The question at hand, is Vancouver the team to beat in the West now? Or is this just Canadian sports coverage being overly hyped up for the Canadian team?
Thoughts?
Posted 02 July 2010 - 09:19 AM
Posted 02 July 2010 - 09:22 AM
Edited by redwingfan19, 02 July 2010 - 09:23 AM.
Posted 02 July 2010 - 09:22 AM

Posted 02 July 2010 - 09:31 AM
Posted 02 July 2010 - 09:33 AM
The Canucks are supposed to be the team to beat every year apparently.
Posted 02 July 2010 - 09:35 AM
They got better in all the areas they needed to and already had a good team... I wouldn't say ANY team is the "team to beat" as there are too many variables that can drastically change things, but they are definitely a scarier team to play today, than they were June 30th...LOL I was thinking the same thing. They sure got the hype last year.
All I have to say about Holland and our off-season:
and finally
Holland is a damn good GM. period.
Posted 02 July 2010 - 09:36 AM
LOL I was thinking the same thing. They sure got the hype last year.
They've improved and should be one of the favorites in my opinion. But definitely not 'the team to beat'.
Posted 02 July 2010 - 09:39 AM
Edited by Carman, 02 July 2010 - 10:20 AM.
Posted 02 July 2010 - 09:40 AM
You really can't discount what LA may do either if they land Kovalchuk...I'm not a fan on preseason projections at all. But if I had to choose a team I would go with Vancouver in paper at least. Although I would just throw the wings, nicks, sharks kings, and Chicago as the class of the west rather then just one team.
All I have to say about Holland and our off-season:
and finally
Holland is a damn good GM. period.
Posted 02 July 2010 - 09:43 AM
Posted 02 July 2010 - 10:06 AM
You really can't discount what LA may do either if they land Kovalchuk...
Posted 02 July 2010 - 10:06 AM
Posted 02 July 2010 - 10:39 AM
Edited by jollymania, 02 July 2010 - 10:40 AM.
Posted 02 July 2010 - 11:12 AM
adding Hamhuis, ballard, Oreskovich, Tambilini, and Malhotra doesn't mean anything, they were mostly saying though that now they are more on par with the Blackhawks with all of their personnel loss.
Posted 02 July 2010 - 11:32 AM
Edited by T.Low, 02 July 2010 - 11:32 AM.
Posted 02 July 2010 - 11:42 AM
Posted 02 July 2010 - 01:06 PM
Well being on par with Chicago would sure be a good thing with winning the Cup I suppose. Now if they can just learn how to get pass them in playoffs....adding Hamhuis, ballard, Oreskovich, Tambilini, and Malhotra doesn't mean anything, they were mostly saying though that now they are more on par with the Blackhawks with all of their personnel loss.
Posted 02 July 2010 - 01:18 PM
Posted 02 July 2010 - 01:29 PM
Well being on par with Chicago would sure be a good thing with winning the Cup I suppose. Now if they can just learn how to get pass them in playoffs....
Luongo does them no help either. All that talent and for some reason just sievitis like crazy when it matters.
Posted 02 July 2010 - 03:17 PM
absolutely not. vancouver is a joke, and TSN and the media hypes them up every year. Same old song and dance, strong or bust regular season and flop in the playoffs.
Vancouver = San Jose Sharks 2.0

| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best Songs That Pump You Up at the Rink |
General Discussion | The Axe |
|
|
|
Coyotes file for Bankruptcy/City pays 25mil to keep them
Atlanta on the move |
General Discussion | MacK_Attack |
|
|
|
The Hottest Red Wing
|
Between Periods | Guest_lidstrom#5 (Guest) |
|
|
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users