdy16 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














