Brett Lebda
in a class with alexandre daigle and pat faloon, and red light racicot in goal. after the past 2 seasons, darryl sutter is a lock for the builder category.
Posted 07 August 2010 - 11:23 PM
Brett Lebda
Wings need some Ryan Pulock in the 1st round, a goal scorer in the 2nd round and rounds 3-7 all guys 6'4 or bigger. Please sign Dekeyser to play with Smith. <--Dekeyser signed, Paired next year. Mark your calendars.
Tootoo needs a partner in crime that plays like him on the other side of Helm. Oh hey, we have Mitchell Callahan. Problem solved.
Cleary....
XBox Live BleedRedWing
Posted 08 August 2010 - 12:50 AM
You think all they consider are career numbers? I believe they come into the discussion only when a guy comes up who was not league leader for any period of time.
Gartner was never a flash in the pan period. He needed incredible career points or he would never have gotten in. The committee members have shown they value peak far more than career in their voting. It's why someone like Forsberg will most likely be a first-year inductee, and someone like Andreychuk, with much greater career numbers, is not in.
A single Hart will ensure Sedin is talked about for the Hall of Fame, whereas he would be virtually ignored without it. Same thing with St. Louis.
Finally, who would you rather have - Gartner for 20 years or Ovechkin for 5?
Posted 08 August 2010 - 03:41 AM
Figures don't lie, but liars sure figure. - Mark Twain
Posted 08 August 2010 - 10:22 AM
Wings need some Ryan Pulock in the 1st round, a goal scorer in the 2nd round and rounds 3-7 all guys 6'4 or bigger. Please sign Dekeyser to play with Smith. <--Dekeyser signed, Paired next year. Mark your calendars.
Tootoo needs a partner in crime that plays like him on the other side of Helm. Oh hey, we have Mitchell Callahan. Problem solved.
Cleary....
XBox Live BleedRedWing
Posted 08 August 2010 - 10:36 AM
Posted 08 August 2010 - 10:50 AM
Posted 08 August 2010 - 12:46 PM

Posted 08 August 2010 - 12:52 PM
OK, he's not a player. But I don't see it as derailing as he's still coaching in the NHL. But I'd have to say no because to me a lock means he's already earned it. I don't think Babcock has earned it yet. But he definitely could get there.Not to derail the original topic... but if Babcock retired today would he be a lock? I would say yes.
Posted 08 August 2010 - 01:57 PM
Hes the only coach ever to win a gold medal at the WC, Olympics, and the Stanley Cup, hes gone to the SCF 3 times, and hes done it only in 7 seasons.OK, he's not a player. But I don't see it as derailing as he's still coaching in the NHL. But I'd have to say no because to me a lock means he's already earned it. I don't think Babcock has earned it yet. But he definitely could get there.
Posted 08 August 2010 - 02:06 PM
To some, 7 seasons isn't enough to earn a spot in the Hall.Hes the only coach ever to win a gold medal at the WC, Olympics, and the Stanley Cup, hes gone to the SCF 3 times, and hes done it only in 7 seasons.
Posted 08 August 2010 - 03:19 PM
Exactly, he's only coached 7 seasons. There have been so many great athletes across all the sports who clearly have HOF talent and aren't in because they didn't do it long enough. And I did say he's on the way there, he just needs to do it longer.Hes the only coach ever to win a gold medal at the WC, Olympics, and the Stanley Cup, hes gone to the SCF 3 times, and hes done it only in 7 seasons.
Posted 08 August 2010 - 10:21 PM
But those guys (accumulators) will always have to wait, if they ever do get in. For instance Andreychuk finished 9th once in the league for points, and that was his best. He never earned a post-season all-star team nod, and was never considered a top player in the league.Andreychuk will get into the Hall of Fame. Too many goals and points not too, especially with Dino getting in being a similar player.
Edited by egroen, 08 August 2010 - 10:29 PM.
Posted 08 August 2010 - 10:36 PM
The bar for goalies is significantly higher than it is for skaters. Osgood could get in, after a wait, but there are still some better goalies waiting (like Vachon).As much as I love Osgood, I really don't think he will get in. It is the hall of fame. It is for the best of the best. Osgood was a very consistent goaltender who did well with what he had. He was never the best of his class any year, he never won an individual award, and he never was considered the best on his team (save perhaps the 09 playoffs).
I would love to see him get in, but I really don't think he will or should.
Edited by egroen, 09 August 2010 - 07:20 AM.
Posted 08 August 2010 - 10:48 PM
No they wouldn't. They've both played like 5 years, which would be way less than Lindros played. Same with Cam Neely.
That would be too unprecedented to get them in after such a short time.
Posted 08 August 2010 - 10:50 PM
As much as I love Osgood, I really don't think he will get in. It is the hall of fame. It is for the best of the best. Osgood was a very consistent goaltender who did well with what he had. He was never the best of his class any year, he never won an individual award, and he never was considered the best on his team (save perhaps the 09 playoffs).
I would love to see him get in, but I really don't think he will or should.
Edited by F2B&G, 08 August 2010 - 10:51 PM.
Posted 09 August 2010 - 12:08 AM
Posted 09 August 2010 - 07:25 AM
Though Osgood was the runner up in 96.I agree. A large number of fellow Wings fans always seem to think he's a lock, but the reality is that he's borderline at best, and if he does get in, it will be years off. A good, reliable goalie with a good postseason track record, but was never a Vezina finalist, and earned most of his playoff wins with the most dominant franchise of the last two decades.
It's alright though, he'll always be a legend in Motown.
EDIT: And for the record, I don't think Cujo belongs in the HoF either.
Posted 09 August 2010 - 07:43 AM
Posted 09 August 2010 - 08:00 AM
I think he's been mentioned, but what argument is there for him really? he does have over 1,000pts, but you can't start putting everyone in that hits that mark. He's way below a ppg on his career, he's only ever finished in the top 10 in scoring once (8th), his career best is 26 goals, he only had 276 goals on his career, no awards, etc., etc.no love for douggie weight?
Posted 10 August 2010 - 08:41 AM
What argument would there be for Guerin? His career best is less than 70pts I think. Even if he gets to 500 goals, which I think he has about a 0.1% chance of doing, I don't think he has a shot. Honestly, I'm not even sure if Guerin is going to be playing this season.I think you've got them covered as far as retiring right now. Guerin maybe, but that will depend on his next few seasons- and you did specify that we are discussing the here-and-now. That's the only other one who popped into my head.
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X Posts For A Game 4 Victory Where X=358 |
General Discussion | MidMichSteve |
|
|
|
Pinned Money on the Board - playoff style!
|
General Discussion | vladdy16 |
|
|
|
Any pickins from the Canucks carcass? |
General Discussion | RedWingsRox |
|
|
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users