Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Percentage of starts next year for Howard and Osgood


  • Please log in to reply
48 replies to this topic

#21 Hockeytown0001

Hockeytown0001

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 22,744 posts
  • Location:A2, Michigan

Posted 16 May 2010 - 09:56 PM

60-22

"All done? Five bucks." - Pavel Datsyuk after an interview
"Very few cities in the NHL have the history or the following of the Detroit Red Wings." - Steve Yzerman

 

 


#22 The Noodle 39

The Noodle 39

    4th Line Grinder

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 247 posts
  • Location:Bay City, Michigan

Posted 17 May 2010 - 01:09 AM

I know im gonna get flamed for this but.. Come on people Howard needs a capable backup goalie! Osgood was HORRIBLE this past season so much so that Howard was starting every freaking game! We need a capable backup who can at least give Howie some rest! Now maybe I will be wrong next season and I think were stuck with Ozzie for 1 more year? Osgood might play descent or good next year to give our kid some rest but yeesh.. i know Ozzie probably deserves another year but please play descent to give Howie some rest or release him and pick up a capable backup!! :ranting:

I know some members here think Osgood has superhuman powers of verbal awesomeness and random veteran cup winning savvy of the greek gods that inspire and make Howard play insane but I just don't buy it.

Thank you Teeman!

#23 Echolalia

Echolalia

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,043 posts
  • Location:fab ferndale

Posted 17 May 2010 - 01:27 AM

As far as I'm concerned Howard needs to prove that he can be number one again next year. Sure he was lights out this year, but when the summer is over its a whole new season and his stats from a year before mean jack. Fortunately this is also the case for Osgood. This year he sucked balls, but its not "this year" anymore an he has an opportunity to steal number 1 back, if for the last time in his career. This is the mindset that Babs needs to instill in Ozzie as well as in Howie, and to do that, I think for the starting stretch of the season, Babs should split starts right down the middle. If one goalie starts sucking, skew the start % to 60-40, or 70-30. If they both play well, keep the competition going. They don't get a free ride to number 1 and that's the way it should be.

#24 king_malice

king_malice

    Sniper

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 755 posts
  • Location:ontario

Posted 17 May 2010 - 07:43 AM

62-20

#25 CrimsonFlame

CrimsonFlame

    1st Line Sniper

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 862 posts
  • Location:Troy, Michigan

Posted 17 May 2010 - 10:23 AM

50/50 then see who's better. Also none of this not playing osgood for a whole month at a time. That's insane and never gives him a shot to rebound.

#26 Lidstromboli

Lidstromboli

    buncha geezers

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,454 posts
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 17 May 2010 - 10:32 AM

82 osgood hes way better than choker howard

Posted Image


#27 Jimmy Jazz

Jimmy Jazz

    Jr. Prospect

  • Member
  • 15 posts
  • Location:Toronto

Posted 17 May 2010 - 11:10 AM

Howard should start anywhere between 50 to 60 games and Osgood starts about 32-22 games. Of course injuries and performance will have a say on who plays at the end of the day but as Jimmy did a good job for us, (yeah I know he has his "moments") he's get's the nod as starter going into camp.



#28 Pucks

Pucks

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 680 posts

Posted 17 May 2010 - 01:08 PM

I know im gonna get flamed for this but.. Come on people Howard needs a capable backup goalie! Osgood was HORRIBLE this past season so much so that Howard was starting every freaking game! We need a capable backup who can at least give Howie some rest! Now maybe I will be wrong next season and I think were stuck with Ozzie for 1 more year? Osgood might play descent or good next year to give our kid some rest but yeesh.. i know Ozzie probably deserves another year but please play descent to give Howie some rest or release him and pick up a capable backup!! :ranting:

I know some members here think Osgood has superhuman powers of verbal awesomeness and random veteran cup winning savvy of the greek gods that inspire and make Howard play insane but I just don't buy it.



You probably will get flamed, but your post is the most coherent one I've read. The others are in denial or fantasy land.

I'd be really surprised if Osgood got more than 10-15 starts. The central is so tough now. Unless we get off to a really great start, we're going to be scratching for every point again.

Edited by Pucks, 17 May 2010 - 01:11 PM.


Welcome to the playoffs....where the games get better and the officiating gets worse.


#29 eva unit zero

eva unit zero

    Save the Princess...Save the World

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,734 posts

Posted 17 May 2010 - 05:46 PM

I know im gonna get flamed for this but..


Foretelling the future? Well, depending on your version on flaming, here goes:

Come on people Howard needs a capable backup goalie! Osgood was HORRIBLE this past season so much so that Howard was starting every freaking game!


Hmm. Interesting. Sounds like what a 4 year old says about why they don't eat their broccoli. "I hate it SOOO much, that's why I never eat it!!!"

You can't say "Osgood was HORRIBLE this past season so much so that Howard was starting every freaking game!" when Howard started more than 20 games in a row more than once, and Osgood LITERALLY was lucky to play one or two games a month. It's not that Osgood was putting up such a poor performance he didn't play for 20 games; it's that he hadn't played for 20 games so he put up a poor performance.

Logic. Look for it at your local grocery store.

"I've never seen a warlock do that without his magic."
"I once devoured a monk's soul. It tasted like chocolate."

#30 HockeyTownHouligan

HockeyTownHouligan

    4th Line Grinder

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 235 posts
  • Location:Lansing MI

Posted 17 May 2010 - 06:01 PM

I think with a great offseason of training the two goalies will have a healthy rotation and having it stay that way without any stupid illnesses.

#31 SouthernWingsFan

SouthernWingsFan

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 24,609 posts
  • Location:Mandeville, Louisiana (Greater New Orleans area)

Posted 17 May 2010 - 08:00 PM

I know im gonna get flamed for this but.. Come on people Howard needs a capable backup goalie! Osgood was HORRIBLE this past season so much so that Howard was starting every freaking game! We need a capable backup who can at least give Howie some rest! Now maybe I will be wrong next season and I think were stuck with Ozzie for 1 more year? Osgood might play descent or good next year to give our kid some rest but yeesh.. i know Ozzie probably deserves another year but please play descent to give Howie some rest or release him and pick up a capable backup!! :ranting:

I know some members here think Osgood has superhuman powers of verbal awesomeness and random veteran cup winning savvy of the greek gods that inspire and make Howard play insane but I just don't buy it.

I'd like these superhuman powers, I'd be able to beat the poop out of people a lot more if I had the power of a Greek god!

Osgood barely played. Primarily because Howard did very little to suggest getting taken out on a consistent basis, and a lot less with Osgood's play.

Osgood is fine as Howard's backup.

#32 SDavis35

SDavis35

    1st Line Sniper

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 935 posts
  • Location:Burlington, ON

Posted 17 May 2010 - 08:21 PM

I wanna see a real rotation - 55-27 for Howard. If we're in need of points, Babcock will play the hotter/sharper goalie, but I'm hoping he won't wear the goalie out. Regardless, I'm not expecting a division championship, just make the playoffs 4th or 5th again is probably where we deserve to be.

#33 GoWings1905

GoWings1905

    Legend

  • Gold Booster
  • 5,375 posts

Posted 17 May 2010 - 09:01 PM

I know im gonna get flamed for this but.. Come on people Howard needs a capable backup goalie! Osgood was HORRIBLE this past season so much so that Howard was starting every freaking game! We need a capable backup who can at least give Howie some rest! Now maybe I will be wrong next season and I think were stuck with Ozzie for 1 more year? Osgood might play descent or good next year to give our kid some rest but yeesh.. i know Ozzie probably deserves another year but please play descent to give Howie some rest or release him and pick up a capable backup!! :ranting:

I know some members here think Osgood has superhuman powers of verbal awesomeness and random veteran cup winning savvy of the greek gods that inspire and make Howard play insane but I just don't buy it.


Your argument against Ozzie basically proves the argument for most of us in favor of him: Babcock has to play him more. The injuries/tight points race forced Babcock's hand into starting Howard every game. I think there was more to it than that, but we'll go with Babcock's rationale for argument's sake.

How can you really even make a fair judgment on Chris Osgood? He started twice in 2010. I think he can without a doubt be a very capable backup provided he gets a start more than once every three months. Hopefully the situation next season will cater more to a favorable balance for both Jimmy and Ozzie to be successful in goal. I agree Jimmy needs rest, but Babcock has to be willing to give Ozzie a chance. This past season can't even be used as a fair barometer for people to say Ozzie can't get the job done anymore.
 
 
"To whom much is given, much is expected."
 
 

 

 

 

 


#34 Hockey God

Hockey God

    Top Prospect

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 62 posts

Posted 18 May 2010 - 08:02 AM

80% Howard
20% Osgood
I'd also like to see Larson get a couple starts to see how he is

#35 thomaz5

thomaz5

    Draftee

  • Member
  • 8 posts

Posted 18 May 2010 - 10:52 AM

Osgood didn't get more starts because he didn't earn them. It's the classic chicken or egg discussion. Mike Babcock didn't give him more starts because he didn't think he'd win the games. There were several times during the season that Howard could have used some rest, but at the same time the team needed a win. That's a tough position for the coach. I have no doubt another goalie would have gotten those games. Osgood wasn't up to the task, obviously. Nothing is going to change next year, certainly not the coaching staff's eyesight.

#36 ltgator333

ltgator333

    Combustion on Contact

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,024 posts
  • Location:southern Michigan

Posted 18 May 2010 - 12:03 PM

Osgood didn't get more starts because he didn't earn them. It's the classic chicken or egg discussion. Mike Babcock didn't give him more starts because he didn't think he'd win the games. There were several times during the season that Howard could have used some rest, but at the same time the team needed a win. That's a tough position for the coach. I have no doubt another goalie would have gotten those games. Osgood wasn't up to the task, obviously. Nothing is going to change next year, certainly not the coaching staff's eyesight.


And I think many of us who still feel Ozzie's got it (a little left, honestly) think the paradox you described was started by Ozzie going down with the flu, and Jimmy playing lights-out during that time. And the fact that Ozzie played poorly for the most part when given the opportunity to play was very predictable- the odds, imo, were against Ozzie playing well at that point.

The situation you describe at the end, if it is to be the truth, is the one situation where I wish that Ozzie was gone- but then again how many remember some of the UFA's who have came to Detroit at the tail end and basicly folded. It's happened, Federko comes to mind allthough that was just before my time.

Either way that it goes with Ozzie, assuming he's still around, it's just a one-year deal. And then we'll have a new set of goalies to beat up/stick up for.
- LT

#37 HankthaTank

HankthaTank

    3rd Line Center

  • Silver Booster
  • 4,815 posts
  • Location:Warren, MI

Posted 18 May 2010 - 03:16 PM

SOOOO tough to figure this out in May...but

65 - Howie
17 - Ozzie

And Osgood slappies...give me legit arguments please not that Jimmy choked and "wellll Ozzie was just great in 08 and 09 playoffs." Things that hold water because as far as I am concerned this kid has plenty of great years ahead of him. And Osgood just looks like he couldn't stop a dang beach ball anymore.
TO WHOM MUCH IS GIVEN, MUCH IS EXPECTED.

#38 eva unit zero

eva unit zero

    Save the Princess...Save the World

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,734 posts

Posted 18 May 2010 - 04:39 PM

SOOOO tough to figure this out in May...but

65 - Howie
17 - Ozzie

And Osgood slappies...give me legit arguments please not that Jimmy choked and "wellll Ozzie was just great in 08 and 09 playoffs." Things that hold water because as far as I am concerned this kid has plenty of great years ahead of him. And Osgood just looks like he couldn't stop a dang beach ball anymore.


Ok, here's a legit argument:

Howard was playing like s*** on most games. He allowed bad goals at bad times, and was playing worse than Osgood did in the regular season. The argument against playing Osgood in the playoffs was that he was so horrible in the regular season, even though his regular season performance would have been an upgrade on Howard's playoffs. Best case and Osgood turns in a third straight super-goalie performance.

However, the likely reason for Howard's considerable inconsistency and obviously slower mental and physical reaction speed in the playoffs was fatigue. So arguing that he should play more than 60 games is ridiculous if you want to win the Cup. That's basically saying you want your goalie to play 90+ games on the season after the playoffs. 80 is a more realistic number for a goalie to play (rookie Howard started 72 this year, btw) because fatigue really affects a goaltenders performance at that level.

"I've never seen a warlock do that without his magic."
"I once devoured a monk's soul. It tasted like chocolate."

#39 HankthaTank

HankthaTank

    3rd Line Center

  • Silver Booster
  • 4,815 posts
  • Location:Warren, MI

Posted 18 May 2010 - 06:14 PM

Ok, here's a legit argument:

Howard was playing like s*** on most games. He allowed bad goals at bad times, and was playing worse than Osgood did in the regular season. The argument against playing Osgood in the playoffs was that he was so horrible in the regular season, even though his regular season performance would have been an upgrade on Howard's playoffs. Best case and Osgood turns in a third straight super-goalie performance.

However, the likely reason for Howard's considerable inconsistency and obviously slower mental and physical reaction speed in the playoffs was fatigue. So arguing that he should play more than 60 games is ridiculous if you want to win the Cup. That's basically saying you want your goalie to play 90+ games on the season after the playoffs. 80 is a more realistic number for a goalie to play (rookie Howard started 72 this year, btw) because fatigue really affects a goaltenders performance at that level.


And it continues to go right back to what everyone else has said and its the most rational of all....

Osgood simply didn't play good enough to warrant any time especially amidst the run to make it into the playoffs so that played into the fatigue portion. Ozzie puts up a good backup campaign next year to make sense and put in for 20+ games and give Howie that needed rest, I am all in for it. Just can't see it. The obvious idea is to find a different backup, which most likely won't happen.
TO WHOM MUCH IS GIVEN, MUCH IS EXPECTED.

#40 eva unit zero

eva unit zero

    Save the Princess...Save the World

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,734 posts

Posted 18 May 2010 - 06:41 PM

And it continues to go right back to what everyone else has said and its the most rational of all....

Osgood simply didn't play good enough to warrant any time especially amidst the run to make it into the playoffs so that played into the fatigue portion. Ozzie puts up a good backup campaign next year to make sense and put in for 20+ games and give Howie that needed rest, I am all in for it. Just can't see it. The obvious idea is to find a different backup, which most likely won't happen.


Name a better goaltender than Osgood who is either a UFA willing to sign for less than $2m, or a currently signed goalie who makes less than $2m and is available for less than a minimum of one of Filppula, Franzen, or Kronwall. Not there.
"I've never seen a warlock do that without his magic."
"I once devoured a monk's soul. It tasted like chocolate."





Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users