I made a reference to last year's Capitals roster and their level of success. You responded with holed arguments, then changed the subject when I refuted those arguments.
I made a counter-argument to your implication that this year's Red Wings team will be the "weakest ever." After I refuted yet another round of flawed arguments, you resorted to attempts to undermine my credibility.
I'm not going to respond to your argument in this particular post, as you'll just use that to change the subject or to say "OMFG YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT, SO WHAT YOU SAID EARLIER IS SO DUMB OMG."
Still no answer to my question...
Capitals are pretty much tougher than Red Wings. They have Erskine, Bradley, Steckell, Chimera, KING...
Their level of succes - lost in 1st round... what's your point?!
I'm going to ask you again for 10th times - WHY 28 GM'S HAVE AT LEAST ONE ENFORCER?! Those are facts and not OWN PERCEPTION.
"Holed arguments" (I really see no holes) are better than using my own perception as arguments...
Edited by Dominator2005, 29 September 2010 - 07:45 PM.
"Some guys dream about scoring goals, or making big saves... I swear to God I dream about kicking ass in a hockey fight - no other way to say it than I love to do it, its who I am"... Brian McGrattan