Edited by cupforwings, 16 April 2011 - 06:43 PM.
Posted 16 April 2011 - 06:39 PM
Edited by cupforwings, 16 April 2011 - 06:43 PM.
Posted 16 April 2011 - 06:46 PM
Posted 16 April 2011 - 06:51 PM
Edited by Z and D for the C, 16 April 2011 - 06:52 PM.
Just cause you look like the gimp don't mean you play like the gimp!
Posted 16 April 2011 - 07:01 PM
Figures don't lie, but liars sure figure. - Mark Twain
Posted 16 April 2011 - 07:11 PM

Posted 16 April 2011 - 08:02 PM
Posted 16 April 2011 - 08:07 PM
Two NHL teams, one NBA team.why is Pennsylvania gray?
Edited by thedisappearer, 16 April 2011 - 08:08 PM.
Posted 16 April 2011 - 08:17 PM
Posted 16 April 2011 - 09:19 PM
Posted 16 April 2011 - 09:56 PM
Posted 16 April 2011 - 10:59 PM
Posted 16 April 2011 - 11:22 PM
Actually it's about right. TV ratings for the Stanley Cup Finals aren't even half of what they are for the NBA.thats not a representation of the hockey fans watching the playoffs at all. Come on, thats an ESPN poll. Most people who still pay attention to their polls and stats are mostly football and basketball fans. Real hockey fans know ESPN are hockey haters so they don't even bother. Look how dark blue the states are in the south east though....

Posted 16 April 2011 - 11:22 PM
That and the Pistons suck. Awesome picture either way.
Posted 17 April 2011 - 05:17 AM
Wild aren't in the playoffs, and it's more of a college hockey state anyway.Those polls are worth watching. Whenever the question pits something Detroit-related against other cities, Michigan always supports its own better than the other states do.
P.S. Minnesota = State of Hockey.....my ass
Posted 17 April 2011 - 11:18 AM
Posted 17 April 2011 - 02:10 PM
Neither are the Timberwolves, which are the most miserable team in basketball.Wild aren't in the playoffs, and it's more of a college hockey state anyway.

Posted 17 April 2011 - 04:25 PM
Actually it's about right. TV ratings for the Stanley Cup Finals aren't even half of what they are for the NBA.

Posted 17 April 2011 - 04:37 PM
Posted 17 April 2011 - 05:26 PM
Posted 17 April 2011 - 06:53 PM
It doesn't matter the exposure that hockey gets; basketball survives because of star players and the rate of play/scoring.If the NHL was actually on a respectable TV station aside from one or two games a week on NBC, we might have some more viewership support in other states. The NBA playoffs are on TNT (which could be sort of considered our VS.), but they also have ABC (our NBC) and games on ESPN. Along with the fact that they have way more NBA analysts willing to talk about how Shaq won't be able to play because he's af****** dinosaur or what LeBron's pregame meal was, we're not going to see any more support for our sport until ESPN hires some people who give a s***.
To be honest though, they had a respectable amount of hockey analysis on yesterday during an evening edition of SportsCenter, IMO, the perfect amount of coverage. If they actually did this with every other sport instead of looking at every block, every other shot, every play in baseball, etc. they might have some time to cover other sports that exist too. But as I said, hockey gets a bum rap because they have people willing to talk about the s*** in regards to basketball, and worse, people actually watch and are genuinely interested in that kind of crap, and the cycle never ends.
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Detroit: Circa June 2018... |
General Discussion | Richdg |
|
|
|
2013 Detroit Red Wings Eulogy |
General Discussion | Echolalia |
|
|
|
2013 Thank You Hockeytown - Player Message
|
General Discussion | Hockeymom1960 |
|
|
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users