Jump to content

- - - - -

Percentage of starts next year for Howard and Osgood

  • Please log in to reply
48 replies to this topic

#1 SouthernWingsFan



  • HoF Booster
  • 24,609 posts
  • Location:Mandeville, Louisiana (Greater New Orleans area)

Posted 16 May 2010 - 04:41 PM

This is not meant to be a "Who should be starter thread". It is obvious that Howard is the man now, and unless he just falls off the face off the earth for training camp or whatever, he's the #1 goalie.

That being said, what's the percentage of starts you would like to see Howard and Osgood get? I highly doubt there's much issue with Howard getting worn out or whatever. And while I wish Osgood could've played in a few more games as the season worn down, I understand Babcock's reasoning and Howard didn't really do anything to suggest being taking out for considerable lengths of time when the Wings were scrapping for a playoff spot. In the grand scheme of things, I don't think it mattered. Howard certainly had some shaky moments in the playoffs (Phoenix game 4, San Jose game 3), but it wasn't enough to cause him to get pulled I think.

And any posts that simply say stuff like ZOMG OSGOOD SUCKS HE'S FINISHED or Osgood should play zero games are pretty much a moot point.

If Howard can keep up his play from last season and the Wings more fortunate with the injury situation and not sweating bullets as much to make the playoffs, I'd like to see something like 50-55 starts for Howard, 25-30 starts for Osgood.

Edited by SouthernWingsFan, 16 May 2010 - 04:42 PM.

#2 Reds4Life


    Red Wings

  • Gold Booster
  • 2,640 posts
  • Location:Czech republic

Posted 16 May 2010 - 04:48 PM

Depends on how he plays and where Detroit is in the standings.

I hope it will be possible to go Howard-Osgood 45-37 or 50-32.

Edited by Reds4Life, 16 May 2010 - 04:49 PM.

#3 nate94gt


    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,127 posts
  • Location:Allegan

Posted 16 May 2010 - 04:50 PM

Id like a somewhat decent split. keep them both fresh. id like to see a 65/35 split or so

#4 Carman



  • HoF Booster
  • 5,121 posts
  • Location:Riverview, MI

Posted 16 May 2010 - 04:54 PM

Depends on how well they play and how well the team plays.

Ideally we could have a playoff spot clinched and roll and 75/25 percentage. But if we need a win we play which ever goalie is playing better like we did this year.

#5 titanium2


    Asha... I want I want!!!

  • Bronze Booster
  • 10,495 posts

Posted 16 May 2010 - 05:02 PM


But that hinges on Osgood finding his game.

#6 Datsyerberger


    "Dat's yer burger, Hank."

  • HoF Booster
  • 3,097 posts
  • Location:Pueblo, CO

Posted 16 May 2010 - 05:11 PM

Roughly 75/25 is fine by me. 60 for Howard and 22 for Osgood, or thereabouts.

As far as stats, as long as Howard puts up around a .915 and Osgood can manage .900-905 as the backup, I'm content with that. Anything better from either of them would be a bonus in my book.
If some bored artist wants to make me a signature, feel free to cut loose and do so.

Of course, I could get off my lame rear and do something.

#7 Guest_Four (Guest)

Guest_Four (Guest)
  • Guests

Posted 16 May 2010 - 05:18 PM

Get rid of Ozzie, Babcock won't use him. Get another goalie, a solid veteran that will be used by Babcock and rotate 66% to 33% in Howard's favour

#8 MulesWillFly93


    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 729 posts
  • Location:So Cal

Posted 16 May 2010 - 05:20 PM

Roughly 75/25 is fine by me. 60 for Howard and 22 for Osgood, or thereabouts.

As far as stats, as long as Howard puts up around a .915 and Osgood can manage .900-905 as the backup, I'm content with that. Anything better from either of them would be a bonus in my book.

I like that split... I want to see Howard play a lot, but I want Osgood to be ready if for nothing else than the ever-present chance of injury (God forbid). I just want everybody to be in damn good shape for some major ass-hauling in their Cup run next year.

Nobody lives forever.
Some things never die.
Like up in the land of ice and snow,
They tell me that a Red Wing always flies.
RIP Ruslan Salei - Brad McCrimmon - Stefan Liv - Lokomotiv Yaroslavl
(Orig. lyrics - Ray Wylie Hubbard, "Airplane Fell Down in Dixie")

#9 FireCaptain


    Two words: Less is more.

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,185 posts
  • Location:Atoka, TN

Posted 16 May 2010 - 05:33 PM

Enough starts to get Ozzy to 400 wins.

Most nights, my posts are brought to you by some sort of IPA and a heaping dose of sarcasm.
Success has a thousand fathers, failure is an orphan.
We not score, is hard to win. - Pavel Datsyuk #13

#10 hardcoretom21



  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,001 posts
  • Location:Montreal

Posted 16 May 2010 - 05:52 PM

I know Ozzie still has a lot of hockey in him, and after a few disappointing regular seasons I'm sure he'll be able to turn it around
Only breathing is more important than winning

"For most of a decade, the Wings were the most popular team not just because they won, but also because they won with flair, with speedy Russians and legendary leaders and the occasional willing fighter"

#11 Miss Wing Queen

Miss Wing Queen

    Hockeytown's Helmetless Hero

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 523 posts
  • Location:Michigan

Posted 16 May 2010 - 05:59 PM

I'm hoping for a better year on the injury front so that Babcock will not be pressured to work himself into a corner as far as goalie management goes like he did this year.

I believe that Osgood would have worked out his funk from 08/09 if the cards had been dealt better (him not getting the flu, the innumerable injuries, scrapping to make the playoffs). In about 60-70% of the games he played in October/November, Osgood showed promise of returning to his 08 postseason form. However, I really believe his lack of starts stunted that for the remainder of the year.

Howard stepped in and proved that he had won the job, and under the circumstances deserved the starter job. The good that came out of it of course is that we learned what Howard is made of, he gained a ton of regular season, and some playoff, experience, and we made the playoffs. But Babcock's ideology of "there's always tomorrow . . ." for Osgood was detrimental to the team to some degree since he screwed himself out of having his backup prepared in the regular season and come playoff time if needed.

Now I understand that things went the way they did in the best interests for the team making the playoffs, but Babcock really needs to learn from this mistake so as to prevent it from happening in the future. As the coaching and management staff has already made clear to the players, everyone will have to begin the fight again for their job come September. And that is only fitting because it challenges the players to up their game and bring their best. The same goes for Howard and Osgood. We don't want Howard to follow Mason's footsteps, and with one year left on his contract, Osgood can still show that he deserves to play for the Red Wings.

Overall, come September, I'd like to see Howard get about 60-65% of the starts, and have Osgood get 35-40%, but have the starts evenly distributed and managed, and of course, have above average to exceptional performances from both goalies.

It just seemed like we were always walking a fine line this season and holding our breath as far as the goalie situation went, always wondering how far we could push our luck, and I would like to see this team avoid that if possible next year.

Edited by Miss Wing Queen, 16 May 2010 - 06:03 PM.

#12 Jesusberg



  • Gold Booster
  • 2,569 posts
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario

Posted 16 May 2010 - 06:00 PM

I'd like somewhere around a 50-32 or 60-22 range.

#13 Broken 16

Broken 16

    Bonecrushing Blueliner

  • Gold Booster
  • 2,959 posts

Posted 16 May 2010 - 06:18 PM

Just a flip flop from last season. They were hoping to get Howard into 35 games. I would think that would be the maximum that Osgood sees if all goes well.

#14 Guest_mindfly (Guest)

Guest_mindfly (Guest)
  • Guests

Posted 16 May 2010 - 06:20 PM

Trade for Carey Price and make him the number 1 goalie with howard backing up

#15 Booster313


    1st Line All-Star

  • HoF Booster
  • 1,607 posts
  • Location:Hockeytown, USA

Posted 16 May 2010 - 06:28 PM

Ken Holland said they would like to get around 20 starts out of Ozzie so that puts the percentage at 24.390244 for Ozzie and 75.609756 for Howie, or 24/76 if you prefer.

What kind of color is red? Red is a warning, a declaration, a color that says I'm ready to do what it takes. Red is focused and driven because red doesn't like second place. So what kind of color is red? Their kind.

#16 GMRwings1983


    The Killer is Me

  • Silver Booster
  • 24,327 posts
  • Location:Jerkwater, USA

Posted 16 May 2010 - 06:29 PM

Leave it to SWF to start a trolling goalie thread. :P

I personally don't expect Ozzie to return next year. I think he took a lot of s*** from Babcock this year and would probably want to move on. Someone else will give him a chance as lesser goalies have gotten numerous chances before, even after their primes were done.

If he does return, I'd say split the games about 60/20, with Howard playing around 60 games.
According to my profile, my reputation is excellent. LOL.

#17 Drake_Marcus



  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,337 posts
  • Location:Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada

Posted 16 May 2010 - 06:32 PM

I`m thinking 60/40 or 65/35 in favour of Howard. The Wings really need to avoid overworking him as recent history has proven that goalies who play 70+ games for their club are often worn down by the time the playoffs come around.
Dedicated to lulz once lost:
Posted Image
Thanks TeeMan!

"We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas
of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage" --H.P. Lovecraft

#18 ltgator333


    Combustion on Contact

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,024 posts
  • Location:southern Michigan

Posted 16 May 2010 - 06:38 PM

Four- I have to wonder if there isn't some truth to that, but we'll have to see. I didn't expect that Ozzie would get the flu and then end up way out of the loop like last year.

FireCaptain- I agree on that if Ozzie's 400th (IF it happens) comes in a jersey other than the winged wheel, it would be the exact opposite of fitting imo.

I think there's still an outside chance that, by demotion/buyout or trade, that Ozzie won't be in Detroit next year. I wouldn't count on it, but I would not be too shocked if it happened.

But if we assume he'll be back next year and getting regular playing time, I don't mind any split that is good for the team given the circumstances- and you never know what the next season will bring good, bad or meh. I really think that the future of hockey goaltending lies in more of an even split in workable situations, and if both goalies are playing well it's a workable situation in my mind.
- LT

#19 RedWingsFan1003


    Jr. Prospect

  • Member
  • 19 posts

Posted 16 May 2010 - 06:40 PM

I know Babcock and Ozzie had a little tiff during this season. But hopefully both sides will let bygones be bygones heading into training camp and throughout next season. But let's take a stroll down memory lane; Since Babcock became the Red Wings coach:

2005-06: Legace--49 Starts Osgood--29 Starts Howard--4 Starts Final Record: (58-16-8---124 Pts) Playoff Result: L-WCQ to EDM 4-2
2006-07: Hasek--56 Starts Osgood--19 Starts ???--7 Starts Final Record: (50-19-13---113 Pts) Playoff Result: L-WCF to ANA 4-2
2007-08: Hasek--40 Starts Osgood--40 Starts Howard--2 Starts Final Record: (54-21-7---115 Pts) Playoff Result: Won Stanley Cup
2008-09: Osgood--44 Starts Conklin--37 Starts Howard--1 Start Final Record: (51-21-10---112 Pts) Playoff Result: L-SCF to PIT 4-3
2009-10: Howard--61 Starts Osgood--21 Starts Final Record: (44-24-14---102 Pts) Playoff Result: L-WCS to SJS 4-1

Notice the difference between 2007-08, when the Wings won the Cup and the other four seasons. Both Ozzie and Dom played 40 games each, leaving both rested for the playoffs. Now we all know the story of how Dom was pulled in game three in the quarterfinal against Nashville and Ozzie led the Wings back to glory. But this isn't 2007-08 anymore. It's 2010-11, and the season begins October 6th. But why wouldn't any coach use the same method that won the Cup a few years earlier? That's not saying Mike Babcock is a bad coach, in fact, in my opinion, he's the best coach in the game today. But heading into 2010-11, I think Coach Babcock should go with the philosophy of platooning his goaltenders the same way he did back in 2007-08. I think Jimmy was just tired against San Jose. He played so much hockey, more than his body was used to, more than his body could take. Now is it better for the future, time will tell. But Ozzie and Jimmy should be within five starts of each other at regular season's end next April, and the Wings may be hoisting Lord Stanley again next June.

#20 eva unit zero

eva unit zero

    Save the Princess...Save the World

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,734 posts

Posted 16 May 2010 - 09:45 PM

Whoever plays the majority should start no more than about 50-55 games, and the backup should start the remainder, give or take a couple. Whoever starts the majority depends on whether Howard has a significant sophomore slump and how close Osgood's play gets back towards his 2007-08 form. Regardless, neither should play an excessive amount and if it comes down to playing almost 50-50, then so be it.

I have said before and agree with what has been posted earlier in this thread that Howard's generally poor performance in the postseason was a result of fatigue, as much of the problems came from issues of physical and/or mental reaction speed. Degredation of such is a symptom of fatigue, so it would not be surprising if that were Howard's issue.

Osgood should be given more playing time and Howie less in the regular season than last year both because he was showing much better play early last season and it keeps both him and Howard fresh going into the playoffs, as well as in the event of injury.

"I've never seen a warlock do that without his magic."
"I once devoured a monk's soul. It tasted like chocolate."

Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users