Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Record Ratings on NBC


  • Please log in to reply
54 replies to this topic

#1 Hockeytown0001

Hockeytown0001

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 22,785 posts
  • Location:A2, Michigan

Posted 02 June 2010 - 11:02 AM

Record Ratings on NBC

NBC Sports' coverage of Game 2 of the Stanley Cup Final on Monday night earned the best overnight rating (4.1 rating and 7 share) for a Game 2 on record (NHL overnight data prior to 1975 is unavailable) and was up 21 percent from last year's (3.4 rating for Game 2 of the series between Detroit and Pittsburgh).

NBC's broadcast of the game between the Philadelphia Flyers and Chicago Blackhawks peaked at a 4.7 rating and 8 share from 10:30-11 p.m. ET. The Chicago market delivered a 25.1/39, while Philadelphia earned an 18.5/29.

The Stanley Cup Final on NBC again won the night, as it did Saturday for Game 1, finishing No. 1 in prime time (2.4, Adults 18-49).

"These historic viewership numbers are the result of compelling stories and great play on the ice, two markets on fire for their teams, terrific coverage by our North American television partners, and a season's worth of unprecedented fan engagement on multiple platforms across North America," NHL Chief Operating Officer John Collins said in a statement.

Last night's milestone comes on the heels of healthy ratings for Game 1, which earned the best overnight rating for a Game 1 in 11 years. The 2.8 overnight rating and 6 share was the highest since 1999, when Buffalo vs. Dallas did a 3.7 on Fox.

Canada also scored big during Game 1 of the Final, with CBC achieving an average audience of 3.16 million, an 83-percent increase from Game 1 in 2009.

NBC's two-game average overnight rating is a 3.5, the best for the first two games of a Stanley Cup Final in 11 years since the Buffalo-Dallas series in 1999 did a 3.8, and is up 17 percent over last year's 3.0 rating.

Top 10 Markets for First Two Games on NBC
1. Chicago 21.0
2. Philadelphia 15.9
3. Buffalo 8.8
4. Pittsburgh 4.5
5. Indianapolis 4.0
6. Detroit 3.8
7. Ft. Myers 3.5
8. Las Vegas 3.3
9. Orlando 3.2
10. Columbus 3.2
11. St. Louis 3.2


"All done? Five bucks." - Pavel Datsyuk after an interview
"Very few cities in the NHL have the history or the following of the Detroit Red Wings." - Steve Yzerman

 

 


#2 Crymson

Crymson

    Ninjelephant

  • Gold Booster
  • 11,032 posts
  • Location:Denver, CO, USA

Posted 02 June 2010 - 11:08 AM

Unsurprising. Pittsburgh is not a big market. Amongst other things, this makes very silly Bettman's concerted attempts to push the team.

#3 Echolalia

Echolalia

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,057 posts
  • Location:fab ferndale

Posted 02 June 2010 - 11:13 AM

Good to see the game is growing. Hopefully those record ratings aren't an indicator of bandwagon fans, but rather fans who will continue to watch regardless of who is playing.

#4 Carman

Carman

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 5,114 posts
  • Location:Riverview, MI

Posted 02 June 2010 - 11:14 AM

I don't get why the first reply had to jab at Bettman/Pittsburgh.


On to the topic at hand it's great the see the game starting to draw in the ratings, it's definitely good news that the game is growing.

Edited by Carman, 02 June 2010 - 11:14 AM.


#5 MacK_Attack

MacK_Attack

    Old School

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,678 posts
  • Location:Ontario

Posted 02 June 2010 - 11:16 AM

I'm surprised to see Indy as the 5th-best market.

#6 Echolalia

Echolalia

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,057 posts
  • Location:fab ferndale

Posted 02 June 2010 - 11:18 AM

I'm surprised to see Indy as the 5th-best market.


I wonder if the Coyotes might end up there soon

#7 babygorilla

babygorilla

    Top Prospect

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 83 posts
  • Location:Austin, TX

Posted 02 June 2010 - 11:22 AM

Wow. Ft. Myers and Orlando. That's a bit of a surprise. Must have been a hell of a lead-in.

#8 soultrain

soultrain

    hairdresser of the sharts

  • Bronze Booster
  • 805 posts
  • Location:it smells like a cow ass Cali

Posted 02 June 2010 - 11:23 AM

its because the world wants to see a walking penis with glasses.Posted Image

Edited by soultrain, 02 June 2010 - 11:24 AM.


#9 GMRwings1983

GMRwings1983

    The Killer is Me

  • Silver Booster
  • 20,846 posts
  • Location:Jerkwater, USA

Posted 02 June 2010 - 11:30 AM

That's good news.

Funny how espn sporstwriters (idiots) are always blabbing about how no one cares about hockey, especially with Crosby/Ovechkin not in the Finals. Yet they make it sound like everyone cares about their overhyped, overrated NBA playoffs.
According to my profile, my reputation is excellent. LOL.

#10 Hockeytown0001

Hockeytown0001

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 22,785 posts
  • Location:A2, Michigan

Posted 02 June 2010 - 11:52 AM

That's good news.

Funny how espn sporstwriters (idiots) are always blabbing about how no one cares about hockey, especially with Crosby/Ovechkin not in the Finals. Yet they make it sound like everyone cares about their overhyped, overrated NBA playoffs.


It's not like the Lakers and Celtics have ever played in the Finals before.

"All done? Five bucks." - Pavel Datsyuk after an interview
"Very few cities in the NHL have the history or the following of the Detroit Red Wings." - Steve Yzerman

 

 


#11 InKennyWeTrust

InKennyWeTrust

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 695 posts

Posted 02 June 2010 - 11:53 AM

Unsurprising. Pittsburgh is not a big market. Amongst other things, this makes very silly Bettman's concerted attempts to push the team.


So is that why the Pittsburgh viewership was 2 places above Detroit's? Not that I'm a fan of their team or anything, but that comment makes no sense in context.

#12 CenterIce

CenterIce

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,989 posts

Posted 02 June 2010 - 11:55 AM

I'm surprised to see Indy as the 5th-best market.


Indianapolis doesn't have a team, Chicago is close by.

#13 Lidstromboli

Lidstromboli

    buncha geezers

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,454 posts
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 02 June 2010 - 12:14 PM

also there's pretty much nothing to do anywhere in indiana so might as well watch some hockey right

Posted Image


#14 jollymania

jollymania

    Heavy Hitter

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,610 posts
  • Location:Chicago

Posted 02 June 2010 - 12:48 PM

So is that why the Pittsburgh viewership was 2 places above Detroit's? Not that I'm a fan of their team or anything, but that comment makes no sense in context.

pennsylvania
"I assure you the hits along the boards he(Aaron Downey) constantly threw SEVERAL TIMES EVERY SHIFT were far more damaging hits that what Kronwall throws."
- uk_redwing
HockeyArchive Twitter

#15 hooon

hooon

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,261 posts
  • Location:Denver

Posted 02 June 2010 - 12:54 PM

Ft. Meyers? really?

Makes total sense that the ratings are up. Because last year's final was a repeat of the year before, I'm guessing there was a lot of casual fans who just said "meh, I saw this last year". While I obviously would have wanted the Wings in the finals this year, as far as ratings go, it makes sense that having 2 new teams in there will bring a lot of new viewers.
Posted Image

#16 GMRwings1983

GMRwings1983

    The Killer is Me

  • Silver Booster
  • 20,846 posts
  • Location:Jerkwater, USA

Posted 02 June 2010 - 01:06 PM

It's not like the Lakers and Celtics have ever played in the Finals before.


Dude espn always talks about how no one ever cares about hockey, yet they've overcovered the entire NBA playoffs like everyone cares about the NBA. I don't think that many people in this country care about the NBA.
According to my profile, my reputation is excellent. LOL.

#17 Konnan511

Konnan511

    #FreePulkkinen

  • HoF Booster
  • 10,338 posts
  • Location:Traverse City, Mi

Posted 02 June 2010 - 01:11 PM

That first reply was idiotic haha.

Mmmmm, higher viewership yield more sponsorship and TV revenue yielding a higher cap =)

KUTGW Bettman. Illitch loves spending money :)

Dude espn always talks about how no one ever cares about hockey, yet they've overcovered the entire NBA playoffs like everyone cares about the NBA. I don't think that many people in this country care about the NBA.

Except most major cities and the growing urban and poverty stricken cities in America.
The Best Of BC
HankthaTank
- Squirrels, they hate to be thrown. / Why is the magical unicorn named Brian... Jedi - I just downloaded the "kids" book, "Go the F--k to Sleep" as narrated by Samuel L. Jackson on my kindle. I am now ready to be a daddy. / *Checks Router* No, I'm positive I didn't hit the "Wings Defense Sucks" button. Electrophile - I'm just glad the Wings were able to win despite the Curse of Brian. ACallToArms - I think Trey needs to put something about payroll tax and deferred income in his sig... Edicius - I'd rather [have] a soundbite of me saying "I like (man sausage)" rather than "I like Crosby".

#18 NC WINGS FAN

NC WINGS FAN

    4th Line Grinder

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 270 posts

Posted 02 June 2010 - 01:29 PM

Good to see the game is growing. Hopefully those record ratings aren't an indicator of bandwagon fans, but rather fans who will continue to watch regardless of who is playing.


I highly doubt it. The reason people are watching is because both teams play in big markets where hockey is relevant.

If it were Anaheim and Florida, no one would be watching.

#19 NC WINGS FAN

NC WINGS FAN

    4th Line Grinder

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 270 posts

Posted 02 June 2010 - 01:36 PM

So is that why the Pittsburgh viewership was 2 places above Detroit's? Not that I'm a fan of their team or anything, but that comment makes no sense in context.



That does not matter. What he is saying is that Pittsburgh is a small market. It does not matter if everyone in Pittsburgh watches the SCF and only half of New York does. There are still more people in New York watching.

Also, what he was getting at is that Philadelphia and Chicago are bigger markets than Pittsburgh, which usually translates to more fans/potential fans.

#20 MacK_Attack

MacK_Attack

    Old School

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,678 posts
  • Location:Ontario

Posted 02 June 2010 - 01:52 PM

That does not matter. What he is saying is that Pittsburgh is a small market. It does not matter if everyone in Pittsburgh watches the SCF and only half of New York does. There are still more people in New York watching.

Also, what he was getting at is that Philadelphia and Chicago are bigger markets than Pittsburgh, which usually translates to more fans/potential fans.

But the Canadian numbers are way higher for this series.

Seems to me there's more interest across the board in these two teams.





Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users