Edited by Shoreline, 16 May 2011 - 05:32 PM.
(1) Vancouver Canucks vs. (2) San Jose Sharks
#101
Posted 16 May 2011 - 05:31 PM
#102
Posted 16 May 2011 - 05:33 PM
scroll back and read the thread if you like. I'm not going to drag this further off actual talk about hockey.So this has what to do with his position on the game, again?
#104
Posted 16 May 2011 - 06:15 PM
The Sharks saying that the Canucks are embellishing? f*** do I hate hypocrites. Shut up and play suckers.
I just saw this on TSN....f****** hilarious.
Figures don't lie, but liars sure figure. - Mark Twain
#105
Posted 16 May 2011 - 06:35 PM
That's hilarious. Not so fun being on the other side of it.The Sharks saying that the Canucks are embellishing? f*** do I hate hypocrites. Shut up and play suckers.
Also funny that they can be both hypocrites and right at the same time. It can be a dive off between Setoguchi, Thornton, Kesler, H. Sedin, and Torres.
Edited by haroldsnepsts, 16 May 2011 - 06:36 PM.
#106
Posted 16 May 2011 - 06:38 PM
Red Wings
Tigers
Roughriders
Lions
Spartans
Pistons
#107
Posted 16 May 2011 - 07:51 PM
I just saw this on TSN....f****** hilarious.
- Detroit # 1 Fan and HankthaTank like this
#108
Posted 16 May 2011 - 08:13 PM
Edited by Broken 16, 16 May 2011 - 08:13 PM.
#109
Posted 16 May 2011 - 08:36 PM
http://sports.yahoo....layoffs-6868803
As an example, last night the Canucks were called for icing late in the game and their centre got tossed (can't remember who it was). It was a critical point in the game. Danny Sedin had to take the draw and he never takes draws. He sucks at them. At the same time they showed a shot of the bench with Henrik tugging on the shoulder of his own sweater and saying something to Coach Vig -- then Vig cracks up laughing. Today in a media conference Coach Vig was asked about it and he said that Henrik said it was "too bad they'd already used their time-out because him and Danny chould change sweaters for the draw." Then, Danny goes on to win the draw. That's hanging pretty loose at a critical point in the game.
Edited by Chairman Maouth, 16 May 2011 - 10:06 PM.
- Detroit # 1 Fan and HankthaTank like this
#110
Posted 16 May 2011 - 08:55 PM
I don't mean for this to sound like some elitest comment but when the wings are favored to win the cup 17 of the past 20 years, I would think it's a special thing to knock them out of the playoffs.I watched Game 1. I know it's only 1 game and Vancouver should win at home, but I was expecting a lot more from San Jose. Hearing the fans in San Jose chant, "Beat Detroit" I'm wondering if beating the Wings is their Stanley Cup?
Hopefully the wings continue to be a dominant team in the league. I don't want it to end.
San Jose really pisses me off. I think they're going to lose in 5 games to Vancouver and I really think the wings would give a much better showing to Vancouver. ARGHHH
This was so funny I had to set it as my sig.
#111
Posted 16 May 2011 - 09:59 PM
Yea, but I see this as a problem for them. I remember before we finally won in 1997 we were saying, "We want Stanley". San Jose fans are saying, "Beat Detroit", they even put it on their rally towels.I don't mean for this to sound like some elitest comment but when the wings are favored to win the cup 17 of the past 20 years, I would think it's a special thing to knock them out of the playoffs.
Add to that, they already beat us last year.
Red Wings
Tigers
Roughriders
Lions
Spartans
Pistons
#112
Posted 17 May 2011 - 03:46 AM
#113
Posted 17 May 2011 - 04:02 PM
I don't mean for this to sound like some elitest comment but when the wings are favored to win the cup 17 of the past 20 years, I would think it's a special thing to knock them out of the playoffs.
So being favored to win the cup 17 of the last 20 years and failing to win them all huh? So who are the real chokers??
It's one game and based on that, you're writing them off in five? Wow.
#114
Posted 17 May 2011 - 04:17 PM
I think 17 is an exaggeration, especially when one takes the early 90s into account.So being favored to win the cup 17 of the last 20 years and failing to win them all huh? So who are the real chokers??
It's one game and based on that, you're writing them off in five? Wow.
However, obviously some bitter Wings fans are going to write the Sharks off. That's what happens when you're at an opponent's forums.
As for choking, well, given the Wings have won 4 cups in the last 20 years (more specifically, in a span of 11 years), the Sharks have none, it looks like the Sharks take a bite out of the Wings in the choker category.
Anyhow, I'm kinda irritated about the extra day off. I kinda skipped yesterday thinking the Bolts/Bruins were playing, only to see they play tonight and the Canucks/Sharks tomorrow night. I r disappoint.
Edited by Shoreline, 17 May 2011 - 04:17 PM.
#115
Posted 17 May 2011 - 04:44 PM
Same here Shoreline. Apparently the reason the Canucks/Sharks have two days off between games is that Kid Rock is in Rogers Arena tonight and has been booked for a long time. I know he's a Michigan native and sorry, but screw Kid Rock.Anyhow, I'm kinda irritated about the extra day off. I kinda skipped yesterday thinking the Bolts/Bruins were playing, only to see they play tonight and the Canucks/Sharks tomorrow night. I r disappoint.
#116
Posted 17 May 2011 - 05:40 PM
The team that has never won it, of course.So being favored to win the cup 17 of the last 20 years and failing to win them all huh? So who are the real chokers??
Same here Shoreline. Apparently the reason the Canucks/Sharks have two days off between games is that Kid Rock is in Rogers Arena tonight and has been booked for a long time. I know he's a Michigan native and sorry, but screw Kid Rock.
The guy is a bandwagon cock face.
Give him as much hell as you would like.
Edited by Doc Holliday, 17 May 2011 - 05:43 PM.

#117
Posted 17 May 2011 - 05:45 PM
You guys will probably think this is a Homerish article but I've noticed the same things as the writer has all year long.
http://sports.yahoo.com/nhl/news?slug=capress-hkn_canucks_playoffs-6868803
As an example, last night the Canucks were called for icing late in the game and their centre got tossed (can't remember who it was). It was a critical point in the game. Danny Sedin had to take the draw and he never takes draws. He sucks at them. At the same time they showed a shot of the bench with Henrik tugging on the shoulder of his own sweater and saying something to Coach Vig -- then Vig cracks up laughing. Today in a media conference Coach Vig was asked about it and he said that Henrik said it was "too bad they'd already used their time-out because him and Danny chould change sweaters for the draw." Then, Danny goes on to win the draw. That's hanging pretty loose at a critical point in the game.
Which team is more mentally fragile? The one that blew a 3 games to nothing lead in the first round or the one that blew it in the 2nd round? Neither team knows what it takes to win. To bad they both can't lose. I'm thinking that Tampa wins the Cup.
#118
Posted 17 May 2011 - 06:27 PM
It's possible that the teams that gave up 3-0 leads and have already been eliminated were the most fragile.Which team is more mentally fragile? The one that blew a 3 games to nothing lead in the first round or the one that blew it in the 2nd round? Neither team knows what it takes to win. To bad they both can't lose. I'm thinking that Tampa wins the Cup.
#119
Posted 18 May 2011 - 07:43 PM
#120
Posted 18 May 2011 - 08:05 PM
I'm more or less watching what the Canucks are doing to see what they might be doing right against the Sharks that the Wings weren't accomplishing. For Game 1 special teams were effective for the Canucks.
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WCSF - (6) San Jose Sharks vs. (5) Los Angeles Kings |
General Discussion | Hockeytown0001 |
|
|
|
Any pickins from the Canucks carcass? |
General Discussion | RedWingsRox |
|
|
|
WCQF - (6) Sharks vs. (3) Canucks |
General Discussion | Hockeytown0001 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












