Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

12/11 GDT: Red Wings 4 at Devils 1


  • Please log in to reply
348 replies to this topic

#141 nate94gt

nate94gt

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,127 posts
  • Location:Allegan

Posted 11 December 2010 - 07:44 PM

I love our 4th line. I wish they could score more

#142 DatsyukianDekes

DatsyukianDekes

    Toronto's Finest

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,258 posts
  • Location:Toronto, Canada

Posted 11 December 2010 - 07:48 PM

damn, if Pavs gets 1 more point hes tied for 3rd in the league with Ovi in points.

Edited by darkmanx, 11 December 2010 - 07:48 PM.


#143 Guest_Crymson (Guest)

Guest_Crymson (Guest)
  • Guests

Posted 11 December 2010 - 07:48 PM

Why did they just focus the camera on Homer's eyebrow?

#144 haroldsnepsts

haroldsnepsts

    "Classy"

  • HoF Booster Mod
  • 18,019 posts

Posted 11 December 2010 - 07:50 PM

Why did they just focus the camera on Homer's eyebrow?

The camera operator was probably setting the backfocus.

You typically zoom into someone's eyes because it's an easy spot on a persons face to tell if focus is soft. Then adjust focus and widen back out and your focus is set.

#145 dragonballgtz

dragonballgtz

    Yu-Gi-HOE

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,518 posts

Posted 11 December 2010 - 07:50 PM

Why did they just focus the camera on Homer's eyebrow?

He wasn't ready for his close up lol

The audio and video are not in sync... I hate that.

#146 Barrie

Barrie

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,257 posts

Posted 11 December 2010 - 07:55 PM

Any way we can send Hudler down to GR to give him some confidence? I'd rather see Draper out there.

#147 Jedi

Jedi

    1928-2016. Mr. Hockey.

  • HoF Booster Mod
  • 9,909 posts
  • Location:Dallas

Posted 11 December 2010 - 07:56 PM

Any way we can send Hudler down to GR to give him some confidence? I'd rather see Draper out there.

If you want to expose him to waivers, sure.

And even if he made it past waivers, there's zero chance he'd make it back on re-entry waivers. Whoever picks him off re-entry waivers would get him at half salary, and Detroit would have to pick up the tab for the other half. That's why Meech is still down in GR, because the Wings don't want to expose him to re-entry waivers.

VkwZzIg.png
1928-2016


#148 Barrie

Barrie

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,257 posts

Posted 11 December 2010 - 08:00 PM

If you want to expose him to waivers, sure.

And even if he made it past waivers, there's zero chance he'd make it back on re-entry waivers. Whoever picks him off re-entry waivers would get him at half salary, and Detroit would have to pick up the tab for the other half. That's why Meech is still down in GR, because the Wings don't want to expose him to re-entry waivers.

Exactly the info I was looking for, thanks!

#149 gcom007

gcom007

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,791 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 11 December 2010 - 08:03 PM

If you want to expose him to waivers, sure.

And even if he made it past waivers, there's zero chance he'd make it back on re-entry waivers. Whoever picks him off re-entry waivers would get him at half salary, and Detroit would have to pick up the tab for the other half. That's why Meech is still down in GR, because the Wings don't want to expose him to re-entry waivers.

Can we get him on LTIR for psychological reasons? Mental constipation or something? Follow it up with a mental conditioning stint in GR?

-Elliot


#150 Xitium

Xitium

    Super Lurker

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,463 posts
  • Location:Vegas. Baby.

Posted 11 December 2010 - 08:04 PM

"One-horse open Salei" - Doc

UGH.


If you start a new thread within two hours after a Wings game, specifically a loss, YOU ARE WRONG.
Posted Image
Posted Image


#151 Esquire

Esquire

    Fix up, Look sharp.

  • HoF Booster
  • 1,269 posts
  • Location:Whitby, ON

Posted 11 December 2010 - 08:04 PM

"One horse open Salei"

I lol'd
Posted Image
Posted Image

#152 Jedi

Jedi

    1928-2016. Mr. Hockey.

  • HoF Booster Mod
  • 9,909 posts
  • Location:Dallas

Posted 11 December 2010 - 08:05 PM

Yay... Drumnj's feed went down, so now all I can get is DRIVE'ing Doc Emmerick.

VkwZzIg.png
1928-2016


#153 puckloo39

puckloo39

    Never forgotten...

  • HoF Booster
  • 22,602 posts
  • Location:Austin, Texas

Posted 11 December 2010 - 08:06 PM

Yay... Drumnj's feed went down, so now all I can get is DRIVE'ing Doc Emmerick.


ditto. I turned the sound off.

puckloo39dom.jpg

 

“Next time I tell you someone from Texas should not be president of the United States, please pay attention."


Best ever


#154 syntax

syntax

    Join the Empire!

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,885 posts
  • Location:Flint, MI

Posted 11 December 2010 - 08:07 PM

Nice save Ozzie.
The Vladinator He earned the NHL Plus/Minus Award in 1995-96, with a plus/minus difference of plus-60. The +60 has been the highest rating a player has finished with in the past 20 seasons, since Wayne Gretzky finished with a +70 in the 1986-87 NHL season

Pavel Datsyuk > x (where x is the name of any active hockey player)

#155 McAwesome

McAwesome

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,649 posts
  • Location:Apopka, FL

Posted 11 December 2010 - 08:08 PM

Fight Club

Weak, just a tie-up with no real punches thrown, hardly worth the 5

Edited by McAwesome, 11 December 2010 - 08:08 PM.

7yss.jpg

 

Thanks MabusIncarnate


#156 Xitium

Xitium

    Super Lurker

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,463 posts
  • Location:Vegas. Baby.

Posted 11 December 2010 - 08:08 PM

Ericsson vs. Clarkson!


If you start a new thread within two hours after a Wings game, specifically a loss, YOU ARE WRONG.
Posted Image
Posted Image


#157 Detroit # 1 Fan

Detroit # 1 Fan

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 19,982 posts
  • Location:Calgary (By way of St. John's, NL)

Posted 11 December 2010 - 08:08 PM

That sucked, E should've went with him.

#MILLERFREE2016


#158 Guest_Stolberg (Guest)

Guest_Stolberg (Guest)
  • Guests

Posted 11 December 2010 - 08:09 PM

i guess we're going to get s***ty fights like that all year

#159 Guest_Crymson (Guest)

Guest_Crymson (Guest)
  • Guests

Posted 11 December 2010 - 08:09 PM

That was a weak fight, but I like Ericsson.

#160 Austrianwing

Austrianwing

    On Waivers

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 487 posts
  • Location:Portland OR

Posted 11 December 2010 - 08:09 PM

The camera operator was probably setting the backfocus.

You typically zoom into someone's eyes because it's an easy spot on a persons face to tell if focus is soft. Then adjust focus and widen back out and your focus is set.

sounds like you have played with cameras a bit. Seems like a lot of the autofocus mechanisms on cameras try to do the same thing. I know that for portraits the eyes are a good default focus point when you are using a large aperture with a narrow depth of field. On the other hand if you try the zoom to focus, you better hope that the lens can keep focus as the zoom changes... guess that might just be a problem for folks like me that can't spend the money for good lenses all that often..
End of my drunken rambling for now :lol: Just finished my last final so I am a little less than on topic :blink:





Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users