oh geez. you had to go and say the C word.=)Yep, the whistle comes right after Franzen goes down (and pushes Niemi in the net) which means the ref probably wanted to blow it before that (see intent to blow rule). Could also explain why they didn't even look at it. Either that or there's a conspiracy and the refs are in on it!
![]()
esteef
Was there a goal missed yesterday? (game 2)
#21
Posted 02 May 2011 - 01:40 PM

I LIVE IN TEXAS SO I DON'T DESERVE HOCKEY
#22
Posted 02 May 2011 - 01:42 PM
Yep, the whistle comes right after Franzen goes down (and pushes Niemi in the net) which means the ref probably wanted to blow it before that (see intent to blow rule). Could also explain why they didn't even look at it. Either that or there's a conspiracy and the refs are in on it!
![]()
esteef
Niemi went in under his own steam. He was playing deep in the net.
If there was intent to blow the whistle there shouldnt have been because the puck was WAY loose. Either way id expect to at least here something about it from the wings so they could sway some calls on wednesday.
#23
Posted 02 May 2011 - 01:48 PM
Highlights
Watch from 1:45/1:50 area. Clearly doesn't go in

Check out my blog -The Heid-Out- a cynical mans take on everyday life
#24
Posted 02 May 2011 - 01:56 PM
wft!?!?! thats not even the whole reply. you can;t go by that. it was after frans fell is where it was in.Have to admit, watched the game on TSN last night, showed extensive replays including the overhead. Puck never went in. Never even went near the post so that isn't a puck at 9:40. What happened was he tried wrapping it around too soon, and instead of getting it into the post, Franzen threw it into the middle of the blue paint, where it then got lost in the scrum.
Highlights
Watch from 1:45/1:50 area. Clearly doesn't go in
you donb't even see the push on that reply.
and what is the rule on being pushed into the goalie? is there one stating that the player can be pushed by the other team and still count as a goal?
Edited by hillbillywingsfan, 02 May 2011 - 01:59 PM.

I LIVE IN TEXAS SO I DON'T DESERVE HOCKEY
#25
Posted 02 May 2011 - 02:13 PM
#26
Posted 02 May 2011 - 02:22 PM
#27
Posted 02 May 2011 - 02:22 PM
Unfortunately none of this matters. Games over, they didn't review. Hopefully they are better Wednesday night.
#28
Posted 02 May 2011 - 02:30 PM
Why am I a fan of the Detroit Red Wings?
The NHL tweeted my son and I at the 2012 NHL Draft!
#29
Posted 02 May 2011 - 02:30 PM
#30
Posted 02 May 2011 - 02:34 PM
Hmmmm you Sir, are right I believe... they did show an overhead last night and from what I remember there was nothing conclusive. Basically commentators said Franzen messed up by trying to shoot too early and not taking another half step toward the goal. Guess we'll now never know!The TSN replay ends too early, but you can see (just before that clip ends) the puck start to come back across the crease towards where it came from. That is where I think it gets knocked into the back of the net with Niemi. Niemi's stick is what actually knocks the puck in after it gets pushed by Demers who's on all fours because he got cross checked by Bertuzzi.
Unfortunately none of this matters. Games over, they didn't review. Hopefully they are better Wednesday night.

Check out my blog -The Heid-Out- a cynical mans take on everyday life
#31
Posted 02 May 2011 - 02:52 PM
freep article
That's why, at the very least, it would have been nice if the play had been reviewed. Tough to definitively say that the Wings got jobbed, though.
Would have certainly changed the game immensely.
#32
Posted 02 May 2011 - 02:55 PM
The freep has now picked up on it with this article...
freep article
Would have certainly changed the game immensely.
well its officialy not just a crazy fan conspiracy anymore
#33
Posted 02 May 2011 - 02:56 PM
There ya go. I was thinking to myself, "Does this guy work for the freep, too?"well its officialy not just a crazy fan conspiracy anymore
#34
Posted 02 May 2011 - 02:57 PM
#35
Posted 02 May 2011 - 02:59 PM
i dont have TSN. im basing this off my only source which is NBC.anyone who watched the game on TSN knows the puck never went in. TSN showed many replays of the play during the game, none of which showed the puck going in the net.
#36
Posted 02 May 2011 - 03:00 PM
Regardless, it's ludicrous to not even give it a look. Plays like that one should be reviewed, not tossed to the side.anyone who watched the game on TSN knows the puck never went in. TSN showed many replays of the play during the game, none of which showed the puck going in the net.
Edited by HankthaTank, 02 May 2011 - 03:01 PM.
#37
Posted 02 May 2011 - 03:03 PM
i dont have TSN. im basing this off my only source which is NBC.
Regardless, it's ludicrous to not even give it a look. Plays like that one should be reviewed, not tossed to the side.
i understand what you guys are saying. i would've wondered myself if i had watched it on NBC.
edit: i just watched the nbc replay. i see what you guys are saying. it definitely looked sketchy.
Edited by atodaso, 02 May 2011 - 03:18 PM.
#40
Posted 02 May 2011 - 03:25 PM
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Calder Cup Finals Game 6 GDT - Grand Rapids Griffins @ Syracuse Crunch
|
General Discussion | FlashyG |
|
|
|
song title game
silliness |
Water Cooler | n y f d 48 |
|
|
|
This or That
A game |
Water Cooler | SouthernWingsFan |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users















