Babcock Underperforming?
#1
Posted 31 March 2011 - 11:19 AM
I'll say this, he is no doubt a good coach and I want him behind our bench. However this year, I haven't been impressed. I don't think this team this year has found a true identity. I don't think this team plays as a cohesive unit most nights. IMO, we've gotton this high in the standings by riding one hot player to the next, but never all together. I believe he's been out coached in a few games. I believe that he's spent too much time juggling lines/players to get other players going to the detriment of winning consistently (Hudler, Madano, Fil). I realize in cases he is tyring to accomodate for injuries, but as far as injuries go we've actually had it fairly good this year. At this point in the season he should have his 2-3 entire team line combo's for the playoffs pretty much decided...I don't think he has a clue if the playoffs were to start tomorrow. McCrimmon is horrible...or at least our D has been horrible and that's his responsibility (Lids, Raffi, Stewy, and Kronner...most teams would give their left arm to have a top four like this??). On paper I believe we have the best team in the NHL (on PAPER!). His job is to get the most out of his players, which with Wings pool of talent should translate into winning/domination for the majority. The job is not getting done and I believe Babs is underperforming and I'll be very interested to watch him as these playoff's start.
Okay right or wrong I've given a lot of opions above. What's your opinion of Babs coaching job this year?
- GMRwings1983 likes this
#2
Posted 31 March 2011 - 11:41 AM
Babcock was interviewed briefly by Pierre LeBrun this morning for the Daily Debate.
I got a question in my chat yesterday from a Wings fan whose handle was "Panicky," and that was before last night's debacle. If I were the Red Wings, though, a veteran and savvy team, I would just chalk it up as a stinker and move on.
"That's what I'm going to do,'' Babcock told me this morning. "But the great thing about this game is reality: you are what you are, and you are what you are every single day. The bottom line is that yesterday we weren't good enough. The coaches, whatever we did, wasn't good enough. The players, whatever they did, wasn't good enough.
"You can stand in the right spots all you want on the ice, but you have to out-compete the other team and we never did. From the goaltenders to the D to the forwards to the coaching staff, we were poor. Those are the facts."
Listen, the Red Wings would definitely rather be on a roll heading into the playoffs than doing this. But if you eliminate last night's game and focus on the other losses, you'll see a hard-fought 2-1 loss to Vancouver, a tough overtime loss to Chicago and a shootout loss to Pittsburgh. They played well in those games.
But my big-picture concern is with the team's overall defensive play. The Wings are 21st in the league in goals against per game. Last season, they were seventh. Now, a lot of this has to do with all the injuries they've had again this season, no question, but still ...
"It hasn't been good," Babcock said of his team's overall defensively play. "I thought it was real good early in the season, then I thought we were taped together [injuries] for a long time. There's lot of things that go into a year. But to be honest with you, I think we know how to play. We've played enough good games that we know how to play. Our focus wasn't there last night, but I liked our focus in a number of games recently before that. I thought we had played pretty darn good even if we didn't get the results."
Datsyuk and Howard are on the mend and should be back this weekend, Babcock said. The Wings play at Nashville on Saturday and host Minnesota on Sunday. Time to get the train back on track.
Link: Daily Debate
#3
Posted 31 March 2011 - 11:47 AM
For what it's worth, Hodgemail over at TSN asks who might win coach of the year...Babcock gets a mention as a potential (probably a lot in part due to injuries though).
#4
Posted 31 March 2011 - 02:18 PM
He's starting to sound like Ozzie from last year.
#5
Posted 31 March 2011 - 04:03 PM
- CaliWingsNut and nate94gt like this
smooth as Tennessee whiskey
#7
Posted 31 March 2011 - 04:20 PM
- Rick D likes this
Feed the Swede! ™ - RETIRED 2012
#8
Posted 31 March 2011 - 04:33 PM
- Hockeymom1960 likes this
#9
Posted 31 March 2011 - 04:34 PM
-numerous injuries to key players throughout the season,
-a starting goalie who struggled most of the year (and then an injured backup goalie who was playing well to compensate before going down)
-and the pressure of all the expectations in Detroit while every other team is gunning for you.
I think he's doing fine. It's been an odd season in some ways. The lines haven't had much luck gelling after Modano went down and Flip once again struggled to find offensive consistency as a full-time 2nd line center. Add injuries to Datsyuk here and there and generally it's safe to say you've got struggles up front. I think he's done pretty well with the cards he's been dealt though. If Modano hadn't been out so long, I think the offense would seem a lot more "united" as he's supposed to be the guy anchoring the 3rd line. Even if Flip struggled, having Modano as a sure fire 3rd line guy made it a lot easier to experiment with Flip on a wing seeing as we still would have Dats and Z who could center the top 2 lines if necessary.
And it's not like we've really struggled to score goals. The only reason we have the record we do is because we score a lot of goals this year as there were about 3 months where it was all but a given that Howard was going to give up 4 goals. When your starting goalie is young and slipping, it's tough on a team, and it's all the harder when your other move (Osgood) actually starts working out only to succumb to a long term injury. But we still found a way to fight through it and win games and stay near the top of the standings.
So long as Datsyuk's not hurting heading into the playoffs and Howard continues to improve and keep it steady when the pressure's on, I think the team is in good shape heading into the post-season. They've got a lot of room to elevate their game, and sometimes it's better to be in that position than to head into the playoffs on cruise control after an easy regular season ride.
I think success in the Playoffs will boil down to 2-3 things that are almost entirely out of Babcocks control:
1) the health of Datsyuk
2) the goaltending (will Howard struggle again? If he does, could Osgood possibly be ready at all?)
3) the inevitable injuries that will creep up on guys in the post-season
The rest I think will work out fine.
#10
Posted 31 March 2011 - 04:41 PM
Red Wings
Tigers
Roughriders
Lions
Spartans
Pistons
#11
Posted 31 March 2011 - 04:44 PM
Edited by ben_usmc, 31 March 2011 - 04:47 PM.
#12
Posted 31 March 2011 - 04:45 PM
Well tell that to the Canucks then, because there still playing hard every nightWait until the playoffs before you start analyzing the coach. As I've said in other discussions, this is the problem when 16 teams make the playoffs. All the attention in the last couple months is on who makes the last 2 playoffs spots. There's no motivation for the best teams to play
, they're just killing time for the playoffs.
- Hockeymom1960 likes this
#13
Posted 31 March 2011 - 04:48 PM
They certainly are on a mission, however that could come back to bite them in the ass. 6/7/8 seeds are not nearly the scrubs 6/7/8 seeds used to be. I especially wouldn't want to face Nashville or Chicago if I was Van. However I feel confident we would crush Chi if we played themWell tell that to the Canucks then, because there still playing hard every night
#14
Posted 31 March 2011 - 04:54 PM
#15
Posted 31 March 2011 - 05:00 PM
That's really my only gripe with him and I'm just gonna assume he will tighten it up for the playoffs. Hey... if the players can 'flip a switch', why can't Babs?
Edited by Broken 16, 31 March 2011 - 05:01 PM.
#16
Posted 31 March 2011 - 05:27 PM
I think they play better when he cant match lines (on the road). homer, hudler, and bert are the only really glaring defensive liabilities we should have at forward. Sure hasnt seemed that way though.I have noticed that Babcock seems to be having a hard time with line match-ups lately. I know Datsyuk being out makes it harder for him to match against other teams consistently, but he's still been getting owned in that department lately. At least from my perspective. Even at home, with the advantage, he seems to be struggling.
That's really my only gripe with him and I'm just gonna assume he will tighten it up for the playoffs. Hey... if the players can 'flip a switch', why can't Babs?
#17
Posted 31 March 2011 - 05:33 PM
Well tell that to the Canucks then, because there still playing hard every night
They certainly are on a mission, however that could come back to bite them in the ass. 6/7/8 seeds are not nearly the scrubs 6/7/8 seeds used to be. I especially wouldn't want to face Nashville or Chicago if I was Van. However I feel confident we would crush Chi if we played them
they're not playing THAT hard. they're just plain good, that's all.
#18
Posted 31 March 2011 - 05:35 PM
they're not playing THAT hard. they're just plain good, that's all.
They are a good regular season team. No doubt about it.
#19
Posted 31 March 2011 - 05:52 PM
They are a good regular season team. No doubt about it.
true because they haven't done much in the playoffs the last couple of seasons. this will likely change this year.
#20
Posted 31 March 2011 - 05:57 PM
true because they haven't done much in the playoffs the last couple of seasons. this will likely change this year.
Ummmmm... aside from losing in the Finals about an era ago, they haven't really done squat in the playoffs. It's gone on a little longer than "the last couple seasons", but yea, maybe they will finally make a splash this season.
I don't know who is in worse shape going in... us for having Howard as our starter or you for having Luongo. Guess we will see.
Edited by Broken 16, 31 March 2011 - 05:58 PM.
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Babcock once asked Holland if he could be Scotty Bowman’s successor |
General Discussion | MidMichSteve |
|
|
|
Mike Babcock Radio/Television Interview |
General Discussion | FlashyG |
|
|
|
Babcock tells players they are soft. Pushes them to play better. |
General Discussion | drumnj |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users















