Why oh why Kenny...
Why did they give up on him SO fast?
Posted 24 May 2010 - 11:48 PM
Posted 24 May 2010 - 11:55 PM
Posted 25 May 2010 - 12:03 AM
Posted 25 May 2010 - 12:12 AM
Posted 25 May 2010 - 12:23 AM
Are you implying that Leino chose to leave?
I think he just wanted to play on a line with skill players, and Babcock wouldnt let him do it without first serving time on the forth line with scrubs. Ville will be a 30 goal scorer in this league, and we gave him away. I'm getting sick of Keeny giving away good talent for nothing. Or maybe its Babcock's coaching. How could we keep Meech in favor of Quincy, or Williams instead of Leino? How can the Red Wings as an organization so blatently miss talent like that?!
Posted 25 May 2010 - 12:33 AM
Posted 25 May 2010 - 12:38 AM
Leino played on a line with Filppula and with other fairly good players for awhile. No dice. He was lazy and he generally sucked. Holland wouldn't have traded him otherwise; as you may have noticed, loyalty is a keystone of this franchise, and so players very rarely get traded unless there's something genuinely wrong with how they're playing. We needed the cap space and Leino wasn't willing to put forth his all, and so he's gone.
Quincey had every chance to prove himself. He got time in the regular season and he played a bunch of games in the '07 playoffs. He didn't even show a glimmer of the offensive talent he has exhibited over the past two seasons. Meech, on the other hand, played quite well when he was thrust into essentially a #1 defense slot during the injury spell in '08. That's why Meech stayed and Quincey did not.
What you're doing here is bitching. You are making complaints that have absolutely no basis in reality. You are engaging in a course of egregious hindsight criticism. What's your problem?
Posted 25 May 2010 - 12:42 AM
Posted 25 May 2010 - 02:33 AM
![]()
![]()
Why oh why Kenny...
Why did they give up on him SO fast?
Posted 25 May 2010 - 02:53 AM
If you remember, the Flip Leino Williams line at the beginning of the year was quoted by Babcock as our best line. What messed that all up was the injury to filpula. They were never reunited. Some players are pure goal scorers. Not every player is going to play a hard nosed gritty style. Didnt the wings lose this year because of a lack of scoring depth? I wont even get started on Kenny's off season blunders, including his inability to retain any of Hudler, Sammy AND Hossa.
Why is it that it seems like players flourish when they leave this team? They just wake up and decide to play to their potential to show the wings what they missed out on? Ken Holland has done nothing but Fuck this team up lately. They won the cup in 2008 despite him, not because of him.
Posted 25 May 2010 - 06:55 AM
The knock on Holland is he doesn't break rules well enough? You are aware he's not *allowed* to "violate" the salary cap, right?Let's start with Holland's inability to violate the salary cap. Clearly that's a big problem of his.
Posted 25 May 2010 - 06:57 AM
Dead on.How long does it take for people to understand that Ville is not a complete player? He chose himself what to do or not to do. He is not going into dirty areas, losses the puck too quickly, etc. He needs special players around him to do this job. Red Wings are not built this way. In our system all players need to be responsible. That is why Williams is very bad here. That is why Ville plays for Philly. And I actually like it.
All I have to say about Holland and our off-season:
and finally
Holland is a damn good GM. period.
Posted 25 May 2010 - 07:03 AM
Posted 25 May 2010 - 07:17 AM
Exactly... people are only looking at the numbers, he still looks timid and meek in the hard areas and the only reason he is scoring, is that he is fortunate enough to be on a team FILLED with guys that are willing to do what he isn't...Leino punched his own ticket out of town. He had some early success and surprised a few people and then chose to rest on his laurels. He looked pathetic in the corners, hardly put in the effort to skate, and did absolutely nothing to grab the opportunities that were given to him. If you want to blame anyone for Leino leaving, blame Ville.
I know I was really pulling for Ville at the beginning of the season, he had the tools to get the job done, but didn't have the constitution to do said job. Maybe he realized he had blown a golden opportunity with a great team and the trade to Philly woke him up, knowing much more slacking meant going back to Finland a failure. He is doing better than he was doing here, but he still hasn't really impressed me in Philly, doing some of the things we knew he was capable of while still having his moments of floating around.
All I have to say about Holland and our off-season:
and finally
Holland is a damn good GM. period.
Posted 25 May 2010 - 07:24 AM
If you remember, the Flip Leino Williams line at the beginning of the year was quoted by Babcock as our best line. What messed that all up was the injury to filpula. They were never reunited. Some players are pure goal scorers. Not every player is going to play a hard nosed gritty style. Didnt the wings lose this year because of a lack of scoring depth? I wont even get started on Kenny's off season blunders, including his inability to retain any of Hudler, Sammy AND Hossa.
Why is it that it seems like players flourish when they leave this team? They just wake up and decide to play to their potential to show the wings what they missed out on? Ken Holland has done nothing but Fuck this team up lately. They won the cup in 2008 despite him, not because of him.
Posted 25 May 2010 - 07:38 AM

Can't listen live? Check out MoreLikeRadio.com/downloads for show archives!
Posted 25 May 2010 - 08:47 AM
How long does it take for people to understand that Ville is not a complete player? He chose himself what to do or not to do. He is not going into dirty areas, losses the puck too quickly, etc. He needs special players around him to do this job. Red Wings are not built this way. In our system all players need to be responsible. That is why Williams is very bad here. That is why Ville plays for Philly. And I actually like it.
Posted 25 May 2010 - 09:39 AM
Posted 25 May 2010 - 10:20 AM
Do you even know what a complete player means? If this organization would have only complete players it would be over the cap by far. You pay for offense and you pay for defense. Hudler is a guy that has great offense and we will put him on the top6. No need to pay extra money to get a guy who can play PK too, as we already have them. Helm isn't a complete player. Abdelkader isn't a complete player. Cleary isn't a complete player. Holmstrom isn't a complete player. The list goes on and on.How long does it take for people to understand that Ville is not a complete player? He chose himself what to do or not to do. He is not going into dirty areas, losses the puck too quickly, etc. He needs special players around him to do this job. Red Wings are not built this way. In our system all players need to be responsible. That is why Williams is very bad here. That is why Ville plays for Philly. And I actually like it.
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
97.1 The Ticket: Hocketown "Dead"? |
General Discussion | StormJH1 |
|
|
|
Babcock tells players they are soft. Pushes them to play better. |
General Discussion | drumnj |
|
|
|
Any tips on ways to tolerate the NBC media? |
General Discussion | Red Wings Addict |
|
|
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users