LOL. Kane "punches a cab driver". And everyone flips their s***. Heatley kills a teammate with asinine driving and no one cares.
Speak for yourself. I've been on the record here more than once stating Heatley should still be prison.
Posted 23 May 2010 - 05:28 PM
LOL. Kane "punches a cab driver". And everyone flips their s***. Heatley kills a teammate with asinine driving and no one cares.

Posted 23 May 2010 - 05:28 PM
Because the Lions, Pistons and Tigers are world beaters.
Edited by Octopus's Garden, 23 May 2010 - 05:29 PM.
Posted 23 May 2010 - 05:29 PM
Hopefully the hawks end up with the same problems detroit had after the cup win with having to release some players due to cap problems
Posted 23 May 2010 - 05:32 PM
Speak for yourself. I've been on the record here more than once stating Heatley should still be prison.
Posted 23 May 2010 - 05:34 PM
I've seen no one bash Heatley. All the focus is on '20 cent'. LOL epic fail. (Not speaking directly to you.)

Posted 23 May 2010 - 05:36 PM
Posted 23 May 2010 - 05:37 PM
But will it be worth it if they win the cup?the hawks will be in deep s***. according to capgeek, they will be $800,000 over the cap, with only 14 players signed. lol. Edmonton might be getting some free players this offseason.
Posted 23 May 2010 - 05:37 PM
I've seen no one bash Heatley. All the focus is on '20 cent'. LOL epic fail. (Not speaking directly to you.)

Posted 23 May 2010 - 05:54 PM
Posted 23 May 2010 - 05:58 PM

Posted 23 May 2010 - 06:07 PM
Posted 23 May 2010 - 06:18 PM
Posted 23 May 2010 - 06:23 PM
Posted 23 May 2010 - 06:24 PM
I am not sure that I would want Nabakov to stay. Actually I know I would not. Nabakov was the reason you lost, and not just this post season.Sharks had a good season. I'm not that depressed like I have been in recent years. We played 100 percent, all the games were close execpt for game 2. My main concerns who stays? Marleau or Nabokov? Marleau will demand lots of money, 6-7 million. WIll he stay here or go on the market and go to LA or Calgary? If we do sign Marleau, Will Nabokov give us a hometown discount. I can't see Nabokov or Marleau in a diffrent jersey. THey've been in this franchise since they were 18. I still am digusted at versus biased for the hawks.
I want the Sharks to get better D. Our D sucks so much ass. I want the WIlson to sign Hamnuis or Volenchenkov, or Michalek on D. Lots of decisions for Mr. WIlson. His biggest offseason yet.
Posted 23 May 2010 - 06:29 PM
Based on what we've seen in these playoffs, the Sharks no longer need a big name goalie.
Nabokov has to go, where they can replace him with nobody Thomas Greiss. Just look at Halak, Leighton and Niemi.
I dont think the reason why we lost was Nabokov. I thought the reason why we lost is because we don't have the speed of the hawks. We didn't get secondary scoring, our D had lapses. Like I said I would like Hamhuis or Michalek or Volenchenkov coming here. And letting Blake, Huskins and Wallin gone.I am not sure that I would want Nabakov to stay. Actually I know I would not. Nabakov was the reason you lost, and not just this post season.
Posted 23 May 2010 - 06:29 PM
Posted 23 May 2010 - 06:36 PM
I could not disagree more. He let in at least one awful goal per game. He is a veteran goalie and goaltending like his will never win a Cup.Well, I don't think Greiss is the answer. Nabokov played good in the playoffs but not Great. We might need him for one more year, there is this young goalie named Stalock in our series, that is our future for goaltending or there is Sex smith.
There is Turco, Thomas, halak\price, Theodore on the market. We have to keep Nabokov or Marleau one of the two at least. Both would be nice since they have been in San Jose for their whole career.
But in a few years, Stalock will be our starting goalie for years to come.
I dont think the reason why we lost was Nabokov. I thought the reason why we lost is because we don't have the speed of the hawks. We didn't get secondary scoring, our D had lapses. Like I said I would like Hamhuis or Michalek or Volenchenkov coming here. And letting Blake, Huskins and Wallin gone.
Posted 23 May 2010 - 06:38 PM
One of our media guys said that, that he may want to start afresh. If he does go, He will mostly go to LA. San Jose fans want him here still, But Marleau will demand 7 mill. He might have a home town discount, but I doubt it this time around.I am thinking Marleau may go elsewhere. I think he has been treated pretty unfairly. Yes he has made 6.3 a year, but the media has really portrayed him having lack of leadership, and clutch play. He proved he is clutch this post season. San Jose fell into that media hype that surrounded the guy, and took the C, which had to be somewhat of a mental stress he had to endure there. I would say thanks, and go hit the market. Start over fresh elsewhere.
He did let a soft goal every game. But does it help that we can't score 2 goals per game in the WCF?I could not disagree more. He let in at least one awful goal per game. He is a veteran goalie and goaltending like his will never win a Cup.
Posted 23 May 2010 - 06:42 PM
Your right it is a team effort but when you let in a softie it can deflate a team quick. Just look at the Wings for an example it happened to us a couple times. I am not saying Nabs is not a good goalie he just cannot make it happen on the big stage.One of our media guys said that, that he may want to start afresh. If he does go, He will mostly go to LA. San Jose fans want him here still, But Marleau will demand 7 mill. He might have a home town discount, but I doubt it this time around.
He did let a soft goal every game. But does it help that we can't score 2 goals per game in the WCF?
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
97.1 The Ticket: Hocketown "Dead"? |
General Discussion | StormJH1 |
|
|
|
Any pickins from the Canucks carcass? |
General Discussion | RedWingsRox |
|
|
|
Pinned Money on the Board - playoff style!
|
General Discussion | vladdy16 |
|
|
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users