Red Wings Addict 787 Report post Posted May 19, 2011 I think it would be great if the Wings found a coach that already has good familiarity and history of a good working relationship with Babs and MacLean. I'm not sure if such a candidate exists but that way everybody can be on the same page faster. Therefore, I hope Babs and MacLean have a loooot of input on the replacement. 1 HankthaTank reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stevkrause 1,247 Report post Posted May 19, 2011 What are the chances we could scoop up Smith again do you think? I'm pretty sure he's under contract with the KHL and I don't think he wants to leave a head gig to be an asst anymore... who knows though, stranger things have happened, I'd welcome him back with open arms! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Crymson Report post Posted May 19, 2011 I hear Ken Hitchcock is on the market for a job... Could he fit in nicely with Babcock as our Defensive Coach? Didn't they work together at some point (Olympics)? Dallas. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
evilmrt 636 Report post Posted May 19, 2011 HAHAHAHA YES!!!!!! This wouldn't have happened if we won the Cup! lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Crymson Report post Posted May 19, 2011 Agreed - however someone has gotta take the fall, and it was McCrimmon. Hopefully his replacement will dog our Dmen, and get them back near the top of the standings. According to the team, it was his decision to leave. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HankthaTank 1,100 Report post Posted May 19, 2011 Every team needs a scapegoat. We could definitely use a guy with better defensive schemes, but he isn't the reason our guys sucked. Maybe so but this was the obvious move. A new scheme and fresh face in that position will be a welcomed thing. Next up is that defenseman we have needed. Whether it happens or not is to be seen but as another poster had put it, the changes start right here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
P. Marlowe 748 Report post Posted May 19, 2011 Just out of curiosity because I really have no idea about these things, why does everyone think that Chelios would be a great replacement? He doesn't have any coaching experience, does he? Is there a reason I'm missing as to why he would automatically be an upgrade from McCrimmon? Coaching just seems like one of those things that requires a lot of experience, and I don't mean playing experience, I mean actual coaching experience. Great players don't always make great coaches, right out of the gate. Anyway, just wondering if there's something to it. I agree. We have to look no further than Wayne Gretzky to see that a great player isn't automatically a great coach. I can't see Holland hiring a coach with no previous experience. Is it a coincidence that so few successful NHL head coaches were successful players? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
evilmrt 636 Report post Posted May 19, 2011 According to the team, it was his decision to leave. TSN sez: "Sources say McCrimmon and head coach Mike Babcock mutually agreed it was the right time to make the change." a.k.a. "you're fired". I don't think its the Wings style to embarrass anyone and say it publicly. 1 F2B&G reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SouthernWingsFan 854 Report post Posted May 19, 2011 Every team needs a scapegoat. We could definitely use a guy with better defensive schemes, but he isn't the reason our guys sucked. I'd be one of the last people on here to play the "Let's blame somebody" game when it isn't dead obvious when one person is pretty much at 100% fault. That's why I rarely get into bagging on typical whipping boys like Ericsson and Hudler because while they didn't have the best seasons obviously, they had their good moments and I think they can be beneficial players at times (conversely, it aggravates me to all ends when people on here overvalue players as well). But, Ericsson and Hudler specifcially isn't the point of my response, point is also they didn't fully help either, the same with McCrimmon here, and while he may not be 100% at fault, some things have to change and unforuantely (or fortunately depending on how you look at it and how the consensus here are looking at it) he's the one getting the ax. Is everything 100% rays and sunshine now that he is eliminated? No. Will it completely be that way eventually? Probably not. Does his exit help things? In all likelihood, yes. 1 ChelisChick reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Red Wings Addict 787 Report post Posted May 19, 2011 I agree. We have to look no further than Wayne Gretzky to see that a great player isn't automatically a great coach. I can't see Holland hiring a coach with no previous experience. Is it a coincidence that so few successful NHL head coaches were successful players? "Those can't do, teach." I remember Kronwall once mentioned how hard it can be for Nick Lidstrom to explain in words to other dmen teammates how he reads the play on the ice. 1 wingsownnhl43 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
haroldsnepsts 4,826 Report post Posted May 19, 2011 "Those can't do, teach." I remember Kronwall once mentioned how hard it can be for Nick Lidstrom to explain in words to other dmen teammates how he reads the play on the ice. It makes sense. Because for a lot of these star players, especially someone with the hockey IQ of Nick, it probably just seems intuitive. So how do you teach guys things that happen to you in a way you don't even think about? Honestly with Chelios, it could go either way. He could be great, but he'd certainly be a gamble due to his lack of real coaching experience. Agreed - however someone has gotta take the fall, and it was McCrimmon. Hopefully his replacement will dog our Dmen, and get them back near the top of the standings. Yup. Like I said in another thread. When you have Lidstrom, Kronwall, Stuart and Rafalski as your top 4. And forwards like Datsyuk, Zetterberg, Flip and a lot of generally responsible players, plus generally solid goaltending from Jimmy, the team should be doing a hell of a lot better than 23rd in GAA. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HankthaTank 1,100 Report post Posted May 19, 2011 "Those can't do, teach." And those who can't teach, teach gym. 5 edicius, wingnut40, Echolalia and 2 others reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WizardOfOz30 1,886 Report post Posted May 19, 2011 Honestly with Chelios, it could go either way. He could be great, but he'd certainly be a gamble due to his lack of real coaching experience. You have to start somewhere. Didn't someone say he was working with the prospects in GR? Sometimes you need to take a chance on someone, they might be just what you need. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Red Wings Addict 787 Report post Posted May 19, 2011 And those who can't teach, teach gym. I've never heard that one before but now that I think back to my gym teachers it actually makes sense, haha. 1 HankthaTank reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LeftWinger 4,958 Report post Posted May 19, 2011 I predict, Holland is not done with his surprises yet! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jusek 437 Report post Posted May 19, 2011 Bob Boughner anyone? Former NHL defenceman, Detroit's 2nd round draft pick of the 1989 draft. Current assistant coach of Columbus and president and C.E.O of the Windsor Spitfires. His hometown is Windsor, by the way. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hockeytown0001 7,652 Report post Posted May 19, 2011 Good news, IMO. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Red Wings Addict 787 Report post Posted May 19, 2011 I predict, Holland is not done with his surprises yet! Next on Kenny's list? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HankthaTank 1,100 Report post Posted May 19, 2011 I think Bieksa is being way overrated on these boards. Like others have said, he makes tons of mistakes and would get crucified here worse than Rafalski or Stuart. Better for the Wings to go a more reliable option. Pitkanen and Ehrhoff get way more pub for whatever reason on here. Bieksa actually fills a need for the Wings. 2 GoWings1905 and wingsownnhl43 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kook_10 1,705 Report post Posted May 19, 2011 No way Bieksa comes to Detroit. He is getting way too much attention to not be overpriced. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
St. Michael (the Red Wing) 422 Report post Posted May 19, 2011 Keep the changes coming. I like this, time to see McCrimmon go.... Dallas. Ken is not returning to Dallas would be my guess. It's the Devils or maybe even Minnesota... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HankthaTank 1,100 Report post Posted May 19, 2011 No way Bieksa comes to Detroit. He is getting way too much attention to not be overpriced. Correct, we would have to unload a king's ransom to make it work. His playoff performance will no doubt get him a solid payday. Still, it's off season, so pipe dreaming is rampant. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest CaliWingsNut Report post Posted May 19, 2011 According to the team, it was his decision to leave. Yeah... like they are going to come out and say they fired him. Does anyone get fired anymore? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Electrophile 3,554 Report post Posted May 19, 2011 Before I even opened the thread, I had already guessed kook and Edi's reactions. I'm happy they're happy. 1 edicius reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bannedforlife 403 Report post Posted May 19, 2011 Great news, but not enough in my opinion. He wasted 3 years of Lidstrom's prime. I think 40 lashes is appropriate. 1 evilmrt reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites