Sharks or Preds?
#21
Posted 26 April 2011 - 02:12 PM
They suck. They barely got by Kopitar-less LA.
Predators are far tougher team, and they own the Wings this year. Also, Rinne >>> Niemi.
#22
Posted 26 April 2011 - 03:29 PM
I think they're ripe for the plucking (note that I didn't say "easy"), and the time zone.
#23
Posted 26 April 2011 - 04:31 PM
Edit: I have this feeling, if Chicago wins tonight, we'll be Western Conference Champions again without much effort. If Vancouver wins, we can still win the West, but it'll be a lot tougher to do so.
Edited by Barrie, 26 April 2011 - 04:32 PM.
Red Wings
Tigers
Roughriders
Lions
Spartans
Pistons
#24
Posted 26 April 2011 - 04:45 PM

#25
Posted 26 April 2011 - 04:59 PM
#26
Posted 26 April 2011 - 05:04 PM
I'm more scared of sharks than Preds! I want revenge but those f***s are tough to beat.
Their series with the Kings makes me think otherwise.
Edited by dropkickshanahans, 26 April 2011 - 05:05 PM.
#27
Posted 26 April 2011 - 05:08 PM
They've got a lot of talent, but their goaltending and defensive play in general is suspect.I'm more scared of sharks than Preds! I want revenge but those f***s are tough to beat.
#28
Posted 26 April 2011 - 05:14 PM
I agree with your final statement, but especially like reasons 4 and 6!Well I have a few reason to want the shats.
1.They took us out last season(granted we were hurt)
2.The shats fans think that thorton is some wing killer
3.I hate hate nashville.(even though i lived there for 20 + years)
4.I hate tootoo's stupid face.
5.nahsville has always been tough on us
6 did i mention i hate tootoos stupid face?
But really we could play either and i would be fine. I think if we play like we did first round we could take out both teams.
#29
Posted 26 April 2011 - 05:16 PM
#30
Posted 26 April 2011 - 05:19 PM
Brian McGrattan 2013. Get it done Kenny.
#31
Posted 26 April 2011 - 06:10 PM
Their series with the Kings makes me think otherwise.
They are ripe for the plucking - against any defense and netminder that can stop 54 out of 55 shots on net, with many quality, and some even brilliant, attempts! I think that may be one thing the Sharks have going for them going into the next round, should their next opponent discount the role that the Kings' defense played in that series, especially in Game 5, and takes it for granted that their own team's defense is essentially the same, if not better in some regard. If any team saw the Kings as truly inferior in all respects, and a well deserved pushover that should have been easily swept, it will bode well for the Sharks offense.
#32
Posted 26 April 2011 - 06:20 PM
#33
Posted 26 April 2011 - 06:35 PM
#34
Posted 26 April 2011 - 06:43 PM
Vancouver would be tough to face in the 3rd round and if Chicago can get them out of the way then hey, all the better for us.
Plus, Chicago and San Jose will kick the crap out of each other and it would just be fun to watch, haha. I think we'd have a better chance at taking out the Sharks in the 3rd round, should it come to that. Chicago we could take out pretty easily as well (I'd say 5 games, but now I'm getting ahead of myself).

Thanks for the memories
#35
Posted 26 April 2011 - 06:51 PM
Besides that, it doesn't matter to me. Both teams have had dominating and absolutely ugly performances in the first round, wildly inconsistent. The Wings are beatable obviously but I'm not scared of either team, if the Wings are on their game and can stay healthy, I like their chances regardless of the opponent.
Edited by SouthernWingsFan, 26 April 2011 - 06:53 PM.
#36
Posted 26 April 2011 - 07:27 PM
That is unless the NHL imposes a ban on train whistles in Nashville. Then I'd go for the Preds for the better game times.
#37
Posted 26 April 2011 - 07:39 PM
The Sharks and Predators are the two teams I wanted to avoid more than any others in the postseason, but I think Sharks/Blackhawks will be a grueling series with the winner limping to the CF wounded more-so than a Canucks/Preds matchup. I also like our odds better against Nashville than the Sharks, although not by much.
Having said that, go Chicago!
#38
Posted 26 April 2011 - 07:41 PM
#39
Posted 26 April 2011 - 08:33 PM
They still wouldn't.Sharks because it would mean the bandwagon-jumping Hawks fans would finally have to STFU.

#40
Posted 26 April 2011 - 08:50 PM
Revenge is less important than the Cup.doesn't anyone else want revenge?
- wingsgirl001 likes this
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WCSF - (6) San Jose Sharks vs. (5) Los Angeles Kings |
General Discussion | Hockeytown0001 |
|
|
|
Babcock once asked Holland if he could be Scotty Bowman’s successor |
General Discussion | MidMichSteve |
|
|
|
Barry Sanders Detroit Lions Games |
Tradin' Post | sonof3m |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













