Aye. Firesale does not mean "trade everyone!"; it means that they're rebuilding. Rebuilding requires a core. They're trying to get rid of their crappy contracts.
Someone say core?
Posted 18 June 2011 - 09:44 PM
Aye. Firesale does not mean "trade everyone!"; it means that they're rebuilding. Rebuilding requires a core. They're trying to get rid of their crappy contracts.
Posted 18 June 2011 - 10:04 PM
Posted 18 June 2011 - 10:17 PM
That would be nice! If Jagr is signed, then trade for Clutterbuck, you would sacrifice Hudler and Mursak or Emmerton, but to have Clutterbuck would be awesome...I'd love Burns. Or Clutterbuck.
Imagine a line of Abby-Helm-Clusterf***... nonstop hitting.
Edited by LeftWinger, 18 June 2011 - 10:18 PM.
Posted 18 June 2011 - 10:34 PM
I know this is off topic, but two avatar questions here:
@DatsYerBerger: That is Jokinen in your avatar right? What happened in the game for him to actually act like that? Thats Fu**ed.
Posted 19 June 2011 - 12:05 AM
Posted 19 June 2011 - 12:28 AM
Posted 19 June 2011 - 12:52 AM
hm...interesting
We could make czech for a czech deal like Hudler+3rd for Zidlicky
Posted 19 June 2011 - 01:05 AM
Zidlicky has a NMC. Also, he's 34 and makes more than $1m more than Hudler. Given the firesale and the NMC, if you place Hudler and a 3rd as Zidlicky's normal value, the 3rd can be removed. But he's not really any more expensive than guys like Burns, Schultz, or Barker. Just older.
The Wings would most likely end up with Barker if it were just Hudler being traded; Burns is the key of their defense, and Schultz is the #2 and signed for three more years while Barker turns RFA next summer.
Posted 19 June 2011 - 01:12 AM
Posted 19 June 2011 - 01:18 AM
Similar deal with Clusterf***. They have him cheap for two more years, and then he's an RFA. What could they gain by trading him?
Posted 19 June 2011 - 03:19 AM
Posted 19 June 2011 - 04:01 AM
Posted 19 June 2011 - 04:51 AM
The Wings should have Eva travel around a pitch Hudler to teams maybe he could get a few to bite.
Posted 19 June 2011 - 04:55 AM
It would only lower our GM Reputation.At first it sounds like a genius idea but in reality that would severely reduce the chances for a trade.
Posted 19 June 2011 - 05:50 AM
It shouldn't, no. And fwiw I think Burns stays there, given the Wild tattoo he has on his back/etc.
Posted 19 June 2011 - 11:24 AM
Zidlicky has a NMC. Also, he's 34 and makes more than $1m more than Hudler. Given the firesale and the NMC, if you place Hudler and a 3rd as Zidlicky's normal value, the 3rd can be removed. But he's not really any more expensive than guys like Burns, Schultz, or Barker. Just older.
Posted 19 June 2011 - 02:11 PM
dude got a wild tattoo on his back? that's a bit silly. hope for his skin's sake his career doesn't turn out like mike sillinge's.
Posted 20 June 2011 - 12:21 AM
Could be nice deal for both teams.The Wild need skilled forward and we need right handed PPQB and I could live with Zidlicky's $4 mil.per year for the next 2 season.
btw of course I would like to see Burns/Clutterbuck here,but trade for Zidlicky is more realistic
Edited by eva unit zero, 20 June 2011 - 12:22 AM.
Posted 20 June 2011 - 12:54 AM

| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pinned WCSF Game 3 GDT - Chicago Blackhawks @ Detroit Red Wings |
General Discussion | FlashyG |
|
|
|
Red Wings don't belong in the same rink as the Hawks? |
General Discussion | MidMichSteve |
|
|
|
WCSF Game 2 GDT : Red Wings 4 at Blackhawks 1 - (Series Tied at 1)
|
General Discussion | Hockeytown0001 |
|
|
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users