Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

2010 College Football Season Thread


  • Please log in to reply
221 replies to this topic

#41 Hockeytown0001

Hockeytown0001

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 22,621 posts
  • Location:A2, Michigan

Posted 15 September 2010 - 11:35 PM

Haha wouldn't want any other type of welcome from you! Thanks for the responses. All the bumps in life have been cleared for now so I'm excited!

As for ND I won't bring up a lot. All I'll say is this: ND has the right coach now. BK is going to win big there in time. He had his arms tied behind his back with the QB situation. Reminded me of the Threet/Sheridan days :scared:

For M: Obviously thrilled with Shoelace, but it's a long season. Tate the "Great" seemed to have the same start last season. I'm not forgetting that. The defense will also have some serious issues all season due to youth/depth.


Hopefully Tate isn't sulking on the sidelines like I've heard some people say.

"All done? Five bucks." - Pavel Datsyuk after an interview
"Very few cities in the NHL have the history or the following of the Detroit Red Wings." - Steve Yzerman

 

 


#42 mannysBETTER3434

mannysBETTER3434

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,868 posts
  • Location:Hudsonville, MI

Posted 17 September 2010 - 12:36 PM

Last week against ND he seemed more upbeat, but against UCONN it looked to me he was being a little cry baby. Pretty annoying I really wanted to redshirt Gardner...

#43 Hockeytown0001

Hockeytown0001

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 22,621 posts
  • Location:A2, Michigan

Posted 18 September 2010 - 11:35 AM

Sad situation with UMass's marching band.

In any event, Go Blue. I'm anticipating a pretty easy win today. Maybe Tate will take a few snaps.

"All done? Five bucks." - Pavel Datsyuk after an interview
"Very few cities in the NHL have the history or the following of the Detroit Red Wings." - Steve Yzerman

 

 


#44 GoWings1905

GoWings1905

    Legend

  • Gold Booster
  • 5,273 posts

Posted 18 September 2010 - 02:39 PM

Michigan's defense is in major trouble when the Big 10 teams roll around.
 
 
"To whom much is given, much is expected."
 
 

 

 

 

 


#45 timothy1997

timothy1997

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,640 posts

Posted 18 September 2010 - 08:47 PM

Michigan is only as good as D-Rob's health. When he plays he freakin scares me. I hear all the comparisons to Pat White in WVU, but White never had to run that many carries and White also had Slaton to run the ball. When a better team does what UMASS did on defense today, how can Michigan respond.

#46 Hockeytown0001

Hockeytown0001

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 22,621 posts
  • Location:A2, Michigan

Posted 18 September 2010 - 09:09 PM

That got a little tense today. Far closer than it should have been.

"All done? Five bucks." - Pavel Datsyuk after an interview
"Very few cities in the NHL have the history or the following of the Detroit Red Wings." - Steve Yzerman

 

 


#47 GoWings1905

GoWings1905

    Legend

  • Gold Booster
  • 5,273 posts

Posted 18 September 2010 - 11:00 PM

DELAY OF GAME!

Seriously, how the hell does that get missed? That wasn't even close.
 
 
"To whom much is given, much is expected."
 
 

 

 

 

 


#48 lookalive07

lookalive07

    --19--

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 650 posts

Posted 19 September 2010 - 03:25 AM

Michigan State tonight... :yowza: :yowza: :yowza:

Posted Image


#49 Heroes of Hockeytown

Heroes of Hockeytown

    Big Goal Bob

  • Bronze Booster
  • 13,729 posts

Posted 19 September 2010 - 06:19 AM

It was a brilliant gamble, I love gutsy football like that. It could've been disastrous if the tight end had gotten hung up or tripped at the LOS, but he got free and the rest is history. I'm guessing BK isn't very in love with the state of Michigan after these last two weeks.
"We've been in the same spot all year long. We won 50 games for the fourth year in a row. People think we're just hum-drum and boring.
No, you know what we are, we're good. You can't do what we do every single day and not be good." - Mike Babcock

#50 haroldsnepsts

haroldsnepsts

    "Classy"

  • HoF Booster Mod
  • 16,931 posts

Posted 19 September 2010 - 10:20 AM

All I have to say about the Notre Dame game is:

HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA!!!

I have no ties to Michigan State other than being from the state of Michigan but man it brings me joy watching Notre Dame lose, especially in OT in such heartbreaking fashion.

What a ballsy call wow.

Posted Image

Good times, good times.

They were going to make Leinart give back his too, but no one can seem to find him. :P

#51 GoWings1905

GoWings1905

    Legend

  • Gold Booster
  • 5,273 posts

Posted 19 September 2010 - 10:39 AM

^ Enjoy it while you can.

Notre Dame is really close to breaking through and it's only Kelly's third game.
 
 
"To whom much is given, much is expected."
 
 

 

 

 

 


#52 mannysBETTER3434

mannysBETTER3434

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,868 posts
  • Location:Hudsonville, MI

Posted 19 September 2010 - 11:24 AM

Wow I would have never expected that from Dantonio. Gutsy call, great game!

I'm petrified of what balanced teams like Wisc, Iowa, MSU, and OSU can do to M's defense. Actually I'm scared of every offense the rest of the season now. The defense is a total joke. The kicking is worse. I'm really torn on this 3-3-5 stuff. I can see it working, and understand the talent on that side of the ball is below average, but I just don't know...

I really think if UMASS would have taken a knee before half they would have won. How pathetic...

Edited by mannysBETTER3434, 19 September 2010 - 11:26 AM.


#53 lookalive07

lookalive07

    --19--

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 650 posts

Posted 19 September 2010 - 03:36 PM

^ Enjoy it while you can.

Notre Dame is really close to breaking through and it's only Kelly's third game.



That sounds a lot like what ESPN says every year in the preseason: "Is this year the year that Notre Dame turns the program back around?"

That said, last night's game was incredibly exciting and ND did look pretty good, but they're going to need a season with Kelly as their coach before I see anything remarkable happening. They did everything to win the game except win it.


Edit: Also, I'd really like to see them actually join a damn conference and play some legitimate teams aside from 4 games of the year. UM, MSU, Utah, and USC are Notre Dame's only real huge threats this year, and they've already lost two of those games. Stanford might be a little tricky too, but I see them coming out hot after losing to MSU. But seriously, Notre Dame needs to join the Big East or something.

Edited by lookalive07, 19 September 2010 - 03:44 PM.

Posted Image


#54 HockeyTownHouligan

HockeyTownHouligan

    4th Line Grinder

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 235 posts
  • Location:Lansing MI

Posted 19 September 2010 - 06:19 PM

AHHHHAAHAHAHAHA oh love being from the great state of Michigan. Go back to south bend and pray some more ya stupid leprechauns and maybe you can come up north and actually win against U of M or MSU. I cant stand U of M but i did find it kinda fulfilling to see ND get beat in the final seconds and then come to East Lansing and get smoked by the fake FG in OT right in front of the ND band too haha. Good win sparty's. oh and by the way to all the people saying that the play clock expired, there are tenths of seconds on a clock, even when it reaches zero the clock is still live.
Ya know the .5 .4 .3 .2 .1 just sayin.

Edited by HockeyTownHouligan, 19 September 2010 - 06:22 PM.


#55 GoWings1905

GoWings1905

    Legend

  • Gold Booster
  • 5,273 posts

Posted 19 September 2010 - 06:53 PM

That sounds a lot like what ESPN says every year in the preseason: "Is this year the year that Notre Dame turns the program back around?"

That said, last night's game was incredibly exciting and ND did look pretty good, but they're going to need a season with Kelly as their coach before I see anything remarkable happening. They did everything to win the game except win it.


Edit: Also, I'd really like to see them actually join a damn conference and play some legitimate teams aside from 4 games of the year. UM, MSU, Utah, and USC are Notre Dame's only real huge threats this year, and they've already lost two of those games. Stanford might be a little tricky too, but I see them coming out hot after losing to MSU. But seriously, Notre Dame needs to join the Big East or something.


I agreed with everything up until the scheduling portion, then I started laughing. I love people that ***** about ND's schedule without actually looking at it. I challenge you to find another team in college football with a tougher six games to start the season. The only one remotely close might be Miami. But yes, they only play four legitimate teams.

Seriously, do you really think the frickin Big East is going to provide a tougher schedule than the one ND plays as an independent? I'd listen to arguments that the Big Ten would provide a "tougher" schedule, but right now I don't see how anyone can say the Big Ten has been anywhere near strong the past few years. I know a couple schools you mentioned that scheduled some major powerhouses such as UMass, Bowling Green, Western Michigan, Florida Atlantic and Northern Colorado. Are those legitimate teams or are you saving Indiana, Northwestern, Minnesota, Illinois, etc. for your argument? Ohio State's first six games are laughable, yet I'm supposed to sit here and believe they have it tougher than Notre Dame because they play in a conference?

If you need further evidence, I wouldn't even consider Michigan and Michigan State two of the more "legitimate teams" on Notre Dame's schedule. The combined record of the first four opponents is 11-1. Stanford isn't just a little "tricky". They could very easily win the Pac-10 and they just hung 69 points on another D-1 school. You completely underestimated Stanford - they are better than USC, UM, and MSU. The week after Notre Dame goes to Boston College, a team that won eight games last season and contends for the ACC title almost yearly. Then Pitt comes to South Bend - apparently they aren't legitimate winning ten games last season and coming a couple plays away from winning the Big East in Cincinnati. Then there's Utah, USC and Navy still to come in the second half. That's nine legitimate teams by my count with a couple "easier opponents" scattered in from Tulsa, Western Michigan and Army. They probably should replace those three with Alabama, Oklahoma and Florida to get really legitimate. Again, find me a Big East team with a tougher schedule. Do you think Michigan or Michgan State has a tougher schedule than that in the Big Ten? I'm not saying they play "weak schedules" relative to other schools, but don't tell me ND doesn't play anyone when Michigan just scheduled UMass and MSU is hosting Northern Colorado this weekend.

Notre Dame isn't joining a conference unless their hand gets completely forced by realignment. I like it that way and so do most other ND fans that I know. I would probably recommend actually looking at Notre Dame's schedule, before suggesting it's filled with "non-legitimate" teams.
 
 
"To whom much is given, much is expected."
 
 

 

 

 

 


#56 GoWings1905

GoWings1905

    Legend

  • Gold Booster
  • 5,273 posts

Posted 19 September 2010 - 07:05 PM

AHHHHAAHAHAHAHA oh love being from the great state of Michigan. Go back to south bend and pray some more ya stupid leprechauns and maybe you can come up north and actually win against U of M or MSU. I cant stand U of M but i did find it kinda fulfilling to see ND get beat in the final seconds and then come to East Lansing and get smoked by the fake FG in OT right in front of the ND band too haha. Good win sparty's. oh and by the way to all the people saying that the play clock expired, there are tenths of seconds on a clock, even when it reaches zero the clock is still live.
Ya know the .5 .4 .3 .2 .1 just sayin.


Very mature. I'm glad they considered those "tenths of a second" at zero the two times Notre Dame got called for delay of game.

At least the Michigan fans here win with some class.
 
 
"To whom much is given, much is expected."
 
 

 

 

 

 


#57 Hockeytown0001

Hockeytown0001

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 22,621 posts
  • Location:A2, Michigan

Posted 19 September 2010 - 08:13 PM

I met Denard Robinson today. Very down to earth, humble guy.

"All done? Five bucks." - Pavel Datsyuk after an interview
"Very few cities in the NHL have the history or the following of the Detroit Red Wings." - Steve Yzerman

 

 


#58 lookalive07

lookalive07

    --19--

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 650 posts

Posted 19 September 2010 - 09:51 PM

I agreed with everything up until the scheduling portion, then I started laughing. I love people that ***** about ND's schedule without actually looking at it. I challenge you to find another team in college football with a tougher six games to start the season. The only one remotely close might be Miami. But yes, they only play four legitimate teams.

Seriously, do you really think the frickin Big East is going to provide a tougher schedule than the one ND plays as an independent? I'd listen to arguments that the Big Ten would provide a "tougher" schedule, but right now I don't see how anyone can say the Big Ten has been anywhere near strong the past few years. I know a couple schools you mentioned that scheduled some major powerhouses such as UMass, Bowling Green, Western Michigan, Florida Atlantic and Northern Colorado. Are those legitimate teams or are you saving Indiana, Northwestern, Minnesota, Illinois, etc. for your argument? Ohio State's first six games are laughable, yet I'm supposed to sit here and believe they have it tougher than Notre Dame because they play in a conference?

If you need further evidence, I wouldn't even consider Michigan and Michigan State two of the more "legitimate teams" on Notre Dame's schedule. The combined record of the first four opponents is 11-1. Stanford isn't just a little "tricky". They could very easily win the Pac-10 and they just hung 69 points on another D-1 school. You completely underestimated Stanford - they are better than USC, UM, and MSU. The week after Notre Dame goes to Boston College, a team that won eight games last season and contends for the ACC title almost yearly. Then Pitt comes to South Bend - apparently they aren't legitimate winning ten games last season and coming a couple plays away from winning the Big East in Cincinnati. Then there's Utah, USC and Navy still to come in the second half. That's nine legitimate teams by my count with a couple "easier opponents" scattered in from Tulsa, Western Michigan and Army. They probably should replace those three with Alabama, Oklahoma and Florida to get really legitimate. Again, find me a Big East team with a tougher schedule. Do you think Michigan or Michgan State has a tougher schedule than that in the Big Ten? I'm not saying they play "weak schedules" relative to other schools, but don't tell me ND doesn't play anyone when Michigan just scheduled UMass and MSU is hosting Northern Colorado this weekend.

Notre Dame isn't joining a conference unless their hand gets completely forced by realignment. I like it that way and so do most other ND fans that I know. I would probably recommend actually looking at Notre Dame's schedule, before suggesting it's filled with "non-legitimate" teams.


Whatever man, I know that Michigan State hasn't exactly been the greatest football team in the past few years but when we pull out a win like that, it's satisfying as hell. I gave ND props for playing teams like MSU, UM, Stanford, USC, Utah, etc. but when I look at ND's schedule, especially after hearing the media suck their dicks each preseason, then they probably should be winning most of their games. The last good season they had was in 2006, and it was a really good season at 10-3. I remember in 2007 they were expected to match that, but what happened? They did the exact opposite...3-9.

Now, when I say a non-legitimate team, of course I'm talking about the Navy, the Air Force, the Army, etc. that should be automatic wins. ND's got a good coach and a good team this year, so let me run down the schedule real quick of what should happen:

Purdue: They should win this game most years, and they did. 1-0
Michigan: Could go either way, and it was close. 1-1
Michigan State: MSU has won 5 of the last 8 meetings, and I expected MSU to win at home and they did. 1-2.
Stanford: Notre Dame should win this game most years, so I say they should win it. 2-2
Boston College: They should win this game. 3-2
Pittsburgh: They should win this game too. 4-2
Western Michigan: See above. 5-2
Navy: Yup. 6-2
Tulsa: ... 7-2
Utah: I see Utah winning this one. 7-3
Army: ND over them no problem. 8-3
USC: USC will win as usual. 8-4

So yeah, they should win most of their games this year, but some of those games could go either way. But IMO, aside from their win over Stanford I'm predicting next week, I don't see the "strength of schedule" playing a factor in their bowl chances this year. I see them losing to who they should lose to, and beating the teams they should have no problem beating. If ND joined a conference like the Big East, not only would they become better, but they would make the conference better as a whole, as the prestigious history of the football program would probably draw in a lot of good recruits to the entire conference.

I wasn't really trying to be a dick, but the whole "enjoy it while it lasts" comment doesn't really apply to me and my team most of the last few years, and especially not considering MSU ranks 2nd all-time for teams who have beaten ND the most.

Edited by lookalive07, 19 September 2010 - 09:54 PM.

Posted Image


#59 GoWings1905

GoWings1905

    Legend

  • Gold Booster
  • 5,273 posts

Posted 19 September 2010 - 10:27 PM

Whatever man, I know that Michigan State hasn't exactly been the greatest football team in the past few years but when we pull out a win like that, it's satisfying as hell. I gave ND props for playing teams like MSU, UM, Stanford, USC, Utah, etc. but when I look at ND's schedule, especially after hearing the media suck their dicks each preseason, then they probably should be winning most of their games. The last good season they had was in 2006, and it was a really good season at 10-3. I remember in 2007 they were expected to match that, but what happened? They did the exact opposite...3-9.

Now, when I say a non-legitimate team, of course I'm talking about the Navy, the Air Force, the Army, etc. that should be automatic wins. ND's got a good coach and a good team this year, so let me run down the schedule real quick of what should happen:

Purdue: They should win this game most years, and they did. 1-0
Michigan: Could go either way, and it was close. 1-1
Michigan State: MSU has won 5 of the last 8 meetings, and I expected MSU to win at home and they did. 1-2.
Stanford: Notre Dame should win this game most years, so I say they should win it. 2-2
Boston College: They should win this game. 3-2
Pittsburgh: They should win this game too. 4-2
Western Michigan: See above. 5-2
Navy: Yup. 6-2
Tulsa: ... 7-2
Utah: I see Utah winning this one. 7-3
Army: ND over them no problem. 8-3
USC: USC will win as usual. 8-4

So yeah, they should win most of their games this year, but some of those games could go either way. But IMO, aside from their win over Stanford I'm predicting next week, I don't see the "strength of schedule" playing a factor in their bowl chances this year. I see them losing to who they should lose to, and beating the teams they should have no problem beating. If ND joined a conference like the Big East, not only would they become better, but they would make the conference better as a whole, as the prestigious history of the football program would probably draw in a lot of good recruits to the entire conference.

I wasn't really trying to be a dick, but the whole "enjoy it while it lasts" comment doesn't really apply to me and my team most of the last few years, and especially not considering MSU ranks 2nd all-time for teams who have beaten ND the most.


No worries. I didn't really feel like you were trying to be a dick, but I felt the scheduling comment was off-base. It was a good win for Michigan State - I'm not denying that, nor am I saying any MSU fans including yourself shouldn't enjoy it. I think you are also confusing media exposure with Notre Dame to the media overhyping them. ND is going to get attention, like it or not, whether they are strong or bad. I can't stand anyone on ESPN besides Herbstreit, so I can't comment on what they have said/are saying about ND. Overall though, who are you referring to that loves ND so much in the media because what is there to like lately? I love this team to death and the only thing I have right now is another head coach that might possibly right the ship.

As for the schedule, I don't think Notre Dame beats Stanford. I'm hoping for 3-3 in the first six, but Boston College and Pitt are no cupcakes either. Notre Dame will NEVER join the Big East either unless they have to. As long as NBC tells Notre Dame they are going to show up for home games, then any conference is out. There's nothing beneficial honestly for the football program to join the Big East. As for the service academies on the schedule, again, you can't schedule 12-quality opponents in today's world of college football. Nobody does that and ND has a long history with the service academies as well. It's a great tradition and it sure as hell beats playing a MAC school or D-2 team.

Everybody has beaten Notre Dame recently, not just Michigan State. My comment was simply in regards to people that hate Notre Dame and go out of their way to make it known. Uhh... people complain about Notre Dame's exposure yet how many casual fans still watch their games or talk about them? I want them to be in the media because they are winning national championships.
 
 
"To whom much is given, much is expected."
 
 

 

 

 

 


#60 mannysBETTER3434

mannysBETTER3434

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,868 posts
  • Location:Hudsonville, MI

Posted 20 September 2010 - 12:56 AM

I agreed with everything up until the scheduling portion, then I started laughing. I love people that ***** about ND's schedule without actually looking at it. I challenge you to find another team in college football with a tougher six games to start the season. The only one remotely close might be Miami. But yes, they only play four legitimate teams.

Seriously, do you really think the frickin Big East is going to provide a tougher schedule than the one ND plays as an independent? I'd listen to arguments that the Big Ten would provide a "tougher" schedule, but right now I don't see how anyone can say the Big Ten has been anywhere near strong the past few years. I know a couple schools you mentioned that scheduled some major powerhouses such as UMass, Bowling Green, Western Michigan, Florida Atlantic and Northern Colorado. Are those legitimate teams or are you saving Indiana, Northwestern, Minnesota, Illinois, etc. for your argument? Ohio State's first six games are laughable, yet I'm supposed to sit here and believe they have it tougher than Notre Dame because they play in a conference?

If you need further evidence, I wouldn't even consider Michigan and Michigan State two of the more "legitimate teams" on Notre Dame's schedule. The combined record of the first four opponents is 11-1. Stanford isn't just a little "tricky". They could very easily win the Pac-10 and they just hung 69 points on another D-1 school. You completely underestimated Stanford - they are better than USC, UM, and MSU. The week after Notre Dame goes to Boston College, a team that won eight games last season and contends for the ACC title almost yearly. Then Pitt comes to South Bend - apparently they aren't legitimate winning ten games last season and coming a couple plays away from winning the Big East in Cincinnati. Then there's Utah, USC and Navy still to come in the second half. That's nine legitimate teams by my count with a couple "easier opponents" scattered in from Tulsa, Western Michigan and Army. They probably should replace those three with Alabama, Oklahoma and Florida to get really legitimate. Again, find me a Big East team with a tougher schedule. Do you think Michigan or Michgan State has a tougher schedule than that in the Big Ten? I'm not saying they play "weak schedules" relative to other schools, but don't tell me ND doesn't play anyone when Michigan just scheduled UMass and MSU is hosting Northern Colorado this weekend.

Notre Dame isn't joining a conference unless their hand gets completely forced by realignment. I like it that way and so do most other ND fans that I know. I would probably recommend actually looking at Notre Dame's schedule, before suggesting it's filled with "non-legitimate" teams.


Very, very valid points. Not going to lie I've bashed the ND schedule in the past, but I agree with you here. Usually when I think of ND's schedule I think of U-M, MSU, USC, and then some military schools, but as listed above quite far from the case. I still wish they would join the B10 for selfish reasons. If you wanna see the weakest schedule ever for this season look no further then MSU. They even miss out on OSU.

To defend schools such as U-M/MSU I will say though that it is a b**** to schedule nowadays. If you want a big fish you gotta do a home/home (assuming it works out), and in most cases you can't do that due to the budget especially with ND already on the schedule. I know UMASS was a desperation schedule jam. IIRC there were only 4 D1 schools that could make it work, and they were small schools that wanted a home/home series (One was Hawaii). I was surprised MSU could work out Alabama, and ND in the same season, but they must of figured out a way.

Speaking of MSU thoughts/prayers to Coach Dantonio. I've been a hater, but when I heard about that it really puts things in perspective. Hope he recovers fast!

Edited by mannysBETTER3434, 20 September 2010 - 12:58 AM.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users