WCSF Game 5 GDT: Red Wings 1 at Sharks 2
#741
Posted 08 May 2010 - 11:47 PM
Don't think this is necessarily a "go back to the drawing board" type end of the season. Wings have good players and a good goaltender. No reason to panic in the D. At least in my opinion. We'll see who comes and goes. Hudler back. Maybe more health out of the entire team next year. Looking forward to it.
Thanks everyone here too for a great season.
#742
Posted 08 May 2010 - 11:48 PM
we need some new blood! SHAKE IT UP KENNY!
-Yeah! Unless you wanna work forty hours a week.
#743
Posted 08 May 2010 - 11:48 PM
I've said it numerous times; I'd take our late 1990's team over todays roster in a heartbeat!Poor showing. I miss the days where Mac, Malts, Draper, Yezerman and Shanny, were standing up on the bench, firing their team up, playing with heart, throwing weight around, shooting, going all out.

#744
Posted 08 May 2010 - 11:48 PM
Oh, stop blaming the referees. When you don't win face-offs, don't play with any strength or heart, or any "give a damn", you're going to lose. And the Sharks showed Detroit that. Not that Detroit gives a damn.
Yeah, there were tons of bad calls against Detroit. The winning goal came off a non-call. Who cares. They had PLENTY of time to get back in the game.
This Detroit team deserved to lose. Call me an idiot, a bandwagon fan, whatever. If they played like game #4, I would be singing a different tune. But they only played like they wanted to win twice in these playoffs. Sorry, but no matter how big of a fan I am, I'm not going to pretend like they are superheroes. Instead I am going to see them for what they were this postseason: Real people with a bad work ethic. If your co-workers were lazy, you'd be pissed too.
You know what? I can't argue with you on any of that. However, one could make a case that despite being outplayed or outhusseled, despite losing faceoffs (other than on PK's), despite playing with a lack of heart, it took bad calls or bad non calls to put the dagger in in all 4 of SJ's wins. You could make a pretty solid case there. I even want to go so far as to say it's the Wings own fault for having to chase the puck more than being on possession of the puck, but some crucial calls weren't even because of that.
I don't know, it's just hard to swallow. SJ deserves to win, and they get the credit, but boy they sure had a lot of help.
- thegerkin, Vladifan, Datsyuk Fan and 1 other like this
This was so funny I had to set it as my sig.
#745
Posted 08 May 2010 - 11:48 PM
Just doesn't feel like we should have lost this one in 5 games. Could have gone 6-7, just some questionable calls and bad bounces. Can't wait for next season. Let's Go Wings!
- Vladifan likes this
#746
Posted 08 May 2010 - 11:49 PM
#747
Posted 08 May 2010 - 11:50 PM
#748
Posted 08 May 2010 - 11:50 PM
#749
Posted 08 May 2010 - 11:51 PM
I highly doubt it. Unfortunately the league seems to think its right to suspend players only when they injure a player. No injury then dont even bother hoping for a suspension.i wonder if the league will look at the headshot that Murray gave Mule and suspend him.
#750
Posted 08 May 2010 - 11:51 PM
My rebut to that would be that all of the games except #4 were close. Detroit was sloppy in them. If they weren't so sloppy, maybe they would have been able to overcome the bad officiating.You know what? I can't argue with you on any of that. However, one could make a case that despite being outplayed or outhusseled, despite losing faceoffs (other than on PK's), despite playing with a lack of heart, it took bad calls or bad non calls to put the dagger in in all 4 of SJ's wins. You could make a pretty solid case there. I even want to go so far as to say it's the Wings own fault for having to chase the puck more than being on possession of the puck, but some crucial calls weren't even because of that.
I don't know, it's just hard to swallow. SJ deserves to win, and they get the credit, but boy they sure had a lot of help.
#751
Posted 08 May 2010 - 11:51 PM
Eaves and Miller Fan
#752
Posted 08 May 2010 - 11:52 PM
I've said it numerous times; I'd take our late 1990's team over todays roster in a heartbeat!
Thank you Captain Obvious. The late 90's team was legendary and probably will not ever be reproduced. The Wings won the cup in half of the 6 years from 97-02. I've accepted that that's just not going to happen as easily in today's game.
#753
Posted 08 May 2010 - 11:52 PM
#754
Posted 08 May 2010 - 11:53 PM
Such a disappointing end to the season. Hopefully Kenny and the brass take some looks at this roster. Is it good enough to win if 100% healthy? I don't know ... it didn't look like it. San Jose, Chicago, Phoenix/Winnipeg, Nashville, etc. aren't going anywhere.
Dammit.
#755
Posted 08 May 2010 - 11:53 PM
#756
Posted 08 May 2010 - 11:53 PM
Lidstrom on Fox saying they lost the series through little things: wrong play at the wrong time, not winning faceoffs, not capitalizing on the PP. Says the Wings never lost confidence in themselves. Also says that right now it feels like it's going to take forever to get over this loss. He's going to sit down with Holland once everything settles down and decide his future from there.
"He even ate with women who at that time were accorded the same status as the family donkey. Are we willing to break bread with, say, child sex slaves, transgender teens and undocumented workers? Because when Jesus comes back to Earth, that's where he'll be hanging."
You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him.
Money on the Board - 100 bucks on the base. From here on, one buck per puck IN goal, win or lose!
Total right now: $105.
#757
Posted 08 May 2010 - 11:54 PM
I've said it numerous times; I'd take our late 1990's team over todays roster in a heartbeat!
If only the league would eliminate the salary cap..............................
#758
Posted 08 May 2010 - 11:56 PM
I have to get up early tomorrow morning, but I just want to say so long for awhile to those of you've taught me stuff, who've made me laugh, and who've stuck by this team. For those of you who will proceed here to rip and tear and say they played with no heart; or they should have played much harder, you can stick it sideways and rotating. I feel nothing but disgust for you.
This team pretty much played their asses off, and not many of us expected them to get as far as they did. I love them and I feel so very bad for them.
Later.
Later Vladifan!
#759
Posted 08 May 2010 - 11:56 PM
I cannot go along with that... I think Mickey's summation at the end of the broadcast summed it up. SJ deserved full credit for winning this thing, but the refs didn't help matters. That no-call on the hit on Franzen was the bad officiating coup de grace of the whole series.I feel terrible. I absolutely feel that the San Jose Sharks did not earn this series.
- DirtyD likes this

"In-a da crease... outta da crease... in-a da crease... outta da crease!!!"
#760
Posted 08 May 2010 - 11:56 PM
- Hockeymom1960 and DirtyD like this
This was so funny I had to set it as my sig.
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
looking for rare edmonton oiler games1984 series |
Tradin' Post | puckhead103 |
|
|
|
Lots of Wings games on tape availablecheap! |
Tradin' Post | hockeytown9321 |
|
|
|
WCSF Game 2 GDT : Red Wings 4 at Blackhawks 1 - (Series Tied at 1)
|
General Discussion | Hockeytown0001 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












