Brian Rafalski appreciation thread
#1
Posted 23 May 2011 - 08:16 PM
He essentially donated $6,000,000 to next year's Stanley Cup run (maybe more, as Lidstrom can now take a pay-cut and still be our highest paid defenseman). Not a lot of professional athletes would have done that, especially in this day and age. It deserves serious recognition and applause, imo.
He had a he!! of a prime with us, won a Stanley Cup, and always gave it all he had.
- Travis, Aussie_Wing, aflac9262 and 6 others like this
#2
Posted 23 May 2011 - 08:35 PM
#3
Posted 23 May 2011 - 08:37 PM
#4
Posted 23 May 2011 - 08:48 PM

#5
Posted 23 May 2011 - 08:59 PM
- Travis, wingsgirl001, evilmrt and 4 others like this
HankthaTank - Squirrels, they hate to be thrown. / Why is the magical unicorn named Brian... Jedi - I just downloaded the "kids" book, "Go the F--k to Sleep" as narrated by Samuel L. Jackson on my kindle. I am now ready to be a daddy. / *Checks Router* No, I'm positive I didn't hit the "Wings Defense Sucks" button. Electrophile - I'm just glad the Wings were able to win despite the Curse of Brian. ACallToArms - I think Trey needs to put something about payroll tax and deferred income in his sig... Edicius - I'd rather [have] a soundbite of me saying "I like (man sausage)" rather than "I like Crosby".
#6
Posted 23 May 2011 - 09:08 PM
I'm still waiting for him to actually say it
Me too.
- 13dangledangle and Mabuhay Red Wings like this
#7
Posted 23 May 2011 - 09:17 PM
- Travis and 13GoWings40 like this




#8
Posted 23 May 2011 - 09:25 PM
As others have said, Brian's showing in the last Olympics were nothing short of amazing. It makes you wonder how great he could have been on the Wings (he was very very good, but not GREAT) had the right conditions been there.
#9
Posted 23 May 2011 - 09:49 PM
(side note: I played rugby with a knee very similar to his apparently...its f***in hard when your 26 let alone 36. I finally got mine fixed (Edit: I thought he was younger but I am... Either way same diff) and let me tell you...the relief I felt the last year has been...absolutely a million percent relief...something for him to look forward to)
Edited by sandyeggo wingnut, 23 May 2011 - 10:37 PM.
#10
Posted 23 May 2011 - 09:59 PM
I could be wrong here, but I think that Brian Rafalski put the Detroit Red Wings ahead of himself today. I think he still wants to play. I think he realized that he was no longer worth the 6mil/season he was being paid. And I think he realized that the organization could make better use of that cap space elsewhere.
He essentially donated $6,000,000 to next year's Stanley Cup run (maybe more, as Lidstrom can now take a pay-cut and still be our highest paid defenseman). Not a lot of professional athletes would have done that, especially in this day and age. It deserves serious recognition and applause, imo.
He had a he!! of a prime with us, won a Stanley Cup, and always gave it all he had.
I think you're very wrong and to be quite honest I think that's ridiculous. He's 37 won the cup mutiple times, has had some nagging injuries and just figured that now is a better time than any to hang em up. Donated 6 million dollars? Cmon..he has made more then enough money in this league..did you ever think that he values his health and would love to spend more time with his family? He took a discount when he signed his deal and to for you to think he's doing this to make the team better is kinda funny actually. Who is out there that we can realistically get that is as good as Raf? Key word being realistic.
- F.Michael, IrishWing19, xtrememachine1 and 1 other like this
"Hard Work Beats Talent When Talent Refuses to Work Hard"
16-15-14-13-12-11-10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1
#11
Posted 23 May 2011 - 10:37 PM
I think you're very wrong and to be quite honest I think that's ridiculous. He's 37 won the cup mutiple times, has had some nagging injuries and just figured that now is a better time than any to hang em up. Donated 6 million dollars? Cmon..he has made more then enough money in this league..did you ever think that he values his health and would love to spend more time with his family? He took a discount when he signed his deal and to for you to think he's doing this to make the team better is kinda funny actually. Who is out there that we can realistically get that is as good as Raf? Key word being realistic.
i guess we'll just have to agree to disagree here, because I think that you're completely off base. he's been slipping for the last couple of seasons. kevin bieksa is going to be available this off-season. in retrospect, would you have traded rafalski for bieksa prior to the most recent san jose series? if you're answer is "no," then i think you're either an idiot, or a stubborn liar.
my contention is that rafalski's answer to that very same question would be "yes." there's no objective facts that either of us can post to back our arguments there. so i guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. it's what i think. and it's what i think most smart hockey people think as well.
95% of nhl players in his exact position would've just sat out half the season with 'injuries,' collected their $6,000,000 (that's a lot of money for any athlete), and not given a damn about how the team did.
#12
Posted 23 May 2011 - 10:44 PM
i guess we'll just have to agree to disagree here, because I think that you're completely off base. he's been slipping for the last couple of seasons.
'07-'08: 55pts in 73gms (0.75pts/gm)
'08-'09: 59pts in 78gms (0.76pts/gm)
'09-'10 42pts in 78gms (0.54pts/gm)
'10-'11: 48pts in 63gms (0.76pts/gm)
Please do a quick graph of pts/gm vs season. And tell me if the line is trending downwards at the end of 2011.
Thanks.
- Heroes of Hockeytown, Konnan511, 55fan and 5 others like this

Thanks TeeMan!
"We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas
of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage" --H.P. Lovecraft
#13
Posted 23 May 2011 - 10:50 PM
'07-'08: 55pts in 73gms (0.75pts/gm)
'08-'09: 59pts in 78gms (0.76pts/gm)
'09-'10 42pts in 78gms (0.54pts/gm)
'10-'11: 48pts in 63gms (0.76pts/gm)
Please do a quick graph of pts/gm vs season. And tell me if the line is trending downwards at the end of 2011.
Thanks.
interesting point. i thought there was more to hockey than racking up power play points, but sure...you're right...i'm wrong...i'm an idiot. that's what you were expecting to hear, right?
- 55fan likes this
#14
Posted 24 May 2011 - 12:01 AM
had the right conditions been there
What else did he need?
Edited by 13dangledangle, 24 May 2011 - 12:05 AM.
- lil Wing's fan likes this
#15
Posted 24 May 2011 - 12:10 AM
Rafalski led all defencemen in even strength points per game. Don't bash the man's offense. He was still one of the best puck movers in the league.interesting point. i thought there was more to hockey than racking up power play points, but sure...you're right...i'm wrong...i'm an idiot. that's what you were expecting to hear, right?
- IrishWing19 and sleepwalker like this
#16
Posted 24 May 2011 - 12:29 AM
interesting point. i thought there was more to hockey than racking up power play points, but sure...you're right...i'm wrong...i'm an idiot. that's what you were expecting to hear, right?
His +/- would indicate he was a great even strength player. Why make an appreciation thread only to bash him later?
- IrishWing19 likes this
HankthaTank - Squirrels, they hate to be thrown. / Why is the magical unicorn named Brian... Jedi - I just downloaded the "kids" book, "Go the F--k to Sleep" as narrated by Samuel L. Jackson on my kindle. I am now ready to be a daddy. / *Checks Router* No, I'm positive I didn't hit the "Wings Defense Sucks" button. Electrophile - I'm just glad the Wings were able to win despite the Curse of Brian. ACallToArms - I think Trey needs to put something about payroll tax and deferred income in his sig... Edicius - I'd rather [have] a soundbite of me saying "I like (man sausage)" rather than "I like Crosby".
#17
Posted 24 May 2011 - 12:29 AM
Rafalski led all defencemen in even strength points per game. Don't bash the man's offense. He was still one of the best puck movers in the league.
And, like it or not, was a big help to Detroit's puck possession game the last three years.
As much as Lidstrom is a generational talent, he had a much easier time doing what he wanted two years ago with Rafalski as his partner. Now that he has been playing with more "shut down" partners (Stuart in particular), he has had a much bigger workload, mentally and physically.
- Konnan511, IrishWing19 and sleepwalker like this

#18
Posted 24 May 2011 - 12:34 AM
And, like it or not, was a big help to Detroit's puck possession game the last three years.
As much as Lidstrom is a generational talent, he had a much easier time doing what he wanted two years ago with Rafalski as his partner. Now that he has been playing with more "shut down" partners (Stuart in particular), he has had a much bigger workload, mentally and physically.
Exactly. Rafalski was so good at even strength, he helped price Ericsson out of Detroit
HankthaTank - Squirrels, they hate to be thrown. / Why is the magical unicorn named Brian... Jedi - I just downloaded the "kids" book, "Go the F--k to Sleep" as narrated by Samuel L. Jackson on my kindle. I am now ready to be a daddy. / *Checks Router* No, I'm positive I didn't hit the "Wings Defense Sucks" button. Electrophile - I'm just glad the Wings were able to win despite the Curse of Brian. ACallToArms - I think Trey needs to put something about payroll tax and deferred income in his sig... Edicius - I'd rather [have] a soundbite of me saying "I like (man sausage)" rather than "I like Crosby".
#19
Posted 24 May 2011 - 01:08 AM
"I think a tough team, a team that sticks together, is a lot better than leaving the onus on one guy to take care of business." - Brendan Shanahan
It still would be nice to have that one guy. (Jordin Tootoo, wish granted)
#20
Posted 24 May 2011 - 01:19 AM
I've always liked Rafalski but you've got your head in the sand if you can't see that his play has declined quite a bit since he first signed in Detroit. He can't keep up in his own end anymore.'07-'08: 55pts in 73gms (0.75pts/gm)
'08-'09: 59pts in 78gms (0.76pts/gm)
'09-'10 42pts in 78gms (0.54pts/gm)
'10-'11: 48pts in 63gms (0.76pts/gm)
Please do a quick graph of pts/gm vs season. And tell me if the line is trending downwards at the end of 2011.
Thanks.
That said, his offense will be very hard to replace.
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eddie Olczyk is very quiet |
General Discussion | onemorecup |
|
|
|
Post Everytime You Look
|
Water Cooler | NazMoBert |
|
|
|
Coyotes file for Bankruptcy/City pays 25mil to keep themAtlanta on the move |
General Discussion | MacK_Attack |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














