Jump to content


Photo
* * * - - 2 votes

Howard, Stuart, Eaves possible Tuesday against the Oil


  • Please log in to reply
99 replies to this topic

#61 Outsider

Outsider

    Quitcha B*tchin' Wings Fans.....

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,971 posts

Posted 04 January 2011 - 03:38 AM

I've crossed off the players who were retained by the Red Wings specifically for the services they provide that you say the team is losing.

It's hard to argue for your Shanny point given the team's success since his departure. Yzerman's effect as a manager still being determined at this point. He's looked good so far in Tampa but they haven't won s*** (and a short stint with Team Canada the includes all of this Wings managerial buddies doesn't count as NHL success). People will ultimately judge his effectiveness as a GM by what happens in Tampa Bay. I wish him all the best in his managerial career except for when that success would hurt the Detroit Red Wings. In the end the logo on the front of the jersey matters more than the name on the back.


You've crossed off Chelios. Hard to argue, I guess, against the impact a sure-fire, first ballot, Hall of Famer is having on the ON ICE product these past couple of Seasons, as he sits in the Press box in his dress shirt and jacket. Same for Maltby, as he performs glorified PR duty. Again....it's not about what these guys bring in the PRESS BOX, but what they brought to the lockerroom.

Yzerman, as VP, was rarely IN the actual lockerroom, let alone on the ice.

Regardless, you miss the point:

Yzerman was basically shoved out, because it was posited to him that Players like Dats and Hank would never be able to take the reins while living under his vast, Legendary shadow in the lockerroom. True? Perhaps? But word has it that Stevie wasn't ready to retire. Not yet, not yet! That he wanted just ONE MORE Season....a chance at 700 goals - just eight more....just EIGHT MORE.... - and maybe a better end than a First Round exit playing in front of a career back-up, but was "shamed" into retiring - his Pride poked and prodded until he had no choice but to admit that he was maybe little more than a shadow of his former self. Perhaps he'd be doing the Team a favor by retiring..... Regardless, it was reported that Stevie chose to retire, rather than play another Season under Babcock, eight goals notwithstanding.

And Chelios was humiliated and discarded before his departure. Not necessary. Not after the career he had. Not after his time in Detroit. Everyone just assumed that Roenick, blowhard that he is, was simply bloviating. But where there's smoke....

Same with Maltby. Sidelined with an injury last year, he took the hit, had the shoulder surgery during the Season, rather than in the off-season, so that the Team could use his cap space....took the hit for the Team, only to be *****-slapped this Season. How hard would it have been to have Maltby skate ONE LAST TIME, on Opening Night at the Joe, as Bert was nursing an injury and was questionable to go, anyway? He could have played on Opening Night, then announced his retirement the next day. But? No. No farewell for the long-time Grind Line member, and fan favorite. Fourteen years with the Wings. Four Stanley Cups. "Yeahthanksbyemalts."

And Shanny? LOL....Shanny was a 40 goal scorer in his last Season in Detroit. He bolted in disgust over the treatment Stevie received. Stevie,o of all people! Holland wanted Shanny back, but Brendan decided that he'd rather LOSE in New York than play for a Contender under Babcock. Ask around.

The point is.....players like Stevie, and Shanny, and Cheli, and Malts....USED to be retained until they had molded their "replacements", shaping with words, and wisdom, and experience....imparting by word AND by Deed, what it means to be a Red Wing, what it means to don the Winged Wheel.

Now? They're shoved off into the sunset, "thanksheresyourgoldwatchandyourfrontofficejob", without regard, or respect, for what they've contributed to the Organization.

It's showing. It's showing in the play on the ice, in the slow crumbling of this Team's cohesion. They don't have that "skate through walls for your Teammate" mentality anymore.

Deny it if you'd like, but it's happening.

#62 Outsider

Outsider

    Quitcha B*tchin' Wings Fans.....

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,971 posts

Posted 04 January 2011 - 03:47 AM

Like it or not-- Howard is the future of the Wings in net right now. Ozzy is the past. And the difference between Howard's bad starts and Ozzy's good starts hasn't been large enough to justify switching the starter positions. That's why Howard gets the extra start. But because we're both math guys let's look at the stats:

Howard:
30gp 30gs 20W-7L-3OTL 2.70GAA 0.908 Sv% 2SO

Osgood:
10gp 9gs 4W-3L-2OTL 2.74GAA 0.905 Sv% 0SO

I've watched the games too man, I know Ozzy's had a few good ones. But to characterise this situation as being a clear cut case of favourtism ignores the statistical evidence that says Howard wins 67% of his games and Osgood wins 44% of his games (all with nearly identical GAA and Sv%).


Who says Howard is the future? The guy couldn't crack the line-up for 5 years - not with numerous chances. Holland re-signed Osgood to partner with Legace. Then signed a geriatric Hasek the year after. Then Conklin. Then invited DAN FREAKIN' CLOUTIER to Camp! Howard only made the roster when the Wings ran out of options. And he only "earned" a shot at the #1 spot once Osgood went down with the flu/groin injury.

Since then? It doesn't matter HOW he's played, nor how his partner has played. He's been handed the Starting job, regardless of performance. Osgood hasn't even been allowed to compete with him for the job. He has been DESIGNATED as the Starter, just as Legace was in 2005-2006.

We all remember how well that turned out.

And bear in mind that Osgood is posting similar stats while coming in COLD, after sitting on the bench for extended periods of time, while Howard has had more than steady work to keep him in Game shape.

Babcock mucked up the goaltending in 2005-2006. He mucked it up in 2008-2009. He mucked it up last Season. And he's well on his way to mucking it up this Season.

Sit back and watch it happen.

#63 Drake_Marcus

Drake_Marcus

    Pariah

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,336 posts
  • Location:Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada

Posted 04 January 2011 - 06:29 AM

Who says Howard is the future? The guy couldn't crack the line-up for 5 years - not with numerous chances. Holland re-signed Osgood to partner with Legace. Then signed a geriatric Hasek the year after. Then Conklin. Then invited DAN FREAKIN' CLOUTIER to Camp! Howard only made the roster when the Wings ran out of options. And he only "earned" a shot at the #1 spot once Osgood went down with the flu/groin injury.

Since then? It doesn't matter HOW he's played, nor how his partner has played. He's been handed the Starting job, regardless of performance. Osgood hasn't even been allowed to compete with him for the job. He has been DESIGNATED as the Starter, just as Legace was in 2005-2006.

We all remember how well that turned out.

And bear in mind that Osgood is posting similar stats while coming in COLD, after sitting on the bench for extended periods of time, while Howard has had more than steady work to keep him in Game shape.

Babcock mucked up the goaltending in 2005-2006. He mucked it up in 2008-2009. He mucked it up last Season. And he's well on his way to mucking it up this Season.

Sit back and watch it happen.


Howard was the runner up for the Calder. His merrits as a goaltender obviously aren't in question among the voters for that award. He's had a s***ty season so far but his rookie season was nothing short of brilliant.

And if Steve was really pushed out like that I'd be very angry. It's always bothered me he didn't hit 700 goals. Where did you hear that he didn't want to retire?
Dedicated to lulz once lost:
Posted Image
Thanks TeeMan!

"We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas
of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage" --H.P. Lovecraft

#64 edicius

edicius

    Professional drinker.

  • HoF Booster
  • 25,212 posts
  • Location:Budd Lake, NJ

Posted 04 January 2011 - 07:37 AM

Consider this, everyone: even Brodeur has accepted that he's not the clear-cut starter for the Devils anymore, since he's been significantly outplayed by Hedberg as of late. And you know what? Lemaire is leaning toward starting Hedberg in more games than Brodeur.

From TSN:
Brodeur is cold 0-3-0, 4.67, .783 in last 4 GPI (3.15 GAA, .882 SV% overall)
Hedberg 1-1-0, 2.14, .915 in last 2 GPI (2.93 GAA, .899 SV% overall)

Small sample size, but Hedberg's clearly performing better, so they go with him - even over Brodeur who is rarely shelved (though he's been pulled 7 times this season and only 8 minutes into his last game) except for injury.

Now let's look at Ozzie and Howard, again, from TSN:
Osgood is hot 1-0-0, 2.18, .944 in last 2 GPI (2.74 GAA, .905 SV% overall)
Howard is cold 0-1-1, 4.04, .860 in last 2 GPI (2.70 GAA, .908 SV% overall)

Hell, before checking this, I didn't even realize how close their overall stats had become. Overall, there's very little difference now - short term, however, Ozzie's clearly got the hot hand.

I can sort of understand, though, why Babcock is going with Howard against Edmonton - ordinarily, that's a game that he would throw in Osgood, because Edmonton's a s*** team. Does this mean that Osgood is going to start getting the Vancouvers and Washingtons of the league until he slumps while Howard will be relegated to the Edmontons and New Jerseys of the league?

ABV_sig.png

                     Can't listen live? Check out MoreLikeRadio.org for show archives!


#65 Buppy

Buppy

    1st Line All-Star

  • Silver Booster
  • 1,980 posts

Posted 04 January 2011 - 09:41 AM

stuff

That's some of the most ridiculous nonsense I've seen in some time. I literally don't think even a single word is true. Not even the small ones like 'by' or 'at'.

#66 Howard He Do It?!

Howard He Do It?!

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,417 posts
  • Location:Hockeytown

Posted 04 January 2011 - 09:49 AM

Somebody has been popping crazy pills, haven't they?

This team makes back-to-back Finals and came within a game of being back-to-back Cup winners and then make an early round exit in 2010 and all of a sudden they suck, do not fight for each other, and play more as individuals than as a team. Does anyone else see the ridiculousness of this? The NHL is no longer a league of 5 teams with the rest fighting for last place. Parity reigns supreme and many people find this difficult to understand. The Red Wings are still a tremendous team but they are not the powerhouse that they once were and they never will be because of the salary cap. Teams that once lived at the bottom are now right at the top with the Wings. There is a disturbing trend on LGW of not giving the competition enough credit, if any at all. Like it or not the NHL is a league of 25 teams now with the other 5 fighting for last place. It's 2011. Stop thinking like it's 1997.

Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image


Round 1: Red Wings (4) vs. Coyotes (0)
Round 2: Red Wings (0) vs. Sharks (0)


#67 Opie

Opie

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 7,419 posts
  • Location:The only Henniker on Earth!

Posted 04 January 2011 - 09:53 AM

I love you guys, in the short term (2 games like that is any kind of sample) you are referring to Howard has had two goals go in off of teammates sticks, another one that was deflected at least two times before it got to him.

The one goal that you could put on Howard in the PHI game if it was Mule who scored it every one would be ranting about how well he goes top shelf.

The team has showed up in the third period of most games lately.

Could it be the fact that they have played so many games in the past month, where as they got a lot of rest earlier in the season?

The team is still one of the tops in Hockey, the just need to get their s*** together. All of them.

Edit:

Missing Dats and Cleary is not helping at all, the offense looks stagnant and lucky to keep the zone at times. The second line should be carrying this team right now.

Edited by Opie, 04 January 2011 - 09:54 AM.

"The more I know about people - the better I like my dog." - Mark Twain

"A wise man once told me, ‘Don’t argue with fools. Cause people from a distance can’t tell who is who'." Jay Z, Takeover

"When I was looking for a captain, I wanted a guy with the Red Wings crest tattooed on his chest," said former Detroit coach Jacques Demers, who named Yzerman captain in 1986. "Steve Yzerman was that guy."

“Told him if he wasn't ultra-competitive he couldn't come here. If he didn't bring it every day he couldn't come here, because he was going to hate it if he didn't, dislike the coach and dislike playing here.
“It's real straightforward. If you don't do it right, you're not happy here." Babcock

#68 Howard He Do It?!

Howard He Do It?!

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,417 posts
  • Location:Hockeytown

Posted 04 January 2011 - 09:58 AM

I love you guys, in the short term (2 games like that is any kind of sample) you are referring to Howard has had two goals go in off of teammates sticks, another one that was deflected at least two times before it got to him.

The one goal that you could put on Howard in the PHI game if it was Mule who scored it every one would be ranting about how well he goes top shelf.

The team has showed up in the third period of most games lately.

Could it be the fact that they have played so many games in the past month, where as they got a lot of rest earlier in the season?

The team is still one of the tops in Hockey, the just need to get their s*** together. All of them.

While Howard has been shaky for the past month or so, those 3 goals against Philly were not as bad as many are making them out to be. The difference between an awesome goal from a sniper and a bad goal that the goalie should have stopped is the Winged wheel. That's the way it goes on LGW. Praise your own, s*** on the rest.

Edit:

Missing Dats and Cleary is not helping at all, the offense looks stagnant and lucky to keep the zone at times. The second line should be carrying this team right now.

The #1 most overlooked fact on LGW for the past week.

Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image


Round 1: Red Wings (4) vs. Coyotes (0)
Round 2: Red Wings (0) vs. Sharks (0)


#69 GoWings1905

GoWings1905

    Legend

  • Gold Booster
  • 5,289 posts

Posted 04 January 2011 - 10:32 AM

Wow people crack me up... Babcock haters, it's really easy to look back and say he shoulda, woulda, coulda. Hindsight is 20/20. The way you people talk it's like we don't have the most successful sports team over the last 15 years, let alone hockey team. You make it sound like had Babcock only listened to you we'd have 3 more cups. Get over yourselves. When are you going to sit back and realize that although not without mistake, these guys know what they are doing and they are right far more often than they are wrong. It you could do it better you'd be coaching. It's one thing to disagree but your personally attacking Babcock.


What's hindsight about this? Howard has played poorly, Ozzie has looked solid, hence we believe Ozzie should get more starts. That's going forward and Babcock has yet to recognize the problem. I never said Ozzie SHOULD have been the starter all season. Right now, I believe Ozzie deserves more starts and Howard needs fewer.

Besides, just because Babcock and the team has been successful in the past, doesn't mean we as fans should be content and accept every move they make. Yes, mistakes do occur but to say Babcock is always right just because he is the coach and we aren't is absurd. Especially considering Babcock has a very questionable history of handling goaltenders which directly relates to the current situation. I think we're past the point of calling it a mistake, it's a clear flaw in Babcock's coaching ability. I still think he's a terrific coach, but he's stubborn as hell and I don't want that stubborness to cost the Red Wings a wonderful opportunity at winning the Stanley Cup.

Maybe Ozzie doesn't pan out, but then at least we know and tried it. All I'm asking for is Babcock to treat Howard the same way he treated Osgood in the past. He hasn't done that and with each Howard start to come, he continues to ignore a reasonable solution to the problem. Does anyone here trust Jimmy Howard if the playoffs were to start tomorrow?

I guess a discussion board is intended to only praise the team as everything Ken Holland and Mike Babcock does is always correct as they are in the positions to make decisions. I'll be quiet now and watch Howard let in another four goals tonight as clearly that is the route Babcock has chosen for this team to follow.
 
 
"To whom much is given, much is expected."
 
 

 

 

 

 


#70 Outsider

Outsider

    Quitcha B*tchin' Wings Fans.....

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,971 posts

Posted 04 January 2011 - 10:40 AM

And if Steve was really pushed out like that I'd be very angry. It's always bothered me he didn't hit 700 goals. Where did you hear that he didn't want to retire?


It's pretty common knowledge, both in Detroit, and in New York, if you listen to people. Do you think Shanny just up and decided to leave, after all those years in Detroit, after such a fabulous Season, and with absolutely NO deliberation over the decision, on a whim? Brendan and Steve are tight. Shanny left without even glancing back.

Just like folks wrote off what Roenick said about Babs "hating' Chelios, how he was constantly "disrespecting" him? Yeah....JR is a BIG mouth....but why would he come out with something so random and off the wall, and be so vehement about it? Hudler just up and "left", deciding to play in Russia rather than stay in Detroit.

Listen around, Drake. You don't even have to ASK. Just buy a few drinks, sit back, and listen. Hockey men are sociable creatures. Get a few cocktails in 'em, and they'll talk your ear off.

#71 b.shanafan14

b.shanafan14

    One good Swede deserves another!

  • Silver Booster
  • 2,870 posts
  • Location:Upper Peninsula, Michigan

Posted 04 January 2011 - 10:43 AM

Consider this, everyone: even Brodeur has accepted that he's not the clear-cut starter for the Devils anymore, since he's been significantly outplayed by Hedberg as of late. And you know what? Lemaire is leaning toward starting Hedberg in more games than Brodeur.

From TSN:
Brodeur is cold 0-3-0, 4.67, .783 in last 4 GPI (3.15 GAA, .882 SV% overall)
Hedberg 1-1-0, 2.14, .915 in last 2 GPI (2.93 GAA, .899 SV% overall)

Small sample size, but Hedberg's clearly performing better, so they go with him - even over Brodeur who is rarely shelved (though he's been pulled 7 times this season and only 8 minutes into his last game) except for injury.

Now let's look at Ozzie and Howard, again, from TSN:
Osgood is hot 1-0-0, 2.18, .944 in last 2 GPI (2.74 GAA, .905 SV% overall)
Howard is cold 0-1-1, 4.04, .860 in last 2 GPI (2.70 GAA, .908 SV% overall)

Hell, before checking this, I didn't even realize how close their overall stats had become. Overall, there's very little difference now - short term, however, Ozzie's clearly got the hot hand.

I can sort of understand, though, why Babcock is going with Howard against Edmonton - ordinarily, that's a game that he would throw in Osgood, because Edmonton's a s*** team. Does this mean that Osgood is going to start getting the Vancouvers and Washingtons of the league until he slumps while Howard will be relegated to the Edmontons and New Jerseys of the league?


Proof is in the pudding. At the end of the day, the only reason most LGWers (including myself) are a bit disillusioned by Babcock's handling of goaltenders in the last two seasons isn't that Osgood isn't starting most games, its that he doesn't seem to be starting any. Someone else said it earlier and I completely agree: when Legace was starter, we stuck with him - when Hasek was starter, we stuck with him (until he really choked, which I do commend Babcock for making the switch in 2008) - when Osgood was starter, we'll see how it goes game to game? - when Howard is the starter, we'll stick with him.

Babcock needs to use a more consistent hand with his goaltenders and more than anything needs to realize that "we're going to ride the hot hand" isn't just a phrase to use when HIS goaltender is hot, but when either goaltender is hot. Howard can't handle a 80-20 or 70-30 split of games and still be prepared for the playoffs. Time will tell if Howard is the real deal or just a temporary solution. In the meantime, this team needs options and two rested goaltenders. Most of use aren't calling for Osgood to be named starter, but a 60-40 or 50-50 split while your backup is hot and starter is cold can't hurt.

Missing Dats and Cleary is not helping at all, the offense looks stagnant and lucky to keep the zone at times. The second line should be carrying this team right now.


Hard for any team to win when a goaltender is flirting with 4 goals against per night, even while the play is spending most of the time on the other side of the ice. We've been spoiled with potent offense and while the defense has had some lapses and Howard has gotten unlucky bounces, him and Osgood both have. Last season, Howard was amazing down the stretch winning games the Wings probably shouldn't have and keeping them afloat while they got healthy. This season, the Wings are banged up, but still competing and Howard has lost them games that the team probably should have won.

One thing that has set Osgood apart from many of his peers is his ability to win the games that his team has earned. It seems like an easy task, but its not. Some of the greatest goaltenders of all time could win when the team should have lost but were shrinking violets when the team was carrying play. Joseph and Hasek were both goaltenders that could steal games in the past but were a less than great fit in Detroit because they couldn't finish what the team started.

All of that said, this is really about Osgood winning in a 46 save effort on the road and then being benched for what looks like at least 4 games. In the 3 of those games that have been played by Howard since, he had all but lost vs. Dallas before his team pulled him out with 6 straight, and lost to the Islanders and didn't finish vs. Philadelphia.

#72 dragonballgtz

dragonballgtz

    Yu-Gi-HOE

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,407 posts

Posted 04 January 2011 - 01:08 PM

While Howard has been shaky for the past month or so, those 3 goals against Philly were not as bad as many are making them out to be. The difference between an awesome goal from a sniper and a bad goal that the goalie should have stopped is the Winged wheel. That's the way it goes on LGW. Praise your own, s*** on the rest.


The #1 most overlooked fact on LGW for the past week.

The past week? This s***ty play has been going on for the pass month. It's just more evident now because the two players that showed up every night are out.

#73 dragonballgtz

dragonballgtz

    Yu-Gi-HOE

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,407 posts

Posted 04 January 2011 - 01:22 PM

You've crossed off Chelios. Hard to argue, I guess, against the impact a sure-fire, first ballot, Hall of Famer is having on the ON ICE product these past couple of Seasons, as he sits in the Press box in his dress shirt and jacket. Same for Maltby, as he performs glorified PR duty. Again....it's not about what these guys bring in the PRESS BOX, but what they brought to the lockerroom.

Yzerman, as VP, was rarely IN the actual lockerroom, let alone on the ice.

Regardless, you miss the point:

Yzerman was basically shoved out, because it was posited to him that Players like Dats and Hank would never be able to take the reins while living under his vast, Legendary shadow in the lockerroom. True? Perhaps? But word has it that Stevie wasn't ready to retire. Not yet, not yet! That he wanted just ONE MORE Season....a chance at 700 goals - just eight more....just EIGHT MORE.... - and maybe a better end than a First Round exit playing in front of a career back-up, but was "shamed" into retiring - his Pride poked and prodded until he had no choice but to admit that he was maybe little more than a shadow of his former self. Perhaps he'd be doing the Team a favor by retiring..... Regardless, it was reported that Stevie chose to retire, rather than play another Season under Babcock, eight goals notwithstanding.

And Chelios was humiliated and discarded before his departure. Not necessary. Not after the career he had. Not after his time in Detroit. Everyone just assumed that Roenick, blowhard that he is, was simply bloviating. But where there's smoke....

Same with Maltby. Sidelined with an injury last year, he took the hit, had the shoulder surgery during the Season, rather than in the off-season, so that the Team could use his cap space....took the hit for the Team, only to be *****-slapped this Season. How hard would it have been to have Maltby skate ONE LAST TIME, on Opening Night at the Joe, as Bert was nursing an injury and was questionable to go, anyway? He could have played on Opening Night, then announced his retirement the next day. But? No. No farewell for the long-time Grind Line member, and fan favorite. Fourteen years with the Wings. Four Stanley Cups. "Yeahthanksbyemalts."

And Shanny? LOL....Shanny was a 40 goal scorer in his last Season in Detroit. He bolted in disgust over the treatment Stevie received. Stevie,o of all people! Holland wanted Shanny back, but Brendan decided that he'd rather LOSE in New York than play for a Contender under Babcock. Ask around.

The point is.....players like Stevie, and Shanny, and Cheli, and Malts....USED to be retained until they had molded their "replacements", shaping with words, and wisdom, and experience....imparting by word AND by Deed, what it means to be a Red Wing, what it means to don the Winged Wheel.

Now? They're shoved off into the sunset, "thanksheresyourgoldwatchandyourfrontofficejob", without regard, or respect, for what they've contributed to the Organization.

It's showing. It's showing in the play on the ice, in the slow crumbling of this Team's cohesion. They don't have that "skate through walls for your Teammate" mentality anymore.

Deny it if you'd like, but it's happening.

And you have facts to back up those statements or just rumors you heard of?

In a way a do agree with you on Maltby.

#74 dobbles

dobbles

    1st Line Sniper

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 864 posts
  • Location:Tulsa, OK

Posted 04 January 2011 - 02:11 PM

wow are you guys shortsighted! sure howard has had some bad games lately, but you guys do realize for the season is goals against and save percentage are still both better than osgood?!?!?!?!

i am not against osgood getting more starts. having a balance to keep guys fresh is a good thing. having a backup you can be confident in is great as well.

however, i really dont understand all the babcock and howard hate. the team as a whole has been playing pretty poor lately. with all the injuries thats not really surprising.

and for all the love you guys are giving osgood, he has given up multiple first period goals 3 games in a row. so he is continuing the habit he has had the last couple years of giving up lots of goals early in games and forcing the team to have to come from behind.

anywho, can't we all calm down? can't we enjoy the fact that even with several key injuries we are still hanging in there and 2nd in the conference? can't we realize that no matter who is in goal, we aren't going to be as tough without 2 great forwards? (one of whom is all world, a selke winner and was a hart nominee recently; another who was leading the team in goals when he went down; and both of whom are guys that are on the ice in the last minute protecting a lead)

I love Maltby, but to say he wasn't a ****** is a dis-service to his career of douchebaggery.


#75 edicius

edicius

    Professional drinker.

  • HoF Booster
  • 25,212 posts
  • Location:Budd Lake, NJ

Posted 04 January 2011 - 03:03 PM

wow are you guys shortsighted! sure howard has had some bad games lately, but you guys do realize for the season is goals against and save percentage are still both better than osgood?!?!?!?!


Howard's season stats are only marginally better than Osgood's at this point: 2.70 GAA, .908 SV% and 2.74 GAA, .905 SV%, respectively. And that's with Howard having two shutouts, while Osgood has none.

And, this just in from Twitter:

@RedWingsFeed:
Red Wings' Mike Babcock changes mind, will start Chris Osgood in goal against Oilers http://19FTW.in/Cg5y0


ABV_sig.png

                     Can't listen live? Check out MoreLikeRadio.org for show archives!


#76 HankthaTank

HankthaTank

    3rd Line Center

  • Silver Booster
  • 4,815 posts
  • Location:Warren, MI

Posted 04 January 2011 - 03:18 PM

This s***ty play has been going on for the pass month. It's just more evident now because the two players that showed up every night are out.

This. Hard to disagree that Danny and Pav were the best out there every night. We have to muster up some of that last season stuff and start playing with a ton of heart. Babs has to get these guys ready night in and night out. Canucks are looking for real as usual and maybe more so this season with a lot more fire behind it. Can't stand the lackluster out of the gate play that they have brought lately. That Stars win was quite impressive and they once again rebounded with a poor showing after. 60 minutes fellas.

Edited by HankthaTank, 04 January 2011 - 03:19 PM.

TO WHOM MUCH IS GIVEN, MUCH IS EXPECTED.

#77 mjlegend

mjlegend

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,903 posts
  • Location:Moose Jaw, SK

Posted 04 January 2011 - 03:19 PM

Howard's season stats are only marginally better than Osgood's at this point: 2.70 GAA, .908 SV% and 2.74 GAA, .905 SV%, respectively. And that's with Howard having two shutouts, while Osgood has none.

And, this just in from Twitter:


Outsider's arguments must have really compelled him.

#78 Rick Zombos Ghost

Rick Zombos Ghost

    the jerk store

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 632 posts
  • Location:cubicle city

Posted 04 January 2011 - 03:45 PM

Babcock must read LGW. per Mlive he has changed his mind and Ozzy is starting.

Edited by Rick Zombos Ghost, 04 January 2011 - 03:45 PM.


#79 Heroes of Hockeytown

Heroes of Hockeytown

    Big Goal Bob

  • Bronze Booster
  • 13,729 posts

Posted 04 January 2011 - 03:57 PM

Who says Howard is the future? The guy couldn't crack the line-up for 5 years

In other words, business as usual for a Wings prospect.
"We've been in the same spot all year long. We won 50 games for the fourth year in a row. People think we're just hum-drum and boring.
No, you know what we are, we're good. You can't do what we do every single day and not be good." - Mike Babcock

#80 CaliWingsNut

CaliWingsNut

    PeeWee Bettman

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,744 posts
  • Location:Sonoma County, CA

Posted 04 January 2011 - 04:04 PM

I don't understand what Babcock is doing. I've always supported him, but his handling of the goalie situation last year and this year is just mind boggling. Howard is not playing well. Whether or not you blame him for losses, it's just a fact. Ozzie, on the flip side, is playing very, very well. Why NOT give him a chance? Howard, for the moment, has played himself OUT of a starting position, yet Babcock refuses to go to Ozzie who we know is capable of carrying the load if need be. It's almost like he forgets we have a 400-win goalie as our backup.

I understand he doesn't want to shake Howard's confidence, but that boat sailed a while ago. Howard has gotten into terrible habits and needs to retool his game (namely, not dropping to the ice every time the opponent comes into the zone), which he can't do if he's starting every game.

If I were Ozzie I'd be even more pissed than last year. Last year Ozzie deserved to not play, and he didn't. This year he deserves to play, and he's not.

Wake up Babcock!


How is Osgood playing "very, very well"?

sigh....

Please point out his last shutout?
3 goals on 46 shots is... ok.

Everyone's still in a daze over 400 wins I guess. He still lets in 3 goals before he tightens up.

Figures don't lie, but liars sure figure. - Mark Twain






Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users