6th Defenseman
#1
Posted 05 June 2010 - 11:22 PM
Garnet Exelby - pretty tough player. Would be a decent #6
Nick Boynton - only 30. Will hit, fight and is a decent player
Jason Strudiwck - getting old but still plays the game hard. Very similar style to Lilja but tougher.
SHane Hnidy - Classic stay at home type
Milan Jurcina - From what I've seen he seems like a big hitter and clears the crease. Maybe someone else can chime in on this one.
Anyone else you guys can think of as potential free agent Lilja type, mean, stay at home guys?
RIP BOB PROBERT #24
#2
Posted 05 June 2010 - 11:41 PM
Edited by WorkingOvertime, 05 June 2010 - 11:54 PM.
#3
Posted 05 June 2010 - 11:45 PM
Exelby is a pretty good player but I tihnk coming off a year in TO he'll be due for a slight cut or may want to take one to play in Detroit which is always possible.Hopefully we can have both a 4th line gritty player and a tough defensemen. Exelby is the only player you mentioned that I've seen play often- he's certainly good enough to be our sixth defensemen but he would probably need to take a pay cut to play here. What are the chances of Janik being called up full-time next year? He's gritty and plays a solid defensive game. If Kindle can handle regular duty, Janik could be a great 6th/7th defensemen at a cheap price.
Janik seemed good when he was here but I dunno if he really is the answer for our need at number 6. The guy hasn't held an NHL job for a long time for a reason. I would not be unhappy with him being the full time 6 or 7 guy because he is tough(not a heavyweight but a good middleweight) and played well when he was up with us because his game is simple.
RIP BOB PROBERT #24
#4
Posted 05 June 2010 - 11:45 PM
Still, I'm guessing the points is to generate discussion
Excelby is someone I really wanted us to get back when he played for Atlanta... but as a Leaf he's been considerably less impressive. You can argue that it's the Leafs who are making him look worse, but the doubt is still there now.
What about Brendan Witt? I'm not really familiar with Leastern teams so I'm not sure if he has anything left in the tank.

Thanks TeeMan!
"We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas
of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage" --H.P. Lovecraft
#5
Posted 05 June 2010 - 11:47 PM
think about it
- EZBAKETHAGANGSTA likes this

#6
Posted 05 June 2010 - 11:53 PM
brendan witt managed to play himself off of the islanders.
think about it
- GMRwings1983 likes this

Thanks TeeMan!
"We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas
of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage" --H.P. Lovecraft
#7
Posted 05 June 2010 - 11:56 PM
Milan Jurcina - From what I've seen he seems like a big hitter and clears the crease. Maybe someone else can chime in on this one.
ASSETS: Owns a huge frame and the ability to play an all-around game from time to time. Also possesses a big shot from the point. Takes up a lot of space in the defensive zone.
FLAWS: Doesn't play with a lot of passion and rarely takes full advantage of his tremendous size. His skating and coordination are also weaknesses in his game.
CAREER POTENTIAL: Inconsistent big defenseman.
He did okay in the Olympics. He might be able to provide some physical play here and there but I imagine that the kind of guy you're looking for is someone who has never EVER been questioned about passion and using their size to their advantage.
#8
Posted 05 June 2010 - 11:57 PM
I think the problem with Janik is the uncertainty of E and Kindl. IMO Janik can handle 7th D duty just fine (and cheap), but if E and/or Kindl fail to develop, Janik may not be sufficient. Either way, signing anyone for 1m+ for more than a year could be risky with the possible emergence of E, Kindl, and Smith (later) in the coming year(s).Exelby is a pretty good player but I tihnk coming off a year in TO he'll be due for a slight cut or may want to take one to play in Detroit which is always possible.
Janik seemed good when he was here but I dunno if he really is the answer for our need at number 6. The guy hasn't held an NHL job for a long time for a reason. I would not be unhappy with him being the full time 6 or 7 guy because he is tough(not a heavyweight but a good middleweight) and played well when he was up with us because his game is simple.
#9
Posted 06 June 2010 - 12:01 AM
He did okay in the Olympics. He might be able to provide some physical play here and there but I imagine that the kind of guy you're looking for is someone who has never EVER been questioned about passion and using their size to their advantage.
Yeah, with Kindl and Ericsson on the team we have more than enough big players who don't use their size consistently.
- GMRwings1983 and Cheveldae32 like this

Thanks TeeMan!
"We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas
of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage" --H.P. Lovecraft
#10
Posted 06 June 2010 - 12:09 AM
I didn't know he was actually on the outs with them.
they waived his ass
- EZBAKETHAGANGSTA likes this

#11
Posted 06 June 2010 - 12:10 AM
they waived his ass
- Cheveldae32 likes this

Thanks TeeMan!
"We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas
of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage" --H.P. Lovecraft
#12
Posted 06 June 2010 - 12:50 AM
- Veery likes this
#13
Posted 06 June 2010 - 12:55 AM
Yeah, with Kindl and Ericsson on the team we have more than enough big players who don't use their size consistently.
Pretty much everybody is scared to death of a possible third pairing of those two. I am a little as well, I must admit, but at the same time I can see those two playing well together. It sounds crazy, but bear with me.
They're pretty similar in my mind. They both have shown shades in the past of an ability to play physical. They're both skilled and they like to make skilled plays. They think the game in a fairly similar way.
When both of these guys are under pressure they tend to make skill plays that perhaps their partner isn't ready for thus leading to a lot of frustrating giveaways. Babcock has said this about Ericsson this past year and Kindl's staunchest supporters have said this about him for years. Don't get me wrong, they're both at fault for that tendency because it shows somewhat of an inability to communicate and make adjustments to the tendencies of their dman partner and teammates for the betterment of the team.
At the same time, what if they had a linemate where they didn't have to adjust as much? Where they make a skilled play, the instincts match one another and the result is tape to tape? When Ericsson was on Kronwall's side he didn't look so bad. At least, not as bad as when he played with Lebda. Why can't a pairing of Ericsson and Kindl have a similar result? They have similar games and they can both play the game the way they like to play it. Then you got both guys playing with confidence because they're allowed to play hockey the way they know how and that confidence will allow them to play a punishing game on the defensive end.
I'm not saying that's how a pairing of Ericsson and Kindl will work out. I'm just saying I wouldn't be surprised if those two found a way to be effective with one another because they have similar skill sets and they'll be able to use them if they're on the same pairing. Does it really sound that crazy after all?
#14
Posted 06 June 2010 - 01:09 AM
brendan witt managed to play himself off of the islanders.
think about it
Yikes. Then you're 100% right. We don't need the worst team in the league's cast offs.
Was there any anomosity between the Isles, and Witt?...Was it mutual that they both go their own ways?...Maybe Witt wanted off that sinking ship?
Anywho - Witt is indestructable; when he went out for his morning coffee in Philly he was struck by an suv...Sounds like a Red Wing if you ask me

#15
Posted 06 June 2010 - 01:30 AM
A Boston fan's assessment of Boychuk:
"He has a BOMB of a shot. It's hard and some what accurate. That is his most valuable skill. He's not really a PP QB, he's a defenseman with a cannon and he does remind me a lot of Souray. Not a great skater, not a great passer, physical, and a huge cannon shot.
He was named the top AHL defenseman of the year. He has good positioning but he needs to play with a really good defenseman or he's going to be exposed. He can't carry a pairing yet. But he hasn't left Chara or Wideman out to dry.
IMO, he's a future #4 defenseman that can play on a team's top PP unit, blasting shots from the point. I don't think he'll ever be a good PMD, but he should be a good physical #4."
Edited by Icesurfer, 06 June 2010 - 01:54 AM.
#16
Posted 06 June 2010 - 01:53 AM
Was there any anomosity between the Isles, and Witt?...Was it mutual that they both go their own ways?...Maybe Witt wanted off that sinking ship?
Anywho - Witt is indestructable; when he went out for his morning coffee in Philly he was struck by an suv...Sounds like a Red Wing if you ask me
he was really bad this year.

#17
Posted 06 June 2010 - 02:11 AM
The Wings should go after Johnny Boychuk from Boston, 26 yo, big and responsible defensively and a big hitter..... he will become an excellent defenceman.
A Boston fan's assessment of Boychuk:
"He has a BOMB of a shot. It's hard and some what accurate. That is his most valuable skill. He's not really a PP QB, he's a defenseman with a cannon and he does remind me a lot of Souray. Not a great skater, not a great passer, physical, and a huge cannon shot.
He was named the top AHL defenseman of the year. He has good positioning but he needs to play with a really good defenseman or he's going to be exposed. He can't carry a pairing yet. But he hasn't left Chara or Wideman out to dry.
IMO, he's a future #4 defenseman that can play on a team's top PP unit, blasting shots from the point. I don't think he'll ever be a good PMD, but he should be a good physical #4."
He'd be nice, but I doubt Boston would let him go easily. Also, another young guy may not be in our best interest. I'd still like it if we could get him at a low price.
What about Shaone Morrison? Might be a bit on the expensive side, but I don't think he'd need much of a raise over his current ~$2m, and Washington seems to be intent on going after Volchenkov so they may let him go. (Then again, with the general shortage of decent d-men, he might draw a premium...)
#18
Posted 06 June 2010 - 02:41 AM
Patrice Bergeron — $4,750,000
Milan Lucic — $4,083,333
Marc Savard — $4,007,143
Michael Ryder — $4,000,000
David Krejci — $3,750,000
Marco Sturm — $3,500,000
Zach Hamill ($500,000) $1,316,667
Brad Marchand ($165,000) $821,667
Shawn Thornton — $812,500
Trent Whitfield — $550,000
DEFENSEMEN
Zdeno Chara — $7,500,000
Dennis Wideman — $3,937,500
Dennis Seidenberg — $3,250,000
Andrew Ference — $2,250,000
Matt Hunwick — $1,450,000
Jeff Penner ($1,000,000) $1,208,333
GOALTENDERS
Tim Thomas — $5,000,000
Tuukka Rask — $1,250,000
BUYOUTS
Peter Schaefer — $766,667
Patrick Eaves — $-41,667
LOST VIA REENTRY WAIVERS
NONE
CAPGEEK.COM TOTALS
ROSTER SIZE 18
SALARY CAP $56,800,000
PAYROLL $54,162,143
BONUSES $1,665,000
CAP SPACE $4,302,857
Listed on the roster now are 10 forwards (without Wheeler) and 6 defensemen. Someone said they would sign Hall or Seguin at about $3.75 mil. Obviously doesn't leave a lot of room for Boychuk. If they were going to try to sign him they prolly can give him only around $1 mil or less. Wings could give him 1.3 - 1.6 mil. He has played with Chara and Wideman. What is interesting is that his +10 was second on team behind Chara. Wings could always keep Meech if they don't think Kindl will pan out.
Edited by Icesurfer, 06 June 2010 - 02:54 AM.
#19
Posted 06 June 2010 - 03:21 AM
$$$$$
CAPGEEK.COM TOTALS
ROSTER SIZE 18
SALARY CAP $56,800,000
PAYROLL $54,162,143
BONUSES $1,665,000
CAP SPACE $4,302,857
Listed on the roster now are 10 forwards (without Wheeler) and 6 defensemen. Someone also said they were going to sign Seguin or Hall at about $3.75 mil. Obviously doesn't leave a lot or room for Boychuk. If they were going to try to sign him they prolly can give him only around $1 mil or less. Wings could give him 1.3 - 1.6 mil. He has played with Chara and Wideman. What is interesting is that his +10 was second on team behind Chara. Wings could always keep Meech if they don't think Kindl will pan out.
Hmm, tighter than I expected when I saw what they gave Seidenberg. But with a $2m cap raise and moving Thomas (if they can) they'd have ~$9.5m to sign Wheeler, Hall/Seguin, a 13th forward, Boychuk, and a backup goalie, plus they'd have close to $4.5 in bonus cushion to work with if they needed to.
Then again, they may want to make some other moves, as the roster you gave has four players that have only played a few NHL games. Then again, they could be next year's Blackhawks if Hall/Seguin can be an impact player. They might be willing to use that bonus cushion. Then again, they might have trouble moving Thomas.
Buychuk is definitely worth a look, and I'm sure a lot of other teams will be looking as well. Something to watch at least.
#20
Posted 06 June 2010 - 05:02 AM
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Who should/will we re-sign first? |
Trade Rumors & Free Agent Talk | matthewdanna |
|
|
|
Ken Holland & Co. Prospects vs. Steve Yzerman & Co. Prospects |
General Discussion | drumnj |
|
|
|
Who Do You Want to Win the Cup? |
General Discussion | Wings_Dynasty |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














