titanium2 867 Report post Posted December 21, 2010 I had a much grosser theory, so I'll just stick to that rumored one. Let's hear the gross one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Stolberg Report post Posted December 21, 2010 And? He is getting the most media attention with his play. That is what will put him over the top. over the top as in winning the norris? idk about that, the norris voters seem to vote based on reputation and most players don't win it for a couple years. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Doc Holliday 1,888 Report post Posted December 21, 2010 And? He is getting the most media attention with his play. That is what will put him over the top. The difference is Byfooglien will not win the Norris. Lidstrom has already been anointed as the 2011 Norris winner in the media anyway. Stop being stupid. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yellowknife Redwing 57 Report post Posted December 21, 2010 When was the last time a defenseman who doesn't kill penalties won the Norris? Through 35 games Byfuglien has 4:23 of total SHTOI. That's not per game, that's under 5 minutes of TOTAL time spent killing penalties. Any consideration that Byfuglien gets for winning the Norris is utterly ridiculous and shows just how bastardized the trophy has become. If Buff wins it, they might as well change the definition of the award to the "highest scoring defenseman in the NHL". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jesusberg 1,256 Report post Posted December 21, 2010 Let's hear the gross one. I would explain it, but I'm not sure if it's ban worthy, so I'll probably just keep it up in the old noggin'. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
titanium2 867 Report post Posted December 21, 2010 I would explain it, but I'm not sure if it's ban worthy, so I'll probably just keep it up in the old noggin'. Hmm... Waffles... But gross... And they threw waffles at him... (Looks up waffle at urban dictionary) 12 pages of definitions... Sigh... The first page had some pretty gross ones. Could've been a good laugh but I guess we'll just leave it at that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Stolberg Report post Posted December 21, 2010 they should start snowballing the maple leafs Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HankthaTank 1,100 Report post Posted December 21, 2010 Just google blue waffle. I am thinking you will all catch the drift. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jesusberg 1,256 Report post Posted December 21, 2010 Just google blue waffle. I am thinking you will all catch the drift. We can say blue waffle?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HankthaTank 1,100 Report post Posted December 21, 2010 We can say blue waffle?? *meh* It will be removed soon most likely lol. Sorry OP, Leafs are just brutal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hockeymom1960 5,107 Report post Posted December 21, 2010 I actually think they need to stamp the waffle with a maple leaf before they throw them or soak them in maple syrup then waffle them on the ice. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barrie 900 Report post Posted December 21, 2010 I got a better idea for Leaf fans, don't go to the games! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barrie 900 Report post Posted December 22, 2010 Leafs directed 91 shots towards Pavelec. He stopped 37, 3 went in, Atlanta blocked 33 and the Leafs missed the net 18 times. Keep thinking positive MacK, but the Leafs are horrible, with no hope for the future. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dragonballgtz 273 Report post Posted December 22, 2010 The difference is Byfooglien will not win the Norris. Lidstrom has already been anointed as the 2011 Norris winner in the media anyway. Stop being stupid. Stop being butt hurt Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
puffy 97 Report post Posted December 22, 2010 Waffles are harmless. Chances are Francois Beauchemin will just eat them after the game. If you want to get the message across you have to throw bricks! 1 asoras reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sputman 1,268 Report post Posted December 22, 2010 lulz when the color guy just says "Waffles." and haha "somebody could have slipped on that." they play a game on ice. but WATCH OUT FOR THE WAFFLE!@!!!1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Doc Holliday 1,888 Report post Posted December 22, 2010 lulz when the color guy just says "Waffles." and haha "somebody could have slipped on that." they play a game on ice. but WATCH OUT FOR THE WAFFLE!@!!!1 Skates are designed for the ice. Skates are NOT designed for random objects thrown on the ice. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sputman 1,268 Report post Posted December 22, 2010 Skates are designed for the ice. Skates are NOT designed for random objects thrown on the ice. razor sharp skates > waffle Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Doc Holliday 1,888 Report post Posted December 22, 2010 razor sharp skates > waffle Skates are not razor sharp. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sputman 1,268 Report post Posted December 23, 2010 Skates are not razor sharp. tell that to mike modano, and richard zednik, and clint malarchuk.. 1 Hockeymom1960 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Doc Holliday 1,888 Report post Posted December 23, 2010 tell that to mike modano, and richard zednik, and clint malarchuk.. Anything that is sharp can cut someone if it makes contact at a high veloticy. Sticks cut too, but they aren't considered razor sharp. Point being, a waffle being thrown on the ice during play could cause injury. A skate being sharp isn't going to magically negate the issue of it coming into contact with a foreign object. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sputman 1,268 Report post Posted December 23, 2010 Anything that is sharp can cut someone if it makes contact at a high veloticy. Sticks cut too, but they aren't considered razor sharp. Point being, a waffle being thrown on the ice during play could cause injury. A skate being sharp isn't going to magically negate the issue of it coming into contact with a foreign object. whatever, i'm not going to have an argument about waffles with you. incidentally, wasn't the original terminator exoskeleton 100% waffle? this would definitely support your argument.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Stolberg Report post Posted December 23, 2010 Skates are designed for the ice. Skates are NOT designed for random objects thrown on the ice. my skate shaped waffle cutters disagree 1 Doc Holliday reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sputman 1,268 Report post Posted December 23, 2010 solutions. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Konnan511 1,736 Report post Posted December 23, 2010 Skates are razor sharp, just the edges, though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites