Jump to content


Photo
* * - - - 6 votes

Babcock Underperforming?


  • Please log in to reply
42 replies to this topic

#1 Learn2LuvIt

Learn2LuvIt

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 547 posts

Posted 31 March 2011 - 11:19 AM

I think Babs is just as much to blame as anyone for lack luster play since Jan. Ever since we started to stumble in January I've been keeping a close eye on Babs and his peformance. When the Dec stumbles started, I wasn't as concerned thinking it was just one of those periods in a season that EVERY team goes through....but they never seem to have come out of it fully. Yes a few multi game winning streaks, but I haven't seen them take it to the next level. I've been paying attention to Babs line changes and matchups, game management, reaction after wins/losses, how he manages his staff of coaches, what the players are saying, stats, etc...

I'll say this, he is no doubt a good coach and I want him behind our bench. However this year, I haven't been impressed. I don't think this team this year has found a true identity. I don't think this team plays as a cohesive unit most nights. IMO, we've gotton this high in the standings by riding one hot player to the next, but never all together. I believe he's been out coached in a few games. I believe that he's spent too much time juggling lines/players to get other players going to the detriment of winning consistently (Hudler, Madano, Fil). I realize in cases he is tyring to accomodate for injuries, but as far as injuries go we've actually had it fairly good this year. At this point in the season he should have his 2-3 entire team line combo's for the playoffs pretty much decided...I don't think he has a clue if the playoffs were to start tomorrow. McCrimmon is horrible...or at least our D has been horrible and that's his responsibility (Lids, Raffi, Stewy, and Kronner...most teams would give their left arm to have a top four like this??). On paper I believe we have the best team in the NHL (on PAPER!). His job is to get the most out of his players, which with Wings pool of talent should translate into winning/domination for the majority. The job is not getting done and I believe Babs is underperforming and I'll be very interested to watch him as these playoff's start.

Okay right or wrong I've given a lot of opions above. What's your opinion of Babs coaching job this year?
ENJOY THE RIDE

#2 Travis

Travis

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,453 posts
  • Location:Grand Rapids, MI

Posted 31 March 2011 - 11:41 AM

I was sort of wondering this earlier. Before Babcock signed his extension, he was concerned about being able to ignite and inspire his players after having been their coach for so long and called a couple long-tenured coaches to get their opinions. I'm wondering if this is exactly what he was thinking about?

Babcock was interviewed briefly by Pierre LeBrun this morning for the Daily Debate.

I got a question in my chat yesterday from a Wings fan whose handle was "Panicky," and that was before last night's debacle. If I were the Red Wings, though, a veteran and savvy team, I would just chalk it up as a stinker and move on.

"That's what I'm going to do,'' Babcock told me this morning. "But the great thing about this game is reality: you are what you are, and you are what you are every single day. The bottom line is that yesterday we weren't good enough. The coaches, whatever we did, wasn't good enough. The players, whatever they did, wasn't good enough.

"You can stand in the right spots all you want on the ice, but you have to out-compete the other team and we never did. From the goaltenders to the D to the forwards to the coaching staff, we were poor. Those are the facts."

Listen, the Red Wings would definitely rather be on a roll heading into the playoffs than doing this. But if you eliminate last night's game and focus on the other losses, you'll see a hard-fought 2-1 loss to Vancouver, a tough overtime loss to Chicago and a shootout loss to Pittsburgh. They played well in those games.

But my big-picture concern is with the team's overall defensive play. The Wings are 21st in the league in goals against per game. Last season, they were seventh. Now, a lot of this has to do with all the injuries they've had again this season, no question, but still ...

"It hasn't been good," Babcock said of his team's overall defensively play. "I thought it was real good early in the season, then I thought we were taped together [injuries] for a long time. There's lot of things that go into a year. But to be honest with you, I think we know how to play. We've played enough good games that we know how to play. Our focus wasn't there last night, but I liked our focus in a number of games recently before that. I thought we had played pretty darn good even if we didn't get the results."

Datsyuk and Howard are on the mend and should be back this weekend, Babcock said. The Wings play at Nashville on Saturday and host Minnesota on Sunday. Time to get the train back on track.


Link: Daily Debate

cc_champs-5_zps34057ff0.png


#3 toby91_ca

toby91_ca

    Legend

  • Gold Booster
  • 8,413 posts

Posted 31 March 2011 - 11:47 AM

I don't really have an opinion on this as I really don't tend to focus too much on coaches and what they are doing unless I notice things glaringly that I would disagree with. I can't say I've seen much of that this year out of him.

For what it's worth, Hodgemail over at TSN asks who might win coach of the year...Babcock gets a mention as a potential (probably a lot in part due to injuries though).

#4 Mabuhay Red Wings

Mabuhay Red Wings

    PACquiao!

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 840 posts

Posted 31 March 2011 - 02:18 PM

"But to be honest with you, I think we know how to play. We've played enough good games that we know how to play. Our focus wasn't there last night, but I liked our focus in a number of games recently before that. I thought we had played pretty darn good even if we didn't get the results."

He's starting to sound like Ozzie from last year.

#5 kook_10

kook_10

    I Like Our Team

  • Gold Booster
  • 2,225 posts
  • Location:South Orange, NJ

Posted 31 March 2011 - 04:03 PM

I think that "we are what we are" and "we know how to play" stuff isn't cutting it anymore. It seems to make them unaccountable for their play on the ice. Granted, with as many injuries as the team as had this year, it would be difficult for any coach to effectively discipline players by benching or demoting. I think that is what he needs to do though. Just tweaking lines doesn't seem to have been the most successful the last couple years. Too much emphasis on chemistry and not enough on performance. I wouldn't mind him making a big off-season trade to show the boys that he means business.

works every time


#6 wingslogo19

wingslogo19

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,234 posts
  • Location:Victoria BC Canada

Posted 31 March 2011 - 04:13 PM

I'd really like to see Babcock sitting guys if there playing poorly, and it should be from our top guy right down the the bottom guys.. If your not going to play sit up in the press box
IPB Image

#7 AtomicPunk

AtomicPunk

    Nobody rules these streets at night like me...

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,028 posts
  • Location:Home of the Wings

Posted 31 March 2011 - 04:20 PM

I think Babcock can only say and do so much, it has to come from the guys whose skates are on the ice, every shift. And a lot of players are not focused, making mistakes, standing around and not hustling enough. Granted, they are in the playoffs and they really don't have that playoff edge right now. But someone better find a way to wake them up or it is going to a long summer if they face Nashville or one of the younger, hungrier teams who are going to outwork them every shift and knock them out.
I am a victim of the science age...the underground.

Feed the Swede! - RETIRED 2012

#8 ben_usmc

ben_usmc

    Kenny Powers Fan

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,791 posts
  • Location:ypsilanti

Posted 31 March 2011 - 04:33 PM

someone needs to do something more than justf****** talk. I could give a f*** less about what babcock has to say how about he ices a team taht at least gives a s*** for more than 2 games a month. I have been a person that has said for a while we will still go deep we just don't care etc. But to watch such uninspired hockey is insulting and i find it more insulting they force fans to have to pay so much money to see players just go through somef****** motions. At least s***ty teams like Isles, Avs, try.
There's no I in team, but there's a U in c***, so don't be little jealous c***s

#9 gcom007

gcom007

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,912 posts
  • Location:Beverly Hills, MI

Posted 31 March 2011 - 04:34 PM

2nd in the West despite...

-numerous injuries to key players throughout the season,

-a starting goalie who struggled most of the year (and then an injured backup goalie who was playing well to compensate before going down)

-and the pressure of all the expectations in Detroit while every other team is gunning for you.

I think he's doing fine. It's been an odd season in some ways. The lines haven't had much luck gelling after Modano went down and Flip once again struggled to find offensive consistency as a full-time 2nd line center. Add injuries to Datsyuk here and there and generally it's safe to say you've got struggles up front. I think he's done pretty well with the cards he's been dealt though. If Modano hadn't been out so long, I think the offense would seem a lot more "united" as he's supposed to be the guy anchoring the 3rd line. Even if Flip struggled, having Modano as a sure fire 3rd line guy made it a lot easier to experiment with Flip on a wing seeing as we still would have Dats and Z who could center the top 2 lines if necessary.

And it's not like we've really struggled to score goals. The only reason we have the record we do is because we score a lot of goals this year as there were about 3 months where it was all but a given that Howard was going to give up 4 goals. When your starting goalie is young and slipping, it's tough on a team, and it's all the harder when your other move (Osgood) actually starts working out only to succumb to a long term injury. But we still found a way to fight through it and win games and stay near the top of the standings.

So long as Datsyuk's not hurting heading into the playoffs and Howard continues to improve and keep it steady when the pressure's on, I think the team is in good shape heading into the post-season. They've got a lot of room to elevate their game, and sometimes it's better to be in that position than to head into the playoffs on cruise control after an easy regular season ride.

I think success in the Playoffs will boil down to 2-3 things that are almost entirely out of Babcocks control:

1) the health of Datsyuk

2) the goaltending (will Howard struggle again? If he does, could Osgood possibly be ready at all?)

3) the inevitable injuries that will creep up on guys in the post-season

The rest I think will work out fine.
-Elliot...does not panic.

#10 Barrie

Barrie

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,877 posts

Posted 31 March 2011 - 04:41 PM

Wait until the playoffs before you start analyzing the coach. As I've said in other discussions, this is the problem when 16 teams make the playoffs. All the attention in the last couple months is on who makes the last 2 playoffs spots. There's no motivation for the best teams to play :zzz:, they're just killing time for the playoffs.
Lets Go:
Red Wings
Tigers
Roughriders
Lions
Spartans
Pistons

#11 ben_usmc

ben_usmc

    Kenny Powers Fan

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,791 posts
  • Location:ypsilanti

Posted 31 March 2011 - 04:44 PM

The only positive I can see about us stumbling into the playoffs is this: A team like Van. still doesn't know how to pace itself (considering the round they always exit) so they are basically blowing their load during the regular season. Then you have so many other teams in a dog fight (I'd even include SJ b/c for a lot of the season they were boarding) that many will be burned out. So hopefully our incrediabily lazy and unred wing like hockey will end up paying off for us in the end. It is a marvel that we managed to stay in 2nd while basically playing so half assed

Edited by ben_usmc, 31 March 2011 - 04:47 PM.

There's no I in team, but there's a U in c***, so don't be little jealous c***s

#12 wingslogo19

wingslogo19

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,234 posts
  • Location:Victoria BC Canada

Posted 31 March 2011 - 04:45 PM

Wait until the playoffs before you start analyzing the coach. As I've said in other discussions, this is the problem when 16 teams make the playoffs. All the attention in the last couple months is on who makes the last 2 playoffs spots. There's no motivation for the best teams to play :zzz:, they're just killing time for the playoffs.

Well tell that to the Canucks then, because there still playing hard every night
IPB Image

#13 ben_usmc

ben_usmc

    Kenny Powers Fan

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,791 posts
  • Location:ypsilanti

Posted 31 March 2011 - 04:48 PM

Well tell that to the Canucks then, because there still playing hard every night

They certainly are on a mission, however that could come back to bite them in the ass. 6/7/8 seeds are not nearly the scrubs 6/7/8 seeds used to be. I especially wouldn't want to face Nashville or Chicago if I was Van. However I feel confident we would crush Chi if we played them
There's no I in team, but there's a U in c***, so don't be little jealous c***s

#14 brett

brett

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,935 posts
  • Location:NJ

Posted 31 March 2011 - 04:54 PM

You can only blame the players for so long. I haven't seen him try to change anything except the lines. Many factors though.

#15 Broken 16

Broken 16

    Bonecrushing Blueliner

  • Gold Booster
  • 2,959 posts

Posted 31 March 2011 - 05:00 PM

I have noticed that Babcock seems to be having a hard time with line match-ups lately. I know Datsyuk being out makes it harder for him to match against other teams consistently, but he's still been getting owned in that department lately. At least from my perspective. Even at home, with the advantage, he seems to be struggling.

That's really my only gripe with him and I'm just gonna assume he will tighten it up for the playoffs. Hey... if the players can 'flip a switch', why can't Babs? :)

Edited by Broken 16, 31 March 2011 - 05:01 PM.


#16 Rick Zombos Ghost

Rick Zombos Ghost

    the jerk store

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 632 posts
  • Location:cubicle city

Posted 31 March 2011 - 05:27 PM

I have noticed that Babcock seems to be having a hard time with line match-ups lately. I know Datsyuk being out makes it harder for him to match against other teams consistently, but he's still been getting owned in that department lately. At least from my perspective. Even at home, with the advantage, he seems to be struggling.

That's really my only gripe with him and I'm just gonna assume he will tighten it up for the playoffs. Hey... if the players can 'flip a switch', why can't Babs? :)

I think they play better when he cant match lines (on the road). homer, hudler, and bert are the only really glaring defensive liabilities we should have at forward. Sure hasnt seemed that way though.

#17 atodaso

atodaso

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 655 posts

Posted 31 March 2011 - 05:33 PM

Well tell that to the Canucks then, because there still playing hard every night



They certainly are on a mission, however that could come back to bite them in the ass. 6/7/8 seeds are not nearly the scrubs 6/7/8 seeds used to be. I especially wouldn't want to face Nashville or Chicago if I was Van. However I feel confident we would crush Chi if we played them


they're not playing THAT hard. they're just plain good, that's all.

#18 Broken 16

Broken 16

    Bonecrushing Blueliner

  • Gold Booster
  • 2,959 posts

Posted 31 March 2011 - 05:35 PM

they're not playing THAT hard. they're just plain good, that's all.




They are a good regular season team. No doubt about it.

#19 atodaso

atodaso

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 655 posts

Posted 31 March 2011 - 05:52 PM

They are a good regular season team. No doubt about it.


true because they haven't done much in the playoffs the last couple of seasons. this will likely change this year.

#20 Broken 16

Broken 16

    Bonecrushing Blueliner

  • Gold Booster
  • 2,959 posts

Posted 31 March 2011 - 05:57 PM

true because they haven't done much in the playoffs the last couple of seasons. this will likely change this year.




Ummmmm... aside from losing in the Finals about an era ago, they haven't really done squat in the playoffs. It's gone on a little longer than "the last couple seasons", but yea, maybe they will finally make a splash this season.

I don't know who is in worse shape going in... us for having Howard as our starter or you for having Luongo. Guess we will see.

Edited by Broken 16, 31 March 2011 - 05:58 PM.






Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users