Unbelievably bad goal.
#41
Posted 06 April 2011 - 09:22 PM
Skilled hockey is, and will forever be, winning hockey. Deal with it.
"A perfect vision, some simple ways to let you know
Free range humans all couped up naked clone is playing lame" Avon by Queens of the Stone Age
#42
Posted 06 April 2011 - 09:22 PM

#43
Posted 06 April 2011 - 09:24 PM
So where is the video of this goal from the camera in the net?
Only a very few amount of games have cameras in the net, those usually are for nationally televised games only, and it was a local feed being rebroadcast nationally.
Tootoo does NOT belong on this team. He is classless and I would rather see the Wings be bad than classless. I feel the same way about Bertuzzi as well, but he at least CAN make the team better. With Tootoo the team becomes worse and in danger of being classless. Would you have liked Claude on the team? Or Roy? No. So why would you be okay with that POS.
This thread has been closed due to emotions being higher than people's ability to read, interpret, and properly respond to simple posts.
#44
Posted 06 April 2011 - 09:27 PM
Blues better win in regulation.
Only a very few amount of games have cameras in the net, those usually are for nationally televised games only, and it was a local feed being rebroadcast nationally.
You'd think the NHL would cough up the extra money and have these installed for all the teams, especially for calls like these.

#45
Posted 06 April 2011 - 09:34 PM
"All done? Five bucks." - Pavel Datsyuk after an interview
"Very few cities in the NHL have the history or the following of the Detroit Red Wings." - Steve Yzerman
"Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people’s liberty teeth and keystone under independence." - George Washington
"Suck my machine gun." - Ted Nugent responding to British pansy Piers Morgan whining for gun control
US Bill of non-rights
#46
Posted 06 April 2011 - 09:35 PM
Absolute disgrace to have this counted after video review in Toronto, obviously kicked in and quite obvious it never crossed the line. Honestly, it's a conspiracy, what else can you say.
Horrible, horrible call.
#47
Posted 06 April 2011 - 09:38 PM
#48
Posted 06 April 2011 - 09:39 PM
At least St. Louis tied it.
Chicago got their point, going to OT... lame.

#49
Posted 06 April 2011 - 09:40 PM
At least St. Louis tied it.
So?!?! They still gave Chicago a point, and they could still walk with two. The NHL should be ashamed.
Tootoo does NOT belong on this team. He is classless and I would rather see the Wings be bad than classless. I feel the same way about Bertuzzi as well, but he at least CAN make the team better. With Tootoo the team becomes worse and in danger of being classless. Would you have liked Claude on the team? Or Roy? No. So why would you be okay with that POS.
This thread has been closed due to emotions being higher than people's ability to read, interpret, and properly respond to simple posts.
#51
Posted 06 April 2011 - 09:44 PM
So what exactly is the point of video review?
Who knows, but Chicago won. Bulls***.
Tootoo does NOT belong on this team. He is classless and I would rather see the Wings be bad than classless. I feel the same way about Bertuzzi as well, but he at least CAN make the team better. With Tootoo the team becomes worse and in danger of being classless. Would you have liked Claude on the team? Or Roy? No. So why would you be okay with that POS.
This thread has been closed due to emotions being higher than people's ability to read, interpret, and properly respond to simple posts.
#52
Posted 06 April 2011 - 09:44 PM
#53
Posted 06 April 2011 - 09:45 PM
Tootoo does NOT belong on this team. He is classless and I would rather see the Wings be bad than classless. I feel the same way about Bertuzzi as well, but he at least CAN make the team better. With Tootoo the team becomes worse and in danger of being classless. Would you have liked Claude on the team? Or Roy? No. So why would you be okay with that POS.
This thread has been closed due to emotions being higher than people's ability to read, interpret, and properly respond to simple posts.
#55
Posted 06 April 2011 - 09:49 PM
I want phone numbers of people in the NHL, anyone got access to them? Because that goal is bulls***. I want to complain on the phone to someone with at least Vice President in their title.
GET 'EM!
- Uncle Danny likes this
#56
Posted 06 April 2011 - 09:51 PM
Somebody PLEASE photoshop the trollface on to the blackhawks logo for me. Please, please, please.
#57
Posted 06 April 2011 - 09:53 PM
- uk_redwing
HockeyArchive Twitter
#58
Posted 06 April 2011 - 09:56 PM
"All done? Five bucks." - Pavel Datsyuk after an interview
"Very few cities in the NHL have the history or the following of the Detroit Red Wings." - Steve Yzerman
"Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people’s liberty teeth and keystone under independence." - George Washington
"Suck my machine gun." - Ted Nugent responding to British pansy Piers Morgan whining for gun control
US Bill of non-rights
#59
Posted 06 April 2011 - 09:57 PM
i hope the wings crush them the next two games and the stars win out, you know the stars will get some horrible reffing against them
I doubt that will happen. Be ready to get jobbed by the refs in the next two games.

#60
Posted 06 April 2011 - 09:59 PM
Hossa definitely kicked the puck, which hit the post and rolled across the line to the other post, and was swept back by Legace, possibly without the puck ever crossing the line. He might have tapped it with his stick (thus negating the kicking motion), and Sobotka might have touched it as well.
The problem is that the ref on the ice (Good ole' Dan O'Halloran) signaled goal. Which means the War Room would have needed indisputable evidence of two things to overturn the goal. 1 - That the puck conclusively did not cross the line, and 2 - That neither Hossa, Sobotka, Polak or Legace touched the puck after it was kicked by Hossa but before it crossed the line.
The replays that I've seen suggest that no one touched it, and that the puck did not completely cross the line. But there's a difference between suggesting something and proving it.
Good post.
It was a questionable call, no doubt. And we may have gotten a break, but you people with your conspiracy theories are hilarious. It was one goal that made it 2-1. It wasnt the goal to win it, it was still 3-3 in overtime, but you think the refs GAVE us this game, and did this so we make the playoffs? What a joke.
The call on the ice was a goal, and there was not one replay that showed conclusivly that the puck didnt go in the net, so they couldnt overturn it. I did think they were going to disallow it because of the kicking motion, but maybe they seen somthing I didnt IE someone else hitting it, it was hard to tell.
- crotty99 likes this
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pinned Round 2 Photoshop War: Chicago Blackhawks
|
General Discussion | Matt |
|
|
|
Viewing party in Chicago? |
General Discussion | dcd |
|
|
|
WCSF - (1) Chicago Blackhawks vs. (7) Detroit Red Wings |
General Discussion | drumnj |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














