• Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

Sign in to follow this  
hockey23

Wings sign Howard to 2-year, $4.5M extension

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

One could argue that Niemi is a better goalie and has proven himself in the playoffs making him worth the extra $1.6MM per year.

And one could also make the argument that the 'Hawks won despite Niemi's performance and for a team like the Wings, signing Howard at the cheaper price is a much better deal because it allows them to spend that $1.6m elsewhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And one could also make the argument that the 'Hawks won despite Niemi's performance and for a team like the Wings, signing Howard at the cheaper price is a much better deal because it allows them to spend that $1.6m elsewhere.

He won the cup and is putting up excellent numbers again this year on a Sharks team that has been pretty poor defensively until recently. Ya he started off weak, but has played lights out for the past two months.

I mean are we trying to argue that Niemi should make the same as Howard, because I think Niemi is clearly a better goaltender at this point (no that doesn't mean I'm saying Howard is bad) and its just a matter of degree.

Edit: Put another way, for the same price, would you rather have Howard or Niemi on the team for this years playoff run (ignore intangibles like locker room chemistry). I think most would take Niemi if they are honest with themselves.

Edited by greenrebellion

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He won the cup and is putting up excellent numbers again this year on a Sharks team that has been pretty poor defensively until recently. Ya he started off weak, but has played lights out for the past two months.

I mean are we trying to argue that Niemi should make the same as Howard, because I think Niemi is clearly a better goaltender at this point (no that doesn't mean I'm saying Howard is bad) and its just a matter of degree.

Edit: Put another way, for the same price, would you rather have Howard or Niemi on the team for this years playoff run (ignore intangibles like locker room chemistry). I think most would take Niemi if they are honest with themselves.

Niemi LATELY = Howie almost all of last year, stealing games.

How quickly everyone just forgets. Right now Niemi is the better goalie but an awful lot of goalies have stood on their head this year with better defenses in front of them. If the question you are posing is who do I want in net for us AT THE PRICE we got him for?

Jimmy Howard please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Niemi LATELY = Howie almost all of last year, stealing games.

How quickly everyone just forgets. Right now Niemi is the better goalie but an awful lot of goalies have stood on their head this year with better defenses in front of them. If the question you are posing is who do I want in net for us AT THE PRICE we got him for?

Jimmy Howard please.

Oh come on. How often have we seen a rookie phenom fall off a cliff and disappear never to be heard from again. So Howard had one great year. Meanwhile, Niemi had a good regular season last year, a great playoffs, and despite a slip early in the year (Stanley Cup hangover or whatever you want to call it) has rebounded and is now supporting a .919 save percentage despite the weak start and he’s on a team with defensive depth problems.

At $2.25MM you’d really rather take Howard who struggled in the playoffs over a guy who has been there, done that in the highest pressure situations and proven himself to be more consistent?

Sounds like I’m bashing Howard, but I’m not. I just think its funny how people think $2.25MM for Howard is a great signing, but Niemi at $3.8MM is horrible.

Not like Sharks have a bunch of options in goal either so they were kind of desperate but still in my eyes they got a fair price. I would’ve preferred a shorter term as I’ve mentioned in some other posts, but a shorter term probably means bigger cap hit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh come on. How often have we seen a rookie phenom fall off a cliff and disappear never to be heard from again. So Howard had one great year. Meanwhile, Niemi had a good regular season last year, a great playoffs, and despite a slip early in the year (Stanley Cup hangover or whatever you want to call it) has rebounded and is now supporting a .919 save percentage despite the weak start and he's on a team with defensive depth problems.

At $2.25MM you'd really rather take Howard who struggled in the playoffs over a guy who has been there, done that in the highest pressure situations and proven himself to be more consistent?

Sounds like I'm bashing Howard, but I'm not. I just think its funny how people think $2.25MM for Howard is a great signing, but Niemi at $3.8MM is horrible.

Not like Sharks have a bunch of options in goal either so they were kind of desperate but still in my eyes they got a fair price. I would've preferred a shorter term as I've mentioned in some other posts, but a shorter term probably means bigger cap hit.

See what kind of crap cap situation this puts them in for next year. Doesn't matter, it took an awful lot just for them to get him and he has been quite good so far but to be honest, what's to say he won't flame out and Jimmy will be just as brilliant in the coming months? Goalie is as unpredictable of a position in all of sports. You just never know what you are going to get.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Niemi LATELY = Howie almost all of last year, stealing games.

How quickly everyone just forgets. Right now Niemi is the better goalie but an awful lot of goalies have stood on their head this year with better defenses in front of them. If the question you are posing is who do I want in net for us AT THE PRICE we got him for?

Jimmy Howard please.

Howard has not been stealing games all year. He hasn't been stealing games hardly at all.

He hasn't been bad, but lets not overrate Howard here. Niemi won a cup with a stacked roster just like Osgood did twice, and I'm sure we would take Ozzie in his prime over Howard. Niemi is getting overpaid based on a season of performance but right now he is a better goaltender.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Howard has not been stealing games all year. He hasn't been stealing games hardly at all.

I know what you thought I meant but...

Howie almost all of last year, stealing games.

He did in fact take us as far as we went last year. Got burnt out come playoffs time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

See what kind of crap cap situation this puts them in for next year. Doesn't matter, it took an awful lot just for them to get him and he has been quite good so far but to be honest, what's to say he won't flame out and Jimmy will be just as brilliant in the coming months? Goalie is as unpredictable of a position in all of sports. You just never know what you are going to get.

I largely agree and personally like Holland's way of managing goalies, pretty much never committing large $ nor significant terms. There are downsides to that approach though in that we constantly take risks with unproven goalies come playoff time. See Legace and Howard as recent examples.

That said, there was no way Niemi was going to sign anywhere near $2.25MM given his "resume" so if the Sharks wanted him, that's what they had to pay and it doesn't seem too ridiculous of a contract to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As it has been said.... getting this deal in before the playoffs is all for the best. If he is brilliant it's another magical signing by Kenny and if he doesn't, it is still a minimal cap hit and with some retiring or being released by the Wings in the near future we could still have around 10 mill to work with and a probably cap increase. WIN-WIN.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He won the cup and is putting up excellent numbers again this year on a Sharks team that has been pretty poor defensively until recently. Ya he started off weak, but has played lights out for the past two months.

I mean are we trying to argue that Niemi should make the same as Howard, because I think Niemi is clearly a better goaltender at this point (no that doesn't mean I'm saying Howard is bad) and its just a matter of degree.

Edit: Put another way, for the same price, would you rather have Howard or Niemi on the team for this years playoff run (ignore intangibles like locker room chemistry). I think most would take Niemi if they are honest with themselves.

Um, to answer that semi-question...no, that wasn't the point I was making at all. Given the approach to team building & cap management that the front office takes, Jimmy is simply the better value for the price & contract length the Wings have him for in my opinion. I wouldn't want Niemi locked in for 4 on this team at $3.8m per no more than I would want Howie locked in for 4 at anything above $3m at this point either.

And as to whether one would want Niemi for the same price as Howard for the playoffs...why not ask the same of Thomas, Lundqvist, Luongo, or Miller? Yeah, who wouldn't want one of those at the same price as Howie? Granted, I want a bj from Angelina Jolie but that ain't happening either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Um, to answer that semi-question...no, that wasn't the point I was making at all. Given the approach to team building & cap management that the front office takes, Jimmy is simply the better value for the price & contract length the Wings have him for in my opinion. I wouldn't want Niemi locked in for 4 on this team at $3.8m per no more than I would want Howie locked in for 4 at anything above $3m at this point either.

And as to whether one would want Niemi for the same price as Howard for the playoffs...why not ask the same of Thomas, Lundqvist, Luongo, or Miller? Yeah, who wouldn't want one of those at the same price as Howie? Granted, I want a bj from Angelina Jolie but that ain't happening either.

Well you gotta have a goalie, right? They could run with Nittymaki, they could sign a Dan Ellis type guy, but those don't always work out as evidenced this year. You could do worse than have Niemi signed for $3.8 million.

But anyway, I don't want to sidetrack this too far. I'm glad we have Howard for the next two years at least and I hope he's solid for this years playoff run.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But anyway, I don't want to sidetrack this too far. I'm glad we have Howard for the next two years at least and I hope he's solid for this years playoff run.

And that is where it all lies right there. Career defining moment for Jimmy Howard in this playoffs potentially. We shall see how this pressure is dealt with and I am hoping I am really really wrong about my condescending opinions I have had of him at certain points this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Howie = the new Ozzie.

Even when he wins, he loses.

That's because the team is winning more games for him then his winning games for the team.

Ozzie was probably in the same situation, all tho the lastt stanley cup win and the stanley cup appearance the following year the team was probably not carried by Ozzie but he stepped up and payed his best in his whole career. (Probably veteran maturity ... experience etc...)

I don't mind the Howard signing, it's not that long anyways. Two years is not that long, considering his low pay and age he could be easy to trade away in a worst case scenario. He has 3 years to prove the organization that he could eventually help this team win a stanley cup. If he does, he stays longer ... if not ... Good Bye Howard.

Give the kid a chance, he might surprise us with a cup ... (hopefully this year so lids could walk away a champ.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh come on. How often have we seen a rookie phenom fall off a cliff and disappear never to be heard from again. So Howard had one great year. Meanwhile, Niemi had a good regular season last year, a great playoffs, and despite a slip early in the year (Stanley Cup hangover or whatever you want to call it) has rebounded and is now supporting a .919 save percentage despite the weak start and he’s on a team with defensive depth problems.

At $2.25MM you’d really rather take Howard who struggled in the playoffs over a guy who has been there, done that in the highest pressure situations and proven himself to be more consistent?

Sounds like I’m bashing Howard, but I’m not. I just think its funny how people think $2.25MM for Howard is a great signing, but Niemi at $3.8MM is horrible.

Not like Sharks have a bunch of options in goal either so they were kind of desperate but still in my eyes they got a fair price. I would’ve preferred a shorter term as I’ve mentioned in some other posts, but a shorter term probably means bigger cap hit.

Great playoff? .910 sv%, 2.63 gaa

Struggled? .915 sv%, 2.75 gaa

Pretty similar stats for such disparate descriptions. Hell, that 'great playoff' isn't too far above Howie's current regular season numbers.

Stats are pretty similar the past two seasons too. Howie 68-27-13 (63% win, 69% point), .923 sv%, 2.5 gaa. Niemi 49-22-7 (62.8% win, 67.3% point), .922 sv%, 2.35 gaa. Similar age. Similar size.

Sharks are just buying at the wrong time. Or maybe the other way around and the Wings are buying at the right time while Jimmy is down a bit. Sharks are also paying a premium for the Hawks Cup win. Which is funny in a way since the Sharks got Niemi because the Hawks weren't willing/able to do that themselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great playoff? .910 sv%, 2.63 gaa

Struggled? .915 sv%, 2.75 gaa

Pretty similar stats for such disparate descriptions. Hell, that 'great playoff' isn't too far above Howie's current regular season numbers.

Stats are pretty similar the past two seasons too. Howie 68-27-13 (63% win, 69% point), .923 sv%, 2.5 gaa. Niemi 49-22-7 (62.8% win, 67.3% point), .922 sv%, 2.35 gaa. Similar age. Similar size.

Sharks are just buying at the wrong time. Or maybe the other way around and the Wings are buying at the right time while Jimmy is down a bit. Sharks are also paying a premium for the Hawks Cup win. Which is funny in a way since the Sharks got Niemi because the Hawks weren't willing/able to do that themselves.

His numbers through the first 3 rounds were stellar. The finals then became a run and gun offensive game with goalies on both sides putting up subpar stats.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Crymson

He won the cup and is putting up excellent numbers again this year on a Sharks team that has been pretty poor defensively until recently. Ya he started off weak, but has played lights out for the past two months.

I mean are we trying to argue that Niemi should make the same as Howard, because I think Niemi is clearly a better goaltender at this point (no that doesn't mean I'm saying Howard is bad) and its just a matter of degree.

Edit: Put another way, for the same price, would you rather have Howard or Niemi on the team for this years playoff run (ignore intangibles like locker room chemistry). I think most would take Niemi if they are honest with themselves.

His first few months were horrendous. His last two have been great. That's the story of his career so far.

His numbers through the first 3 rounds were stellar. The finals then became a run and gun offensive game with goalies on both sides putting up subpar stats.

He got lit up against Nashville.

It will never cease to amaze me how far supposed fans of this team will go to deprecate the team's own players.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will never cease to amaze me how far supposed fans of this team will go to deprecate the team's own players.

So by your logic, if I say Tim Thomas is better than Howard and deserves a bigger contract, then I'm deprecating Howard? There's a logic fail in there somewhere.

There's quite a bit of blind homerism on this board though. I mean it cracked me up how many people were saying Holland had some grand master scheme in the works during the Nabokov fiasco, that he wasn't just signing Nabokov to lose him in the waiver process and he was going to pull something out of his rear end.

Most of the fans on the sharks message boards love the Niemi signing, many here hate it, I'm just trying to provide some middle ground saying there was no way Niemi was going to sign for anywhere $2.2 million given his resume, so if the Sharks wanted him (and given the lack of goaltending depth they probably need him) they were going to have to make a reasonable offer which it appears they did. They can both be good signings, Holland isn't the only GM in the league that can sign a good contract.

Edited by greenrebellion

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So by your logic, if I say Tim Thomas is better than Howard and deserves a bigger contract, then I'm deprecating Howard? There's a logic fail in there somewhere.

Not accurate. The statement "Howard sucks, I think the Wings should sign a real starter like Tim Thomas" is closer to what was referenced. Which is, basically, bashing our players. It is one thing to post that we need an upgrade, and another to outright bash. Please be eloquent with your treatment of a player's abilities or lack thereof. Thank you and good day.

There's quite a bit of blind homerism on this board though. I mean it cracked me up how many people were saying Holland had some grand master scheme in the works during the Nabokov fiasco, that he wasn't just signing Nabokov to lose him in the waiver process and he was going to pull something out of his rear end.

Most of the fans on the sharks message boards love the Niemi signing, many here hate it, I'm just trying to provide some middle ground saying there was no way Niemi was going to sign for anywhere $2.2 million given his resume, so if the Sharks wanted him (and given the lack of goaltending depth they probably need him) they were going to have to make a reasonable offer which it appears they did. They can both be good signings, Holland isn't the only GM in the league that can sign a good contract.

I mean it cracked me up how many people were saying Holland had some grand huge master scheme in the works during the Nabokov fiasco, that he wasn't just signing Nabokov to lose him in the waiver process and he was going to pull something out of his rear end.

Niemi wasn't going to sign for $2.2m because he was already making $2m. Howard is just coming off a deal making $750k. BIG difference. Niemi is no better than Howard; he just happened to have a contract up at the right time. He would not be making even as much as Howard's new deal if he had not been in net for the Hawks last spring, and subsequently had his contract expire that summer. Alternatively, if the Wings had Howard for one more year on his current deal, and won the Cup with him this season...how much do you think he would cost? As much as Niemi? Probably what his agent would be looking for. So think about it for a second. If the Wings are awesome this postseason, and Jimmy Howard is decent enough so that they get through and win it all, and his stats are comparable to Niemi's from 2010 playoffs...is he a $4m netminder? That's the question you should ask yourself about whether Niemi's deal is good.

And please stop talking about Ken Holland's rear end... I mean, there are other boards for that stuff.

Edited by eva unit zero

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Howard has not been stealing games all year. He hasn't been stealing games hardly at all.

He hasn't been bad, but lets not overrate Howard here. Niemi won a cup with a stacked roster just like Osgood did twice, and I'm sure we would take Ozzie in his prime over Howard. Niemi is getting overpaid based on a season of performance but right now he is a better goaltender.

Agreed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

His numbers through the first 3 rounds were stellar. The finals then became a run and gun offensive game with goalies on both sides putting up subpar stats.

His numbers were decent against Nashville with the two shutouts (but sub-par in the other 4 games). Against Vancouver he had a sub .900 sv% and a gaa over 3. His stats were great against the Sharks and he got lit up in the Finals.

I fail to see how being good half the time makes him worth any more than Howie.

Time will tell of course, but for now I have to say the Sharks should have waited, and certainly shouldn't have commited to 4 years at that price. The pay scale for goalies was trending down, and there's little reason to think that trend won't continue. At least it's easy to dump an overpaid goalie if needed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Niemi wasn't going to sign for $2.2m because he was already making $2m. Howard is just coming off a deal making $750k. BIG difference. Niemi is no better than Howard; he just happened to have a contract up at the right time. He would not be making even as much as Howard's new deal if he had not been in net for the Hawks last spring, and subsequently had his contract expire that summer. Alternatively, if the Wings had Howard for one more year on his current deal, and won the Cup with him this season...how much do you think he would cost? As much as Niemi? Probably what his agent would be looking for. So think about it for a second. If the Wings are awesome this postseason, and Jimmy Howard is decent enough so that they get through and win it all, and his stats are comparable to Niemi's from 2010 playoffs...is he a $4m netminder? That's the question you should ask yourself about whether Niemi's deal is good.

And please stop talking about Ken Holland's rear end... I mean, there are other boards for that stuff.[/font]

The bolded part is kind of humurous. I'd bet every GM in the league would take Niemi over Howard at $2.25 million per year given the information currently available.

And ya, Howard is just one good postseason run away from deserving a higher contract, problem is that he hasn't done it yet whereas Niemi has. Its almost like you give no value to having 4 rounds of postseason experience and winning a cup then coming back the next season and putting up pretty phenomenal numbers after the "hangover" period.

I have no problem with Howard. I'm not a huge fan of his inconsistent play this year and at times am concerned if he'll be consistent enough to make it through a deep playoff run, but I've certainly never argued that we should bail on the guy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One could argue that Niemi is a better goalie and has proven himself in the playoffs making him worth the extra $1.6MM per year.

I would think that is pretty much the case. I watched Niemi battle through the playoffs when he had a bad start in the Nashville series; and he became the difference in the finals against the Flyers and their goaltending . As for Howard he didn't have good playoff last year it cost us. Now this year's run what is it going to be ? I think then we will have the answer as to this signing. To put it mildly I'm sceptical: still waiting for a top tier goaltender to lead this team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this