http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/09/patrick-kane-arrested-bla_n_255122.htmlwas that an attmept at humor? it doesn't even make sense.
(2) San Jose Sharks vs. (3) Detroit Red Wings
#101
Posted 27 April 2011 - 12:24 PM
#102
Posted 27 April 2011 - 12:30 PM
HankthaTank - Squirrels, they hate to be thrown. / Why is the magical unicorn named Brian... Jedi - I just downloaded the "kids" book, "Go the F--k to Sleep" as narrated by Samuel L. Jackson on my kindle. I am now ready to be a daddy. / *Checks Router* No, I'm positive I didn't hit the "Wings Defense Sucks" button. Electrophile - I'm just glad the Wings were able to win despite the Curse of Brian. ACallToArms - I think Trey needs to put something about payroll tax and deferred income in his sig... Edicius - I'd rather [have] a soundbite of me saying "I like (man sausage)" rather than "I like Crosby".
#103
Posted 27 April 2011 - 12:32 PM
"You eat pieces of SH-- for breakfast?!?"
#104
Posted 27 April 2011 - 12:56 PM
Thanks. Jokes aren't funny if you have to explain them though. Can't win em all I guess.
#105
Posted 27 April 2011 - 12:59 PM
i'm well aware of that incident...the horribly forced reference still didn't make sense. in his defense, maybe english is not his first language.
LOLHelm is a perennial Selke candidate
#106
Posted 27 April 2011 - 01:12 PM
The travel our team is forced to go through is a complete joke. Great!! We get to travel all the way to California, and if we move on, we are propbaly looking at travel to the other side of Canada vs. Vancouver!! SMMFH. I really hope Nashville pummels those clowns out in BC.
The Wings are close to full health and very well rested so the only issue really is our special teams - especially the damn PK. If Babs hasn't straightened this out and if the Sharks continue their penchant for flopping and complaining, mixed with the usual NHL Joe Thorton-love fest and this series could get ugly.
I guess it is positive that we play the Sharks and not the Canucks, because they are the 2009 Pens of this year - the NHL annointed favorite going into the playoffs. A Canadian team in the Final, and even better if they can win their first Cup. The Canucks won't go far without the usual NHL assistance, but that's for round 3.
This series is either Detroit in a quick 5 or a long 7 gamer [with the refs help]. Over to you Babcock ...
GO WINGS!!!
One reason why I hate the East. The NHL needs to change up the conferences..s***s ridiculous.

#107
Posted 27 April 2011 - 01:12 PM
i'm well aware of that incident...the horribly forced reference still didn't make sense. in his defense, maybe english is not his first language.
in your defense, nobody likes you. go away.
- Doggy, OakWing and HankthaTank like this
#108
Posted 27 April 2011 - 01:19 PM

I LIVE IN TEXAS SO I DON'T DESERVE HOCKEY
#109
Posted 27 April 2011 - 01:20 PM
stinky wins another derailing attempt....
If SJ had that much trouble with LAK's offense, they are going to be hurting against ours... likewise, we struggled against a s***ty PHX PP, the SJ PP is going to murder us.
So this means every game is going be 10+ goals total between each team. I like our chances in those types of games
#110
Posted 27 April 2011 - 01:23 PM

I LIVE IN TEXAS SO I DON'T DESERVE HOCKEY
#111
Posted 27 April 2011 - 01:27 PM
Soooo, hockey and stuff?
![]()
stinky wins another derailing attempt....
Sorry. I'm done.
Is it just me reading stats wrong or did the shats go 2-23 on the PP? I'm hillbirry. me can't weed sometimes.
At 8.7% for the PP, that appears correct.
#112
Posted 27 April 2011 - 01:33 PM
#113
Posted 27 April 2011 - 01:36 PM
I'm going to be honest -- I was rooting for the Hawks to win last night because as a Sharks' fan I would have preferred to play a tired Chicago to a rested Detroit. But maybe that rest will actually be more like rust, although I wouldn't count on it, as Detroit is a team that's been around the block a few tiimes and knows what it takes, as a total organization, to win the big shiny thing. Sharks still haven't gotten the memo, but I'm keeping the faith (going on 20 years now) that maybe, just maybe, this is they year they finally get it.
Ideally, it would have been nice to get a little retribution for last year's WCF sweep at the hands of the Hawks and then go on to face Detroit in the third round this year, but alas, it wasn't to be.
Looking for a great, competive, exciting series in which no one gets hurt. Bring on the Wings!
- Vladifan likes this
#114
Posted 27 April 2011 - 01:47 PM
I'm hillbirry. me can't weed sometimes.
esteef
- Chris Avram likes this
#115
Posted 27 April 2011 - 01:49 PM
I have ranked PIM per Game for regular season and playoff:
In regular season, DET is 8.4 PIM/G and ranked 3rd less penalized team (of playoff teams).
In playoff so far, DET is 11.8 PIM/G and ranked 14th...
The change in ranking (-11) is biggest of all playoff teams.
In regular season, SJS is 9.3 PIM/G and ranked 8th,
while in playoff, they are 11.4 PIM/G, ranked 8th.
Last year, there were little change for DET in PIM/G in regular season and playoff, but SJS 'improved' from ~14.8 (regular) to ~8.9 (playoff).
No conspiracy, just a little gary's tweaking...
#116
Posted 27 April 2011 - 02:18 PM
i'm well aware of that incident...the horribly forced reference still didn't make sense. in his defense, maybe english is not his first language.
Given your inability to capitalize letters, perhaps it's not yours either.
http://www.hiyoooo.com/
Edited by _Kabrok_, 27 April 2011 - 02:18 PM.
#117
Posted 27 April 2011 - 02:29 PM
Should be a good series.
Sharks in 2010?!
#118
Posted 27 April 2011 - 02:43 PM
Let's beat 'em this year.
- Vladifan and HankthaTank like this
No, you know what we are, we're good. You can't do what we do every single day and not be good." - Mike Babcock
#119
Posted 27 April 2011 - 02:49 PM
If SJ had that much trouble with LAK's offense, they are going to be hurting against ours... likewise, we struggled against a s***ty PHX PP, the SJ PP is going to murder us.
Didn't Sharks only score 2 PP goals on 25 chances or something like that? Sharks PP hasn't been good in this post-season.
#120
Posted 27 April 2011 - 02:50 PM
neither has the wings PK. one of those will change, it's just a matter of which one.Sharks PP hasn't been good in this post-season.
LOLHelm is a perennial Selke candidate
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Red Wings don't belong in the same rink as the Hawks? |
General Discussion | MidMichSteve |
|
|
|
WCSF - (6) San Jose Sharks vs. (5) Los Angeles Kings |
General Discussion | Hockeytown0001 |
|
|
|
Pinned WCSF Game 2 GDT : Red Wings 4 at Blackhawks 1 - (Series Tied at 1)
|
General Discussion | Hockeytown0001 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



This topic is locked










