79 replies to this topic

[saven]

I was screaming about no review when this happened yesterday but then I just remembered the NHL's " intent to blow"

[Wing Across The Pond]

Hmmmmm getting very fishy... Then again I think it just serves Franzen right for deciding to only shoot the puck in the last 5-10 minutes

[HankthaTank]

A job for:

[Rick Zombos Ghost]

i cant even imagine Mickey's reaction to this if they were broadcasting...

[Donaldjr2448]

And the Plot thickens!! Sweet Jesus this league is soooooo Bush League its pathetic! NWL, National Wateredown League!! Hell the NBA has more creditablity than the NWL!! JOKE!!!

[wingnut40]

I say because of this Wings start Game 3 with a 1-0 lead.

[Crymson]

It's possible, but it's not really worth arguing it. The game is over.

[Lonewuhf]

I say because of this Wings start Game 3 with a 1-0 lead.

Yeah but then there'd be a penalty against Detroit in the first 15 seconds which the Sharks would score on.

Edited by Lonewuhf, 02 May 2011 - 05:04 PM.

[joesuffpaulson]

You know your team is in trouble when threads like this pop up. I believe the intent to blow whistle rule pretty much guarantee they would have waived off the goal even if it did cross the line. What kind of pissed me off about game 2 was when Eager i think it was got a 10 minute misconduct yet the wings never got a powerplay out of it.

[VM1138]

It was pretty clear when watching it, but I just assumed Niemi was shoved in and therefore wouldn't have counted, or something.

[Crashnburnluder]

The real question was where was the puck on the initial wrap around... Niemi was very deep in his net and there is a good chance that the original wrap around that the puck was in but underneath Niemi... But like everyone said.. for some reason that was never another replay shown...

[Grypho]

Have to admit, watched the game on TSN last night, showed extensive replays including the overhead. Puck never went in

WRONG. I took the video into Adobe Premiere, and could see clearly that the puck was absolutely in the net. Before the whistle.




The only thing that can be argued is whether or not the ref intended to blow the whistle, but it all happened so fast, I think it can be argued that there was no way he had that intent until the puck was already in goal.

[sandyeggo wingnut]

WRONG. I took the video into Adobe Premiere, and could see clearly that the puck was absolutely in the net. Before the whistle.




The only thing that can be argued is whether or not the ref intended to blow the whistle, but it all happened so fast, I think it can be argued that there was no way he had that intent until the puck was already in goal.

Looking carefully at the refs arms you can see he's waving off. Problem is he doesn't have three arms...two for the wave off and one for the whistle.

Like others have said, it's moot. While it woulda been nice to at least have a review, it's pointless the games over

[Yzermania]

I think it's fairly obvious that it went in when franzen rammed him into the net, therefore making it a disallowed goal.

[hooon]

Me and my friend were watching this and both thought we saw Niemi kick it out, but apparently no one on the ice saw it. Even Niemi had that "aw shucks" expression on this face like he knew it was in.

Even if it was reviewed though, not a doubt in my mind that it wouldn't have counted, no matter what.

[Grypho]

Looking carefully at the refs arms you can see he's waving off. Problem is he doesn't have three arms...two for the wave off and one for the whistle.

A clever argument...if there was only one ref. I was going to make this a video, and not a .gif, since the audio clearly tells what I described, but I didn't, because I figured anyone could review that part in real time, from the original video, and see and hear the obvious for themselves.

[sandyeggo wingnut]

A clever argument...if there was only one ref. I was going to make this a video, and not a .gif, since the audio clearly tells what I described, but I didn't, because I figured anyone could review that part in real time, from the original video, and see and hear the obvious for themselves.

The argument actually goes to the "intent to blow [Crosby]" rule more than anything lol. I was just pointing out that the waveoff--regardless of the point of whistle sound--would be the tool used during review to disallow the goal is all

(and like i said,moot point. Games over I'm looking forward to wednesday when I'll be at the game )

[Grypho]

I'm looking forward to wednesday when I'll be at the game )

I hate you for that.

You can redeem yourself by sharing an extra ticket with me. I will even build you a cake to sweeten the pot.

[nosyt612]

I watched the game on tsn, they went in depth. It never went it. I think it ends up in his glove, and thats him dropping it there.

Edit, now not so sure after looking at all the posts in this thread.

Edited by nosyt612, 02 May 2011 - 06:50 PM.

[sandyeggo wingnut]

I hate you for that.

You can redeem yourself by sharing an extra ticket with me. I will even build you a cake to sweeten the pot.

<thread_hijack>
sorry only extra ticket I got is goin to a hot girl. But I promise to post pics if you build me that cake
</thread_hijack>